Candidate Ratings: 2010 Contested General Elections

Watchdog Indiana Home Page Indiana General Assembly & Governor Ratings  

NOTE #1: Candidates in selected contested Indiana General Assembly general elections are listed below by District Number. You need your State Representative and State Senator District Numbers to locate candidates for the November 2, 2010, general election. You can go to Who's Your Legislator? at http://www.in.gov/apps/sos/legislator/search/ to find your Indiana House and Indiana Senate District Numbers.

NOTE #2: Unless asked to do so by the incumbent, Watchdog Indiana will NOT participate in the 2010 General Elections of State Representatives in Districts 1, 4, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 39, 40, 41, 42, 44, 45, 47, 48, 49, 51, 52, 53, 57, 58, 59, 62, 63, 65, 66, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 77, 78, 79, 81, 82, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 91, 92, 93, 94, 96, 97, and 100.

Information from the Candidate Questionnaire below, together with the Indiana General Assembly & Governor Ratings and other information sources (such as public comments during legislative sessions and campaign platform statements), have been used to rate each of the General Assembly candidates in the November 2, 2010, contested general elections as either Taxpayer Friendly, Uncertain, Taxpayer UNfriendly, or POLITICAL HOG.

Taxpayer Friendly candidates are results-oriented, compassionate, and fiscally conservative to the point where they are not expected to increase the state and local tax burden of Hoosier working families.

Some candidates have an Uncertain rating because of a limited or mixed public record.

Taxpayer UNfriendly candidates believe the greatest good is served when the fist of government is shoved ever deeper in the wallet of ordinary working families.

A POLITICAL HOG is a Taxpayer UNfriendly candidate who also voted himself or herself a perpetual pay increase that is 20% more than the typical Hoosier working family earns during an entire year. POLITICAL HOGS care more about feeding at the public trough than they do serving the needs of Hoosier working families.

Candidate Questionnaire for the November 2, 2010, General Election:

1. BACKGROUND: Voters statewide have the opportunity on November 2, 2010, to amend  the Indiana Constitution  to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the Constitutional Amendment?
2. BACKGROUND: To achieve a balanced budget with ZERO funds in reserve on June 30, 2011, the state is using $1.9362 billion in federal stimulus money, $1.3770 billion in reserve funds, and $2.5642 billion in spending cut reversions. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished.
3. BACKGROUND: Homeowners rely on the following assessed value deductions to control their property tax burden: (a) the Homestead Standard Deduction is the lesser of $45,000 or 60% of the home's gross assessed value, (b) the Homestead Supplemental Deduction (after subtracting the $45,000 standard deduction) is 35% of the first $600,000 of net assessed value plus 25% of any net assessed value that exceeds $600,000. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change?
4. BACKGROUND: Under current law, the Governor, the Indiana Department of Transportation, or an operator, may approve without the consent of the General Assembly a public-private agreement to establish a tollway on I-69 between I-64 and Martinsville. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville?
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? 

State Representative District 2:

Earl L. Harris (POLITICAL HOG)

Kenneth R. Stevenson
526 Siebert Drive
Schererville, IN 46375 
Phone:
(219) 545-4623
E-mail:

Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

 

State Representative District 3:

Charlie Brown (POLITICAL HOG)

John A. Schick
1254 Dogwood Drive
Chesterton, IN 46304
Phone: (219) 629-1037
E-mail:
johnthenomad@comcast.net 
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

 

State Representative District 5:

Ronald R. Cenkush (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
55100 Cedar Trail
Osceola, IN 46561
Phone: (574) 876-3464
E-mail: info@cenkush2010.com; rcenkush@hotmail.com  
Website:
http://cenkush2010.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: Property tax is the worst kind of tax we have. You could own your home outright, but if you become destitute and cannot pay your tax the County will take it from you. Last year in St. Joseph County we had 4500 notices in the South Bend Tribune of people who owed property tax. We can and should do better. I will propose replacing property tax with sales based tax on services. This type of tax can be avoided by the poor. If the legislature does not like that idea, I am open to others and I request they bring an Idea forward. Property tax caps are not good enough, now they just adjust your assessed value.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: We may have to consider sweeping cuts in spending, education should be cut the least, but when everyone is feeling the pinch of the tightening economy the government must also tighten its budget. We have to get spending under control, major projects may have to be placed on hold, we're going to have to get creative, but raising taxes in a down economy cannot be the answer.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: Please see the answer to the first question. Lets eliminate property tax and let Hoosiers keep their family home.
4. QUESTION: D
o you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: It seems like the General Assembly should have a say so in an event of this type, I would need to check the Indiana Constitution to make sure.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: I am running against a 22 year incumbent Democrat as a Libertarian with no Republican challenger. I think its time we had a across the board discussion on term limits. I promise to limit myself to two terms if elected. I would also like to work on removing barriers created by the state that discourages people from starting small businesses. Please check my website and give me the chance to earn your vote. Thank you!

Craig R. Fry (Taxpayer UNfriendly)

 

State Representative District 6:

B. Patrick Bauer (POLITICAL HOG)

Duane Beals (Taxpayer Friendly)
3445 Creekwater Lane
South Bend, IN 46635
Phone:
(574) 271-7416
E-mail:
duanebeals@comcast.net; info@duanebeals.com; bealsd@bethelcollege.edu 
Website:
http://www.duanebeals.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: I support the Constitutional amendment of the property tax caps.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished.
ANSWER: The question is confusing. What about the 2011-2012 budget? I am a fiscal conservative.  Mitch Daniels and his friends in the State House have done a good job giving what they had to work with (a debt six years ago). I would be in favor of maintaining essential services (Medicaid, education, etc.) to the level that is possible while developing a balanced budget and maintaining a surplus. Indiana must maintain its fiscally responsible leadership among the other States, first for our own good, and secondly as an example to others.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: Homestead standard and supplemental deductions should be maintained. We need to lower property taxes at all levels so that business and industry will come to Indiana, and so that workers can afford to buy homes.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: Toll ways, etc., -- in fact any such expenditure -- should only be possible when approved by the General Assembly. We need a Fiscally conservative general assembly that will work with the governor.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: DO YOU WANT LOWER TAXES AND MORE JOBS IN SOUTH BEND? If so, vote for DUANE BEALS on November 2, 2010. The Indiana Economic Development Corporation (IEDC) exists to help businesses and companies locate or expand in Indiana. IEDC helped 150 new businesses or companies come to Indiana in the last 12 months (South Bend Tribune, Thursday, July 1, 2010, p A7). NOT ONE OF THOSE 150 COMPANIES CAME TO SOUTH BEND OR ST. JOSEPH COUNTY! WHY NOT? Because our city and county are not business friendly. Businesses in our county pay higher property taxes than those in 90 other Indiana counties; your property taxes are higher also. Higher taxes drive businesses and companies away. And who is responsible for that? B. Patrick Bauer and the Democratically controlled Indiana House of Representatives. B. Patrick Bauer does not represent you. He makes you pay higher taxes, and drives business away. Bauer is not looking out for you! According to a June 19, 2010 Wall Street Journal article, Indiana was the number one State for job creation during January through May of 2010, creating 10% of all new jobs in the US in those five months. How many new businesses or companies came to South Bend/St. Joseph county during those five months? NONE! How many new jobs did they bring? NOT ONE! 40 years of Pat Bauer and Democratic policies have had a negative impact on business, manufacturing, and the quality of life in our city, county, and state! We've had enough! STOP THE MADNESS! On November 2, 2010 elect DUANE BEALS as your Representative to the Indiana House.

 

State Representative District 8:

Ryan M. Dvorak (Taxpayer UNfriendly)

Richard Pfeil (Uncertain)
51707 Oakbrook Court
Granger, IN 46530
Phone:
(574) 286-8400
E-mail:
tmiller@roselandtech.com 
Website:
http://www.pfeilstaterep.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 4, 2010, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the Constitutional Amendment on the November 2, 2010, statewide ballot? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.

 

State Representative District 9:

Scott D. Pelath (POLITICAL HOG)

Andrew R. Wolf
2622 N. Shawnee Trail
LaPorte, IN 46350
Phone: (219) 380-3070
E-mail:
arwolf@arwolf.com 
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

 

State Representative District 14:

Catherine Campbell
578 Jefferson
Gary, IN 46402 
Phone: (219) 882-5112
E-mail: ccampbell14th@hotmail.com 
Website: 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008, General Election
1.
QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in 2009 for the exact same version of Senate Joint Resolution 1 that passed in 2008? ANSWER: Yes I would vote to keep SJR 1 intact.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: Not at this time.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1.
QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: I support the Constitutional amendment for the 1 per cent tax cap.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: Not at this time.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 7, 2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax increased from 5% to 6% with a promise that the proceeds would be used to decrease homeowner homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm, Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3% decrease into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average Hoosier homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility to levy income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax relief. QUESTION: Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose additional income, sales, and other taxes? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget the last two fiscal years has been balanced without fund transfers for the first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm). QUESTION: Should the state's total budget expenditures be no more than total revenues for the next biennium? DID NOT RESPOND.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced with the inclusion of a one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This decreases property taxes for the average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be continued beyond 2007? DID NOT RESPOND.
4. BACKGROUND: Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should the state pay for full-day kindergarten?  If YES, where should the state get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten? DID NOT RESPOND.
5. BACKGROUND: The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road ("Major Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to pay off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges. QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next ten years? DID NOT RESPOND.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects include $694 million for a new terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to Evansville as well as a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION: Should the "Major Moves" expenditures be combined with the Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain I-69 extension without state tax increases? DID NOT RESPOND.
7. BACKGROUND: The 2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a toll road for an I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION: Do you favor legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69 extension? DID NOT RESPOND.
8. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 2, 2004, General Election
1. Guiding Principles for 2005-07 Biennium Budget. DID NOT RESPOND.
2. Opinions on Homeowner Property Taxes. DID NOT RESPOND.
3. Position on Indianapolis to Evansville Interstate. DID NOT RESPOND.
4. Additional Comments. DID NOT RESPOND.

Vernon G. Smith (POLITICAL HOG)

 

State Representative District 21:

Dwight Fish
P.O. Box 2151
Elkhart, IN 46515
Phone:
(574) 295-7659
E-mail:
fish@dwightfish.com 
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

Benjamin Jarvis
57024 Copper Terrace
Elkhart, IN 46516
Phone:
(574) 206-6122
E-mail:
jarviscampaign@gmail.com; carolaj@mac.com 
Website:
http://bjarvis.tumblr.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

Timothy Wesco (Taxpayer Friendly)
59771 Red Bird Ct.
Mishawaka, IN 46544
Phone:
(574) 220-3696
E-mail:
tim@timothywesco.com   
Website:
http://www.timothywesco.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: SUPPORT.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: I will not raise taxes. K-12 education should remain the state's first priority. Maintaining a reserve is wise.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: YES .
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? YES.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: Please visit my website for more information.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 4, 2010, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the Constitutional Amendment on the November 2, 2010, statewide ballot? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND. POSITION (from Website): I believe lower taxes and less government create economic growth. We must keep taxes low so Hoosiers can keep more of their hard earned dollars and to give entrepreneurs a greater incentive to succeed. However, we cannot lower taxes without shrinking government. We need to increase efficiency at all levels of government, from the townships to the state. I believe the best way to cut taxes is to cap and limit spending at both the state and local level.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.

 

State Representative District 22:

Thom Cox 
1231 Pike Street
Wabash, IN 46992
Phone: (260) 563-5237
E-mail: thom@post.com 
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

Allen "Big Al" Dunnagan
519 Elm Street
Wabash, IN 46992
Phone: (260) 569-1024, (765) 491-0996
E-mail:
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 2, 2006, Primary Election
1. What will be your guiding principles for the 2007-2009 biennium budget? Specifically, what mix of spending cuts, tax increases, and/or reserve depletions will you support? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. What are your opinions regarding homeowner property taxes? Specifically, do favor freezing all property taxes and funding budget increases through both individual and business income tax increases? Or, do you favor a mixture of income tax, sales tax and meals tax increases to reduce property tax growth while providing additional revenue to local governments? DID NOT RESPOND.
3. Considering the "Major Moves" legislation passed by the General Assembly this year, do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next ten years? DID NOT RESPOND.
4. What is your position regarding the construction of an interstate from Indianapolis to Evansville? Specifically, should the $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund that is part of "Major Moves" be used exclusively for a new terrain I-69 extension so as to avoid state gas tax increases? DID NOT RESPOND.
5. Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Rebecca Kubacki
1401 E. Northshore Drive
Syracuse, IN 46567
Phone:
(574) 457-4458
E-mail:
info@rebeccakubacki.com; ewiggins@warsaw.in.gov  
Website:
http://www.rebeccakubacki.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

Michael (Mike) B. Ridenour
2867 N 200 W
Wabash, IN 46992
Phone: (260) 563-1393
E-mail: lewisjsue@yahoo.com 
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: Yes, I do plan on voting to amend the caps into the constitution.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: No, thank you.

 

State Representative District 25

Jeb Bardon (Taxpayer UNfriendly)

Dan Pool
P.O. Box 825
Crawfordsville, IN 47933 
Phone:
(765) 362-5803
E-mail:
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

 

State Representative District 43:

Clyde Kersey (POLITICAL HOG)

Alan Morrison (Uncertain)
3998 Country Wood
 Terre Haute, IN 47805
Phone:
(812) 208-2338
E-mail:
alanmorrison2010@yahoo.com  
Website:
http://electmorrison43.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED. RECORD (from Website): I support the proposed property tax cap.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED. RECORD (from Website): Treat the state budget like a household budget…do not spend more than we have.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

 

State Representative District 46:

Bionca D. Gambill (Uncertain)
951 West Sutliff Drive
Terre Haute, IN 47802
Phone: 
(812) 898-2394
E-mail:
bionca.gambill@gmail.com; donate@bioncagambill.com 
Website: 
http://www.bioncagambill.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 4, 2010, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the Constitutional Amendment on the November 2, 2010, statewide ballot? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.

Bob Heaton (Uncertain)
3255 E Dallas Dr
Terre Haute, IN 47802
Phone: (812) 299-3275
E-mail: bob.heaton@verizon.net 
Website:
http://www.bobheaton.com:80/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED. RECORD (from Website): While we are all tightening our belts we should expect our government to do the same.  The excessive spending needs to end in order to reduce the tax burden we all face.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008, General Election
1.
QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in 2009 for the exact same version of Senate Joint Resolution 1 that passed in 2008? ANSWER: If elected in Nov. 2008, I pledge to vote in 2009 for the exact same version of Senate Joint Resolution 1 that passed in 2008.
2. QUESTION: Do you wis
h to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: Not at this time.

 

State Representative District 54:

Rex Bell 
17059 State Road 38
Hagerstown, IN 47346
Phone: (765) 489-5363
E-mail: rex_bell@msn.com 
Website:
http://www.electrexbell.com/; http://rexbell.blogspot.com/  
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008, General Election
1.
QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in 2009 for the exact same version of Senate Joint Resolution 1 that passed in 2008? ANSWER: While I am sure the intentions of SJR 1 are good, I have serious reservations about it's ability to protect Hoosiers from the effects of arbitrary re-assessments, and the inherent unfairness of property taxes, which in effect prevent people from ever really owning their home. I pledge to continue to work for the complete elimination of property taxes. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race): No. The Constitution should be amended to eliminate property taxes. In the interim, property should be taxed on an equal and decreasing formula.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: Not at this time.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 7, 2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax increased from 5% to 6% with a promise that the proceeds would be used to decrease homeowner homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm, Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3% decrease into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average Hoosier homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility to levy income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax relief. QUESTION: Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose additional income, sales, and other taxes? ANSWER: I will work to reduce and eventually eliminate both property and income taxes. Once government is reduced to it's proper size, necessary functions should be funded by sales tax and user fees. I can see circumstances where local governments could have control over those user fees, depending upon the services offered.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget the last two fiscal years has been balanced without fund transfers for the first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm). QUESTION: Should the state's total budget expenditures be no more than total revenues for the next biennium? ANSWER: YES.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced with the inclusion of a one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This decreases property taxes for the average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be continued beyond 2007? ANSWER: This question assumes a desire to tweak and maintain property taxes as a source of funding for the state. I have no such desire, but I am in favor of giving property owners as much relief as possible until those taxes are eliminated. 
4. BACKGROUND: Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners would cost $210 million in 2009. QUESTION: Should the state pay for full-day kindergarten? ANSWER: NO.
5. BACKGROUND: The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road ("Major Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to pay off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges. QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next ten years? ANSWER: Only if our legislators continue to spend the revenue from gas taxes on projects that have nothing to do with transportation. 
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects include $694 million for a new terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to Evansville as well as a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION: Should the "Major Moves" expenditures be combined with the Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain I-69 extension without state tax increases? ANSWER: New terrain I-69 should be scrapped in favor of the 41 route.
7. BACKGROUND: The 2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a toll road for an I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION: Do you favor legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69 extension? ANSWER: YES.
8. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? NO RESPONSE.

Bruce Gaylor
126 Tara Lane

New Castle, IN 47362
Phone:
(765) 521-2016
E-mail:
gaylorforstaterep@gmail.com 
Website:
http://brucegaylor.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

Thomas E. (Tom) Saunders (Taxpayer UNfriendly)

 

State Representative District 55:

Sarah Jordan 
2022 East Old St. Rd. 122

Richmond, IN 47374
Phone:
(765) 993-7639
E-mail:
sjordan@purdue.edu  
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

Tom Knollman (Uncertain)

David Moeller (Uncertain)
6796 W. Coletrane Road

Glenwood, IN 46133
Phone:
(765) 679-5071
E-mail:
mojaxcow@aol.com 
Website:
www.moellerfordistrict55.org
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 4, 2010, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the Constitutional Amendment on the November 2, 2010, statewide ballot? ANSWER: I’ve not made my mind up yet on this proposal. I just read the Watchdog Indiana thoughts on the website. Conceptually I don’t like different percentage caps for different classes of property owners. I am afraid that it may be a “band-aid for a system that has gangrene”. I want to completely eliminate property taxes. I think they are inherently unfair as the evaluations cannot be objective and uniform from one taxing district to another and they must be paid whether the taxpayer has income or not. The tax is also a very costly one to administer. Look at all the overhead to determine the amount and collect the tax. Ninety-two county assessors, many township assessors and lots of hired consultants are needed to just develop the evaluations. Add the activities of the County treasurers and Sheriffs to collect the tax and you have a tremendous cost. On the second part of the question, if we cannot eliminate the Property tax then we must have exemptions for homesteads.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? ANSWER: Also not sure yet. I do not think that the rainy-day fund needs to be completely replaced. I would want to review all the states expenditures and make cuts somewhat across the board. I think education should be one of the top priorities of state government and we should be very careful in cuts for educational funding. As a businessman I know there are creative ways of reducing costs without sacrificing essentials and I’d like to get into the details to find them.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: If we cannot eliminate property taxes across the board then I would not vote to change the Homestead Exemption in any way!
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: Yes.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: I am employed at Standens Inc. of Indianapolis as their manager of US Sales. My wife Sandy and I own and operate Glenbrook Farm raising purebred beef cattle. I am a past president and director of the American Murray Grey Association and have marketed breeding stock throughout the US. Sandy and I have lived in Franklin and Fayette counties for the last 35 years and have been active participants in community life. I served on the Franklin County Council, Area Plan Commission, Board of Zoning Appeals, Economic Development Commission and PTO President at Laurel Elementary. Sandy is on the Orange Township Advisory Board. I am a graduate of Purdue University with a degree in education. I went to work at Mt. Vernon School Corporation after graduation teaching English and Social Studies and coaching Football and Wrestling. In 1974 I went to work at Detroit Steel Products in Morristown, Indiana and held several management positions. From 1985 to 1991 I was General Manager of Franklin Casket Company. I returned to Detroit Steel as General Sales Manager and held that position until the operation closed in 2007. Sandy and I have 4 grown children and 11 grandchildren and are members of St. Mary Parish in Rushville. I am a fiscal conservative that believes all levels of government must live within their means. If citizens want government to do certain things then they must be willing to pay for it, be it fight a war or build a road!  If we have problems then we must address them not leave them for the next administration or generation. I am glad to learn of Watchdog Indiana and your activities to help protect the taxpayers here in Indiana. I’m sure I share your overall goals but we may differ on some specific policies.        

 

State Representative District 56:

Brad Hyatt 
129 N. 29th St.

New Castle, IN 47362
Phone:
(765) 465-2438
E-mail:
bhyatt5150@hotmail.com    
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

Phillip Pflum (POLITICAL HOG)

 

State Representative District 60:

Steven R. Hogan (Taxpayer Friendly)
8992 Ella Street
Nashville, IN 47448
Phone:
(812) 360-3743
E-mail:
srhogan1972@gmail.com   
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 4, 2010, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the Constitutional Amendment on the November 2, 2010, statewide ballot? ANSWER: I absolutely support an amendment to cap property taxes.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? ANSWER: Education and local governments cannot continue to expand their spending as if there were no problem with the economy of the private sector. In education the first place to cut expenses is not in the classroom. Building programs, new supplies and technology and in-service and travel expenses should be put on hold and those funds used for the kids, first. As happened this year, it is more important that we have teachers and class rooms than new buildings. Medicaid spending will be an even greater problem with Obamacare. I am not sure what can be done except to protect ourselves from an intrusive federal government passing the responsibilities for funding t us. I do not support any increases in income taxes or other taxes for that matter. The citizens of Indiana cannot be expected to come up with extra money from their pay checks when their incomes are decreasing and people are losing jobs. All government entities need to cut back to operate within expected revenues. It is important that we maintain a reserve account. This reserve account is what will protect us from our federal government. The length of this recession is unknown and if Indiana is to come out of it strong in the future, we must be well prepared.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: Yes, I support the Homestead Deductions without change.
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: I support building I-69. In order to get this project completed I would support making it a toll road if that were the only way to get it done. To require approval of the General Assembly to make that happen is probably impossible.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: We have serious economic problems right now in large part because of the government meddling with what should be "free enterprise." The suggestion of new regulations for banks, wall street, etc. have only shut down banking for the little guy. Nationalizing car companies and special deals for unions have taken the notion of competition out of the picture. Public-private partnerships are special relationships that exclude competition and keep entrepreneurs from entering the picture (unless they are the one to secure the favor). Government jobs are not sustainable jobs. Private business making informed investments and hiring individuals to help provide a service or produce a product should be the only definition of economic growth and real jobs.

David W. (Doc) Murdoch (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
5557 Lanam Ridge Rd.
Nashville, IN 47448
Phone:
(317) 443-3186
E-mail:
vote4doc@gmail.com 
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: I DO NOT support this Amendment. Capping property taxes is a stop-gap measure at best. I foresee assessments being significantly raised to make up the difference and increase our taxes even more. I believe during the last assessment period many "assessed" values of residential real property increased just for this purpose. Regarding the homestead reduction, I don't believe there should be ANY exemptions or deductions for taxes. The tax system provides these deductions and exemptions to benefit special interest groups. This creates loopholes, which establish an environment of corruption and cheating. These deductions and exemptions also complicate the system unnecessarily. The only real answer to our tax "problems" is to a) Repeal property taxes, b) Repeal ALL other state taxes which are not specifically listed in the Constitution of the State of Indiana, c) Completely reform the state tax system so it is simple and fair for all. I currently favor a version of the Fair Tax as a replacement for our current system. Completely eliminating the very many separate hidden taxes and the visible taxes would delete the need for the agencies currently involved in the collection, accounting, and disbursement of all these separate taxes. That means smaller government and a lower total budget. The Fair Tax is the best way to ensure all pay their way, as long as it's done with NO LOOPHOLES OR EXEMPTIONS. Government would be physically and fiscally smaller. Tax code could be simplified into "common language" as legislation is required to be by the Constitution of the State of Indiana. Any created exemptions would again mean loopholes, an environment of corruption, legislation to close these loopholes and open others for special interest groups, and return us to the same complex tax system we have now.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: I believe we need to go back to basics and learn our State Constitution and also study the reasons for the subject matter within it. That is the beginning for deciding ANY and ALL actions taken to ensure the Indiana State government operates as designed. First, Medicaid and all other "entitlement" programs must be eliminated. These programs are only justifications for the State to extort money from one group of people and give it to another. Before all these entitlement programs were created, most of the same functions were performed by private charities, religious charities, and community charities. This method of helping people worked fine. As it is, people just give less to these "non-government" charities because a) We don't have as much money left each week after the government extorts / steals what it determines it needs and b) The government is forcing us all to contribute to certain charitable programs instead of letting us decide for ourselves where our money is going. Nobody has a moral or ethical "entitlement" to the fruits of anyone else's labor. There is the legal entitlement because of government legislation, but legal doesn't mean right. The deletion of these programs would also delete a HUGE portion of the government bureaucracy significantly reducing government both physically and fiscally. We all have more money to give to those groups we choose to. Also, more of the money would actually reach the people intended. Studies have shown that when the government steals our money in the form of taxes, almost 70% is burned up in government overhead. Second, the Constitution of the State of Indiana specifically lists the authorized sources of income for the funding of our schools. The Constitutional parameters should be adhered to. The State should remove itself from the business of mandating curriculum, teaching methods, establishing standards, etc. These things should all be done at the local level by the parents of our children. The curriculum should NOT consist of moral and ethical "training" but should focus on core skill subjects. Let the parents decide if a nice, new building is more important than students having new, updated, correct textbooks. Let the parents decide if building a multi-million dollar sports complex is as important as transportation to and from school or enlarging the library. This state is the only state I've lived in that actually charges "rent" for textbooks. If changes were made books, pens, pencils, paper could all be provided at no cost ("rent" or otherwise) to the student's family. Getting the State out of the "government school business" would greatly decrease size of government both physically and fiscally. An added bonus would be decreased costs to families of school-age children and increased parent participation in the education process. Third, I will NEVER support a statewide tax increase for ANY reason. An increase in ANY tax just means the elected officials of this state are only interested in increasing the number of state programs, or increasing the size of existing programs. Both of these increase the size of government, both physically and fiscally, and gives more power to the state by taking it from the citizens. Government has proven it NEVER does ANYTHING efficiently and taxes are government authorized theft of citizens' property. Property rights should be of paramount concern to every freedom loving citizen. Fourth, reserve funds should be replenished and could easily be if the above actions are taken. Most of these issues could be fixed with a stroke of a pen. The reason they aren't fixed is because a) the system has been made so complex that it's actually difficult to understand how different government programs and entities operate and b) fixing these problems would take power away from the elected, career government officials and give it back to the citizens.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: No, I do not. Keeping these deductions "as is" means not reforming the State tax system itself. Making this "pledge" means agreeing that the system is not broken, and we all know it is. The only correct thing to do is FIX IT, and FIX IT again...over and over, always looking for ways to simplify the system while decreasing the physical size of the government, ensuring government operates within the parameters of the State Constitution, and decreasing the State budget by deleting inefficient "programs".
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: I do support changing Indiana Code to establish required approval of the General Assembly. Most of all I support repealing much of the Indiana Code that is inefficient, expensive, and is outside the parameters of the Constitution. The most perfect session of the General Assembly would be entirely used to repeal past legislation and delete established programs and governmental departments which do nothing but cost us money. I do support privatization of many current government functions. As stated above, government does NOTHING as efficiently as private enterprise. That's the way our government is designed. The founders knew that a government that figures out how to "do things" by initiating the "you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours" system will grow out of control and take power away from the citizens and use that power to become oppressive.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: As you can tell from my responses above, I believe in personal liberty and property rights. These were just as important to those who created our governments, both State and Federal. The farther we stray from those simple values, the more oppressive our government becomes, and, the more reliant upon government it's citizens become. That is the process that brought us to our current situation. I'm more than happy to answer questions anyone may have regarding my thoughts on any issue. Please email me your questions and I will answer them in the order I receive them. Please understand I'm a "one man operation" so there may be a time lag between your sending your questions and me answering them, but I will answer them. I also have a Facebook "Group", VOTE4DOC. In order to get a more complete understanding of my beliefs regarding government and my candidacy, please request a copy of my basic bio and an explanation of my governmental philosophy. I ask you to please vote for me, to make me your elected representative to the Indiana General Assembly for District #60. Allow me to inject integrity into our state government.

Peggy Welch (POLITICAL HOG)

 

State Representative District 61:

Matt Pierce (POLITICAL HOG)

Kevin Suddeth (Uncertain)
402 W. Saidah Road
Bloomington, IN 47404
Phone:
(812) 384-7181
E-mail:
Website:
http://kevinsuddethfor61.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED. RECORD (from Website): I support permanent property tax caps.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED. RECORD (from Website): I will work to keep K-16 funding at the highest levels the state budget allows. If schools are forced to make cuts, then those cuts should come from administration areas, not the classroom. As state tax revenues continue to decrease, we must be prudent with our taxing decisions. Tax cuts in a recession should be carefully weighed, but no new taxes. As part of my commitment to NO new taxes, I have signed the Americans for Tax Reform, Taxpayer Protection Pledge, a commitment to voters that I will "oppose and vote against any and all efforts to increase taxes." 
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

 

State Representative District 64:

Kreg Battles (Taxpayer UNfriendly)

Ken A. Beckerman
304 Logan Avenue
Hazleton, IN 47640
Phone:
(812) 431-5078
E-mail:
drkab1@verizon.net 
Website:
www.KenABeckerman.com 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

 

State Representative District 73:

Ryan D. Bower (Uncertain)
106 W. Wendy Lane
Salem, IN 47167
Phone:
(812) 883-2272
E-mail:
bower.ryan@gmail.com; votebower@gmail.com   
Website:
http://www.votebower.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 4, 2010, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the Constitutional Amendment on the November 2, 2010, statewide ballot? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.

Steve Davisson (Taxpayer Friendly)
PO Box 341
Salem, IN 47167
Phone:
(812) 883-2751
E-mail:
daviss@blueriver.net   
Website:
http://www.stevedavisson.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: I support the Constitutional Amendment to Cap property taxes.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: The challenge will be great to provide a balanced budget for 2012-2013. I believe that like hard working Hoosier families, our state must sit down and make the hard decisions about revenue in and expenditures out. We have to make our education dollars work harder with evidence-based reforms. Presently, many schools waste money with excessive administration staff, money that could be put in classrooms. Medicaid faces an estimated 300,000 more eligible members under the new Healthcare Reform Act recently passed by Congress. This is huge burden to our state budget, but we can manage it. First, we can funnel more of the cigarette state excise tax that is being used in the Healthy Indiana Insurance Plan to the IN Medicaid program. Personal responsibility  in the form of low premiums or affordable co-pays on services will offset some costs and discourage unnecessary visits. I would view increasing state income taxes as a last resort to balance the budget. We should enact policies that encourage economic growth and recovery.  This is the only sustainable way to both balance our budget and replenish reserve funds over the next few years. Indiana leads our neighbors and we should do everything we can to make sure we remain a leader by allowing business growth to continue.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: I pledge to retain Homestead deductions without change.
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: I support changing that Indiana Code to require a General Assembly majority approval to create a Toll Road project, regardless of who has negotiated it. A toll would affect all Hoosiers and their voices should be heard regarding anything as major as tolling Indiana transportation routes.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: I am running for State Representative because Indianapolis is sick, and has forgotten the needs of southern Indiana for too long. With radicalization of Washington DC, Hoosiers depend on state government to protect them from federal abuse. I have experience in business as a pharmacist. I have a great perspective on the current healthcare bills, and what they mean for you and me. I will serve as a statesman for southern Hoosiers, represent their views and concerns passionately, and respond to them quickly. Voters can count on me for dedication and service. If my constituents trust me with their health, they can trust me to cure what’s wrong with Indianapolis. I welcome comments or concerns about our state or the 73rd District.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 4, 2010, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the Constitutional Amendment on the November 2, 2010, statewide ballot? ANSWER: I support the Constitutional Amendment to Cap property taxes.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? ANSWER: The challenge will be great to provide a balanced budget for 2012-2013. I believe that like hard working Hoosier families, our state must sit down and make the hard decisions about revenue in and expenditures out. We have to make our education dollars work harder with evidence-based reforms. Presently, many schools waste money with excessive administration staff, money that could be put in classrooms. Medicaid faces an estimated 300,000 more eligible members under the new Healthcare Reform Act recently passed by Congress. This is huge burden to our state budget, but we can manage it. First, we can funnel more of the cigarette state excise tax that is being used in the Healthy Indiana Insurance Plan to the IN Medicaid program. Personal responsibility in the form of low premiums or affordable co-pays on services will offset some costs and discourage unnecessary visits. I would view increasing state income taxes as a last resort to balance the budget. We should enact policies that encourage economic growth and recovery. This is the only sustainable way to both balance our budget and replenish reserve funds over the next few years. Indiana leads our neighbors and we should do everything we can to make sure we remain a leader by allowing business growth to continue.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: I pledge to retain Homestead deductions without change.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: I support changing that Indiana Code to require a General Assembly majority approval to create a Toll Road project, regardless of who has negotiated it. A toll would affect all Hoosiers and their voices should be heard regarding anything as major as tolling Indiana transportation routes.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: I am running for State Representative because Indianapolis is sick, and has forgotten the needs of southern Indiana for too long. With radicalization of Washington DC, Hoosiers depend on state government to protect them from federal abuse. I have experience in business as a pharmacist. I have a great perspective on the current healthcare bills, and what they mean for you and me. I will serve as a statesman for southern Hoosiers, represent their views and concerns passionately, and respond to them quickly. Voters can count on me for dedication and service. If my constituents trust me with their health, they can trust me to cure what’s wrong with Indianapolis. I welcome comments or concerns about our state or the 73rd District. 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008, General Election
1.
QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in 2009 for the exact same version of Senate Joint Resolution 1 that passed in 2008? ANSWER: Yes, I would vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: I believe SJR 1 is a safety net for home owners across Indiana, but I am also inclined to work in the future for even greater tax breaks for homeowners, farmers and businesses. I believe it is important that we complement this legislation with spending caps and make sure that state and local governments live within their budgets just like every Hoosier family does.

 

State Representative District 74:

Sue Ellspermann (Uncertain)
212 E. 25th St.
Ferdinand, IN 47532
Phone: (812) 489-0737, (812) 998-2084
E-mail:
sue@sueellspermann.com 
Website:
http://sueellspermann.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 4, 2010, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the Constitutional Amendment on the November 2, 2010, statewide ballot? ANSWER (April 28, 2010): Yes, I agree voters should have the opportunity to vote on the property tax caps. I do believe there will and should be continued legislation development to fairly assess and balance these taxes among taxpayer groups.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? ANSWER (April 28, 2010): The intermediate answer is to focus on growing jobs attracting and helping companies start and expand in Indiana.  Getting unemployment back to 5-6% would solve many state budget problems. The next biennial budget, at least in the first year, will be very difficult. I am an Industrial Engineer used to looking for cost savings opportunities. Our governor is very good at that. The Kernan Shepard report should be utilized for further local government reform. And, we should continue to streamline state government and learn to do “more with less” as K-12 and higher education have been asked to do. We must make it not only the government’s job, but ask Hoosiers to help identify and participate in cost savings programs.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER (April 28, 2010): It would be irresponsible for me to say “without any change” without knowing if there are potential circumstances which would require the Homestead deduction review.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road bet
ween I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER (April 28, 2010): I don’t have enough information on what Indiana Code says today.  New I69 will provide a great economic benefit to SW Indiana, for which I have supported and fought for while a board member of the Chamber of Commerce of SW Indiana for many years. 
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER (April 28, 2010): I believe small government, low taxes and self-determination are paramount. Beyond that, I am a problem solver who will look for innovative solutions and continuous improvement in all government spending. More efforts should be placed on leveraging the IEDC and OCRA to enable economic and community development at the local and regional level. And, we should work hard to participate in, within reason, federal programs which fund the re-engineering of our current services, such as Race for the Top in K-12 Education.

Russ Stilwell (POLITICAL HOG)

 

State Representative District 75

Ron Bacon (Uncertain)
10300 Meadowlark Hill Road
Chandler, IN 47610 
Phone:
(812) 867-3227
E-mail: 
Website:
http://www.ronbacon.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED. RECORD (from Website): Government should, like the citizens it serves, live within its means. I will only support those budgets that spend no more than we receive in revenues. I am a Fiscal Conservative and will oppose raising taxes as a solution to government overspending.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

Mike Goebel
389 S. Alvord Blvd.
Evansville, IN 47714 
Phone:
(812) 204-4453
E-mail:
rgelarden@insightbb.com 
Website:
http://www.warrickdemocrats.com/mike_goebel.htm 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

 

State Representative District 76

Bob Deig (POLITICAL HOG)

Wendy (Mac) McNamara
8971 Waltz Road
Mt. Vernon, IN 47620 
Phone:
(812) 985-7823
E-mail:
Website:
http://www.wendymac2010.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

 

State Representative District 80:

Phil GiaQuinta (Uncertain)

Jonathan Moosey
6404 Bristol Road
Fort Wayne, IN 46816
Phone:
(260) 456-4205
E-mail:
moosey80th@gmail.com 
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

 

State Representative District 83:

Kathleen Heuer
P.O. Box 512
Columbia City, IN 46725
Phone:
(260) 609-2802
E-mail:
kathleenheuer@hotmail.com  
Website:
http://www.kathyheuer.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

Wray McCalester (Uncertain)
5828 N Center
Columbia City, IN 46725
Phone:
(260) 691-3786
E-mail:
puravida@mchsi.com 
Website:
http://www.wrayforstatehouse.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: I cannot support the amendment as it stands. I do support maintaining the homestead property tax deductions, but feel they must be separated from the other issue. A flat rate cap that allows no provision for changing circumstances is a poor substitute for the common sense that should be used by the legislature/local government in making such decisions. I am no fan of paying taxes, believe me, but I oppose the 1,2,3% caps.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished.
ANSWER: I would like to be more specific on this, but I cannot be without knowing what the situation is at the time. I can say that I would rather see money used to balance the budget rather than to rebuild the rainy day fund. Education is the largest portion of the budget and will always be the elephant in the room. We will best solve our funding problems by working to improve the state economy, not by raising taxes. Every candidate is stating the obvious: We need jobs! I not only understand the problem, but I understand the causes and solutions. When General Motors made a corporate wide decision to outsource all sequencing of parts, thousands across the country lost jobs. No GM plant in the country kept that work—except one. I, as the representative responsible for insourcing work, led negotiations at the Fort Wayne plant. I planned the strategy, the committee worked hard, and in the end GM agreed to build a 300,000 square foot addition to the plant. That created an estimated 140 new jobs and saved another 200. But the story doesn’t end there. When, GM was looking for a truck plant to add a third shift, they chose Ft. Wayne. Why? For the high quality truck produced there, certainly, but also because of the flexibility the addition I negotiated brought to the plant. The result? Another 900 jobs added to this area. I don’t claim to have done this alone. I had a talented, hard working committee, and, when that committee made their case for the work, they earned the support of both GM and the UAW. I believe there is no other candidate in Indiana running for the legislature with my track record for working to produce and maintain high quality jobs in our state. No candidate is likely to say that they want to raise taxes. Neither do I. As a result I will fight the failed policy of giving Indiana work to companies from outside the state. This administration has given control of our roads to foreign countries, our Unemployment offices to Ohio, and our Family and Social Services Administration to Texas. Not only has this resulted in poorer service, but in the case of the Family and Social Services debacle cost 1.3 BILLION dollars and actually resulted in the DEATH of a Hoosier cut off from the services she needed and should have to received. I believe that Indiana tax dollars should be spent to KEEP control of necessary services in the hands of capable Hoosiers—not be paid to out-of-state firms that have other no interest in Hoosiers other than making a profit. And there are hidden costs, too. If Hoosier companies had been contracted to perform these services the property taxes, income taxes, COIT taxes and wheel taxes of all the company executives and staff would have come into Indiana tax coffers—not to foreign countries and states like Texas, Ohio, and now, with Ft. Wayne’s recent decision to outsource the school’s janitorial service, to a company in Michigan. Indiana works best when HOOSIERS, not foreign countries or other states, perform the work. We get better service, keep tax money in state, and generate many more jobs than outsiders will ever do. This administration has behaved as though they don’t trust Hoosiers to do the work. I believe the problem lies with the government—not with the hard working people of Indiana!
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: Yes. (finally an easy one!)
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: Yes, another easy one.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some
additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: My website should be updated and ready by Sept. 4 or 5. I encourage visitors/comments. Sometimes I am buried and answers are delayed, but I reply to all but rude emails as soon as I am able. Some politicians rail about how policemen and women, firemen and women, and teachers don’t do enough and are overpaid. I believe that when police and fire department workers stand willing to give their LIVES for us, we should be ready to give them all the support they need—including good wages and insurance. I also know that while it may be fashionable to bash teachers, they are some of the hardest working people in the state—and often the most caring. They take home work every night; grading papers, planning projects and doing classroom preparation. I do not believe that the problem with our schools can be laid at the feet of the teachers alone. We all must bear some responsibility for the problems in school. When I was 12 my father died. That next year in eighth grade I was the ONLY child in a class of nearly twenty-five students without two parents. Nowadays there are as many children living in single parent homes as are living with Mom and Dad. We must find a way to support our teachers AND our children. Charter schools are often held up as examples of how to do this. The fact is that they are simply another profit making group at taxpayer expense. Charter schools get to choose their students, have much smaller class sizes, and often longer school days. Give our teachers those same conditions and test scores would rise all over the state! And, we wouldn’t be paying for some CEO’s new boat, but preparing our children for life in a difficult world. Let’s elect state representatives who believe that Hoosiers can do the work, need the jobs, and are ready to stop the steady bleeding of outsourcing Hoosier jobs and tax dollars to other states and countries. Let’s ensure that when we pay for a service we get that service, and let’s support our public servants properly. Our lives, the lives of our families and the future of our children depend on their dedicated service. Much, if not all, of this can be accomplished, not by raising taxes, but by putting the jobs, the leadership and the future of our state in Hoosier hands—not those of outsiders. I will listen, I will learn, and I will lead. Elect me to the statehouse in District 83. PROTECT HOOSIER JOBS AND TAX MONEY!

 

State Representative District 84:

Bob Morris (Uncertain)

Evan Smith
4507 North Drive
Fort Wayne, IN 46815
Phone:
(260) 246-2755
E-mail:
smith_evan2010@yahoo.com  
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

 

State Representative District 90:

Mike Speedy (Taxpayer Friendly) 
4733 Moss Creek Terrace
Indianapolis, IN 46237
Phone: (317) 787-0280
E-mail: mike@mikespeedy.com; m.speedy@sbcglobal.net 
Website:
http://www.mikespeedy.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: SUPPORT.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: Will not support income tax increase. We should always endeavor to live within our means, and as such reserve funds should be replenished with the strengthening of our economy. Spending cuts should always be the first approach to balancing the state budget.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: I see no need for any changes that increase property taxes or otherwise circumvent the tax caps.
4. QUESTION: Do you su
pport changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: Inclined to Support but would like to know more.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: Not at this time.

Kevin Vail 
5727 Yucatan Dr.
Indianapolis, IN 46237
Phone: (317) 258-4986
E-mail: kevin@vail.org 
Website:
http://www.kevinvail.us/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

 

State Representative District 95

John Bartlett (Taxpayer UNfriendly)

Ray G. Shearer
P.O. Box 36517
Indianapolis, IN 46236
Phone: (317) 696-0865
E-mail:  
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008, General Election
1.
QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in 2009 for the exact same version of Senate Joint Resolution 1 that passed in 2008? DID NOT RESPOND. 
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

 

State Representative District 98

William A. Crawford (POLITICAL HOG)

Briane M. House
2064 Gallery Court
Indianapolis, IN 46229 
Phone:
(317) 894-3442
E-mail:
bhouse@ncs-law.com 
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

 

State Representative District 99

David Blank
4551 Sylvan Road
Indianapolis, IN 46228
Phone:
(317) 329-8462
E-mail:
blankdocs@comcast.net 
Website:
http://www.voteblank.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

Beth Hayes
1244 N. Illinois St. #311
Indianapolis, IN 46202
Phone:
(317) 635-8732
E-mail:
haybeth2010@yahoo.com   
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

John Meuser
3305 Decker Ridge Dr.
Indianapolis, IN 46258
Phone: (317) 644-6128
E-mail: meuserj@gmail.com; john@johnmeuser.com
Website:
http://www.johnmeuser.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008, General Election
1.
QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in 2009 for the exact same version of Senate Joint Resolution 1 that passed in 2008? ANSWER: Yes. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race): I will always prefer repeal over the capping amendment, but would vote for the cap if it came up to vote when I am in office.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: I do have some reservations about SJR1/HB1001. I believe that it is a mistake to have a subjectively measured tax on what is essentially debt for many citizens. I would feel much better about the amendment if it removed the subjective assessment process and replaced it with an objective measurement such as square footage. I am also disappointed that repeal was not given more serious attention by our legislature. My other concern about SJR1/HB1001 is that a close reading of the Indiana Constitution reveals that as of now there is no constitutional support for a tax on non-commercial property and this amendment seems like a Trojan horse to add that support. However, despite all of these concerns, I feel that this amendment is a very important step in the right direction of providing lasting property tax relief and will support it if I am elected.

Vanessa J. Summers (POLITICAL HOG)

 

State Senate District 1:

Frank Mrvan, Jr. (Taxpayer Friendly)

David B. Spudic
259 Lawndale Street
Hammond, IN 47401 
Phone:
(219) 765-0880
E-mail:
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

 

State Senate District 4:

Shawn Olson (Uncertain)
5307 4th Ave.
Valparaiso, IN 46383
Phone:
(219) 464-7090
E-mail:
Info@Olson4Senate.com  
Website:
http://www.olson4senate.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED. RECORD (from Website): Taxes have a purpose, for paying for what is necessary. Count on a NO vote for anything that will increase Indiana Property, Sales, and Income taxes. All of us are already burdened with increased inflation and a depressed economy. As a nation we have always prospered with a free market system with hard working individuals as the back bone. Lets not put anymore burdens on the backs of our fellow Hoosiers.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

Karen Tallian (POLITICAL HOG)

 

State Senate District 6:

Charles E. Barman
7451 W 121st Ave
Crown Point, IN 46307
Phone:
(219) 226-3400
E-mail:
charlesbarman@lakelpin.org 
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

Sue Landske (Taxpayer Friendly)

Jim Metro
14822 Wicker Ave.
Cedar Lake, IN 46303 
Phone:
(219) 374-7610
E-mail:
Website: 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

 

State Senate District 11:

Catherine Fanello
18441 Summer Wind Lane
South Bend, IN 46637 
Phone:
(574) 277-9774
E-mail:
cfanello@comcast.net; fanelloforsenate@gmail.com  
Website:
http://www.fanelloforsenate.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

Joseph C. Zakas (Taxpayer Friendly)

 

State Senate District 15:

Jack Morris
1034 Wingate Drive
Fort Wayne, IN 46845
Phone:
(260) 417-6177
E-mail:
jack@morrisforstatesenate.com; bpmjl@verizon.net 
Website:
http://www.morrisforstatesenate.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

Thomas J. (Tom) Wyss (Taxpayer Friendly)

 

State Senate District 19:

Robert Couse (Taxpayer Friendly)
705 S Water St
Jonesboro, IN 46938
Phone:
(765) 618-6013
E-mail:
couseforsenatedistrict19@gmail.com 
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: I support making the property tax caps permanent.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: I unfortunately do not have a good answer for this issue. I do know that Indiana statue requires that the budget be balanced. If funds continue to shrink, more than likely across the board cuts will have to be made. I would hope that through cuts the State of Indiana could avoid tax increases. Here again I am not sure
that budget cuts will be enough. With the economic times being the way they are I truly do not know what the best answer will be especially two years out. I fully understand that this is not the answer everyone wants to hear, but I also know from my experience on the Jonesboro City Council that financial situations, especially in the climate that we are in currently, require the ability to be flexible, creative, and proactive.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: Yes.
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: Yes.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: I have a facebook group page under Robert Couse for Indiana State Senate District 19. I would like to say that out of all the current candidates I am probably the one the best understands the issues that face every day Hoosiers. Other candidates have probably faced issues along the way but their families and careers grew before the current economic times that we are in currently. My family and I face trying to grow during this time of
economic hardship. I understand what it is like not being able to find a job that matches my skill sets. I'm currently employed as a janitor despite my multiple degrees from Purdue University and despite the fact that I'll have completed my Masters this coming February. I really understand the fears that parents have when it comes to
education here in Indiana My children are only starting to enter into the local school systems, and in the next two years, I will have a child in 1st grade, kindergarten, and preschool. I know the hard balance of finding time for the family despite both my wife and I having to work just to be able to pay the bills and have a little extra to do things as a family. From my position on the Jonesboro City Council, I know and understand the impact of budget cuts and I am forced to make decisions that impact the livelihood of individuals whom I have to see and interact with on a daily basis. I will say that I do not fault any candidate for achieving the level of comfort that they have, because I myself am striving for, and will one day achieve that for my family and I. However, I can say that other candidates will legislate from what they think the everyday Hoosier needs, where as, I will legislate from what I know the everyday Hoosier needs, because I live the life that the majority of Hoosiers are living today.

Travis Holdman (Taxpayer Friendly)

 

State Senate District 21:

James R. (Jim) Buck (Taxpayer Friendly)

Chuck Sosbe
1715 S. Courtland Avenue
Kokomo, IN 46902 
Phone:
(765) 438-8293
E-mail:
chuck@sosbe.net; chuck@sosbeforsenate.com
Website: http://www.sosbeforsenate.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

 

State Senate District 22:

Ron J. Alting (Taxpayer Friendly)

Michael J. Oxenrider
105 Leslie Avenue
West Lafayette, IN 47906 
Phone:
(765) 577-5627
E-mail:
michael@oxenriderforIndiana.com 
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

 

State Senate District 25:

Brian S. Jacobs (Taxpayer Friendly)
8975 S 800 W
Pendleton, IN 46064
Phone:
(317) 485-3117
E-mail:
bjacobs@healthmatch.com; brian@votejacobs.com  
Website:
http://votejacobs.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: I support the Amendment as written because the level of property taxation reflected by the 1-2-3% caps is a ceiling above which property tax cannot rise while leaving the General Assembly free to reduce property taxes further as they see fit.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished.
ANSWER: Let's start by laying out some boundaries of what we shouldn't do: (a) We shouldn't raise taxes. This will simply drive business investment away from Indiana when we desperately need to get Hoosiers back to work. Such an irresponsible act would hurt Hoosier families for decades. (b) We shouldn't count on federal stimulus money. This money is not "free"; it is simply going on the tab of our children. Besides, if states
become dependent on federal dollars it will further erode the foundations of federalism which is central in the Constitution and vital to our liberty. Now for what we MUST do. We must cut spending. There are two general
principles for finding the spending cuts needed to balance the budget. First, and most obviously, we should eliminate programs that are wasteful, unnecessary, or things that could be done by the private sector. This is the low hanging fruit that almost everyone would agree on...but there isn't enough of this in Indiana to keep the budget balanced. The second principle is we must make cuts where all the money goes. In Indiana, this means two things, Medicaid and education. There are two ways to reduce Medicaid spending without affecting health outcomes. First,
eliminate payment for services considered optional by the federal Medicaid program such as chiropractic care. Average Hoosier families should not be asked to sacrifice more to provide optional services even for the poorest Hoosiers. Second, Medicaid suffers from over-utilization because the end users have no "skin in the game." People consume more units if there is no additional marginal cost to them for such usage; this is called Moral Hazard. We can reduce Moral Hazard in Medicaid in a couple of ways. First, we can expand Indiana's creative pilot programs in Medicaid Health Savings Accounts. These have been shown to substantially reduce costs to taxpayers. Second, we can introduce co-pays, particularly for the most expensive types of care, like the ER. And we can electronically link those co-pays to other forms of public assistance. For example, if a Medicaid beneficiary goes to the ER and does not have the $20 co-pay, we won't turn them away, but we will deduct that $20 from other public assistance they might receive, such as from welfare checks. This will deter them from casually consuming more than they need and will encourage them not to use the ER for convenience instead of making a far less expensive (to the taxpayer) appointment with a primary care physician. The second place we must cut is education. We have no choice, as about 50% of the general fund is spent on K-12 education and another 13% on higher education. With regard to higher education, let's let students pay for more of their
own education instead of burdening taxpayers further. This has a couple of good effects: (a) People value things more if they pay for them. (b) Isolating people from the costs encourages over consumption. (c) It is easy for universities to beg the General Assembly for more money but it is difficult for them to justify tuition rises to students and parents. Perhaps this will encourage universities to find operational efficiencies (which they have not done in decades) instead of simply seeking more revenue. In K-12, results aren't about money. During the downturn, K-12 was pared, and yet I-STEP scores went up. We can save money and get better results by concentrating on the basics: English, Math, and civics. American schools of 100 years ago performed better without spending nearly as much. We should allow broader use of participation fees for student activities outside those basics. We should rely on competition through charter schools, vouchers, or even home-schooling. Competition breeds excellence and efficiency, monopoly does the reverse, even if that monopoly is state K12 education.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: While I don't favor govt using the tax code to foster social policy, I don't see changing the homestead credit as feasible or desirable unless part of a wholesale reform of Indiana tax policy. And there is always the problem of changing the rules mid-stream.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: Toll roads and other user-taxes can be an efficient and fair means of paying for such projects. In general, I support such efforts in lieu of broader taxation of non-users. The General Assembly could always act in specific cases to prevent such agreements. So no, I don't believe such a change is necessary.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: Overspending and overtaxation at the federal level is threatening the future of my children and is what prompted me to get involved. I believe we need to get Hoosiers back to work, and we can do that by making Indiana the most business friendly state in the nation. We need to rely less on government and more on the creativity, common sense, and work ethic of everyday Hoosiers. More government isn't the answer...not in the economy, not in healthcare, not in education. Frankly, we've had enough of "change you can believe in." It is time for Change that Believes in YOU!

Tim Lanane (Uncertain)

 

State Senate District 26:

Doug Eckerty (Taxpayer Friendly)
10200 W. River Rd.
Yorktown, IN 47396
Phone: (765) 744-6364
E-mail:
gdeckerty@comcast.net  
Website:
http://dougeckerty.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: FULLY SUPPORT.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: My first choice is to make further cuts to higher education......not k-12. Mayoral elections should be shifted to normal election cycles ...saving $22 million every four years. Next, do away with township government and trustees or at the very least consolidate them to half their current numbers.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: I can live with no changes to the current assessment system. However, the entire assessment system must be addressed ASAP to avoid falling into the same old trap........CAPS do us no good if assessments run wild. It is entirely possible that we may see 10% inflation or more again.......which would put us back in the same bad position with property taxes.
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: Yes, the General Assembly should have the final vote. I would even go for a voter referendum on this issue.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: Thank you for allowing me to participate in this survey.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 4, 2010, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the Constitutional Amendment on the November 2, 2010, statewide ballot? ANSWER: I fully support placing property tax caps into the constitution.....without any reservation.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? ANSWER: With respect to Medicaid. Currently in Indiana Medicaid accounts for 13% of the states budget. With unemployment likely to continue at historic levels we will continue to see a surge in Medicare enrollment. My understanding is that the states share of Medicaid funding is Federally mandated (another unfunded mandate from our friends in Washington). Bottom line is that it appears little we can do as a state to avoid this enrollment surge. We will have to continue to cut aggressively in other places in the budget as well as shift priorities. Changing mayoral elections to the even years will save the state $22 M every four years ....and the elimination of one entire layer of local government is a must. I could go on but time does not permit.
3. QUESTION: Do y
ou pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: I fully support retaining the standard homestead supplemental deductions...........but also feel we need to go further to place some sort of CAP in place for overall property assessments. If we don't CAP assessments then Property Tax CAPS will become meaningless at some point and property tax payers will be victimized once again.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code s
o approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: I'm not in favor of setting up any toll roads
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: Property tax CAPS are critical to Indiana's future and especially the creation and retention of jobs. Ball State University just released an economic impact study assessing the impact property tax caps will have on jobs in Indiana. Their findings were that property tax caps will likely produce 97,000 jobs in Indiana as well as stimulate wealth creation for homeowners. If you wish to research my credentials further please feel free to contact Chris Hiatt of the CDCPTR in Muncie. Chris knows me well. Feel free to contact me at anytime:

Sue Errington (POLITICAL HOG)

 

State Senate District 27:

Donald Crossley 
9600 Smoky Row Rd.
Greens Fork, IN 47345
Phone: (765) 886-9955
E-mail:
don.crossley@yahoo.com     
Website:
 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: I will do the questionnaire soon. But, I don't like yes or no answers. Property tax, no I don't support it...it is better than it was I will say #1 Property taxes should be lower I prefer none at all, some states have $0 property tax and do fine. #2 No matter how you look at how low it is now...A retired person that has worked all of their life to pay off their home, they are now 78 years old,  they miss a paying their taxes in the fall, Indiana could confiscate their home and sell it for a profit and boot them out. Its not a "yes" or "no" answer to me. Personally The state blows to much, like there is a ton of it. They are planning on spending $2 Billion more in 2011 ouch! They better have 600,000 jobs coming in the next 6 months!

Allen Paul (Taxpayer Friendly)

 

State Senate District 29:

Mike Delph (Taxpayer Friendly)

Robin Shackleford (Uncertain) 
4964 Potomac Square Way Unit 4
Indianapolis, IN 46268
Phone: (317) 328-4921, (317) 201-3403
E-mail:
rshackleford1@comcast.net    
Website:
http://www.shacklefordforsenate.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 4, 2010, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the Constitutional Amendment on the November 2, 2010, statewide ballot? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.

 

State Senate District 31:

Frank J. Anderson 
115 W Washington St Ste 1165
Indianapolis, IN 46204
Phone:
(317) 231-7100
E-mail: 
kmurray@fbtlaw.com 
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

Benjamin Hale
8527 Honeysuckle Way
Indianapolis, IN 46256
Phone:
(317) 698-3418
E-mail:
halebenw@gmail.com 
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

James W. Merritt, Jr. (Taxpayer Friendly)

 

State Senate District 38:

Ed Gluck (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
628 Ash St. Apt. 53
Terre Haute, IN 47804
Phone:
(812) 235-0412
E-mail:
Ed@ElectEdGluck.com; edgluck2@yahoo.com    
Website:
http://www.electedgluck.com:80/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: Oppose. You mentioned in a previous reason why the amendment must be passed, that other taxes were already planned. Voters must vote out Democrats and Republicans and support good candidates rather than corrupt parties. Good candidates would pass a similar amendment without crushing the working and the children. Don't support the global agenda!
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: Medicaid spending: Spend 100% of Federal money allotted, 0% coming from state government.
K-12 education: The Indiana Constitution has a fund for this. Follow the Constitution. (As a representative I must!) We can also consider state funding only K-6. Statewide income tax increase: Do not attack the worker. If income is defined as dividends and capital gains on stocks, then perhaps we can increase the % as long as taxes on wages and tips is ended. I do not see this as a revenue generator. Reserve funds should be replenished to at least $2 billion. Tough times are ahead and this phony stimulus federal money must dry up.  
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maint
ain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: These values should probably be raised ($45,000 and $600,000) since the price of housing is still in bubble mode. I agree this progressive taxing looks fair and I certainly would NOT raise it. (Now I would have to visit an assessor, but I think a decimal pt. is missing - perhaps .35% plus .25%.) Allow me to tell you my philosophy: If they can tax it they can take it, if they can take it, you don't own it.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: Yes I approve changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required. I understand the tolls will be used to build Pacific side ports for Mexico and China. Indiana tolls should be used for Indiana roads.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: I will support a U.S. amendment limiting corporations and their contract with the state. Corporations are not people, therefore have no free speech rights. Corporations must be limited in life, (the past practice of 10 years under good behavior seems a maximum). Owners will be liable for losses.
On the other side, I will not leave losers penniless. Indiana bankruptcy law is unconstitutional (Indiana Constitution). The equity allowed in your house under bankruptcy in Indiana has moved from $13,000 in the 1990s to $15,000 today. I propose moving that to $120,000 or higher. I do see many medical bankruptcies in the near future. I will be for a tenth amendment resolution to keep Indiana from bailing out other states and other nations. I will support an amendment to the U.S. Constitution if the resolution is ineffective.

Timothy Dale Skinner (POLITICAL HOG)

Bill Webster (Taxpayer Friendly)
5191 S. Coxville Road
Montezuma, IN 47862
Phone:
(765) 569-2385
E-mail:
bill@webstersenate.com; patriotsforwebster@gmail.com    
Website:
http://www.webstersenate.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: SUPPORT.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: We should live within our means. I will not vote to raise taxes. K-12 is always a high priority. Yes, reserve funds should be replenished.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: YES!
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: YES!
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: Please join us on Facebook Bill Webster State Senate and visit our Website. 

 

State Senate District 39:

Steven M. Thais
205 Nicholas St.
Vincennes, IN 47591 
Phone: (812) 886-6676
E-mail: steveforsenate@live.com 
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election

1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 7, 2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax increased from 5% to 6% with a promise that the proceeds would be used to decrease homeowner homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm, Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3% decrease into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average Hoosier homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility to levy income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax relief. QUESTION: Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose additional income, sales, and other taxes? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget the last two fiscal years has been balanced without fund transfers for the first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm). QUESTION: Should the state's total budget expenditures be no more than total revenues for the next biennium? DID NOT RESPOND.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced with the inclusion of a one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This decreases property taxes for the average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be continued beyond 2007? DID NOT RESPOND.
4. BACKGROUND: Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should the state pay for full-day kindergarten?  If YES, where should the state get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten? DID NOT RESPOND.
5. BACKGROUND: The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road ("Major Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to pay off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges. QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next ten years? DID NOT RESPOND.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects include $694 million for a new terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to Evansville as well as a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION: Should the "Major Moves" expenditures be combined with the Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain I-69 extension without state tax increases? DID NOT RESPOND.
7. BACKGROUND: The 2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a toll road for an I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION: Do you favor legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69 extension? DID NOT RESPOND.
8. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

John Waterman (Taxpayer Friendly)

 

State Senate District 41:

Chris Roller
921 Princeton Dr.
New Whiteland, IN 46184 
Phone:
(317) 691-7028
E-mail:
chrisroller77@yahoo.com; voteroller2010@yahoo.com 
Website:
http://voteroller2010.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

Greg Walker (Taxpayer Friendly)

 

State Senate District 45:

James (Jim) Lewis (POLITICAL HOG)

Jim C. Smith   
6103 Welsh Landing
Charlestown, IN 47111
Phone:
(812) 207-6278
E-mail:
smithforsenate@gmail.com 
Website:
http://jimsmithforsenate.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

 

State Senate District 46:

Charles "Chuck" Freiberger
7011 Brenlee Drive
Georgetown, IN 47122 
Phone:
(812) 923-3711
E-mail:
cfry@insightbb.com 
Website:
http://chuckfreiberger.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

Ron Groomes (Taxpayer Friendly) 
3104 Autumn Green Way
Jeffersonville, IN 47130
Phone: (812) 282-6108
E-mail:
r.grooms@insightbb.com 
Website:
http://rongroomsstatesenate.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: Yes, I support the amendment.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: The 2012-2013 State Budget should be balanced without any tax increases. Reserve funds should be replenished. Medicaid spending can be reduced to bare essentials. K-12 education spending should be maintained at current levels. Further spending cuts will be needed in departments such as Natural Resources, Transportation and State Elected Offices. The State may have to ask private citizens and state businesses and corporations for donations or prepayment of future taxes. Volunteer groups may be called on to offer help with essential state services. Retired citizens may be called on to help in schools and health facilities. Perhaps we need an “Indiana Volunteer Corps” to get us through these tough times. The State Legislature will have to focus on maintaining  health, education and public assistance. Almost everything else will require reduced spending.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: I pledge to maintain both deductions without any changes.
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: A toll road is a user fee. User fees should be approved by some board or agency or regulatory commission. I would support changing the code to require approval by the General Assembly before I-69 becomes a toll road, between I-64 and Martinsville. The decision should not be made by one person.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: I have over 35 years experience as a community pharmacy owner and businessman. I have served almost 20 years in grassroots local government as a city council person. I have been a pharmacist in Indiana for 43 years and a resident of my Senate District for 42 years. I bring to the office, common sense from real experience and conservative values. Legislation,finance and budgets and job creation  are not uncommon to me.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 4, 2010, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the Constitutional Amendment on the November 2, 2010, statewide ballot? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND. POSITION (from Website): I support giving voters the right to choose by voting for or against an amendment to the State’s constitution to make the property tax caps permanent and a part of the Constitution.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND. POSITION (from Website): I suggest that school corporations work through the State’s Department of Administration to purchase most goods and services. This will save taxpayers millions of dollars by using the state’s buying power to negotiate the lowest possible price for everything from office supplies to fuel to computers. Providers and vendors would have the option to participate at state pricing levels. The state funding available to school corporations for Full-Day Kindergarten should continue to increase.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.

 

State Senate District 47:

Ted Metzger (Taxpayer Friendly)
1433 Mt. Gilead Road
Boonville, IN 47601 
Phone:
(812) 897-7969
E-mail:
HoosiersforMetzger@juno.com 
Website:
http://www.tedmetzger.net/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: Yes, I support the Constitutional Amendment. However, I would like to abolish property taxes all together and replace them with a flat tax/fair tax system. Which will allow Hoosiers to truly own their property like our founding fathers intended.  
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished.
ANSWER: I would oppose any increases in taxes. I believe a balanced budget should be accomplished by simply living within our means. I would favor budget cuts across the board, some items (like Medicaid) more then others (like infrastructure). If and when the State starts producing a surplus in the budget, then the reserve fund may be replenished or tax cuts issued which ever Hoosiers prefer.   
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: I do pledge to maintain both Homestead Deductions.   
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: Yes, this brings our state back in line with our republic principles.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: I am a self-employed small business owner of a 30-year-old commercial contract cleaning service. I was born and raised here in southern Indiana and have resided in Boonville, for the last 23 years. I have been happily married to Melissa for 36 years and have one son. I am a veteran of the U.S. Air Force and a long time member of the American Legion Post #200. After my military duty I returned to school under the G.I. bill where I earned my Associates Degree in Air Conditioning, Refrigeration and Heating Technology. This will be my first elected office. I have no formal political experience. Yet I am exactly the type of individual our founding fathers intended to hold office, the average citizen. For the last ten years I have been fighting in the trenches on a local level as a grassroots activist working to restore our liberties. I have received the Defender of the Constitution award for my staunch support of the Bill of Rights. I have also received recognition from the Institute for Legislative Action for my grassroots efforts. My campaign has received the endorsement of The Independence Caucus, a conservative grassroots caucus comprised of liberty-minded individuals from across the nation. I believe our elected officials have lost their way and no longer represent the people. I am a conservative, constitutionalist, Republican from the working class. I have learned to live within my means and believes it’s time for the government to live within its means. I will work for Hoosier families to reduce taxes and eliminate wasteful spending. I believe in the sanctity of marriage and am Pro-Life. I understand the importance of keeping the first and second amendment intact. I am now ready to take my grassroots efforts to the next level as your state senator. I will be a strong voice for the people of southern Indiana at the State Capital in Indianapolis. I will work tirelessly to defend our family values, our American traditions, and our children’s freedom at the state level. 

Richard D. Young, Jr. (Taxpayer UNfriendly)

 

State Senate District 49:

Patty Avery 
11400 Big Cynthiana Road
Evansville, IN 47720 
Phone:
(812) 455-4231
E-mail:
patty.avery@insightbb.com 
Website:
http://pattyavery.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.

Jim Tomes (Taxpayer Friendly) 
9412 Hwy 66
Wadesville, IN 47638
Phone: (812) 985-5473
E-mail:
jimtomes49th@gmail.com; jmtomes@pngusa.net    
Website:
http://www.jimtomes.com/index.html 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010, General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: Yes. I would have liked to see a 1% cap for all categories, though.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be replenished. ANSWER: Medicaid, Family Social Service Administration, Education and many other agencies throughout Indiana have budgets that are questionable and in some cases suspicious in my opinion. As a state senator I would like to examine the budgets and spending conducted by many of these agencies to see if their operation justifies their spending. We must corral the wastefulness of taxpayers money that has become a routine way of doing business, before any discussion about raising taxes or inventing a new tax. I firmly believe if we start at that point of addressing state budget proposals we will have a much more realistic picture of our financial status.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER: Yes!
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: Yes!
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: My wife and I have always lived within our budget. We are working class people who are now retired. I understand the value of a dollar and what it means to live within your means. If you don't have money in hand, then you don't buy it. We save up for what we want and all the folks in our circles live the same. I don't think it's expecting too much for government to operate the same, ( at one time it did). We need legislators who are a little more frugal and can be trusted to be good stewards of the peoples money and trust. I would be such a servant.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 4, 2010, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the Constitutional Amendment on the November 2, 2010, statewide ballot? ANSWER: Yes, I support the amendment.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? ANSWER: I'm holding a report in my hand of a Indiana state reserve statement released June 30, 2009 showing an estimated Medicaid Reserve of 57.6 million dollars and tuition reserve of 425 million dollars. But after reading down the entire list of expenditures and balances it appears the budget is still going to be 60 million dollars short by June 30, 2011. Increasing income taxes, in my opinion will only throw us in more of a tail spin. We must get control of the enormous spending that goes out on projects that are simple not urgent at the moment. Just like a household that cannot restrain from spending far beyond it's income neither can state government. Irresponsible administration and lack of frugality in the educational sector is one example. There is not enough time here to cover all the aspects on this monumental issue, but as a tax payer and retired on a fixed income I can assure you that there is absolutely a solution to our money problems and it does not require increasing taxes.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: ABSOLUTELY!!! Beyond that, as a state senator I intend to examine why there is such a disparity among property values in homes that are in the same proximity that simply defies logic. I'm concerned about the qualifications of individuals charged with the duty of assessing.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? You can bank on that. This is another example of where we have traded a Republic for a Democracy. Matters such as this and others like it ought to and should be decided by the citizens by virtue of their elected representatives.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: I first ran for office in 2004 for state representative in District 76. I didn't get elected then and things have not improved all that much since. I've decided to run for state senate in District 49 for the same reasons as last time. We must get legislators from the general population who understand icy clear what the Constitution prescribes and that government is bound to operate within limits and to the expectations of the citizens and in a manner of integrity.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2004, Primary Election
1. Guiding Principles for 2005-07 Biennium Budget. Those on fixed incomes, small businesses and working class citizens of which I’m one, live on budgeted incomes. Some are very limited incomes and must live accordingly. Should we not expect our state government to live within its means as well? First we must plug the leaks, check wasteful spending. I would like to see a complete housecleaning of every agency (housing authorities, FSSA, BMV, etc.) in our state to eliminate the absolute wasteful spending. We can’t keep adopting every new “feel good” program that comes along, including those from the Federal level that is dangled in front of us with the promise of some start up money and then Indiana has to come up with a way to keep paying for it from there on. Indiana needs to structure its budget and the way it operates on its ordinary income, which are mainly tax revenues. The practice of relying on riverboat wagering revenues and settlements from lawsuits such as the tobacco settlement for setting budgets is risky because of unforeseen shortfalls that could occur. Careful spending based on known income would likely lead to a more stable government operating environment and any monies from other sources could be used to build a surplus once again and perhaps result in the elimination or reduction in existing taxes. I understand that government relies on taxes to fund it's operation and the many services that it provides but I feel that citizens have come to accept taxes and tax increases too willingly in exchange  for a larger government that most say they do not want. I am just not one who welcomes new and more taxes with open arms. I still say the solution to our dismal fiscal situation is cut waste.
2. Opinions on Homeowner Property Taxes. There has been talk in the past of dropping the property tax which I support wholeheartedly. I don't want to exchange that tax for another form of taxation. I don't believe it realistic to think that the legislature will eliminate the property tax which is one of their main sources of revenue until Indiana regains is financial stability. If our runaway spending were brought in check we could still maintain the services those agencies provide and ELIMINATE the property tax and not trade off for one under a different name.
3. Position on Indianapolis to Evansville Interstate. I-69 appears to be a "done deal." I personally don't think it will ever be completed in my life time. If the residents are willing to accept a new tax such as an increase in a gasoline tax that should be up to them in a vote. I don't support a toll road because the delays caused by stopping at a toll booth would cancel what little time travel this new road is supposed to afford.
4.
Additional Comments. In my opinion the most pressing issue is why are jobs and businesses leaving Indiana. Is it too many regulations or taxes, such as the inventory tax? We must insure that the jobs and industry currently existing in our state stay here. It’s better to keep and improve what we have, which will in turn entice new businesses to set up in a state that has a history of long established market place. With all the recent international trade arrangements now in place labor and management must work together to exist. It’s vital that workers in this Country have incomes that will allow them to maintain a standard of living that in turn keeps our economy healthy. Companies that provide fair and equitable pay and benefits in turn acquire employees who display good work ethics. This combination is what produces the best products and services in the market place. With your support and your authority, I would like to bring state government back to where it belongs, in the hands of its citizens.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 4, 2004, Primary Election
1. Guiding Principles for 2005-07 Biennium Budget. Our state needs a complete overhaul, agency by agency, to cut out wasteful spending. Two comes to mind quickly, BMV and State Police's program in the way they conduct background checks for gun purchases. Absolutely no more tax increases. If we check this runaway spending we could lower taxes or in some cases probably eliminate them.
2. Opinions on Homeowner Property Taxes. I would like to eliminate property tax and choose not to replace it with yet another tax. I still think a close and honest inspection of how fast our state spends carelessly could result in property tax elimination.
3. Exempting gasoline sales from the sales tax and increasing the gasoline tax by another 5 cents. I know that state government relies on taxes of some sort for revenues. I think we now pay 38 cents per gallon not counting sales tax in taxes on gasoline. I still prefer to get ahead of this snowball by examining spending.
4. Tax increases to build an interstate from Indianapolis to Evansville. With being a billion dollars in debt right now I don't think we can afford the interstate from Indianapolis to Evansville. I think Indiana needs to do what working class have to do, that is try saving money back for awhile.
5. Additional comments. I'm an average working class taxpayer. I think it's time we have someone like me who knows the value of a dollar. Who knows right from wrong. When to say yes and when to say no. 

Watchdog Indiana Home Page Indiana General Assembly & Governor Ratings  

This page was last updated on 09/08/10 .