Vaneta G. Becker (Taxpayer Friendly)
Watchdog Indiana Home Page Indiana General Assembly & Governor Ratings Legislative Voting Record
Address: 4017 Cobble Field Drive, Evansville, IN 47711
Phone: (812) 479-3776
E-mail: S50@in.gov
Website: http://www.in.gov/legislative/senate_republicans/homepages/s50/index.htm
2013 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, which is Taxpayer Friendly because the 2013-15 state budget makes
better use of the existing state Gasoline Tax and state Sales Tax revenues from
gasoline purchases with NO NEW TRANSPORTATION TAX INCREASES to increase
transportation funding for INDOT by 11%, cities and towns by 34%, and counties
by 23%.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1011, which is Taxpayer Friendly because
construction of a costly light rail transportation system cannot be approved by
a new central Indiana transit district before March 14, 2014.
Voted NO on House
Bill 1313, which is Taxpayer Friendly because it (1) supports the
establishment of a 2013 interim committee to study local government regulation
of residential leases and (2) prohibits a local government from adopting
regulations for landlord licensing, mandatory landlord classes, and rental
inspection and registration fees until July 1, 2014.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 319, which is Taxpayer Friendly because it prevents a significant shift
of the property tax burden to farm working families by (1) using the current
soil productivity factors until 2015 and (2) requiring the Department of Local
Government Finance to confer with the College of Agriculture of Purdue
University and submit a 2013 interim study committee report on soil productivity
factors.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 389, which was Taxpayer UNfriendly because it created the possibility
for a minority of county income tax council members representing a minority of
the county population to impose a county-wide motor vehicle excise surtax and
wheel tax.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 6, 2012,
General Election
1. QUESTION: What are your priorities regarding the 2013-2015 state budget?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Should the non-transportation appropriations from the state’s
Motor Vehicle Highway Account be transferred to the state’s General Fund so
more of our Indiana Gasoline Tax dollars can be properly spent to meet our
transportation needs? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
3. QUESTION: Should the
Automatic Taxpayer Refund law be (a) improved to make refunds more likely, (b) kept as
it is, or (c) eliminated? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
4. QUESTION: Do you
pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead
Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
5. QUESTION: What is your position regarding township government
reform? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
6. QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment
commissions oversight? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
7. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your
candidacy? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2012 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1003, which is Taxpayer Friendly because (1) public access to
government meetings and records is improved and (2) it is less likely that
public agencies will intentionally violate the Public Access Laws.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1005, which contains six Taxpayer Friendly local government Conflict Of
Interest provisions and sixteen Taxpayer Friendly local government Nepotism
provisions.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1376,
which is Taxpayer UNfriendly because (1) the automatic taxpayer refund excess
reserves trigger is increased from 10% to 12.5% and (2) Hoosier working families
will possibly receive an automatic taxpayer refund every even-numbered year
instead of every year.
Voted YES on
Senate Bill 25,
which was Taxpayer Friendly because (if it had passed the House) much improved
oversight would have been provided for redevelopment commissions and
departments.
2011 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, which includes among its 16 Taxpayer Friendly state budget
provisions no tax increases and an operating surplus in both the 2012 and 2013
fiscal years with a satisfactory reserve balance on June 30, 2013.
Voted NO on House
Bill 1002, which is Taxpayer Friendly because (1) charter schools have the
potential to help increase the academic growth of lower socioeconomic students,
(2) the number of Indiana nonprofit private colleges and universities authorized
to create charter schools is limited, (3) the Indianapolis mayor is the only
Indiana mayor who may authorize charter schools, (4) conversion from a public
school to a charter school is sufficiently stringent, and (5) property taxes are
NOT improperly used to support charter schools.
Voted NO on
House Bill 1003, which uses state K-12
tuition support money to fund scholarships for nonpublic school students and is
Taxpayer UNfriendly because (1) nonpublic private and parochial schools are not
equally open to all children, (2) nonpublic school budgets are not approved by a
directly elected public body, (3) evidence-based research does not support
greater school choice as a means to achieve overall educational improvement, (4)
it is very likely unconstitutional, and (5) state tuition support dollars would
go to nonpublic schools that are not uniformly distributed throughout the state.
Voted NO on House
Bill 1022, which would have implemented a number of Taxpayer Friendly local
government provisions related to nepotism and officeholder conflict-of-interest.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1074, which provides that school board members selected by election
must be elected at November general elections and is Taxpayer Friendly because
the greater voter turnout in general elections will make it more difficult for
local vested interests to unduly influence school board elections.
2010 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES
on House Joint Resolution 1,
which gives voters statewide the opportunity to amend the Indiana Constitution
to (1) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (2) protect
homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1001, which contains 21 Taxpayer Friendly government ethics reform
provisions including a 365-day wait after leaving the General Assembly before a
legislator can become a lobbyist or legislative liaison, the reporting of
certain expenditures by the legislative liaisons of state agencies and state
educational institutions, and a reduction from $100 to $50 in the minimum
reportable amount for the total daily gifts given by a registered lobbyist to a
legislative person.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1086, which contains 7 Taxpayer Friendly provisions including the HJR
1 Constitutional Amendment ballot language.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1367, which contains 5 Taxpayer Friendly K-12 education provisions
that preserve and protect instructional programs.
Voted YES on
Senate Bill 23, which delays the scheduled increase in unemployment insurance
premiums for one year until 2011.
Voted YES on Senate Bill
396, which mandates an
adjusted six-year average that eliminates the highest value to calculate the
base rate for the assessment of agricultural land.
2009 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted NO
on House Bill 1001 SS, the
2009-2011 special session budget bill that (1) provides enough resources for
good government AND (2) satisfactorily protects Hoosier working families
from state and local tax increases. A YES
vote supports a budget that is sufficiently Taxpayer Friendly. A
NO vote would have shut down much of state government.
Voted
YES
on Senate
Joint Resolution 1, which amended the Indiana Constitution beginning 2012 to
include a cap on homestead property tax in 90 counties at 1% of gross assessed
value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008, is
exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St. Joseph
counties ONLY. The effective constitutional homeowner property tax caps in Lake
and St. Joseph counties are 1.88% and 1.52% respectively until the 1% cap takes
effect in 2020.
Voted NO on Senate
Bill 348 to have a Library Services Plan developed and approved by a Public
Library Service Planning Committee (with an "opt out" referendum
provision) in every county (except Marion County) to help more effectively use
working family dollars currently spent on library services (with the option to
equitably replace public library property taxes with a county economic
development income tax).
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 452 to prohibit employees of a
local government unit from serving as elected officials within the same local
government unit, move the elections of municipal officers to even-numbered
years, move all school board member elections to the November general election
in even-numbered years, establish the use of vote centers as an option for all
counties, and require a city clerk-treasurer in a third class city to attend
fiscal officer training provided by the state board of accounts.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 506 to (1) allow a single County Chief Executive
Officer or County Manager, (2) allow the County Council or the Board of
County Supervisors to exercise both the fiscal and legislative powers
of the county, (3) provide for voter-initiated referendums on county
government reorganization, (4) repeal the requirement that political
subdivisions must approve local government reorganizations initiated by voters,
(5) assign the Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations four
responsibilities to identify and monitor good local government
practices, (6) prohibit County Manager nepotism, (7) repeal unproductive
reporting requirements, and (8) continue to elect the County Assessor.
Voted NO
on Senate
Bill 512 to (1) abolish on January 1, 2013, each township board in every
county (other than Marion County) and make the county fiscal body also the
fiscal body and legislative body of each township, (2) require a township when
formulating an annual budget to consider whether the part of the ending balance
in each township fund in excess of 10% of budgeted expenditures should be used
instead of imposing additional property taxes for the ensuing year, (3) prohibit
a relative of a township officer or employee from being employed by the township
in a position that would put the relative in a direct supervisory or subordinate
relationship with the officer or employee, (4) require a township trustee's
annual report to list separately each expenditure to reimburse the trustee for
the trustee's public business use of personal property, (5) require each
township office to include the address, phone number, and regular office hours
(if any) of the township office in at least one local telephone directory, (6)
prohibits a public meeting or a public hearing of a township official or
governing body from being held in a private residence, and (7) requires the
State Board of Accounts to submit an annual township examination report to the
executive director of the Legislative Services Agency and to county councils.
Voted YES
on House
Bill 1607 to require a referendum before establishing a Northern Indiana
Regional Transportation District, which is a new tax-imposing level of
Indiana government in Lake, Porter, LaPorte, and St. Joseph counties controlled
by a board with unrestricted powers (where most board members have no real
connection to the taxpayers' community).
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008, General Election
1.
BACKGROUND: Senate Joint Resolution 1 passed
the Indiana Senate 40-7 and the Indiana House 79-20 on March 14, 2008, and
was signed by the Governor on March 19, 2008. SJR 1 amends the Indiana
Constitution to cap homeowners' property tax bills at 1% of assessed value,
rental and agricultural property at 2%, and business property at 3%. For
property taxes first due and payable in 2012, 90 of Indiana's 92
counties must have a homeowner property tax cap that is 1% of the gross
assessed value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008,
is exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St.
Joseph counties ONLY. The result of these two existing debt service
exemptions equates to a 1.88% homeowner cap in Lake County and a 1.52%
homeowner cap in St.
Joseph County. The homeowner caps for Lake and St. Joseph counties must become
1% in 2020. The exact same version of SJR 1 that passed in 2008 must again pass in the General Assembly in 2009 to put the 1%
constitutional homeowner property tax cap amendment on the 2010 ballot. We
the people can then vote to make the 1% homeowner property tax cap a
permanent part of the Indiana Constitution. Never has it been so easy to separate those who are part of the
property tax relief solution from those who are part of the property tax
spending problem. A General Assembly candidate who pledges to
vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009 is part of the
solution, otherwise the legislator is part of
the problem. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in 2009 for
the exact same version of Senate
Joint Resolution 1 that passed in 2008? DID NOT
RESPOND.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID
NOT RESPOND.
2008 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on Senate
Joint Resolution 1, which amended the Indiana Constitution beginning 2012 to
include a cap on homestead property tax in 90 counties at 1% of gross assessed
value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008, is
exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St. Joseph
counties ONLY. The effective constitutional homeowner property tax caps in Lake
and St. Joseph counties are 1.88% and 1.52% respectively until the 1% cap takes
effect in 2020.
Voted NO on
House
Bill 1001, which phases in the SJR 1 constitutional property tax caps by
2010. Also, 2008 property taxes are reduced 26% from the prior year. An increase
in the sales tax from 6% to 7% and local option income taxes will be used to
replace the property tax revenue reductions that result from the property tax
caps.
2007 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that is Taxpayer
Friendly because the General Fund & Property Tax Replacement Fund $26.0722
billion expenditures total for the 2008 and 2009 fiscal years is less than the
$26.1946 billion revenues total. HB 1001 also includes additional homestead
credits from the Property Tax Reduction Trust Fund of $300 million in 2007 and
$250 million in 2008.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1478, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly for the following reasons: (1)
Homeowner property taxes will increase 1.2% each year from 2009 through 2013
with annual decreases in the Homestead Standard Deduction. (2) The 2% Circuit
Breaker Cap on residential property taxes passed by the General Assembly in 2006
has been watered down to the point where it is almost eliminated. (3) The new
local option income tax for property tax relief will be offset by future
property tax increases unless the new local option income tax to replace
property tax increases is implemented. (4) Using the new local option income tax
to replace property tax increases means that income tax increases on Hoosier
working families would lower the proportionate tax burden of businesses and
utilities by freezing business and utility property taxes without a
corresponding increase in other business and utility taxes. (5) A new local
option income tax has been authorized for public safety.
Voted NO on House
Bill 1835,which is Taxpayer Friendly because it uses slot machine licensing
fees and wagering taxes to establish the Property Tax Reduction Trust Fund,
which is to be used for property tax relief in any manner prescribed by the
General Assembly.
Voted NO on Senate
Bill 401, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly because state legislators voted
themselves a perpetual pay increase that is 20% more than the typical Hoosier
working family earns during an entire year. SB 401 also eliminated taxpayer-paid
lifetime health insurance and the $4 taxpayer match for each $1 of legislator
pension contribution, but General Assembly members should not have received an
excessive salary increase in return for eliminating extravagant perks they
should not have in the first place.
2006 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on
"Major
Moves" House
Bill 1008, which authorizes the Indiana Department of Transportation to
enter into public-private agreements with private entities (operators)
concerning tollway projects for I-69 between Martinsville and Evansville. HB
1008 also authorizes the Indiana Finance Authority to enter into public-private
agreements with operators for the Indiana Toll Road.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, a residential property tax reduction bill that increases the
homestead credit for one year in 2006 to 28% and the homestead standard
deduction for one year in 2007 to $45,000. Beginning in 2007 for Lake County and
2008 for all other counties, HB 1001 also establishes a cap on residential
property taxes equal to 2% of the assessed value of the residential property.
2005 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that included seven significant homeowner
property tax increases.
Voted NO on House
Bill 1120, which contained thirteen negative tax impacts including a
regional Food and Beverage Tax to finance a new Colts stadium.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 2, 2004, General
Election
1. Guiding Principles for 2005-07 Biennium
Budget. DID NOT RESPOND. Record:
Voted for the 2004-05 state budget where General Fund and Property Tax
Replacement Fund spending totals exceed current
revenue totals for the eighth straight year.
The 2004-05 state budget also includes Pension Stabilization Fund transfers,
which worsen the $8.5 billion shortfall in
teacher retirement funds.
2. Opinions
on Homeowner Property Taxes. DID NOT RESPOND. Record: Voted
for the 2004-05 state budget where the property
tax relief promised to homeowners in the 2002 special session was reduced
by the so-called Homestead Credit "correction."
3. Position on Indianapolis to Evansville Interstate. DID NOT RESPOND.
4. Additional Comments. DID NOT RESPOND. Record: See
the Candidate Questionnaires for the May
4, 2004, Primary Election, November
5, 2002, General Election, and the May 7,
2002, Primary Election. Also see the Legislative
Voting Record.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
5, 2002, General Election
1-2.
Special session vote AGAINST several tax increases that
will increase revenues $1.7782 billion from July 1, 2002, through June 30, 2005.
3. Special
session vote AGAINST a 20% gas tax increase
(from 15 to 18 cents per gallon) effective 01/01/03.
4. Special
session vote AGAINST a phased-in shift of the inventory
tax to (1) all other types of property through an increased property tax rate
and (2) a tax on the income of individuals (in those counties
choosing to do so) through the establishment or increase of a County Economic
Development Income Tax (CEDIT).
5. DID NOT RESPOND to General Election Questionnaire. See the Candidate
Questionnaire for the May 7, 2002, Primary Election.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire
- May 7,
2002, Primary Election
1. Voted on February 4 AGAINST
the Indiana House of Representatives version of HB 1004, which did not
have enough Property Tax relief in return for a 20% Sales Tax rate increase,
imposed a new Business Franchise Tax
(Business Activity Fee) based on net worth, and increased
revenues $2.683 billion more than taxes would have been reduced
through June 30, 2004.
2. Voted on February 5 FOR
the Indiana House of Representatives version of HB 1317, which would have raised
the Gasoline Tax from 15 cents per gallon to 16 cents during 2003 and
17 cents after 2003.
3. Voted March 13 to uphold the Governor's
veto of HB 1083 so Indiana General Assembly members
will remain covered by the state's Public Access Laws.
4. Did not receive Primary Questionnaire. See the Candidate
Questionnaire for the November 5, 2002, General Election.
Watchdog Indiana Home Page Indiana General Assembly & Governor Ratings Legislative Voting Record
This page was last updated on 04/29/13 .