Randy Frye (Taxpayer Friendly)

Watchdog Indiana Home Page Indiana General Assembly & Governor Ratings Legislative Voting Record

Address: 4704 S. US 421, Greensburg, IN 47240
Phone: (812) 662-9665
E-mail: H67@in.gov
Website: http://www.in.gov/legislative/house_republicans/homepages/r67/; http://www.randyfrye.com/  

2013 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House Bill 1001, which is Taxpayer Friendly because the 2013-15 state budget makes better use of the existing state Gasoline Tax and state Sales Tax revenues from gasoline purchases with NO NEW TRANSPORTATION TAX INCREASES to increase transportation funding for INDOT by 11%, cities and towns by 34%, and counties by 23%.
Voted YES on House Bill 1011, which is Taxpayer Friendly because construction of a costly light rail transportation system cannot be approved by a new central Indiana transit district before March 14, 2014.
Voted NO on House Bill 1117, which was Taxpayer UNfriendly because it created the possibility for a minority of county income tax council members representing a minority of the county population to impose a county-wide motor vehicle excise surtax and wheel tax. 
Voted NO on House Bill 1313, which is Taxpayer Friendly because it (1) supports the establishment of a 2013 interim committee to study local government regulation of  residential leases and (2) prohibits a local government from adopting regulations for landlord licensing, mandatory landlord classes, and rental inspection and registration fees until July 1, 2014.
Voted YES on Senate Bill 319, which is Taxpayer Friendly because it prevents a significant shift of the property tax burden to farm working families by (1) using the current soil productivity factors until 2015 and (2) requiring the Department of Local Government Finance to confer with the College of Agriculture of Purdue University and submit a 2013 interim study committee report on soil productivity factors.

Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 6, 2012, General Election
1. QUESTION: What are your priorities regarding the 2013-2015 state budget? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Should the non-transportation appropriations from the state’s Motor Vehicle Highway Account be transferred to the state’s General Fund so more of our Indiana Gasoline Tax dollars can be properly spent to meet our transportation needs? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
3. QUESTION: Should the Automatic Taxpayer Refund law be (a) improved to make refunds more likely, (b) kept as it is, or (c) eliminated? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
4. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
5. QUESTION: What is your position regarding township government reform? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
6. QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment commissions oversight? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
7. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.

2012 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House Bill 1003, which is Taxpayer Friendly because (1) public access to government meetings and records is improved and (2) it is less likely that public agencies will intentionally violate the Public Access Laws.
Voted NO on House Bill 1005, which contains six Taxpayer Friendly local government Conflict Of Interest provisions and sixteen Taxpayer Friendly local government Nepotism provisions.
Voted YES on House Bill 1376, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly because (1) the automatic taxpayer refund excess reserves trigger is increased from 10% to 12.5% and (2) Hoosier working families will possibly receive an automatic taxpayer refund every even-numbered year instead of every year.

2011 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House Bill 1001, which includes among its 16 Taxpayer Friendly state budget provisions no tax increases and an operating surplus in both the 2012 and 2013 fiscal years with a satisfactory reserve balance on June 30, 2013.
Voted YES on House Bill 1002, which is Taxpayer Friendly because (1) charter schools have the potential to help increase the academic growth of lower socioeconomic students, (2) the number of Indiana nonprofit private colleges and universities authorized to create charter schools is limited, (3) the Indianapolis mayor is the only Indiana mayor who may authorize charter schools, (4) conversion from a public school to a charter school is sufficiently stringent, and (5) property taxes are NOT improperly used to support charter schools.
Voted YES on House Bill 1003, which uses state K-12 tuition support money to fund scholarships for nonpublic school students and is Taxpayer UNfriendly because (1) nonpublic private and parochial schools are not equally open to all children, (2) nonpublic school budgets are not approved by a directly elected public body, (3) evidence-based research does not support greater school choice as a means to achieve overall educational improvement, (4) it is very likely unconstitutional, and (5) state tuition support dollars would go to nonpublic schools that are not uniformly distributed throughout the state.
Voted NO on House Bill 1022, which would have implemented a number of Taxpayer Friendly local government provisions related to nepotism and officeholder conflict-of-interest.
Voted YES on House Bill 1074, which provides that school board members selected by election must be elected at November general elections and is Taxpayer Friendly because the greater voter turnout in general elections will make it more difficult for local vested interests to unduly influence school board elections.
Voted YES on House Bill 1583, which passed as part of House Bill 1004 and is Taxpayer Friendly because the 1% homeowner property tax cap and ten homeowner property tax deductions are allowed in the year of a property transfer if the property is determined to be exempt in the year following the transfer year.

Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 4, 2010, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you support or oppose the Constitutional Amendment on the November 2, 2010, statewide ballot? ANSWER: At this time I don’t support the Constitutional Amendment due to the problem with the formula for assessing farm ground. I firmly believe we need to do all we can to keep taxes low and allow Hoosiers to keep as much of their money as possible. However, I feel the property tax assessment for farm ground hurts Hoosier farmers and is unfair.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced? ANSWER: The state must live within its means. A balanced budget can be obtained by reducing spending, becoming more efficient, and using creative ways to add to the state’s income. I strongly support K-12 education. However, we may have to cut certain programs if funding doesn’t allow. Certain extra curricular actives may need to be cut. Sending school busses across county’s for sports events is an area we can cut without decreasing the teacher student ratio. Increasing technology in education will make education more cost effective. We must continue to fund Medicaid. Controlling cost may possible through better doctor, pharmacy, and patient relationships. I oppose a state wide income tax increase. The state operates much like a business. As a business owner one must have a reserve fund available for difficult times. We can and we must replace our surplus when the economy recovers. Indiana ’s economy will begin to grow only when Indiana business and residents are able to keep more of their hard earned income through business retention, recruitment, and development. As business begins to receive orders and make a modest profit, money is invested in other businesses. Companies expand operations, develop new products, replace old equipment, hire new employees, and train existing ones. Workers begin to believe their job will be secure and with an increase in consumer confidence sales go up. 
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: Yes I do.
4. QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: I believe government should be for the people by the people. I feel the General Assembly as a representative of Indiana residents should be allowed to vote on I-69 as a toll road between I 64 and Martinsville.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: “I want to be your next State Representative because I have the experience and vision to make the tough choices needed at the Statehouse.” As a farmer, business owner, and professional fire fighter I bring a diverse lifetime of experience needed to bring our Hoosier economy back. We must put Hoosiers back to work. We can do so by holding the line on taxes and stopping deficit spending. The Federal Government has failed us with a so called economic bail out. With a multi trillion dollar budget deficit and less revenue coming in, the burden on the tax payer in increasing. Add a tax on business for health care and cap and trade and the economic recovery slows further. Only when the American business and American citizen is allowed to keep more of their hard earned money will the economy begin to grow again. I stand for lower taxes, smaller government, and more freedom.  

Watchdog Indiana Home Page Indiana General Assembly & Governor Ratings Legislative Voting Record

This page was last updated on 04/29/13.