Heath VanNatter (Taxpayer Friendly)
Watchdog Indiana Home Page Indiana General Assembly & Governor Ratings Legislative Voting Record
Address: 11820 Crestview Blvd., Kokomo, IN 46901
Phone: (765) 883-1420
E-mail: H38@in.gov; vannatterv@aol.com;
heath@vannatterforstaterep.com
Website: http://www.in.gov/legislative/house_republicans/homepages/r38/;
http://www.vannatterforstaterep.com/
2013 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, which is Taxpayer Friendly because the 2013-15 state budget makes
better use of the existing state Gasoline Tax and state Sales Tax revenues from
gasoline purchases with NO NEW TRANSPORTATION TAX INCREASES to increase
transportation funding for INDOT by 11%, cities and towns by 34%, and counties
by 23%.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1011, which is Taxpayer Friendly because
construction of a costly light rail transportation system cannot be approved by
a new central Indiana transit district before March 14, 2014.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1117, which was Taxpayer UNfriendly because it created the possibility
for a minority of county income tax council members representing a minority of
the county population to impose a county-wide motor vehicle excise surtax and
wheel tax.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1313, which is Taxpayer Friendly because it (1) supports the
establishment of a 2013 interim committee to study local government regulation
of residential leases and (2) prohibits a local government from adopting
regulations for landlord licensing, mandatory landlord classes, and rental
inspection and registration fees until July 1, 2014.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 319, which is Taxpayer Friendly because it prevents a significant shift
of the property tax burden to farm working families by (1) using the current
soil productivity factors until 2015 and (2) requiring the Department of Local
Government Finance to confer with the College of Agriculture of Purdue
University and submit a 2013 interim study committee report on soil productivity
factors.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 6, 2012,
General Election
1. QUESTION: What are your priorities regarding the 2013-2015 state budget?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Should the non-transportation appropriations from the state’s
Motor Vehicle Highway Account be transferred to the state’s General Fund so
more of our Indiana Gasoline Tax dollars can be properly spent to meet our
transportation needs? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
3. QUESTION: Should the
Automatic Taxpayer Refund law be (a) improved to make refunds more likely, (b) kept as
it is, or (c) eliminated? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
4. QUESTION: Do you
pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead
Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
5. QUESTION: What is your position regarding township government
reform? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
6. QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment
commissions oversight? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
7. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your
candidacy? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 8, 2012,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Should the 2013-2015 state budget be balanced where (a) current
year appropriations do not exceed current year revenues, (b) there are no
delayed payments and one-time fund transfers, and (c) a reserves balance of at
least 5% is maintained? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Should the non-transportation appropriations from the state’s
Motor Vehicle Highway Account be transferred to the state’s General Fund so
more of our Indiana Gasoline Tax can be properly spent to meet our
transportation needs? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
3. QUESTION: Should the automatic taxpayer refund be improved, maintained, or
eliminated? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
4. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and
the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
5. QUESTION: What is your position regarding township government reform? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
6. QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment commissions
oversight? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
7. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2012 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1003, which is Taxpayer Friendly because (1) public access to
government meetings and records is improved and (2) it is less likely that
public agencies will intentionally violate the Public Access Laws.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1005, which contains six Taxpayer Friendly local government Conflict Of
Interest provisions and sixteen Taxpayer Friendly local government Nepotism
provisions.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1376,
which is Taxpayer UNfriendly because (1) the automatic taxpayer refund excess
reserves trigger is increased from 10% to 12.5% and (2) Hoosier working families
will possibly receive an automatic taxpayer refund every even-numbered year
instead of every year.
2011 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, which includes among its 16 Taxpayer Friendly state budget
provisions no tax increases and an operating surplus in both the 2012 and 2013
fiscal years with a satisfactory reserve balance on June 30, 2013.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1002, which is Taxpayer Friendly because (1) charter schools have the
potential to help increase the academic growth of lower socioeconomic students,
(2) the number of Indiana nonprofit private colleges and universities authorized
to create charter schools is limited, (3) the Indianapolis mayor is the only
Indiana mayor who may authorize charter schools, (4) conversion from a public
school to a charter school is sufficiently stringent, and (5) property taxes are
NOT improperly used to support charter schools.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1003, which uses state K-12
tuition support money to fund scholarships for nonpublic school students and is
Taxpayer UNfriendly because (1) nonpublic private and parochial schools are not
equally open to all children, (2) nonpublic school budgets are not approved by a
directly elected public body, (3) evidence-based research does not support
greater school choice as a means to achieve overall educational improvement, (4)
it is very likely unconstitutional, and (5) state tuition support dollars would
go to nonpublic schools that are not uniformly distributed throughout the state.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1022, which would have implemented a number of Taxpayer Friendly local
government provisions related to nepotism and officeholder conflict-of-interest.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1074, which provides that school board members selected by election
must be elected at November general elections and is Taxpayer Friendly because
the greater voter turnout in general elections will make it more difficult for
local vested interests to unduly influence school board elections.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1583, which passed as part of House
Bill 1004 and is Taxpayer Friendly because the 1% homeowner property tax cap
and ten homeowner property tax deductions are allowed in the year of a property
transfer if the property is determined to be exempt in the year following the
transfer year.
Watchdog Indiana Home Page Indiana General Assembly & Governor Ratings Legislative Voting Record
This page was last updated on 04/30/13.