Candidate Ratings: 2008 Contested Primary Elections

Watchdog Indiana Home Page Indiana General Assembly & Governor Ratings  

NOTE: Candidates in the contested Indiana General Assembly primary elections are listed below by District Number. You need your State Representative and State Senator District Numbers to locate candidates for the May 6, 2008, primary election. You can go to Who's Your Legislator? at http://www.in.gov/apps/sos/legislator/search/ to find your Indiana House and Indiana Senate District Numbers.

Information from the following Candidate Questionnaire, together with the Indiana General Assembly & Governor Ratings and other information sources (such as public comments during legislative sessions and campaign platform statements), have been used to rate each of the Governor and General Assembly candidates in the May 6, 2008, contested primary elections as either Taxpayer Friendly, Uncertain, Taxpayer UNfriendly, or POLITICAL HOG.

Taxpayer Friendly candidates are results-oriented, compassionate, and fiscally conservative to the point where the state and local tax burden of Hoosier working families is not increased.

Some candidates have an Uncertain rating because of a limited or mixed public record.

Taxpayer UNfriendly candidates believe the greatest good is served when the fist of government is shoved ever deeper in the wallet of ordinary working families.

A POLITICAL HOG is a Taxpayer UNfriendly candidate who also voted himself or herself a perpetual pay increase that is 20% more than the typical Hoosier working family earns during an entire year. POLITICAL HOGS care more about feeding at the public trough than they do serving the needs of Hoosier working families.

Candidate Questionnaire for the May 6, 2008, Primary Election:

1. BACKGROUND: Senate Joint Resolution 1, which contains a meaningful homeowner property tax cap amendment to the Indiana Constitution, passed the Indiana Senate 40-7 and the Indiana House 79-20 on March 14, 2008. For property taxes first due and payable in 2012, 90 of Indiana's 92 counties must have a homeowner property tax cap that is 1% of the gross assessed value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008, is exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St. Joseph counties ONLY. The result of these two existing debt service exemptions equates to a 1.88% cap in Lake County and a 1.52% cap in St. Joseph County. The caps for Lake and St. Joseph counties must become 1% in 2020. SJR 1 must again pass in the General Assembly in 2009 to put the 1% constitutional homeowner property tax cap amendment on the 2010 ballot. We the people can then vote to make the 1% homeowner property tax cap a permanent part of the Indiana Constitution. Never has it been so easy to separate those who are part of the property tax relief solution from those who are part of the property tax spending problem. A General Assembly candidate who pledges to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009 is part of the solution, otherwise the legislator is part of the problem. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009?
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? 

Jim Schellinger (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
P.O. Box 1226
Indianapolis, IN 46206
Phone: (317) 440-9919
E-mail: jim.schellinger@comcast.net
Website: www.jimschellinger.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to sign Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race ): Gov. Daniels put the cart before the horse when it came to government reform. As a businessman, I do not have the luxury of only looking at one side of the ledger. While I do think that caps can be an important part of property tax reform, we must fully understand what their implementation will do to the state’s revenue picture before we enshrine those caps in the state constitution.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Jill Long Thompson (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
P.O. Box 108
Argos, IN 46501
Phone: (574) 892-6433
E-mail: jrettof@hoosiersforjill.com
Website: www.hoosiersforjill.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to sign Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race ): Currently the Constitution requires equal levels of property taxation, and I think sensible changes to our tax code should be done statutorily, not constitutionally. In Congress, I never voted for a tax increase or for a new tax, and I believe taxes in Indiana should be fair, equitable and transparent. As governor, instead of simply playing a shell game with our tax structure by shifting the burden of taxes from one revenue source to another, I’ll work to update our entire tax structure. We need to do a better job of helping our businesses and families compete in today’s global economy, and fixing our tax system is central to jump-starting Indiana’s struggling economy.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Raymond L. Fletcher, III (Taxpayer Friendly)
7611 Birch Ave
Hammond, IN 46324
Phone: (219) 677-1637
E-mail: r3.fletcher2008@gmail.com
Website: http://www.myspace.com:80/fletcher2008_4_state_rep 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: I SUPPORT SJR 1.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: For too long now, the needs of special interest have been represented rather than the needs of the average tax payer. Some are too busy tearing others down rather than working together to help build our community up! For TRUE property tax reform to be enacted we must some things first: 1) We MUST repeal House Enrolled Act 1858. 2) Property is zoned as residential, commercial and industrial. We must change the assessment process by removing the physical structures and amenities and measure the size of the lot. Assess the value of said lot and use that to formulate the tax owed. It is unfair that big business received the benefits of 1858 and the caps.

Linda C. Lawson (POLITICAL HOG)

Drake Morris (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
4136 Deal Street
East Chicago, IN 46312
Phone: (219) 397- 9361
E-mail:
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 2, 2006, Primary Election
1. What will be your guiding principles for the 2007-2009 biennium budget? Specifically, what mix of spending cuts, tax increases, and/or reserve depletions will you support? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. What are your opinions regarding homeowner property taxes? Specifically, do favor freezing all property taxes and funding budget increases through both individual and business income tax increases? Or, do you favor a mixture of income tax, sales tax and meals tax increases to reduce property tax growth while providing additional revenue to local governments? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. Considering the "Major Moves" legislation passed by the General Assembly this year, do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. What is your position regarding the construction of an interstate from Indianapolis to Evansville? Specifically, should the $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund that is part of "Major Moves" be used exclusively for a new terrain I-69 extension so as to avoid state gas tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 4, 2004, Primary Election
1. What will be your guiding principles for the 2005-2007 biennium budget? Specifically, what mix of spending cuts, tax increases, and/or reserve depletions will you support? (Background: see the Indiana State Finances web page at http://www.finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm for information on how total state expenditures exceed current revenues every year from 1999 through 2005). DID NOT RESPOND.
2. What do you think of (a) a property tax replacement study commission to study the elimination of property taxes and alternative sources of revenue and (b) a senior and disabled individuals property tax deferral program? (Background: Senate Bill 264 information about the property tax replacement study commission can be found online at http://www.in.gov/apps/lsa/session/billwatch/billinfo?year=2004&session=1&request=getBill&docno=264
and information about the property tax deferral program can be found online at http://www.finplaneducation.net/property_tax_deferral_program.htm.) DID NOT RESPOND.
3. Do you support exempting gasoline sales from the sales tax and increasing the gasoline tax by another 5 cents? (Background: combined with the 3-cent gasoline tax hike in 2003, this would result in a revenue-neutral shift of all gasoline tax proceeds from Indiana's General Fund directly to road improvements). DID NOT RESPOND.
4. What is your position regarding tax increases to build an interstate from Indianapolis to Evansville? DID NOT RESPOND.
5. Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

State Representative District 3:

Bryan K. Bullock (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
7863 Broadway, Suite 222
Merrillville, IN 46410
Phone: (219) 472-1546
E-mail: attybullock@yahoo.com
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race ): Constitutional amendments should not be taken lightly. Although I am in favor of reduced property taxes for citizens of our state, I am not sure that I can endorse a 3 percent cap on industry since this cap may deprive particular communities of much needed tax revenue.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

George A. Rogge (WITHDRAWN)
607 S. Lake Street
Gary, IN 46403
Phone: (219) 938-8080
E-mail: george@roggeinsurance.com
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Shawn Olson (Taxpayer Friendly)
5307 4^th Ave
Valparaiso, IN 46383
Phone: (219) 464-7090
E-mail: info@olson4rep.com 
Website: www.olson4rep.com 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: YES! I would support this bill along with the House Bill 1001 that just passed. Do they go far enough to protect the tax payers? Maybe not. Eventually I would love to see “ Homestead ” Property taxes eliminated!
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: Count on a NO vote for anything that will increase Indiana Property, Sales, and Income taxes. All of us are already burdened with increased inflation and a depressed economy. Let’s not put anymore burdens on the backs of our fellow Hoosiers. Additional information about my positions on important topics can be found on my Issues web page at http://www.olson4rep.com/issues.htm.

Ed Soliday (Uncertain) 

Anthony V. "Tony" Underly (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
30133 Chicago Tr.
New Carlisle, IN 46552
Phone: (574) 654-8785
E-mail:
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Charles "Chuck" Moseley (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
6448 Central Avenue
Portage, IN 46368
Phone: (219) 763-3756
E-mail:
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Bob Poparad (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
352 Melton Rd.
Chesterton, IN 46204
Phone: (219) 787-8074
E-mail:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Greg Simms (Uncertain)

Lon P. Childress (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
9549 W. 159^th Ave.
Lowell, IN 46356
Phone: (219) 552-4879
E-mail:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race): No, because it will raise our taxes. People should do the math with the new system, and they should put out a similar form of it than the 900-page report.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - 2004 General Election
1. Guiding Principles for 2005-07 Biennium Budget. DID NOT RESPOND.
2. Opinions on Homeowner Property Taxes. DID NOT RESPOND.
3. Position on Indianapolis to Evansville Interstate. DID NOT RESPOND.
4. Additional Comments. DID NOT RESPOND.

Don Lehe (Uncertain)

John Anthony Malan (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
10580 S 50 W
Brook, IN 47922
Phone:
E-mail: gweedothewireman@yahoo.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 2, 2006, Primary Election
1. What will be your guiding principles for the 2007-2009 biennium budget? Specifically, what mix of spending cuts, tax increases, and/or reserve depletions will you support? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. What are your opinions regarding homeowner property taxes? Specifically, do favor freezing all property taxes and funding budget increases through both individual and business income tax increases? Or, do you favor a mixture of income tax, sales tax and meals tax increases to reduce property tax growth while providing additional revenue to local governments? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. Considering the "Major Moves" legislation passed by the General Assembly this year, do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. What is your position regarding the construction of an interstate from Indianapolis to Evansville? Specifically, should the $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund that is part of "Major Moves" be used exclusively for a new terrain I-69 extension so as to avoid state gas tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? RESPONSE: I am John Anthony, Malan and will be forty three years of age next week. I served my country honorably in the United States Marine Corps—recon marine. I currently am an electrician and receive work from a union hiring hall—International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers. This is my third time seeking a chair on the Indiana General Assembly. Since I am out of town and will not be available until after the election I am issuing this press release so as to clearly give notice to all, as to what my research has identified as being problems for the people. First let me say that I am not a politician or an attorney. The word politics can be split into two words—poly meaning many and tics meaning blood sucking creatures. If elected to service I will be a statesman not a politician. A statesman is for the people and the country — a politician serves his own belly. The issues are as follows:
1. Land Grab—non-governmental organizations (ngo’s) continue to purchase land for pennies on the "dollar" in order to turn certain parcels into wildlife preserves pursuant to Agenda 21 of the United Nations. Thousands of acres of land are now removed from the property tax rolls.
2. CAFR— the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report shows billions in surplus. The STATE fraudulently has a second set of books called the annual budget. These books always show deficits and are their basis for increasing all taxes.
3.The Judiciary continues to legislate from the bench—the Indiana Judicial Conference has no common people on the rule making committees.
4. Privatization of the peoples departments of government must cease—e.g. Indiana Department of Commerce.
5. Property and "income" taxes are too high.
These are a few areas that I will work on, if the people on the 15^th District consent. This country is dying. We must, one state at a time remove the tyrants who govern and restore the Constitutional Republic. May God bless this country again.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 4, 2004, Primary Election
1-4. The Candidate Questionnaire issues are over my head! 
5. Biography: I originally hail from Brooklyn, New York. From 1980 till 1984 I served as a Recon Marine in the 2^nd Marine Division. After being Honorably discharged I worked as a truck driver delivering newspapers for the New York Daily News. In February 1988 I initiated into the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local #3 as an elevator repair apprentice. I am now a Journeyman Wireman/Certified Welder. I have 2 children located in Lake County and it is for them I am seeking to sit on the 19^th District’s State Representatives seat. Tough Steps to Restore Constitutional Government: There are some major problems in this Country, with most people not realizing the power that the individual states have in effecting change. I am not a professional politician so there is no ambition to climb the political ladder. The word politics can be broken down into two words—poly, meaning many—and tics, meaning blood sucking creatures. Being an outsider I am not afraid to propose the tough steps needed to restore our Constitutional form of government. STEP ONE: Re-define free trade, impose tariffs and quotas on all goods imported, and establish a 50/50 trade policy with all nations where 50% exported goods means 50% imported goods. The legislature of the states must demand that unilateral power of the President to engage in free trade agreements is not in the best interests of its citizens since it encourages corporations to flee to low wage countries. STEP TWO: Expose the State of Indiana’s two book system. If the average citizen kept two sets of books relating to taxes he would be prosecuted and jailed. Why does the state of Indiana keep two sets of books? The Annual State Budget always show shortfalls and deficits. This is the basis politicians use to raise taxes; on the other hand the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) shows billions in surpluses. How can any tax increase in any sector be justified? An investigation of these CAFR funds will show that the Property Tax Re-Assessment Plan in Indiana was not necessary. Visit: http://cafrman.com for more information on the CAFR (visit: http://www.in.gov/auditor/publications/ to obtain your free copy). STEP THREE: Stop the land grab. Non governmental organizations are buying lands under the guise of creating wildlife preserves and refuges. Thousands of acres of land are being removed from the tax rolls thereby shrinking our tax base in Indiana. STEP FOUR: Stop illegal immigration. I find it amazing how the government can trace a mad cow from Canada thru the United States but not find illegal immigrants who bleed resources from people who are here legally. Fiscal Year 2003 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) Information: If the State returned the $11.73 billion in surpluses to the people the State economy would grow by $3,808 per capita. Businesses net incomes could double or triple. One source of CAFR surpluses is Toll Roads, an Enterprise Fund and not part of the budget, that made a profit of $16 million and had reserves (cash and investments) of $195 million. The State Revolving Fund, also an Enterprise Fund and not part of the budget, made a profit of $17 million and had cash and investment reserves of $871 million. The Administrative Services Revolving Fund had net expenditures of $555 thousand and cash reserves of $25 million (or 46 years of reserves). Other Non-Major Special Revenue Funds, not individually itemized and part of the budget, made a profit of $105 million and had reserves of $1.1 billion. These only represent four of the 53 funds shown below that had cash and investment reserves not being used. Unless the budget flaws are corrected and the entire State finances are used in the budget process, the problems that created the surpluses will continue to exist. The budget deficits reported by the Governor and legislatures will be used year after year for the excuses for tax increases and/or to reduce needed services.

Richard H. (Rich) Niemeyer (Taxpayer Friendly)
13339 Calumet Ave
Cedar Lake, IN 46303
Phone: (219) 776-7042
E-mail: niemeyerforrepresentative@gmail.com 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: I pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1. This provides for meaningful property tax relief. I would also be in favor of legislation that would put a cap on assessed valuation due to annual trending.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: I am also an advocate of maintaining our grassroots local government. I do not believe the elimination of township government will save the tax payers any money or expense. I actually believe it would be more costly.

Myron M. Sutton (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
103 West Goss Street
Kentland, IN 47951
Phone: (219) 474-3287
E-mail: kathierigby@hotmail.com
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 7, 2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax increased from 5% to 6% with a promise that the proceeds would be used to decrease homeowner homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm, Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3% decrease into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average Hoosier homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility to levy income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax relief. QUESTION: Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose additional income, sales, and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget the last two fiscal years has been balanced without fund transfers for the first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm). QUESTION: Should the state's total budget expenditures be no more than total revenues for the next biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced with the inclusion of a one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This decreases property taxes for the average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be continued beyond 2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. BACKGROUND: Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should the state pay for full-day kindergarten?  If YES, where should the state get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND: The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road ("Major Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to pay off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges. QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects include $694 million for a new terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to Evansville as well as a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION: Should the "Major Moves" expenditures be combined with the Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain I-69 extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The 2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a toll road for an I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION: Do you favor legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69 extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 2, 2006, Primary Election
1. What will be your guiding principles for the 2007-2009 biennium budget? Specifically, what mix of spending cuts, tax increases, and/or reserve depletions will you support? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. What are your opinions regarding homeowner property taxes? Specifically, do favor freezing all property taxes and funding budget increases through both individual and business income tax increases? Or, do you favor a mixture of income tax, sales tax and meals tax increases to reduce property tax growth while providing additional revenue to local governments? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. Considering the "Major Moves" legislation passed by the General Assembly this year, do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. What is your position regarding the construction of an interstate from Indianapolis to Evansville? Specifically, should the $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund that is part of "Major Moves" be used exclusively for a new terrain I-69 extension so as to avoid state gas tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.

Ernest Rowe (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
300 Eastwood Dr.
Plymouth, IN 46563
Phone: (574) 936-7862
E-mail:
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race): Indiana property taxes should be repealed through sales tax and state or local income tax. I think homeowners' real estate tax should be totally abolished. Why should they be the only ones to pay for schools???? Tax caps on rental and business are OK.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Bill Johnson (Taxpayer Friendly)
106 West Clark St.
Crown Point, IN 46307
Phone: (219) 488-7631
E-mail: Bill.Johnson@johnson19.com 
Website: www.johnson19.com 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: Yes, but I would like to point out this is only a token start. With this law, our fearless leaders have not put all of Indiana on a diet. Rather they have trimmed the tax everyone is looking at - property taxes. Like a magician, they will pull new tax burdens out of the hat. If government is not reduced, it will need the same portion of Purina Government Tax Chow it needed before the new property tax laws. Where will the Tax Chow come from? My question to those in office is, “Is Government smaller, more efficient and less expensive than when you went into office?"
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: Tired of disorganized, burdensome and confusing taxation, I intend to protect the wallets of everyone in Indiana by doing the following: (1) vote NO, for any increase in our Indiana property, sales or income taxes; (2) promote fair and simple taxation for Indiana citizens and businesses; (3) prioritize spending for the care of our aging Hoosiers; (4) derail the South Shore expansion with its increased and on-going tax burden; (5) avoid all forms of debt – we must live within our means, and so should Indiana ; (6) work to end overlapping governmental bureaucracy, beginning with selectively eliminating township trustees in the urban setting. The Unhappy Taxpayers for Bill Johnson and I believe three things. The first is that tax dollars should not benefit one group of citizens or businesses over another; rather they should benefit everyone equally when properly spent. The second is that it’s time to put Indiana on a fiscal diet by freezing or reducing our tax burdens. It’s plain and simple – if Indianapolis feels they need to add a single dollar to the State budget, they should find a dollar of spending to cut. The third is that our elected officials are not doing the job we sent them to do, which is to give us smaller government and lower taxes.

Dennis Meeks (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
P.O. Box 137
Crown Point, IN 46308
Phone: (219) 662-0961
E-mail:
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race): In order to make a intelligent and informed decision I would need to look at state debt-to- income ratios. Potential cuts to overstaffed and redundant offices, but I believe property taxes can be eliminated by using the above-mentioned methods and cut many of the needless redundant jobs in government.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Shelli VanDenburgh (Uncertain)

Andrew Webster (Taxpayer Friendly)
402 E. Sigler Street
Hebron, IN 46341
Phone: (219) 226-1735
E-mail:
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race): Yes.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

William A. (Bill) Dixon (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
1300 N. Long Dr.
Syracuse, IN 46567
Phone: (574) 525-6035
E-mail: bill@wawaseetv.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: I'm against it. Three classes of taxation is simply unfair, those being taxed at the highest rate (the State Chamber) oppose it, and I do to. It seems to me that every piece of property should be taxed the same, at whatever rate that might be, to pay for the
property tax portion of the budget. It seems unfair to tax business property at three times the rate that we tax residential property. I am sick and tired of the state having one set of rules for urban Indiana and another set for rural Indiana. At first, I didn't like the exceptions for St. Joseph and Lake Counties, but upon further reflection, this is their way of taking responsibility for debts that they have incurred, and that sounds like the right thing, too. It's about time there was one set of rules. I am more friendly to equal rights than I am anything else. I still think we'd been better off if we'd started by attacking spending, and let the revenues come down by taking less, but that's just
not a politically viable alternative given the makeup of the legislature.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? ANSWER: Property taxes no longer accurately reflect what they once did: a tax
on wealth. In 1851, you had to own or rent real property to produce revenue. Today, $5000 will buy you 2 acres of farmland, inventory to sell on E-bay, or 100 shares of McDonald's stock. All three produce revenue. Only one is taxed by the state. This is ridiculous. We either need to tax all of them or none of them. I have looked into taxing all of them, and frankly find the required bureaucracy unworkable and too inefficient to tolerate. Therefore, property taxes have to go, for all Hoosiers. The state should also undergo a total top-to-bottom budget overhaul, eliminating all programs and expenses that no longer serve a deserving purpose, either because the issues they addressed have gone away or because the number of people effected is insignificant compared to the cost. The last time I am aware that this was done was during the Bowen Administration. Whether this is politically possible is another question. There is a general desire for the state legislature to become the county commissioners, school board, and town council for every community in the state, micro-managing to a point that would be comical, if it weren't so painful. This must be stopped. If community "A" wants this, and community "B" doesn't, but wants that instead, what does that hurt, as long as they're raising their own money to do it? People have to trust in their power of the ballot box, and not call on the state legislature to destroy local control. Anyone who wants to e-mail me on this should feel free to do so, and I'm willing to "be educated" on these topics, too.

Allen "Big Al" Dunnagan (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
519 Elm Street
Wabash, IN 46992
Phone: (260) 569-1024
E-mail:
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 2, 2006, Primary Election
1. What will be your guiding principles for the 2007-2009 biennium budget? Specifically, what mix of spending cuts, tax increases, and/or reserve depletions will you support? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. What are your opinions regarding homeowner property taxes? Specifically, do favor freezing all property taxes and funding budget increases through both individual and business income tax increases? Or, do you favor a mixture of income tax, sales tax and meals tax increases to reduce property tax growth while providing additional revenue to local governments? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. Considering the "Major Moves" legislation passed by the General Assembly this year, do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. What is your position regarding the construction of an interstate from Indianapolis to Evansville? Specifically, should the $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund that is part of "Major Moves" be used exclusively for a new terrain I-69 extension so as to avoid state gas tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.

Larry E. Rensberger (Taxpayer UNfrinedly)
10371 Long Meadow Lane
Granger, IN 46530
Phone: (574) 674-2723
E-mail: tbansba@aol.com
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race): No. Daniels has been incorrect in almost everything he has done. We must not allow this to be put into the constitution as it is now written. Indiana must address Illegal Immigrants. Why do you not have a question about this? Why do you not have a place for our comments? Also, Daniels has been blaming local government for the high cost of Indiana taxes. The fact is that the local government, county and township, is not where the waste is. The HUGE waste is at the State level, and much of it comes under the heading of construction. Only a new group of Representatives and a new Governor can SAVE INDIANA.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 7, 2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax increased from 5% to 6% with a promise that the proceeds would be used to decrease homeowner homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm, Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3% decrease into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average Hoosier homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility to levy income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax relief. QUESTION: Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose additional income, sales, and other taxes? ANSWER: NO.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget the last two fiscal years has been balanced without fund transfers for the first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm). QUESTION: Should the state's total budget expenditures be no more than total revenues for the next biennium? ANSWER: YES.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced with the inclusion of a one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This decreases property taxes for the average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be continued beyond 2007? ANSWER: YES. Or more help would be OK.
4. BACKGROUND: Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should the state pay for full-day kindergarten?  If YES, where should the state get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten? ANSWER: Mandatory is not a good idea. Optional is the only way for this to be done. Parents and teachers should have a choice here. Five-year-old children are not all at the same level and to make it mandatory shows the lack of ability politicians have in running our educational system.
5. BACKGROUND: The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road ("Major Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to pay off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges. QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next ten years? ANSWER: We do not know how this will turn. I'm against any additional taxes.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects include $694 million for a new terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to Evansville as well as a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION: Should the "Major Moves" expenditures be combined with the Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain I-69 extension without state tax increases? ANSWER: This is a joke. The road will not be built for this amount. It will require much more. If possible this road should not be built, but improve US 41 connecting to I-70 or improve Ind 37 connecting to I-64.
7. BACKGROUND: The 2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a toll road for an I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION: Do you favor legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69 extension? ANSWER: NO.
8. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? DID NOT RESPOND.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 2, 2006, Primary Election
1. What will be your guiding principles for the 2007-2009 biennium budget? Specifically, what mix of spending cuts, tax increases, and/or reserve depletions will you support? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. What are your opinions regarding homeowner property taxes? Specifically, do favor freezing all property taxes and funding budget increases through both individual and business income tax increases? Or, do you favor a mixture of income tax, sales tax and meals tax increases to reduce property tax growth while providing additional revenue to local governments? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. Considering the "Major Moves" legislation passed by the General Assembly this year, do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. What is your position regarding the construction of an interstate from Indianapolis to Evansville? Specifically, should the $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund that is part of "Major Moves" be used exclusively for a new terrain I-69 extension so as to avoid state gas tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.

Michael B. Ridenour (Taxpayer Friendly)
2867 N 200 W
Wabash, IN 46992
Phone: (260) 563-1393
E-mail: mridenour@fwi.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: Yes, I do plan on voting to amend the caps into the constitution.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: No, thank you.

William J. (Bill) Ruppel (Uncertain)

Richard (Rick) Eller (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
503 S. Raleigh Road
Galveston, IN 46932
Phone: (574) 699-7853
E-mail: Richard.Eller@insightbb.com
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race): Firstly, all tax rates should be the same. Any tax constitutionally has to be deemed fair and equitable. This plan is not. We have tried caps and relief measures since the 1970s. They will never work. The plan does not include public debts. The only solution is property tax elimination.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 2, 2006, Primary Election
1. What will be your guiding principles for the 2007-2009 biennium budget? Specifically, what mix of spending cuts, tax increases, and/or reserve depletions will you support? RESPONSE: I would support a standard growth rate for two years on all state agencies. For example, if revenues are projected to be up 3% each year, then a cap of 2% annual growth on all departments. This would exit politics out of this next biennial budget.
2. What are your opinions regarding homeowner property taxes? Specifically, do favor freezing all property taxes and funding budget increases through both individual and business income tax increases? Or, do you favor a mixture of income tax, sales tax and meals tax increases to reduce property tax growth while providing additional revenue to local governments? RESPONSE: None of the above. I have proposed an elimination of property taxes over a ten year period. A shift to sales, income, and possibly even license plates.
3. Considering the "Major Moves" legislation passed by the General Assembly this year, do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next ten years? RESPONSE: No. Major Moves was designed to close the 2.8 billion transportation gap.
4. What is your position regarding the construction of an interstate from Indianapolis to Evansville? Specifically, should the $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund that is part of "Major Moves" be used exclusively for a new terrain I-69 extension so as to avoid state gas tax increases? RESPONSE: Yes, and we need to keep promises associated with Major Moves.
5. Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? RESPONSE: www.electrichardeller.com  

Richard W. McClain (Taxpayer Friendly)

Theodore (Ted) Baker (Taxpayer Friendly)
4904 North Sollars Drive
Muncie, IN 47304
Phone: (765) 744-6956
E-mail: tbaker9037@aol.com
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: If elected to the Indiana House of Representatives this fall, I pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009. I am an advocate for continued property tax relief and will work hard to continue this cause. I believe this issue needs to be brought to a public vote for a permanent change to the Indiana Constitution.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: I have been in private business for the past 28 years and have owned a manufacturing business for 11 years (sold this past November) and currently own two retail businesses.  My experiences in business and job creation have motivated me to try to make a difference in Indiana.  I am very optomistic concerning Indiana's future.  We have so many great resources and opportunities before us.

Gilbert T. Lumsey (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
1019 E Willard
Muncie, IN 47302
Phone:
E-mail:
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Kelly S. Gaskill (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
16 E. 29^th Street
Anderson, IN 46016
Phone: (765) 374-3945
E-mail:
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Greg Valentine (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
52975 – 800 W
Lapel, IN 46051
Phone: (765) 534-4532
E-mail: greg.valentined37@yahoo.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: I will pledge to vote for most of the provisions in this resolution once modified. I cannot honestly vote for the bill the way it currently reads. As a farmer living on the 1853 Homestead my family and I have farmed since then, I believe the 2% agriculture land rate is just doubled. I believe it should be 1% just like our homes and improvements. I also cannot support this bill if our schools are destined to suffer. I just met with our local school administrators, and they are very worried at this point. If I thought for one minute an ample portion of the additional 1% sales tax would be distributed to our schools, I could support the bill. I believe it will be like the gambling profit portion that was supposed to help support our schools a few years ago and never be seen as it was originally presented. Most of the folks I know and support feel this entire 2008 session was pushed beyond the limits by our governor. Did we really gain anything at this point? Some tax relief in counties where the taxes were high. I agree with most taxpayers in Madison County, that in my county we have no tax problem. I personally attended several days of testimony by the Ways and Means Committee. I was actually sick to my stomach after the way most of the concerned citizens and elected officials who testified were treated. I saw no committee members listening to legitimate concerns of my county commissioners, auditors or sheriff's who testified. I have not found one single school administrator or one business person who feels our governor knows the magnitude of what he has crammed down the taxpayer's throats. No, I will not vote for this bill as it currently reads. I'm all for lesser taxes, but not at farmers, schools, townships, municipalities and county administrators expense.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: I have been married to Patty for 37 years. We have 4 sons. I just retired after over 43 years of service from General Motors. I retired as a Sr. Project Facilities Engineer. I am a veteran of the U.S. Air Force Reserves. I am a NRA life member. I have served on numerous county, regional and state committees. I have been a 4-H Leader since 1986. I also farm and have lived all my life on an 1853 Homestead in Madison County. I will continue to support agland preservation throughout Madison County as well as throughout Indiana. If elected in November, I will author agland preservation incentives. I also would author legislation to stop involuntary annexations in this state. I have been involved in GOP politics, township and local government for many years. I believe in giving back to the community a part of what it has given me over the last 6 decades. My wife is serving her 18th year on our local school corporation board. I am motivated to enhance education in our state. I support the Indiana DOE's P-16 proposal. I would like to introduce legislation designed to reward our high school graduates who take their education to the next level with apprenticeships, internships and other personal educational enhancement programs. I would like to financially reward our students to remain in this state and work. I am a 36 year GOP precinct committeeman and current township chairperson. I am in my third term as Green Township Trustee/Assessor. I believe the best ally a taxpayer ever had just got knocked out of their position by legislators who have no clue of our job description. I attained the Level 1 and Level 2 certification before the state mandated it in 2006. I am currently getting ready to attend classes and begin working on my Level 3. Many of us take our assessing jobs to heart and very seriously. I am one of 3 township assessors in my county of 14 assessors who have these levels. Whether elected in November or not, I will continue to support county and township government remaining as-is. After reading the Kernan-Shepherd Blue Ribbon Report, I believe it was obviously compiled by folks who never lived financially from one week to the next. They obviously never had to ask for Township Assistance. If by chance the township trustee is eliminated in the 2009 sessions or in later years, the financially challenged taxpayers of this state will truly suffer. Lives will definitely be lost during the winter months. I see folks every week who just live from day to day, not knowing what tomorrow will bring to them and their families. I feel so strongly, I recently co-sponsored opening a community food pantry. I organize annual job fairs in my community. I have the determination, combined with the experience to educate the public in the everyday need to maintain township government. Public safety in the areas of Fire, EMS and Fire Rescue are areas where most of our legislators have no expertise. I will never support the K-S Blue Ribbon Report when they propose merging fire territories, or proposing one county governing body or one county commissioner. Public safety is not something I take lightly. I believe it is insane to consider the thought of eliminating the one caring and knowledgeable person a needy person has in their township. I'd invite any taxpayer to visualize a walk in the shoes of the township trustee as they assist the single mothers who are trying hard to survive. It is real folks. Very real. I suggest a common sense approach by letting the 2008 tax breaks sink in for a few years before we jump in and change things we have no certainty of how it could impact the taxpayers of our great state.

Dave Berryman (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
6849 Windsong Court
Brownsburg, IN 46112
Phone: (317) 852-3932
E-mail: daveberryman@aol.com
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race): Thirty-five years after Gov. Otis Bowen, M.D., signed property tax relief legislation, Gov. Mitch Daniels signed new property tax relief legislation. Both property tax relief attempts began with good intentions; however, both failed to permanently solve our tax issues. It is time to seriously work toward eliminating our property tax system.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 2, 2006, Primary Election
1. What will be your guiding principles for the 2007-2009 biennium budget? Specifically, what mix of spending cuts, tax increases, and/or reserve depletions will you support? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. What are your opinions regarding homeowner property taxes? Specifically, do favor freezing all property taxes and funding budget increases through both individual and business income tax increases? Or, do you favor a mixture of income tax, sales tax and meals tax increases to reduce property tax growth while providing additional revenue to local governments? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. Considering the "Major Moves" legislation passed by the General Assembly this year, do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. What is your position regarding the construction of an interstate from Indianapolis to Evansville? Specifically, should the $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund that is part of "Major Moves" be used exclusively for a new terrain I-69 extension so as to avoid state gas tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.

Zachary (Zach) Rice (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
P.O. Box 963
Brownsburg, IN 46112
Phone: (317) 286-3137
E-mail: zach@zachrice.com; jbmax3238@tds.net; jtlmiller@aol.com
Website: www.zachrice.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Greg Steuerwald (Taxpayer Friendly)

Duane W. Conover (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
9648 East Keep Lane
Rockville, IN 47872
Phone: (765) 344-1772
Cell: (219) 677-4227
E-mail:
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Nancy A. Michael (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
330 Highfall Ave.
Greencastle, IN 46135
Phone: (765) 653-6213
E-mail: nancymichael@broadreach.net
Website: www.nancymichael44.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race): No.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Amos Thomas (Uncertain)

Richard Thompson (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
9122 E. 900 S.
Brazil, IN 47834
Phone: (765) 672-8217
E-mail: circlet@ccrtc.com
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race): I feel that this amendment puts too much strain on the farmers and lower- to middle-class citizens. The higher-class taxpayers benefit more than most.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Mark A. Meadows (Taxpayer Friendly)
6202 E. Roselyn Drive
Mooresville, IN 46158
Phone: (317) 834-2527
E-mail: MARKMEADOWS@STONEMOUNTAINADVISORS.COM
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: Yes I do.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: The state needs an immediate cut in spending of 8% across the board. Government should live within its means like everyone else. Also I will propose the new State Employee Bounty Program. This program has financial incentives for the people who see waste everyday, the office workers, managers and bookkeepers, and everyone else down the government food chain, to get a share in the wasted money that they recover … When they bring to the attention of the legislature where we could save for example 100 thousand dollars, then they have earned a 10 % commission bounty by saving us the other 90%. We need them on our side of the equation.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 2, 2006, Primary Election
1. What will be your guiding principles for the 2007-2009 biennium budget? Specifically, what mix of spending cuts, tax increases, and/or reserve depletions will you support? RESPONSE: I believe the only way to curb spending is not from the top down but from the inside out. I propose a new way of finding waste in government by letting the people who see it everyday, the office workers, managers and bookkeepers, and everyone else down the government food chain get a share in the money they find. If some one shows us where to save 1 million dollars of money that was going to be wasted by duplication or an obsolete program, then that person should receive 10% thats 100 thousand dollars they have earned, by saving us the other 900 k . These employees have no incentive NOT to spend our money; lets help them, help us all. And I believe that a government that governs least governs best. It’s only common sense.
2. What are your opinions regarding homeowner property taxes? Specifically, do favor freezing all property taxes and funding budget increases through both individual and business income tax increases? Or, do you favor a mixture of income tax, sales tax and meals tax increases to reduce property tax growth while providing additional revenue to local governments? REPONSE: freezing at current levels.
3. Considering the "Major Moves" legislation passed by the General Assembly this year, do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next ten years? RESPONSE: Absolutely not. The last thing we need is to reduce spendable income from the public.
4. What is your position regarding the construction of an interstate from Indianapolis to Evansville? Specifically, should the $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund that is part of "Major Moves" be used exclusively for a new terrain I-69 extension so as to avoid state gas tax increases? RESPONSE: I’m afraid the decision for building this unneeded road was made long ago. Now its time for the dog and pony show. If its going to be built I would only support the tolling of it over the new part from Bloomington to Evansville . I am in favor of immediately leasing it out so it will become self sustaining.
5. Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.

Wes Culver (Taxpayer Friendly)
2020 Elkhart Road, Suite B
Goshen, IN 46526
Phone: (574) 533-6300
E-mail: wes@wesculver.com; electwesculver@wesculver.com
Website: www.ElectWesCulver.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: I'm for Senate Joint Resolution 1.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? HAS NOT RESPONDED.

Phone: (
E-mail:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

John D. Ulmer (Uncertain)

Terry R. Abbett (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
1541 Avon Place
Huntington, IN 46750
Phone: (260) 356-4163
E-mail: clabbett@hotmail.com
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Daniel J. (Dan) Leonard (POLITICAL HOG)

Gary L. Snyder (Taxpayer Friendly)
1747 Cherry St.
Huntington, IN 46750
Phone: (260) 479-7006
E-mail: snydergaryl@yahoo.com
Website: www.garylsnyder.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER:  While I do/will support for SJR 1, I am for the complete elimination of property taxes.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: Not at this time.

Judith "Judy" Coleman (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
605 S Thompson Lane
Paoli, IN 47454
Phone: (812) 723-0323
E-mail: Lycolem8@aol.com; P.Kruger@insightbb.com
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Jamie-Joe Allen Harris (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
P.O. Box 641
Bedford, IN 47421
Phone: (812) 275-5349
E-mail: bedfordharris@sbcglobal.net
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Donald O. Patton (Taxpayer Friendly)
R2 Box 226B
Solsberry, IN 47459
Phone: (812) 825-4909
Cell: (812) 361-9358
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: Yes.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: Not at this time.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 7, 2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax increased from 5% to 6% with a promise that the proceeds would be used to decrease homeowner homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm, Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3% decrease into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average Hoosier homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility to levy income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax relief. QUESTION: Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose additional income, sales, and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget the last two fiscal years has been balanced without fund transfers for the first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm). QUESTION: Should the state's total budget expenditures be no more than total revenues for the next biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced with the inclusion of a one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This decreases property taxes for the average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be continued beyond 2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. BACKGROUND: Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should the state pay for full-day kindergarten?  If YES, where should the state get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND: The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road ("Major Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to pay off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges. QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects include $694 million for a new terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to Evansville as well as a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION: Should the "Major Moves" expenditures be combined with the Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain I-69 extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The 2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a toll road for an I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION: Do you favor legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69 extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 2, 2006, Primary Election
1. What will be your guiding principles for the 2007-2009 biennium budget? Specifically, what mix of spending cuts, tax increases, and/or reserve depletions will you support? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. What are your opinions regarding homeowner property taxes? Specifically, do favor freezing all property taxes and funding budget increases through both individual and business income tax increases? Or, do you favor a mixture of income tax, sales tax and meals tax increases to reduce property tax growth while providing additional revenue to local governments? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. Considering the "Major Moves" legislation passed by the General Assembly this year, do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. What is your position regarding the construction of an interstate from Indianapolis to Evansville? Specifically, should the $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund that is part of "Major Moves" be used exclusively for a new terrain I-69 extension so as to avoid state gas tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 4, 2004, Primary Election
1-5. DID NOT RESPOND to this Primary Election Questionnaire or to the Candidate Questionnaire for the November 5, 2002, General Election. 

Brook Tarr (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
3900 E. CR 840 N
Orleans, IN 47452
Phone: (812) 653-1205
E-mail:
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Bryan "Foxy" Fox (Taxpayer Friendly)
2149 Oakland Ave.
Evansville, IN 47711
Phone: (812) 305-1270
E-mail: bryan@foxy08.com
Website: http://www.foxy08.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: I would definitely support a constitutional amendment to cap property taxes at 1% of the assessed home value. This would make the caps more permanent. My opponent, the longtime incumbent Dennis Avery, doesn't support the amendment.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: If elected, I will always support measures supporting spending cuts on big bureaucracies. I will never support tax increases. For more information about myself or my candidacy, feel free to visit my website or send me an email.

J. D. Strouth (Taxpayer Friendly)
1021 N Fairlawn Cir E
Evansville, IN 47711
Phone: (812) 476-3380
E-mail: JDStrouth@JDStrouth.com
Website: www.JDStrouth.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: Yes.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: No.

Robert Lee (Taxpayer Friendly)
2713 Rolling Meadows Lane
New Haven, IN 46774
Phone: (260) 749-2758
E-mail: RobertLeeH85@verizon.net
Website: www.RobertLeeH85.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race): Yes, the caps address my two biggest concerns with property taxes. It reduces our dependency on property taxes in the mix to fund local services and gives a measure of predictability to the dollar amount of future property tax bills. The lack of predictability has been at the root of the upheaval over property tax.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Phyllis J. Pond (Taxpayer Friendly)

Denny Worman (Taxpayer Friendly)
9735 Gerig Road
Leo, IN 46765
Phone: (260) 627-5512
E-mail: dennyworman@hotmail.com 
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: I support Senate Joint Resolution 1 and I will do what is necessary to take away property tax for good.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: My main objective is to represent the people as the founding fathers did. I am concerned about the state of public education and respect for authority in the schools and society in general. My intention is to support the people and smaller government by a return to fundamental values.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 2, 2006, Primary Election
1. What will be your guiding principles for the 2007-2009 biennium budget? Specifically, what mix of spending cuts, tax increases, and/or reserve depletions will you support? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. What are your opinions regarding homeowner property taxes? Specifically, do favor freezing all property taxes and funding budget increases through both individual and business income tax increases? Or, do you favor a mixture of income tax, sales tax and meals tax increases to reduce property tax growth while providing additional revenue to local governments? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. Considering the "Major Moves" legislation passed by the General Assembly this year, do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. What is your position regarding the construction of an interstate from Indianapolis to Evansville? Specifically, should the $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund that is part of "Major Moves" be used exclusively for a new terrain I-69 extension so as to avoid state gas tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED

Brian Sweeney (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
6701 N College #404
Indianapolis, IN 46220
Phone: (317) 701-7191
E-mail: bps@brianpsweeney.com
Website: www.brianpsweeney.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race): Given the recent law, this matter appears to be off the legislative plate for a while, as I strongly doubt that the legislature or the governor has the will to revisit this issue. That said, and with respect to my opinions regarding property taxation, I do not favor imposing a greater property tax on renters than is felt by homeowners. Renters often have less economic means than homeowners, and it appears to be unfair to enact a comparative punishment on those who are attempting to climb the economic ladder or are perhaps trying to hold on to their rung. Accordingly, I would advocate establishing equivalence in the property tax rate experienced by homeowners and renters. Regarding taxation on business property, as I support lower taxation, and I want to ensure Indiana has a thriving business community, I would welcome the chance to listen to business property owners to hear their complaints and concerns on this level of taxation.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

John F. Barnes (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
7902 Willow Wind Circle
Indianapolis, IN 46239
Phone: (317) 375-0120
E-mail: john_barnes57@comcast.net
Website: www.Barnes4StateRep.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race): I believe that we must be cautious any time we look to amend Indiana’s Constitution. We have amended the constitution many times, but rarely have we repealed an amendment. I look forward to examining the impact that the property tax caps have, and if elected, evaluating the proposed constitutional amendment that will come before the next General Assembly.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 7, 2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax increased from 5% to 6% with a promise that the proceeds would be used to decrease homeowner homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm, Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3% decrease into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average Hoosier homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility to levy income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax relief. QUESTION: Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose additional income, sales, and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget the last two fiscal years has been balanced without fund transfers for the first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm). QUESTION: Should the state's total budget expenditures be no more than total revenues for the next biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced with the inclusion of a one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This decreases property taxes for the average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be continued beyond 2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. BACKGROUND: Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should the state pay for full-day kindergarten?  If YES, where should the state get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND: The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road ("Major Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to pay off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges. QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects include $694 million for a new terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to Evansville as well as a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION: Should the "Major Moves" expenditures be combined with the Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain I-69 extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The 2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a toll road for an I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION: Do you favor legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69 extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.

Michael A. Batz (Taxpayer Friendly)
320 N. Arlington Ave.
Indianapolis, IN 46219
Phone: (317) 356-6080
E-mail: michael@batzforstaterep.com
Website: www.batzforstaterep.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER (April 23): I do support an amendment to Indiana's constitution capping property taxes at 1, 2 & 3 %.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: I support tax breaks for the elderly and those who have low incomes. Another web-site you may visit is www.indystar.com/2008race to look up my information.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 2, 2006, Primary Election
1. What will be your guiding principles for the 2007-2009 biennium budget? Specifically, what mix of spending cuts, tax increases, and/or reserve depletions will you support? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. What are your opinions regarding homeowner property taxes? Specifically, do favor freezing all property taxes and funding budget increases through both individual and business income tax increases? Or, do you favor a mixture of income tax, sales tax and meals tax increases to reduce property tax growth while providing additional revenue to local governments? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. Considering the "Major Moves" legislation passed by the General Assembly this year, do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. What is your position regarding the construction of an interstate from Indianapolis to Evansville? Specifically, should the $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund that is part of "Major Moves" be used exclusively for a new terrain I-69 extension so as to avoid state gas tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? RESPONSE: On another note, I graduated from Lebanon High School in 1982.  My family is from Boone county, and my mother, aunt and grandmother graduated from Whitestown High School.  My mother's family had 2 farms in Boone county, helped start the 4-H fair grounds, my grandfather was a director for Farm Bureau and the Boone County Co-Op, etc.

Larry Cooper (Taxpayer Friendly) WITHDRAWN
209 S. Butler Ave.
Indianapolis, IN 46219
Phone: (317) 748-0114
E-mail: larrycooper4indy@sbcglobal.net
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? Yes. I do pledge to support SJR 1.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: I am an average working class person who has never held political office.  I decided to run because I believe that the average citizen is not being represented and is tired of being told which hand picked candidtaes to chose from. I think it is time that the average citizen took back our legislature and let the powers that be know that we will not site quitely while they continue with business as usual.

Tyler Gough (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
104 S. Spencer Ave.
Indianapolis, IN 46219
Phone: (317) 536- 2677
E-mail: thgough@mailcity.com
Website: http://gough4staterep.blogspot.com/  
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race): I don't believe that a constitutional amendment is necessary. Politicians need to listen to their constituents to develop a plan that is equitable to all citizens. Business and industrial property are notoriously undertaxed, leaving the burden for municipalities on individual homeowners. Property tax needs to be levied in a fair manner. Tax giveaways or so-called "incentives" given to corporations have resulted in freeing them from funding things such as public education. The legislature argues that tax giveaways are good for the economy of the state, but the revenue lost is taken in other areas, most notably the wallets of homeowners.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Chris J. Swatts (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
1426 N. Leland Ave
Indianapolis, IN 46219
Phone: (317) 357-9147
E-mail: swattsforstaterep@sbcglobal.net; cjswatts@sbcglobal.net
Website: www.chrisswatts.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND. 
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Matthew L. Hamner (Taxpayer Friendly)
5941 Bonnieville Way
Indianapolis, IN 46237
Phone: (317) 791-9542
E-mail: matthewhamner2008@yahoo.com
Website: http://matthamner.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race): Yes. Even better, we should get rid of property taxes completely.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Michael B. Murphy (Taxpayer Friendly)

Timothy Huber (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
6910 Bannock Drive
Indianapolis, IN 46221
Phone: (317) 856-6726
E-mail: thuberfamily@aol.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race): No. All property should be taxed at the same percent. We should stop tax abatements, and taxes should be paid later.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: I think we need tax control, along with less government.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 7, 2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax increased from 5% to 6% with a promise that the proceeds would be used to decrease homeowner homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm, Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3% decrease into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average Hoosier homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility to levy income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax relief. QUESTION: Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose additional income, sales, and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget the last two fiscal years has been balanced without fund transfers for the first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm). QUESTION: Should the state's total budget expenditures be no more than total revenues for the next biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced with the inclusion of a one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This decreases property taxes for the average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be continued beyond 2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. BACKGROUND: Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should the state pay for full-day kindergarten?  If YES, where should the state get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND: The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road ("Major Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to pay off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges. QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects include $694 million for a new terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to Evansville as well as a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION: Should the "Major Moves" expenditures be combined with the Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain I-69 extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The 2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a toll road for an I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION: Do you favor legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69 extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.

Thomas Konstantine Pappas (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
7996 Dogwood Court
Plainfield, IN 46168
Phone: (317) 918-2510
E-mail: tom.k.pappas@gmail.com
Website: http://pappasforindiana.org/  
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race): No. The problem with the property taxes lies at the heart of government itself. A streamlined local government would reduce our dependence on high property tax revenue.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Stephanie DeKemper (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
8717 Gordonshire Dr.
Indianapolis, IN 46278
Phone: (317) 329-8178
E-mail: stephanie@dekemperforyou.com 
Website: http://www.dekemperforyou.com/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: I do not pledge to vote in favor of it or against it at this time. I am a support of the resolution but feel that it needs to be strengthened. In the end, if it can not be strengthened SRJ1 in its current form is better than nothing at all.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? I am prepared to support SJR 1 in a more strengthen form. Currently the legislation for Senior citizens with income of 30-40K and home value of 150K have a maximum cap of 2%. I strongly feel that the language should include adjusted income since many seniors making more than that, although not much more. have health related expenses that lower their overall income. In addition, increasing tax based on the 1% of the assessed market value concerns me, as we are currently seeing an economy that is in recession and home values are decreasing, will there be a decrease in tax?  Where is the additional mandate that State governments have to reduce spending during hard economic times. I believe that we have been overtaxed and that we have experienced significant government waste, particularly with the privatization and out sourcing without holding vendors accountable to preform under their contracts. With gas at an all time high, has their been any discussions to the windfall that tax revenue has brought to the state. Where is the build Indiana money currently going? I say all of this to demonstrate that I am a strong supporter of amending the Indiana constitution, but we must make sure that we have solid amendments because we will not be able to make correction easily. I am worried about the poor, about the middle class and the loss of jobs, the growing numbers of people eligible for food stamps, Medicaid, and TANF, many of whom had jobs a year or two ago. We have an obligation that we have to reduce unnecessary spending, increase contractual oversight of our vendors and hold them accountable, support the creation and recruitment of jobs that pay a living wage, and as legislators be accessible and accountable to our constituent that we  have  asked to trust us to represent their interest. I will not be a legislator who is part of the problem, but part of the solution as a well informed and knowledgeable legislators that makes decision based on a full review of  the issues and how they impact Hoosiers and not party lines.

Robin Olds (WITHDRAWN)
7411 Bramblewood Lane
Indianapolis, IN 46254
Phone: (317) 291-2276
E-mail: balcpa@iquest.net
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 7, 2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax increased from 5% to 6% with a promise that the proceeds would be used to decrease homeowner homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm, Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3% decrease into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average Hoosier homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility to levy income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax relief. QUESTION: Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose additional income, sales, and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget the last two fiscal years has been balanced without fund transfers for the first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm). QUESTION: Should the state's total budget expenditures be no more than total revenues for the next biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced with the inclusion of a one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This decreases property taxes for the average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be continued beyond 2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. BACKGROUND: Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should the state pay for full-day kindergarten?  If YES, where should the state get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND: The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road ("Major Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to pay off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges. QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects include $694 million for a new terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to Evansville as well as a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION: Should the "Major Moves" expenditures be combined with the Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain I-69 extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The 2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a toll road for an I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION: Do you favor legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69 extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.

Abu Henderson (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
2736 N. Wheeler St.
Indianapolis, IN 46218
Phone: (317) 921-8608
E-mail:
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Carolyn Rhymes Jordan (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
201 W 47^th Ave
Gary, IN 46408
Phone: (219) 887-1602
E-mail:
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Rev. Dr. Jesse L. Ortiz (Taxpayer Friendly)
3929 Deal St.
East Chicago, IN 46312
Phone: (219) 397-6678
E-mail: Eastchcortiz@aol.com 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: If Senate Joint Resolution 1 is the best we can do between now and 2009, I will support it. However, I must advise you that I feel it is not enough and still subject to whimsical manipulations of assessors and their influencers.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: I suggest we work for nothing less than the elimination of at least home property tax. The protection of home property is a democratic American ideal, it is economically sound. It is unconscionable, unwarranted and, therefore, unconstitutional for any American to lose their home over taxes.

Lonnie M. Randolph (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
1919 E. Columbus Dr.
East Chicago, IN 46312
Phone: (219) 980-1735
E-mail:
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Michael D. Scott, Sr. (Taxpayer Friendly)
540 W. 52^nd Pl.
Gary, IN 46410
Phone: (219) 980-1735
E-mail:
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race ): Yes. However, we should not stop there. We should continue to develop ways to lower the burden on homeowners even more.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

June L. Simmons-Blackmon (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
3744 Euclid Ave.
East Chicago, IN 46312
Phone: (219) 801-5553
E-mail: j-blackmon@sbcglobal.net
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Diane Smith (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
P.O. Box 3218
East Chicago, IN 46312
Phone: (219) 397-2024
E-mail:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Louis Vasquez III (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
5605 Reading Ave.
East Chicago, IN 46312
Phone: (219) 397-6326
E-mail:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Debra J. Birkholz (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
4932 N 200 East
LaPorte, IN 46350
Phone: (219) 778-9769
E-mail: djbirk@csinet.net; ddecker3@verizon.net
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race ): No.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Maxine Spenner (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
2582 W Joliet Rd
LaPorte, IN 46350
Phone: (219) 324-8571
E-mail:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race ): I'm not sure this is the fairest plan, as I have always believed in equality, and I question the fairness of the assessment.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

James C. Erb (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
P.O. Box 177
13633 CR44
Millersburg, IN 46543
Phone: (574) 642-3847
E-mail: jimerb@embarqmail.com; erbefour@yahoo.com; brendanamber@yahoo.com
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Joe Guerrero (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
65831 Barrens Drive
Goshen, IN 46526
Phone: (574) 534-3212
E-mail: guerrero2K@aol.com; joeg.statesenate@yahoo.com
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Mike Leasor (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
15 St Joseph Manor
Elkhart, IN 46516
Phone: (574) 527-6047
E-mail:
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Don Metzler-Smith (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
59272 Lewis Street
Elkhart, IN 46516
Phone: (574) 575-1582
E-mail: dlmetzle@alumni.iu.edu
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race): Until "trending" plays out, and we know more about exactly how urban areas are affected, a constitutional amendment for the caps is premature. I would like to see a tax formula constructed that includes a futuristic stance in a proactive way rather than reactive. My question to incumbents of both parties has always been: Where were they the last nine to 10 years since the St. Johns decision was handed down? Couldn't they see the inevitable instability and erratic nature of property taxes? I care deeply for the future of Indiana and the state's education structure, workforce, and job status. Messing around with time and highway assets only distracts from the fundamentals needed for Indiana to be a leader in the region in the 21st century.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Joseph P. Williams (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
57043 Downy Ct.
Goshen, IN 46528
Phone: (574) 875-9440
E-mail:
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Carlin J. Yoder (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
59246 State Road 13
Middlebury, IN 46540
Phone: (574) 370-9110
E-mail: cyoder@ccsgoshen.org; stroyer@bnin.net
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Randall Head (Taxpayer Friendly)
5003 Waterbury Court
Logansport, IN 46947
Phone: (574) 722-5542
E-mail: rhead10@hotmail.com
Website: http://www.electrandyhead.org/ 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: I will vote for SJ1 if elected to the Indiana State Senate.  I believe that the government should exist to support taxpayers, and not vice versa. The 1, 2, and 3% caps represent the first step in the right direction for  Indiana taxpayers. My first preference is to eliminate property taxes altogether, and my second choice is for a property tax cap that is equal for all types of property. The compromise that has been reached is far better than doing nothing, and I will vote for it because it reduces our reliance on property taxes.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: I have been a Deputy Prosecuting Attorney for over thirteen years in Indiana, and I understand how local government works. In addition to property taxes, my priorities include obtaining longer sentences for child molesters, eliminating loopholes that let criminals slip through the system, reducing waste in government spending, and representing the interests of agriculture and small business. I believe that smaller government is better, that legislators should be held accountable for the money they vote to spend, and that the most important quality a legislator can have is the willingness to listen to his constituents.

David R. Martin (Taxpayer Friendly)
6106 South, 800 East
Walton, IN 46994
Phone: (574) 626-2571
E-mail: drmartinva@hotmail.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: I support the 1% cap on property taxes for homes. I would vote for the legislation to amend the cap into the Indiana Constitution.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: Not at this time. 

Phillip R. Messer (Taxpayer Friendly)
11837 W. 300 S.
Francesville, IN 47946
Phone: (219) 567-9987
E-mail: PhillipRMesser@gmail.com
Website: www.PhillipRMesser.politicalgateway.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: I do support the 1% cap on property taxes for homes.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: Please visit my website for additional information about my candidacy.

Brian Thomas (Taxpayer Friendly)
8559 E. State Road 18
Galveston, IN 46932
Home: (574) 699-9029
Cell: (765) 210-1804
Work: (765) 457-6787
E-mail: brian@avs-in.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: Yes – for the sole reason I believe the majority of people want to be able to put this to a vote. It should be understood that the caps being put into the Indiana Constitution is nothing more than a “get me re-elected” strategy. Without a set plan and guidelines laid out to insure how money in excess of the capped amount will be replaced or cut - the caps will simply force money that has been relinquished by the caps to be ascertained using another tactic. Taxpayer education, elimination of unnecessary and redundant government layers, and fixing this broken property taxation system are all absolutely necessary elements to be included with these constitutional caps.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? ANSWER: I pledge to bring a common man with family values mentality to the table. I have worked with property taxes for 15 years day in and day out.  I know the system why it is broken and how to fix it. I am the only candidate with the experience and knowledge to be the leader this state needs in the crusade to end the unfair practices of property taxation. I am not going to go out and raise thousands of dollars - taxpayers need that money to pay their taxes. I am out pounding the pavement getting my name and message out. I will spend a little money but I am most interested in votes not money. If people want to stop the property tax nightmare – it starts with getting someone in the general assembly that has knowledge of the system and how it works. Legislators should not be able to treat the property taxation system like a game of craps but they do because no one actually knows how the changes they are proposing will affect the working men and women until it actually hits them in the wallet. I am the taxpayers choice – Republican and Democrats alike. Lets FIX the problem. People can call me directly and ask me any questions or share concerns. I pledge accountability now and after I am elected.

Ken Geesaman (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
5527 Elderberry Road
Noblesville, IN 46062
Phone: (317) 770-3689
E-mail: ken.geesaman@gmail.com
Website: www.kenforsenator.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race): Property taxes should be eliminated.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Luke Kenley (Uncertain)

John M. Gootee (Taxpayer Friendly)
10443 N CR 1000 E
Brownsburg, IN 46112
Phone: (317) 769-3212
E-mail: solutions1@tds.net
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: YES. I will support SJR 1.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: my thoughts are simple: Less government, less spending equals lower taxes. It is truly a shame that we have to make it ILLEGAL for the legislature to take money from us. This again shows you how easy it is to spend someone else’s money.  According to the Office of Management and Budget, wasteful spending is everywhere in our state government. We knowingly spend half a million dollars a year educating Ohio students; 54% (54%!!!) of state programs reviewed did not have measurable results; $2.4m annually is spent funding Public Television and Radio. The list goes on and on…Not only will I support Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009, I will look to support any and all measures that cut wasteful spending of our money by our state agencies.

Connie Lawson (Uncertain)

Terry L. Michael (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
10928 Geist Woods N Dr.
Indianapolis, IN 46256
Phone: (317) 842-9699
E-mail: terryleemichael@comcast.net
Website: www.terrymichael.org
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race): No. We should not be so irresponsible to make the caps constitutional. In an ever-evolving economy, we cannot assume things will always be the same. We must have the freedom to roll with the time.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Ken Morgan (Uncertain)
404 East 50^th Street
Indianapolis, IN 46205
Phone: (317) 260-1828
E-mail: morgan.ken@mac.com
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: I will vote for SJR1 only unless I can't get something better. The only reason I would vote for it, is because I think the people should have a larger voice in their laws than they now have. Having voted to allow the people a voice on the matter, I would actively encourage people to vote against it. The 1/2/3 formula has no logic or justice in it. The Indiana constitution states: “The General Assembly shall provide, by law, for a uniform and equal rate of property assessment and taxation.” Amending the constitution with a 1/2/3 formula would unleash all restraint on unfair taxation in Indiana. It would also be an obstacle to my goal of abolishing property tax all together.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: Not at this time.

Charles "Doc" Henderson (Taxpayer Friendly)
3626 Nuthatcher Dr.
Indianapolis, IN 46228
Phone: (317) 989-1411
E-mail: chas4124@yahoo.com
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race): Yes. This cap may help homeowners in working out a fair budget for their families, should they decide to buy or sell a home.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Peter Krempely (Taxpayer Friendly)
4719 Arabian Run
Indianapolis, IN 46228
Phone: (317) 387-1236
E-mail: pkrempely@gmail.com 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: If given the opportunity I will vote yes on SJR 1. I'm just surprised it took so long.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: Not at this time.

James Patterson (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
6829 Bretton Wood Drive
Indianapolis, IN 46268
Phone: (317) 297-1035
E-mail: jamespattersonforindiana@gmail.com
Website: www.jamespattersonforindiana.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race): Indiana homeowners desire and deserve tax relief. However, amending the Indiana Constitution to cap property taxes for agricultural proprietors, businesses, renters and homeowners would be a major step, and it portends a significant impact on the ability of government to fund services for a long time to come. I would need to see the details of such a plan before deciding on a position.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Greg Taylor (Uncertain)
3855 North Delaware Street
Indianapolis, IN 46205
Phone: (317) 925-1182
E-mail: gtaylor@cgslegal.com
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: At this time I really think that the 1% cap is good, however, I cannot tell you that it will work, without seeing how it effects the tax base.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: Not at this time.

David L. Nicholson (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
2440 N Bolton Ave
Indianapolis, IN 46218
Phone: (765) 914-0375
E-mail: davidlnicholson@aol.com
Website: 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race): Capping property tax at 1, 2 and 3 percent of the assessed valuation of the property sounds good, but it has a fundamental flaw. It’s based on the assessed valuation of the property which is a subjective figure that’s established by guidelines that can be changed at any time. Having a cap on property taxes built into the law is a good safeguard to have, but because of the flaws and ambiguities associated with property taxes, it’s not a good idea to amend it into the constitution. If we are going to amend the Indiana Constitution to include some kind of a cap on taxes, we should amend it to cap the percentage of an individual's income that is consumed in taxes.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Mike Beeles (Taxpayer Friendly)
409 Brewer Place
Greenwood, IN 46142
Phone: (317) 859-9012
E-mail: beeles08senator@yahoo.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: YES I DO. I want to add Seniors and retirees to have a larger discount or even no property tax issued to them, they have paid their dues to this State.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: To have total property tax free problems we must first fix or cut area's that makes up the total pie of property taxes, if not, this State will need to find other means of income which would come from the tax payers. I'm a family man with 6 children, 3 teens still living at home, the burden that everyone else feels, I feel. The job of State Senator is to help the people of his district and the people of his State. we are not getting that now. I don't want a State Senator that is there to promote himself or his career and not for the people as we have now.

Brent Waltz (Taxpayer Friendly)

Max A. Ellison, Jr. (Taxpayer Friendly)
1205 N Central Ave
Connersville, IN 47331
Phone: (765) 265-4619
E-mail: max@thepoint.net
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race): I believe that Indiana's constitution should be amended to 1 percent of homeowners and agricultural property and at 3 percent for all others. While in the business domain, a portion (or all) would likely be passed to consumers.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

John Heaton (Taxpayer Friendly)
1270 North 350 East
Shelbyville, IN 46176
Phone: (317) 398-4288
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: Yes.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER: No.

Jean Leising (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
5268 Stockpile Rd.
Oldenburg, IN 47036
Phone: (812) 934-4118
E-mail: jeanleising@aol.com; jillkoch@etczone.com
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Jeff Sponsel (Taxpayer Friendly)
110 Saint Mary Street
Shelbyville, IN 46176
Phone: (317) 402-0667
E-mail: jeff@jeffsponsel.com
Website: www.SponselforSenate.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race): Yes.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Matthew S. Colglazier (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
588 Humpback Bridge Rd
Heltonville, IN 47436
Phone: (812) 834-5431
E-mail: mscolgla@indiana.edu; rscolglazier@gmail.com; marticolglazier@att.net
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Tony "Big Dog" Van Pelt (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
404 M Street
Bedford, IN 47421
Phone: (812) 797-2107
E-mail: vanpelt4indianasenate@yahoo.com; treasurer@unleashthedog.us
Website: www.unleashthedog.us 
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.

Watchdog Indiana Home Page Indiana General Assembly & Governor Ratings  

This page was last updated on 11/25/12 .