Watchdog
Indiana Home Page Indiana
General Assembly & Governor RatingsPrior Governor & State Senator Candidate Ratings
Watchdog
Indiana Home Page Indiana
General Assembly & Governor Ratings
NOTE: Prior Governor and State Senator Candidates (starting with the 2006 primary election) are listed below. You need your State Senator District Number to locate the Watchdog Indiana candidate ratings for prior State Senator Candidates. You can go to Who's Your Legislator? at http://www.in.gov/apps/sos/legislator/search/ to find your Indiana Senate District Numbers.
Taxpayer Friendly elected officials and candidates who are results-oriented, compassionate, and fiscally conservative must be identified and supported. Taxpayer UNfriendly elected officials and candidates do not deserve the electoral support of informed Watchdogs. Some elected officials and candidates have an Uncertain rating because of a limited or mixed public record. Indiana General Assembly ratings information is obtained from the Legislative Voting Record; Candidate Ratings for the 2012 General Elections; Candidate Ratings for the 2012 Contested Primary Elections; Candidate Ratings for the 2010 Contested General Elections; Candidate Ratings for the 2010 Contested Primary Elections; Candidate Ratings for the 2008 General Elections; Candidate Ratings for the 2008 Contested Primary Elections; Candidate Questionnaire for the November 7, 2006, General Election responses; Candidate Questionnaire for the May 2, 2006, Primary Election responses; Candidate Questionnaire for the November 2, 2004, General Election responses; Candidate Questionnaire for the May 4, 2004, Primary Election responses, Candidate Questionnaire for the November 5, 2002, General Election responses; Candidate Questionnaire for the May 7, 2002, Primary Election responses; and other sources (such as public comments during legislative sessions and campaign platform statements).
Governor:
Rupert Boneham (Uncertain)
Mitch Daniels (Taxpayer
Friendly)
2012 General Assembly Record
Signed House
Bill 1003, which is Taxpayer Friendly because (1) public access to
government meetings and records is improved and (2) it is less likely that
public agencies will intentionally violate the Public Access Laws.
Signed House
Bill 1005, which contains six Taxpayer Friendly local government Conflict Of
Interest provisions and sixteen Taxpayer Friendly local government Nepotism
provisions.
Signed House
Bill 1376, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly because (1) the automatic taxpayer
refund excess reserves trigger is increased from 10% to 12.5% and (2) Hoosier
working families will possibly receive an automatic taxpayer refund every
even-numbered year instead of every year.
2011 General Assembly Record
Signed House
Bill 1001, which includes among its 16 Taxpayer Friendly state budget
provisions no tax increases and an operating surplus in both the 2012 and 2013
fiscal years with a satisfactory reserve balance on June 30, 2013.
Signed House
Bill 1002, which is Taxpayer Friendly because (1) charter schools have the
potential to help increase the academic growth of lower socioeconomic students,
(2) the number of Indiana nonprofit private colleges and universities authorized
to create charter schools is limited, (3) the Indianapolis mayor is the only
Indiana mayor who may authorize charter schools, (4) conversion from a public
school to a charter school is sufficiently stringent, and (5) property taxes are
NOT improperly used to support charter schools.
Signed House
Bill 1003, which uses state K-12 tuition support money to fund scholarships
for nonpublic school students and is Taxpayer UNfriendly because (1) nonpublic
private and parochial schools are not equally open to all children, (2)
nonpublic school budgets are not approved by a directly elected public body, (3)
evidence-based research does not support greater school choice as a means to
achieve overall educational improvement, (4) it is very likely unconstitutional,
and (5) state tuition support dollars would go to nonpublic schools that are not
uniformly distributed throughout the state.
Signed House
Bill 1074, which provides that school board members selected by election
must be elected at November general elections and is Taxpayer Friendly because
the greater voter turnout in general elections will make it more difficult for
local vested interests to unduly influence school board elections.
2010 General Assembly Record
Signed House
Joint Resolution 1, which gives voters statewide the opportunity to amend
the Indiana Constitution to (1) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps
permanent and (2) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal
challenge.
Signed House
Bill 1001, which contains 21 Taxpayer Friendly government ethics reform
provisions including a 365-day wait after leaving the General Assembly before a
legislator can become a lobbyist or legislative liaison, the reporting of
certain expenditures by the legislative liaisons of state agencies and state
educational institutions, and a reduction from $100 to $50 in the minimum
reportable amount for the total daily gifts given by a registered lobbyist to a
legislative person.
Signed House
Bill 1086, which contains 7 Taxpayer Friendly provisions including the HJR 1
Constitutional Amendment ballot language.
Signed House
Bill 1367, which contains 5 Taxpayer Friendly K-12 education provisions that
preserve and protect instructional programs.
Signed Senate
Bill 23, which delays the scheduled increase in unemployment insurance
premiums for one year until 2011.
Signed Senate
Bill 396, which mandates an adjusted six-year average that eliminates the
highest value to calculate the base rate for the assessment of agricultural
land.
2009 General Assembly Record
Signed House
Bill 1001 SS, the 2009-2011 special session budget bill that is sufficiently
Taxpayer Friendly because it (1) provides enough resources for good government
AND (2) satisfactorily protects Hoosier working families from state and local
tax increases.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Senate Joint Resolution 1 passed
the Indiana Senate 40-7 and the Indiana House 79-20 on March 14, 2008, and was
signed by the Governor on March 19, 2008. SJR 1 amends the Indiana Constitution
to cap homeowners' property tax bills at 1% of assessed value, rental and
agricultural property at 2%, and business property at 3%. For property taxes
first due and payable in 2012, 90 of Indiana's 92 counties must have a homeowner
property tax cap that is 1% of the gross assessed value. Until 2020, existing
debt service prior to July 1, 2008, is exempted from the 1% homeowner gross
assessed value cap in Lake and St. Joseph counties ONLY. The result of these two
existing debt service exemptions equates to a 1.88% homeowner cap in Lake County
and a 1.52% homeowner cap in St. Joseph County. The homeowner caps for Lake and
St. Joseph counties must become 1% in 2020. The exact same version of SJR 1 that
passed in 2008 must again pass in the General Assembly in 2009 to put the 1%
constitutional homeowner property tax cap amendment on the 2010 ballot. We the
people can then vote to make the 1% homeowner property tax cap a permanent part
of the Indiana Constitution. Never has it been so easy to separate those who are
part of the property tax relief solution from those who are part of the property
tax spending problem. A General Assembly candidate who pledges to vote
for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009 is part of the
solution, otherwise the legislator is part of the
problem. QUESTION: Do you pledge to sign in 2009 the exact same
version of Senate Joint Resolution 1 that passed in 2008? DID NOT RESPOND.
RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race):
Yes. Constitutional caps are necessary to
protect this year’s property tax cuts from reversal by future politicians or
judges. The caps provide assurance to Hoosier home and business owners that they
will not lose their homes or businesses due to future rapid or unpredictable
property tax increases.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your
candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT
RESPOND.
2008 General Assembly Record
Originated Senate
Joint Resolution 1, which amends the Indiana Constitution to include a cap
beginning 2012 on homestead property tax in 90 counties at 1% of gross assessed
value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008, is exempted from
the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St. Joseph counties ONLY.
The effective constitutional homeowner property tax caps in Lake and St. Joseph
counties are 1.88% and 1.52% respectively until their 1% cap takes effect in
2020.
Signed House
Bill 1001, which phases in the SJR 1 constitutional property tax caps by
2010. Also, 2008 property taxes are reduced 26% from the prior year. An increase
in the sales tax from 6% to 7% and county-wide local option income taxes will be
used to replace the property tax revenue reductions that result from the
property tax caps.
2007 General Assembly Record
Signed House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that is Taxpayer Friendly because the General
Fund & Property Tax Replacement Fund $26.0722 billion expenditures total for
the 2008 and 2009 fiscal years is less than the $26.1946 billion revenues total.
HB 1001 also includes additional homestead credits from the Property Tax
Reduction Trust Fund of $300 million in 2007 and $250 million in 2008.
Signed House
Bill 1478, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly for the following reasons: (1)
Homeowner property taxes will increase 1.2% each year from 2009 through 2013
with annual decreases in the Homestead Standard Deduction. (2) The 2% Circuit
Breaker Cap on residential property taxes passed by the General Assembly in 2006
has been watered down to the point where it is almost eliminated. (3) The new
local option income tax for property tax relief will be offset by future
property tax increases unless the new local option income tax to replace
property tax increases is implemented. (4) Using the new local option income tax
to replace property tax increases means that income tax increases on Hoosier
working families would lower the proportionate tax burden of businesses and
utilities by freezing business and utility property taxes without a
corresponding increase in other business and utility taxes. (5) A new local
option income tax has been authorized for public safety.
Signed House
Bill 1835,which is Taxpayer Friendly because it uses slot machine licensing
fees and wagering taxes to establish the Property Tax Reduction Trust Fund,
which is to be used for property tax relief in any manner prescribed by the
General Assembly.
Signed on Senate
Bill 401, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly because state legislators voted
themselves a perpetual pay increase that is 20% more than the typical Hoosier
working family earns during an entire year. SB 401 also eliminated taxpayer-paid
lifetime health insurance and the $4 taxpayer match for each $1 of legislator
pension contribution, but General Assembly members should not have received an
excessive salary increase in return for eliminating extravagant perks they
should not have in the first place.
2006 General Assembly Record
Signed the
"Major Moves" House
Bill 1008, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly because
it authorizes the Indiana Department of Transportation to enter into
public-private agreements with private entities (operators) concerning tollway
projects for I-69 between Martinsville and Evansville. HB 1008 also
authorizes the Indiana Finance Authority to enter into public-private agreements
with operators for the Indiana Toll Road. Any agreement is subject to the
approval of the Governor after review by the State Budget Committee. I-69
construction is prohibited from running through Perry Township in southern
Indianapolis. The $3.85 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road will
be used to establish (a) a Bond Retirement Account to pay off bonds selected by
the Indiana Finance Authority, (b) an Administration Account, (c) an Eligible
Project Account for highway improvements throughout Indiana, and (d) a $500
million Next Generation Trust Fund to be used
exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges for the benefit of
the people of Indiana. One use of the Administration
Account will be to fund reductions in, or refunds of, user fees imposed on
noncommercial cars and trucks individuals who use the Indiana Toll Road.
Signed House
Bill 1001, a residential property tax reduction
bill that increases the homestead credit for one year in 2006 to 28% and the
homestead standard deduction for one year in 2007 to $45,000. Beginning in 2007
for Lake County and 2008 for all other counties, HB 1001 also establishes a cap
on residential property taxes equal to 2% of the assessed value of the
residential property.
2005 General Assembly Record
Signed House
Bill 1001. This budget bill includes the Property
Tax increases listed next (which overshadow the positive development
of a 2% property tax cap for Lake County). (a) $436 million over the next two
years from placing a cap on the state's Property Tax Relief Credits (PTRCs)
while providing PTRC funding equal to the amount paid in 2002 plus the revenue
generated by one percent of the sales tax. (b) School property tax increases of
1.2 percent the first year and 1.3 percent the second year for basic funding.
(c) One to 1.2 percent school property tax increases to provide textbooks to
low-income students, recoup state cuts for transportation, and pay for utility
and insurance costs. (d) Lowered base assessed values for farmland will benefit
farmers but shift property taxes to other property owners such as businesses and
homeowners, especially in rural counties. (e) Counties can issue bonds to be
paid off with property taxes to fund about $100 million owed the state for
housing juvenile offenders. (f) $52.5 to $63 million in county levies this year
to enhance and adequately fund services to protect abused and neglected
children. (g) A new rule requiring annual assessments of homes will increase
2007 homeowner property taxes between 8 to 11 percent.
Signed House
Bill 1120, which includes the negative tax impacts
listed next. (a) Repeals the termination of the one percent Marion County Food
and Beverage Tax and authorizes the Indianapolis City-County Council to increase
the rate of the County Food and Beverage Tax an additional one percent; the
resulting increased revenue is to be distributed to the Marion County Capital
Improvement Board for use in paying debt service on obligations issued by an
Indiana Stadium and Convention Building Authority to finance a new Colts stadium
and expanded convention center facilities in Marion County. (b) Authorizes
Marion County to increase the following taxes: Auto Rental Excise Tax (from 2%
to 4%), Innkeeper's Tax (from 6% to 9%), Sports Venue Admissions Tax (from 1% to
6%). (c) Imposes a Ticket Tax on Colt's Stadium events: $3 per ticket for
professional sports and $1 per ticket for other sports (excluding high school
and charity events). (d) Authorizes an increase in the amount of state sales and
individual income tax revenue that is annually captured by the Marion County
Professional Sports Development Area (from $5 million to $16 million). (e)
Authorizes Boone, Hamilton, Hancock, Hendricks, Johnson, Morgan and Shelby
counties to adopt a one percent Food and Beverage Tax and allocates half of the
revenue would to Marion County stadium and convention center projects. (f)
Authorizes the municipalities of Avon, Carmel, Fishers, Greenfield, Lebanon,
Martinsville, Noblesville, Westfield, and Zionsville to adopt a one percent Food
and Beverage Tax in addition to a Food and Beverage Tax adopted in the
municipality's parent county. (g) Allows Lake County and Porter County to adopt
a one percent Food and Beverage Tax to cover the costs associated with
membership in a Regional Development Authority to pursue expansion of the Gary
Airport, regional transit projects, and Lake Michigan shoreline development. (h)
Authorizes Wayne County and its municipalities to adopt a Food and Beverage Tax.
(i) Authorizes Howard County and Miami County to increase their County Option
Income Tax rate by 0.25 percent to fund local jail costs. (j) Authorizes
Vanderburgh County to adopt a County Auto Rental Excise Tax. (k) Authorizes
Tippecanoe County to increase its Innkeeper's Tax by one percent. (l) Authorizes
Hendricks County to increase its Innkeeper's Tax by three percent. (m) Increases
the Oil Inspection Fee by 10 cents per 50-gallon barrel (raised to 40 cents).
Candidate Questionnaire for the November 2, 2004, General Election:
1. What will be your guiding principles for the
2005-2007 biennium budget? Specifically, what mix of spending cuts, tax
increases, and/or reserve depletions will you support? (Background: see the
Indiana State Finances web page at http://www.finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm
for information on how total state expenditures exceed current revenues every
year from 1999 through 2005). DID NOT RESPOND. Record: "Tax
increases are not off the table, but they're at the bottom of the
list." Candidate Daniels' "Roadmap to an Indiana comeback" is a
slick, fold-out campaign brochure that lists 61 "New Ideas" under the
headings of education, jobs, health care, integrity, and state government
reform. None of these proposed changes have cost increases or savings
identified, and there is no clear indication they would reduce state spending or
significantly increase state revenues from existing sources. As federal Budget
Director, Candidate Daniels oversaw a federal budget that went from the largest
dollar-level surplus in American history to the largest dollar-level deficit.
2. What are your opinions regarding
homeowner property taxes? Specifically, what would be a good outcome for the
property tax replacement study commission currently studying the elimination of
property taxes and alternative sources of revenue? Do you support the Watchdog
Indiana senior and disabled individuals property tax deferral program (http://www.finplaneducation.net/property_tax_deferral_program.htm)?
What is your position on a 2% annual homeowner property tax cap and how would
you argue for, or against, those supporting a cap of 1% to 1.5% of the market
value of homeowner property? DID NOT RESPOND. Record: Candidate Daniels offers
no state-paid property tax relief to the most vulnerable Hoosier
homeowners. His phase-in of property tax increases would be of little help. His
10-year freeze on property taxes for agricultural producers would shift property
taxes to homeowners. Candidate Daniels refuses to consider cutting total annual
state spending 0.36 percent to implement the senior and disabled individuals
property tax deferral program.
3. What is your position regarding the
construction of an interstate from Indianapolis to Evansville? Specifically, do
you favor tax increases and/or toll roads to help build any such interstate? DID
NOT RESPOND. Record: Candidate Daniels favors a new-terrain interstate
between Indianapolis and Indiana and, because the budget is "barely enough
to maintain the roads we have now," would consider
tolls as a means of payment.
4. Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
Candidate Questionnaire for the May 4, 2004, Primary Election:
1. What will be your guiding principles for the 2005-2007 biennium budget?
Specifically, what mix of spending cuts, tax increases, and/or reserve
depletions will you support? (Background: see the Indiana State Finances web
page at http://www.finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm
for information on how total state expenditures exceed current revenues every
year from 1999 through 2005). DID NOT RESPOND.
RECORD (April 25, 2004, Indianapolis Star): The governor has a
constitutional duty to see that the budget is balanced. Although a thorough
house-cleaning of spending programs is long overdue, it
is not likely that we can cut our way out of our current fiscal emergency.
It is essential that we have more individuals and businesses making more income
and paying taxes to support the improvements we want to make as a state. In a
situation as desperate as this one, we can't rule
anything out; everything must be on the table for consideration.
There is a positive side to our fiscal emergency, however. At moments like this,
hard decisions become more thinkable.
2. What do you think of (a) a property tax replacement study commission to study
the elimination of property taxes and alternative sources of revenue and (b) a
senior and disabled individuals property tax deferral program? (Background:
Senate Bill 264 information about the property tax replacement study commission
can be found online at http://www.in.gov/apps/lsa/session/billwatch/billinfo?year=2004&session=1&request=getBill&docno=264
and information about the property tax deferral program can be found online
at http://www.finplaneducation.net/property_tax_deferral_program.htm.)
DID NOT RESPOND.
3. Do you support exempting gasoline sales from the sales tax and increasing the
gasoline tax by another 5 cents? (Background: combined with the 3-cent gasoline
tax hike in 2003, this would result in a revenue-neutral shift of all gasoline
tax proceeds from Indiana's General Fund directly to road improvements). DID
NOT RESPOND.
4. What is your position regarding tax
increases to build an interstate from Indianapolis to Evansville? 4. DID
NOT RESPOND. RECORD (November 26, 2003 Indianapolis Star):
Candidate Daniels "enthusiastically"
endorses a new-terrain extension of I-69 from Indianapolis to Evansville.
He thinks the northern end of the extension should be changed from I-465 in
Marion County to I-70 near Indianapolis International Airport. He wants the
state to consider turning the I-69 extension into a toll road.
5. Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID
NOT RESPOND. RECORD: When Candidate Daniels states that
"everything must be on the table for consideration" for the state's
2005-2007 biennium budget, it is just another way of saying that he will
consider tax increases. This is disturbing when one considers that state
spending has increased 25.18 percent, or 2.39 times more than inflation, since
the last balanced budget in 1999. Candidate Daniels' enthusiastic support for a
toll-road, new-terrain extension of I-69 from Indianapolis to Evansville is
likewise troubling because (1) costs for new terrain interstates always
escalate, (2) taxes will increase because the political climate does not support
spending cuts for interstate construction, (3) the positive economic impact of
highway projects is exaggerated, (4) unnecessary environmental damage would
result, and (5) temporary highway construction job increases would be paid for
by inefficiently administered highway spending.
Jo
hn R. Gregg (Uncertain)Donnie Harold Harris (Uncertain)
5333 Basin Pk. Dr.
Indianapolis, IN 46239
Phone: (317) 339-8078
E-mail: don@donharrishomeimprovement.com
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 6, 2012,
General Election
1. QUESTION: What are your priorities regarding the 2013-2015 state budget?
ANSWER: Any extra $ where current year revenues exceed current year
appropriations will going to future services. Delayed payments and one-time fund
transfers should not be used to balance the budget. A reserves balance of at
least 5% should be maintained.
2. QUESTION: Should the non-transportation appropriations from the state’s
Motor Vehicle Highway Account be transferred to the state’s General Fund so
more of our Indiana Gasoline Tax dollars can be properly spent to meet our
transportation needs? ANSWER: It is better to share the hoard. Plus the toilet
get things moving again.
3. QUESTION: Should the Automatic Taxpayer Refund law be (a) improved to make
refunds more likely, (b) kept as it is, or (c) eliminated? ANSWER: To be
decided.
4. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and
the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: Changes needed
are in the area of the 600,000.00 Homestead Supplemental Deduction threshold.
This protection and help is designed for those of special trials. The credit
should be increased toward the bottom while decrees the qualifying upper limit
limits.
5. QUESTION: What is your position regarding township government reform? ANSWER:
Yes with qualifications. Once a town reaches a certain size in relation to state
gross %. a. Yes, make the delivery of township services more consistent and
professional. b. Yes, consolidate fire protection services to save tax dollars.
c. Yes, improve township government oversight. d. Don't curtail the practice of
accumulating excessive township fund balances without corresponding decreases in
property tax rates. Standards need broadened and consultative with state
standards by local talent.
6. QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment commissions
oversight? ANSWER: Of my greatest concern.
7. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: I will make lots of comments. But about what ?
Andy Horning (Taxpayer
UNfriendly - Part of
the Problem)
7851 Pleasant Hill Road
Freedom, IN 47431-7235
Phone: (812) 859-4416
E-mail: andrewhorning@hotmail.com
Website: http://www.horningforgovernor.com/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4,
2008, General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in 2009 for the exact same version
of Senate Joint Resolution 1 that passed in 2008? ANSWER: Your
apparent advocacy for SJR 1 makes no sense
for a taxpayer "watchdog." Have you read it? Do you have any idea what
this really does to taxpayers by removing constitutional protections and opening
up the limits on both spending and taxation? You can't possibly trust the
politicians who've been continuously betraying us to amend the constitution that
protects us from them! I
know that it seemed like a very positive thing for our politicians to respond to
my calls for tax reform. It probably even seems like a good idea to amend the
constitution (that almost nobody has read, and no politician obeys) because
we've been told all sorts of nonsense about it...and we tend to believe what
we're told.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments
about your candidacy? ANSWER: Now,
you know that I started the tax protest movement here, right? I was the guy who
held press conferences and forums on tax reform for years before I lead the
protest on the Governor's Mansion lawn July 4, 2007. I advocated almost 100%
personal property tax repeal in 1999 by doing the constitution (see my Platform
on my current website). I still advocate a 100% constitution diet and exorcism
plan to rid the state of unconstitutional spending, agencies, powers and
taxation. I am the only candidate who'd cut spending and taxes. Period. That's
unequivocal. I
apologize for responding in what can only be seen as an insulting fashion. But
please, please read the constitution. If you contact me, I'll send you a PDF
copy of the Indiana Constitution that I have annotated with my observations and
interpretations. It's a pretty short read. Also, please review the history of
constitutional revisions. The reason we're in the mess we're in right now is
because of the last two constitutional amendment processes! Don't let these guys
amend what they will not obey. Make them obey what protects us from them!
Jim Schellinger (Taxpayer
UNfriendly)
P.O. Box 1226
Indianapolis, IN 46206
Phone: (317) 440-9919
E-mail: jim.schellinger@comcast.net
Website:
www.jimschellinger.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to
sign Senate
Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race ):
Gov. Daniels put the cart before the horse when it came to government reform. As
a businessman, I do not have the luxury of only looking at one side of the
ledger. While I do think that caps can be an important part of property tax
reform, we must fully understand what their implementation will do to the
state’s revenue picture before we enshrine those caps in the state
constitution.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
Jill Long Thompson (Taxpayer
UNfriendly - Part of
the Problem)
P.O. Box 108
Argos, IN 46501
Phone: (574) 892-6433
E-mail: jrettof@hoosiersforjill.com
Website: www.hoosiersforjill.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to sign in
2009 the exact same version of Senate Joint Resolution 1 that passed in 2008? DID
NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your
candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID
NOT RESPOND.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to
sign Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT
RESPOND. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race):
Currently the Constitution requires equal levels of property taxation,
and I think sensible changes to our tax code should be done statutorily, not
constitutionally. In Congress, I never voted for a tax increase or for a new
tax, and I believe taxes in Indiana should be fair, equitable and transparent.
As governor, instead of simply playing a shell game with our tax structure by
shifting the burden of taxes from one revenue source to another, I’ll work to
update our entire tax structure. We need to do a better job of helping our
businesses and families compete in today’s global economy, and fixing our tax
system is central to jump-starting Indiana’s struggling economy.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
State Senate District 1:
Chris Morrow (Taxpayer
UNfriendly)
Address: 848 Killarney Drive, Dyer, IN 46311
Phone: (219) 730-3497
E-mail: cmorrow@fnbiweb.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 7,
2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax
increased from 5% to 6% with a promise that the proceeds would be used to
decrease homeowner homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3% decrease
into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average Hoosier
homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility to levy
income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax relief. QUESTION:
Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose additional income, sales,
and other taxes? ANSWER: First we need to look at all options other than
property tax. I am looking to cut spending locally, as to give relief to the
property tax payer. I am in favor of Home Rule which would give local
authorities flexibility to raise some taxes. Being a boarder community a
gas tax or additional sales tax is offset by Illinois residents buying goods in
Indiana. Much like a food and beverage tax I
see this as a subsidized tax for Lake county residents. The locals
must have a plan for the money and quite frankly operations and salaries are not
acceptable, but for capital or other specific needs may be. Illinois has sales
tax home rule. I think our zoning would be better if locals had a way to capture
some sales tax, and we would quite putting ugly or non productive businesses
(storage facilities) in good business districts.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget the last two fiscal years has been balanced
without fund transfers for the first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm).
QUESTION: Should the state's total budget expenditures be no more than total
revenues for the next biennium? ANSWER: Expenses
should never eclipse revenues. I am discussing the idea for both
local and state budgets to be based on real revenues, no longer allowing budgets
to be set by projections. We know what revenues we brought in last year (or for
sure the year before). Make the following years budget be based on proven
revenues. This will take economists out the loop and hold budgets in line.
Growing communities would have increasing budgets (Crown Point) and falling
revenues (Hammond) would have lessening budgets. The state should be doing the
same.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced with the inclusion of a
one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This decreases property taxes for the
average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be
continued beyond 2007? ANSWER: Is there enough info on this subject.
The legislation of three years ago brought to reality two things. First and most
important the assessment up to then was cooked. Big business and business in
general
was paying a higher share of the base. Assessments were deflated to keep the
voters happy. Once an independent assessment was made properties were shown
their true value. This was emotional legislation. It is
unfair for Whiting to go from $200 to $6,000, but at the same time was $200 fair.
We had 35,000 homes paying $200 or less, and of those thousands that paid almost
nothing. There is a cost of government and everyone needs to pay their fair
share. After the tax issue was semi resolved business has invested billions in
NWI. Towns like Munster will never get close to the cap and the $45,000
homestead will affect the communities like Whiting. That said we need to have
all the info before making more legislative promises.
4. BACKGROUND: Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of
Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners would cost $210 million in 2009. QUESTIONS:
Should the state pay for full-day kindergarten? If YES, where should the
state get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten? ANSWER: Full day
kindergarten sounds great, but where do we cut to pay for the costs. If we can
cut welfare and replace full day K, I would be in favor. This would give the
parents the needed coverage to get a job. This is not a silver bullet. The
schools are broken. I think the Governor should stop putting money into losing
systems...like Gary. Money is not the issue that will solve problems like
Hammond and Gary.
5. BACKGROUND: The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road
("Major Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to
pay off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next
ten years? ANSWER: Gas tax needs to be reviewed. As the
crossroads of America a lot of non Hoosiers pay the tax for us...We
need more info. If we grant Homerule will this preclude a gas tax?
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects include $694 million for a new
terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to Evansville as well as a $500 million
Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION: Should the "Major Moves" expenditures
be combined with the Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain
I-69 extension without state tax increases? ANSWER: I don't know the I-69
issues. I don't think current needs and future needs (funds) should be combined.
One is for now and one is for the future. These issues are long and short term.
7. BACKGROUND: The 2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a
toll road for an I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION:
Do you favor legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? ANSWER: If we can charge a toll for
this expansion we should explore. Tolls are user fees that benefit
the state and pay back debt. The whole Major Moves issue is how well we spend
the funds to leverage the needs of the future. It is a present cost of money
verses future cost of that same dollar. I would rather have a billion dollars to
spend now on infrastructure now then wait for 45 cents to trickle in later. If
we can build our needs now and leverage the capital expenditure for more
development go for it...That is government efficiency...
8. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: on . First and foremost some of the issues pertaining to watchdog are
not black and white. If we had politicians that would make the hard decisions we
would not find ourselves in this mess. I am running as a republican, but I have
always been my own man. As of this email (9/25/2006) I have not received any
money from the state party. I have been involved in many community and
philanthropic endeavors as
well as quasi political arenas. This area has been neglected for many decades
and to some degree we need to spend our way out of the problems. That said, we
have wasted a lot of money and have not targeted money to specific issues. I
have been pretty open and maybe to my detriment. As I said I am not afraid of
the voters before or after the election. If we give solid review of the issues
people can decide for themselves. We need to take the emotion out of debate. Our
area is broken if not very very fragile, and more indecision or lack of
leadership will be a disaster. I don't know where you live, but a more broken
Lake County is horrible for Lake Co and the rest of the state.
David B. Spudic (Unknown)
259 Lawndale Street
Hammond, IN 47401
Phone: (219) 765-0880
E-mail:
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you
support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the
1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax
deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced?
Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility
of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be
replenished.
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain
both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction
without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General
Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between
I-64 and Martinsville?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
5. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
State Senate District 2:
Carl L. Dahlin, Jr. (Taxpayer
UNfriendly -
DESPICABLE)
4720 Ivy
East Chicago, IN 46312
Phone: (219) 398-5290
E-mail:
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in
2009 for the exact same version of Senate Joint Resolution 1 that passed in
2008? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your
candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID
NOT RESPOND.
Carolyn Rhymes Jordan (Taxpayer
UNfriendly)
201 W 47th Ave
Gary, IN 46408
Phone: (219) 887-1602
E-mail:
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate
Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
Rev. Dr. Jesse L. Ortiz (Taxpayer
Friendly)
3929 Deal St.
East Chicago, IN 46312
Phone: (219) 397-6678
E-mail:
Eastchcortiz@aol.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate
Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: If Senate Joint
Resolution 1 is the best we can do between now and 2009, I will support it.
However, I must advise you that I feel it is not
enough and still subject to whimsical manipulations of assessors and their
influencers.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
I suggest we work for nothing less than the elimination of at least home
property tax. The protection of home property is a democratic American
ideal, it is economically sound. It is unconscionable, unwarranted and,
therefore, unconstitutional for any American to lose their home over taxes.
Michael D. Scott, Sr. (Taxpayer
Friendly)
540 W. 52nd Pl.
Gary, IN 46410
Phone: (219) 980-1735
E-mail:
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate
Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD
(www.indystar.com/2008race ):
Yes. However,
we should not stop there. We should continue to develop ways to lower the burden
on homeowners even more.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
June L. Simmons-Blackmon (Taxpayer
UNfriendly)
3744 Euclid Ave.
East Chicago, IN 46312
Phone: (219) 801-5553
E-mail: j-blackmon@sbcglobal.net
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate
Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
Diane Smith (Taxpayer
UNfriendly)
P.O. Box 3218
East Chicago, IN 46312
Phone: (219) 397-2024
E-mail:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate
Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
Samuel Smith, Jr. (Uncertain)
Address: P.O. Box 3218, East Chicago, IN 46312
Phone: (219) 397-2024
E-mail:
Website:
2008 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on Senate
Joint Resolution 1, which amended the Indiana Constitution beginning 2012 to
include a cap on homestead property tax in 90 counties at 1% of gross assessed
value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008, is
exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St. Joseph
counties ONLY. The effective constitutional homeowner property tax caps in Lake
and St. Joseph counties are 1.88% and 1.52% respectively until the 1% cap takes
effect in 2020.
Voted YES on
House
Bill 1001, which phases in the SJR 1 constitutional property tax caps by
2010. Also, 2008 property taxes are reduced 26% from the prior year. An increase
in the sales tax from 6% to 7% and local option income taxes will be used to
replace the property tax revenue reductions that result from the property tax
caps.
2007 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that is Taxpayer Friendly because the General
Fund & Property Tax Replacement Fund $26.0722 billion expenditures total for
the 2008 and 2009 fiscal years is less than the $26.1946 billion revenues total.
HB 1001 also includes additional homestead credits from the Property Tax
Reduction Trust Fund of $300 million in 2007 and $250 million in 2008.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1478, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly for the following reasons: (1)
Homeowner property taxes will increase 1.2% each year from 2009 through 2013
with annual decreases in the Homestead Standard Deduction. (2) The 2% Circuit
Breaker Cap on residential property taxes passed by the General Assembly in 2006
has been watered down to the point where it is almost eliminated. (3) The new
local option income tax for property tax relief will be offset by future
property tax increases unless the new local option income tax to replace
property tax increases is implemented. (4) Using the new local option income tax
to replace property tax increases means that income tax increases on Hoosier
working families would lower the proportionate tax burden of businesses and
utilities by freezing business and utility property taxes without a
corresponding increase in other business and utility taxes. (5) A new local
option income tax has been authorized for public safety.
Voted YES on
House
Bill 1835,which is Taxpayer Friendly because it uses slot machine licensing
fees and wagering taxes to establish the Property Tax Reduction Trust Fund,
which is to be used for property tax relief in any manner prescribed by the
General Assembly.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 401, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly because state legislators voted
themselves a perpetual pay increase that is 20% more than the typical Hoosier
working family earns during an entire year. SB 401 also eliminated taxpayer-paid
lifetime health insurance and the $4 taxpayer match for each $1 of legislator
pension contribution, but General Assembly members should not have received an
excessive salary increase in return for eliminating extravagant perks they
should not have in the first place.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
7, 2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax
increased from 5% to 6% with a promise that the proceeds would be used to
decrease homeowner homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3% decrease
into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average Hoosier
homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility to levy
income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax relief. QUESTION:
Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose additional income, sales,
and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget the last two fiscal years has been balanced
without fund transfers for the first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm).
QUESTION: Should the state's total budget expenditures be no more than total
revenues for the next biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced with the inclusion of a
one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This decreases property taxes for the
average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be
continued beyond 2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. BACKGROUND: Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of
Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should
the state pay for full-day kindergarten? If YES, where should the state
get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND: The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road
("Major Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to
pay off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next
ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects include $694 million for a new
terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to Evansville as well as a $500 million
Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION: Should the "Major Moves" expenditures
be combined with the Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain
I-69 extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The 2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a
toll road for an I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION:
Do you favor legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2006 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted NO on "Major
Moves" House
Bill 1008, which authorizes the Indiana Department of Transportation to
enter into public-private agreements with private entities (operators)
concerning tollway projects for I-69 between Martinsville and Evansville. HB
1008 also authorizes the Indiana Finance Authority to enter into public-private
agreements with operators for the Indiana Toll Road.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, a residential property tax reduction bill that increases the
homestead credit for one year in 2006 to 28% and the homestead standard
deduction for one year in 2007 to $45,000. Beginning in 2007 for Lake County and
2008 for all other counties, HB 1001 also establishes a cap on residential
property taxes equal to 2% of the assessed value of the residential property.
2005 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted NO on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that included seven significant homeowner
property tax increases.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1120, which contained thirteen negative tax impacts including a
regional Food and Beverage Tax to finance a new Colts stadium.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
2, 2004, General Election
1. Guiding Principles for 2005-07 Biennium Budget. DID NOT RESPOND.
2. Opinions on Homeowner Property Taxes. DID NOT RESPOND.
3. Position on Indianapolis to Evansville Interstate. DID NOT RESPOND.
4. Additional Comments. DID NOT RESPOND.
2003 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted AGAINST on
House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that was Taxpayer UNfriendly primarily
because (1) the 2004-05 fiscal year General Fund and Property Tax Replacement
Fund spending total of $11.48 billion exceeded the $11.4424 billion revenues
total (fiscal year 2004-05 was the eighth straight year where spending exceeded
revenues), (2) the full Property Tax relief that was promised to homeowners in
last year's special session legislation was reduced by the so-called Homestead
Credit "correction," and (3) Pension Stabilization Fund transfers were
included (these transfers worsened the $8.5 billion shortfall in teacher
retirement funds).
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 5,
2002, General Election
1-2. DID NOT VOTE on the special session
bill that included several tax increases that will
increase revenues $1.7782 billion from July 1, 2002, through June 30, 2005.
3. DID NOT VOTE on the special session bill that
included a 20% gas tax increase (from 15 to 18
cents per gallon) effective 01/01/03.
4. DID NOT VOTE on the special session bill that
included a phased-in shift of the inventory tax to (1) all
other types of property through an increased property tax rate and (2) a tax on
the income of individuals (in those counties choosing to do so) through
the establishment or increase of a County Economic Development Income Tax (CEDIT).
5. Did not receive General Election Questionnaire. See the Legislative
Voting Record.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 7, 2002,
Primary Election
1. Voted on February 28 FOR
the Indiana Senate version of HB 1004, which included an unneeded
Income Tax rate increase, imposed a new
business Payroll Tax, and increased revenues
$933 million more than taxes would have been reduced through June 30,
2004.
2. Voted on February 27 FOR
the Indiana Senate version of HB 1317, which would have raised
the Gasoline Tax from 15 cents per gallon to 18 cents during 2003, 20
cents during 2004, and 22 cents after 2004.
3-4. Did not receive Primary Questionnaire. See the Legislative
Voting Record.
Louis Vasquez III (Taxpayer
UNfriendly)
5605 Reading Ave.
East Chicago, IN 46312
Phone: (219) 397-6326
E-mail:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate
Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
State Senate District 3:
David Vinzant (Uncertain)
1535 W. 4th Place
Hobart, IN 46342
Phone: (219) 942-5781
E-mail: dave@davevinzant.com; vinzant2012@gmail.com
Website:
http://www.vinzant2012.com/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 8, 2012,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Should the 2013-2015 state budget be balanced where (a) current
year appropriations do not exceed current year revenues, (b) there are no
delayed payments and one-time fund transfers, and (c) a reserves balance of at
least 5% is maintained? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Should the non-transportation appropriations from the state’s
Motor Vehicle Highway Account be transferred to the state’s General Fund so
more of our Indiana Gasoline Tax can be properly spent to meet our
transportation needs? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
3. QUESTION: Should the automatic taxpayer refund be improved, maintained, or
eliminated? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
4. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and
the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
5. QUESTION: What is your position regarding township government reform? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
6. QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment commissions
oversight? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
7. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
Darren L. Washington (Uncertain)
701 Lincoln St.
Gary, IN 46402
Phone: (219) 882-052
E-mail: DWashington@garycsc.k12.in.us
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 8, 2012,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Should the 2013-2015 state budget be balanced where (a) current
year appropriations do not exceed current year revenues, (b) there are no
delayed payments and one-time fund transfers, and (c) a reserves balance of at
least 5% is maintained? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Should the non-transportation appropriations from the state’s
Motor Vehicle Highway Account be transferred to the state’s General Fund so
more of our Indiana Gasoline Tax can be properly spent to meet our
transportation needs? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
3. QUESTION: Should the automatic taxpayer refund be improved, maintained, or
eliminated? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
4. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and
the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
5. QUESTION: What is your position regarding township government reform? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
6. QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment commissions
oversight? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
7. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
State Senate District 4:
Dale Brewer (Uncertain)
Address: 161 Bote Drive, Porter, IN 46304
Phone: (219) 395-1665
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 7,
2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax
increased from 5% to 6% with a promise that the proceeds would be used to
decrease homeowner homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3% decrease
into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average Hoosier
homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility to levy
income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax relief. QUESTION:
Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose additional income, sales,
and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget the last two fiscal years has been balanced
without fund transfers for the first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm).
QUESTION: Should the state's total budget expenditures be no more than total
revenues for the next biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced with the inclusion of a
one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This decreases property taxes for the
average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be
continued beyond 2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. BACKGROUND: Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of
Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should
the state pay for full-day kindergarten? If YES, where should the state
get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND: The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road
("Major Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to
pay off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next
ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects include $694 million for a new
terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to Evansville as well as a $500 million
Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION: Should the "Major Moves" expenditures
be combined with the Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain
I-69 extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The 2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a
toll road for an I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION:
Do you favor legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Paul Childress (Uncertain)
Address: 1175 Dune Meadow Drive, Porter, IN 46304
Phone: (219) 405-5217
E-mail: paul@splashdowndunes.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 2, 2006,
Primary Election
1. What will be your guiding principles for the 2007-2009 biennium
budget? Specifically, what mix of spending cuts, tax increases, and/or reserve
depletions will you support? RESPONSE: No tax increases. I do favor a tax
shift. I would like to eliminate property taxes. Sales
tax would be changed to include everything except food. Business
income tax would change also.
2. What are your opinions regarding homeowner property taxes? Specifically, do
favor freezing all property taxes and funding budget increases through both
individual and business income tax increases? Or, do you favor a mixture of
income tax, sales tax and meals tax increases to reduce property tax growth
while providing additional revenue to local governments? RESPONSE:
Eliminate property taxes. Business income should be taxed at 3.4%. Business
income is gross receipts minus payroll expense.
3. Considering the "Major Moves" legislation passed by the General
Assembly this year, do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases
the next ten years? RESPONSE: No!
4. What is your position regarding the construction of an interstate from
Indianapolis to Evansville? Specifically, should the $500 million Next
Generation Trust Fund that is part of "Major Moves" be used
exclusively for a new terrain I-69 extension so as to avoid state gas tax
increases? RESPONSE: Yes.
5. Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website?
Larry Chubb (Uncertain)
Address: 348 Indian Boundary Road, Chesterton, IN 46304
Phone: (219) 928-1509
E-mail:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 2, 2006,
Primary Election
1. What will be your guiding principles for the 2007-2009 biennium
budget? Specifically, what mix of spending cuts, tax increases, and/or reserve
depletions will you support? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. What are your opinions regarding homeowner property taxes? Specifically, do
favor freezing all property taxes and funding budget increases through both
individual and business income tax increases? Or, do you favor a mixture of
income tax, sales tax and meals tax increases to reduce property tax growth
while providing additional revenue to local governments? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. Considering the "Major Moves" legislation passed by the General
Assembly this year, do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases
the next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. What is your position regarding the construction of an interstate from
Indianapolis to Evansville? Specifically, should the $500 million Next
Generation Trust Fund that is part of "Major Moves" be used
exclusively for a new terrain I-69 extension so as to avoid state gas tax
increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Shawn Olson (Taxpayer
Friendly)
5307 4th Ave.
Valparaiso, IN 46383
Phone: (219) 464-7090
E-mail: Info@Olson4Senate.com
Website: http://www.olson4senate.com/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2,
2010,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you
support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the
1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax
deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: I
support the Constitutional Amendment, even though I feel the real
percentages should be a straight 1%. I’m not much a fan of personal property
taxes on the individual. I would like to see the eventual elimination of taxes
collected by the state on Personal Property. I would like to add one thing
capping the property taxes is good and all but are we going to ensure the
counties don’t just over assess the property to any over inflated prices they
feel like? (Watchdog Indiana note: see http://www.finplaneducation.net/property_tax_assessment.htm.)
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced?
Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility
of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be
replenished.
ANSWER: You see I’m a small business owner. Working with budgets and
being an executive of several private business boards you learn how to watch the
money very carefully and one thing you learn is that any department with a
fairly good leader can easily cut any budget by 10% without affecting production
or the final product. Even in a fiscally sound budget 10% is an easily obtained
amount. More the waste in spending the higher the amount can be cut without much
effect to the production and product. Using your numbers above Indiana will be
broke in June 30th 2011. Therefore we either need to raise taxes by
13.3% or cut taxes by 13.3%. Why is this you may ask first because the federal
stimulus is a one time shot there could be more but we cannot bank the future of
our state on it being there. Besides the federal government can only print so
much money before we will have to start factoring in inflation, which means an
even higher increase in taxes! Second we will have gone through our reserves and
once the reserve is gone it is gone. Medicaid this is going to be a very hard
subject in a couple of years. Lets right now forget the aging population that
will be on the increase over the next couple of years. (Yes the aging population
is an important factor to look at but there is a bigger factor looming
overhead.) Lets look at this very large factor that nobody is talking about. The
Health Care bill that just passed by the federal government will put at the
minimum an increase of 25% to the state Medicare budget. How do we deal with the
new federal healthcare requirements? K-12 education currently our state spends
over 50% of our taxes collected for k-12 education. We have to look at the
budgets closely and cut any unnecessary overhead and waste to ensure our tax
dollars actually make it to the classroom. Well at this time the reserves were
for a rainy day and well its raining! I know there will be more rainy days ahead
and we need to ensure our state has a back up plan incase of times like we are
having right now but replacing the money shouldn’t be top priority. It will be
replaced when we are financially sound by cutting back on government waste and
balancing the state budget within the means of the taxpayers. RECORD (from Website): Taxes have a purpose,
for paying for what is necessary. Count on a NO vote for anything that will
increase Indiana Property, Sales, and Income taxes. All of us are already
burdened with increased inflation and a depressed economy. As a nation we have
always prospered with a free market system with hard working individuals as the
back bone. Lets not put anymore burdens on the backs of our fellow Hoosiers.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain
both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction
without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER:
Yes! Anyway we
can help lessen the tax burdens on homeowners I’m for it. Like I said above I’m
not much a fan of Personal Property Taxes.
4.
QUESTION: Do you support
changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General
Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between
I-64 and Martinsville?
ANSWER: I
lean yes but need more info. I would rather see the people who are affected by
this vote make the decision through a referendum. Either way it affects the
people living there they have to stop and pay a toll or they will have to pay
more in taxes so they are the ones who should be best to decide. If it were I, I
would say the people who use it should pay for it.
5. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
This upcoming year our budget will need major changes like it or not. Luckily
Indiana is one of 2 states that are still in the black. If we do nothing the
next few months this statement will not be true any longer. We have to ensure
that Political Hogs and the Tax and Spenders can’t stop the necessary budget
cuts. Lets create the climate that businesses will decide to come to Indiana.
How? By keeping taxes low, keeping the size of government in check, and full and
open disclosure of all tax payer money ensuring a complete
transparency to guarantee tax payer money is protected and not wasted.
Timothy E. Vojslavek (Uncertain)
Address: 102 North 350 West, Valparaiso, IN 46385
Phone: (219) 477-6960
E-mail:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 2, 2006,
Primary Election
1. What will be your guiding principles for the 2007-2009 biennium
budget? Specifically, what mix of spending cuts, tax increases, and/or reserve
depletions will you support? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. What are your opinions regarding homeowner property taxes? Specifically, do
favor freezing all property taxes and funding budget increases through both
individual and business income tax increases? Or, do you favor a mixture of
income tax, sales tax and meals tax increases to reduce property tax growth
while providing additional revenue to local governments? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. Considering the "Major Moves" legislation passed by the General
Assembly this year, do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases
the next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. What is your position regarding the construction of an interstate from
Indianapolis to Evansville? Specifically, should the $500 million Next
Generation Trust Fund that is part of "Major Moves" be used
exclusively for a new terrain I-69 extension so as to avoid state gas tax
increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
State Senate District 5:
Larry W. Balmer (Taxpayer
UNfriendly -
DESPICABLE)
16909 13 Road
Plymouth, IN 46563
Phone: (574) 935-4741
E-mail: oldsalt@hughes.net; hphendon@yahoo.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in
2009 for the exact same version of Senate Joint Resolution 1 that passed in
2008? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your
candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID
NOT RESPOND.
Victor Heinold (POLITICAL
HOG)
P.O. Box 1040
Valparaiso, IN 46384
Phone: (219) 465-7221
E-mail: vheinold@hotmail.com
2007 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that is Taxpayer
Friendly because the General Fund & Property Tax Replacement Fund $26.0722
billion expenditures total for the 2008 and 2009 fiscal years is less than the
$26.1946 billion revenues total. HB 1001 also includes additional homestead
credits from the Property Tax Reduction Trust Fund of $300 million in 2007 and
$250 million in 2008.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1478, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly for the following reasons: (1)
Homeowner property taxes will increase 1.2% each year from 2009 through 2013
with annual decreases in the Homestead Standard Deduction. (2) The 2% Circuit
Breaker Cap on residential property taxes passed by the General Assembly in 2006
has been watered down to the point where it is almost eliminated. (3) The new
local option income tax for property tax relief will be offset by future
property tax increases unless the new local option income tax to replace
property tax increases is implemented. (4) Using the new local option income tax
to replace property tax increases means that income tax increases on Hoosier
working families would lower the proportionate tax burden of businesses and
utilities by freezing business and utility property taxes without a
corresponding increase in other business and utility taxes. (5) A new local
option income tax has been authorized for public safety.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1835,which is Taxpayer Friendly because it uses slot machine licensing
fees and wagering taxes to establish the Property Tax Reduction Trust Fund,
which is to be used for property tax relief in any manner prescribed by the
General Assembly.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 401, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly because state legislators voted
themselves a perpetual pay increase that is 20% more than the typical Hoosier
working family earns during an entire year. SB 401 also eliminated taxpayer-paid
lifetime health insurance and the $4 taxpayer match for each $1 of legislator
pension contribution, but General Assembly members should not have received an
excessive salary increase in return for eliminating extravagant perks they
should not have in the first place.
2006 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES
on "Major
Moves" House
Bill 1008, which authorizes the Indiana Department of Transportation to
enter into public-private agreements with private entities (operators)
concerning tollway projects for I-69 between Martinsville and Evansville. HB
1008 also authorizes the Indiana Finance Authority to enter into public-private
agreements with operators for the Indiana Toll Road.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, a residential property tax reduction bill that increases the
homestead credit for one year in 2006 to 28% and the homestead standard
deduction for one year in 2007 to $45,000. Beginning in 2007 for Lake County and
2008 for all other counties, HB 1001 also establishes a cap on residential
property taxes equal to 2% of the assessed value of the residential property.
2005 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES
on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that included seven significant homeowner
property tax increases.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1120, which contained thirteen negative tax impacts including a
regional Food and Beverage Tax to finance a new Colts stadium.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
2, 2004, General Election
1. Guiding
Principles for 2005-07 Biennium Budget. I will not support any tax increases
except in a shift from property taxes. I will not
support any budget that exceeds the state's income.
As a state senator I believe it is my constitutional responsibility to pass a
balanced budget.
2. Opinions on Homeowner Property Taxes. I feel that property tax is unfair and
outdated. I have been following the work of the Property Tax Replacement Study
Commission co-chaired by Sen. Luke Kenley. I look forward to seeing their final
report.
3. Position on Indianapolis to Evansville Interstate. I will not support
any additional taxes for this or any project. I would be willing to look at
alternative funding mechanisms though.
4. Additional Comments. Did not respond to the Candidate
Questionnaire for the May
4, 2004, Primary Election.
Debora "Deb" Porter (Uncertain)
3602 Candlewood Drive
Valparaiso, IN 46385
Phone: (219) 309-8794
E-mail: electdebporter@gmail.com
Website: http://www.porter4senate.com/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 6, 2012,
General Election
1. QUESTION: What are your priorities regarding the 2013-2015 state budget?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (from campaign website): Among my top priorities
in the upcoming budget year will be restoring the deep cuts made to education as
a result of the state’s 2011 budget that included a permanent base reduction
of $300 million for K-12 education and also slashed public university funding by
$14.8 million. Full day kindergarten attendance should be made mandatory and
fully funded at the same rate other students are funded. My platform includes
reevaluating Right to Work to ensure that future legislation protects working
Hoosiers and living wage jobs, continuing to offer incentives to companies who
want to relocate or build in Indiana, and requiring employers to give Just Cause
before dismissing employees. I would launch a full scale investigation on the
state wide Child Abuse Hotline and the children it protects. and maintain full
participation in federal health programs such as Medicaid and Medicare.
2. QUESTION: Should the non-transportation appropriations from the state’s
Motor Vehicle Highway Account be transferred to the state’s General Fund so
more of our Indiana Gasoline Tax dollars can be properly spent to meet our
transportation needs? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
3. QUESTION: Should the Automatic Taxpayer Refund law be (a) improved to make
refunds more likely, (b) kept as it is, or (c) eliminated? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
4. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and
the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
5. QUESTION: What is your position regarding township government reform? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
6. QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment commissions
oversight? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
7. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
State Senate District 6:
Charles E. Barman (Taxpayer
Friendly)
7451 W 121st Ave
Crown Point, IN 46307
Phone: (219) 226-3400
E-mail:
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you
support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the
1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax
deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: SUPPORT.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced?
Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility
of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be
replenished.
ANSWER: The budget should be balanced by taxing casinos and racinos more,
and using more of the state's lottery money. Medicaid spending should be pushed
back to the federal government - the current House and Senate want to change the
health care of this country - let the federal government pay for that. School
vouchers should be given to all parents, including home school parents, and this
would reduce taxes by lessening the urge to build gigantic schools where
children learn nothing. Reserve funds should be replenished without a statewide
income tax increase.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain
both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction
without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER:
Yes I do.
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General
Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between
I-64 and Martinsville?
ANSWER: I am against I-69 becoming a toll road because the toll company will
raise the toll and nobody will use I-69. Instead, they will use local roads to
avoid the tolled portion of I-69 resulting in damage to those local roads.
Therefore, I do
support
changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General
Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road
5. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
I wish to stop the Illiana tollway to avoid future flooding in Lake County.
John B. Greaves (Uncertain)
Address: 390 S. 200 W., Valparaiso, IN 46385
Phone: (219) 464-3065
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 7,
2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax
increased from 5% to 6% with a promise that the proceeds would be used to
decrease homeowner homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3% decrease
into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average Hoosier
homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility to levy
income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax relief. QUESTION:
Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose additional income, sales,
and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget the last two fiscal years has been balanced
without fund transfers for the first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm).
QUESTION: Should the state's total budget expenditures be no more than total
revenues for the next biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced with the inclusion of a
one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This decreases property taxes for the
average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be
continued beyond 2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. BACKGROUND: Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of
Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should
the state pay for full-day kindergarten? If YES, where should the state
get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND: The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road
("Major Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to
pay off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next
ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects include $694 million for a new
terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to Evansville as well as a $500 million
Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION: Should the "Major Moves" expenditures
be combined with the Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain
I-69 extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The 2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a
toll road for an I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION:
Do you favor legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Crystal Hall (Uncertain)
Address: 5350 Vasa Terrace, Lowell, IN 46356
Phone: (219) 696-7184
E-mail: crystal@crystalhall4statesenator.com
Website: www.crystalhall4statesenator.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 2, 2006,
Primary Election
1. What will be your guiding principles for the 2007-2009 biennium
budget? Specifically, what mix of spending cuts, tax increases, and/or reserve
depletions will you support? RESPONSE: Don't spend what you don't have.
To give accurate answers to budget questions requires the figures and the
expenditures.
2. What are your opinions regarding homeowner property taxes? Specifically, do
favor freezing all property taxes and funding budget increases through both
individual and business income tax increases? Or, do you favor a mixture of
income tax, sales tax and meals tax increases to reduce property tax growth
while providing additional revenue to local governments? RESPONSE:
Property taxes too high. No tax increases.
3. Considering the "Major Moves" legislation passed by the General
Assembly this year, do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases
the next ten years? RESPONSE: No!!
4. What is your position regarding the construction of an interstate from
Indianapolis to Evansville? Specifically, should the $500 million Next
Generation Trust Fund that is part of "Major Moves" be used
exclusively for a new terrain I-69 extension so as to avoid state gas tax
increases? RESPONSE: Again, no increases.
5. Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website?
Jim Metro (Uncertain)
14822 Wicker Ave.
Cedar Lake, IN 46303
Phone: (219) 374-7610
E-mail: metroforsenate@gmail.com
Website: http://metroforsenate.com/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you
support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the
1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax
deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced?
Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility
of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be
replenished.
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (From Website): We need to be focused on
funding schools and spurring job creation, not sending millions of dollars to
mismanaged facilities in Indianapolis. I pledge to fight any provisions in the
next budget that would divert money away from critical government services. We
must be committed to fully funding our public schools. Indiana can no longer
balance the budget on the backs of our children and state leaders must be held
accountable for doing so. A school corporation should
be allowed to transfer up to 50 percent of the capital projects fund to its
general fund with no stipulations. Full-day kindergarten should be
provided to every Hoosier child. Individuals should be allowed to donate part or
all of their state income tax refund to a fund benefiting an Indiana public
school corporation or public education foundation by a check-off box on their
tax return form. Eligibility for an existing tax credit program for donations to
private school scholarship funds should be expanded to Indiana public education
foundations. In 2009, the Indiana General Assembly approved a tax credit for 50
percent of each dollar contributed to organizations that grant scholarships to
children attending private schools. By expanding the credit to individuals and
corporations that donate to public education foundations, Hoosiers have more
options and more students can benefit from private donations. The current cap of
$2.5 million in tax credits available each year would remain. There are more
than 50 public education foundations in local communities throughout Indiana.
Public education foundation membership includes parents, educators and business
leaders who collaborate on the local level to provide funds for innovative
educational programs that motivate, recognize and appreciate students and
teachers. I support the Indiana Open Government Initiative which includes
specific proposals within three primary areas of focus: (1) the Indiana OpenGov
web site providing one-stop public access to state budgets, spending and
contracts; (2) corporate accountability laws for state economic incentives,
including “clawback” provisions for companies that receive tax breaks then
fail to make the investment or create the jobs promised; (3) ending “pay to
play” in state contracts to ensure that they are awarded based on
qualifications, not political contributions. Open government initiatives can
save millions of taxpayer dollars through more efficient government operations,
more competitive contracting bids, fewer manual information requests, and lower
risk of fraud. Transparency also allows states to track how well subsidies and
tax incentives deliver results. Coupled with corporate accountability laws and
greater public input, transparency allows the state to recoup funding from
underperforming projects and programs and reinvest those dollars into more
successful programs. To restart our economy we must put unemployed Hoosiers back
to work by providing tax breaks for businesses that hire new employees and end
the red tape that holds back small businesses by creating a fast-track
permitting process to move job creating projects forward. By finding common
sense solutions in these tough economic times, we can ensure that our emergency
personnel and first responders will continue to receive the funding, resources
and training necessary to serve and protect.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain
both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction
without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General
Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between
I-64 and Martinsville?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
5. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
State Senate District 7:
Brad Thompson (Taxpayer
Friendly)
7395 W. Stoney Dr.
Delphi, IN 46923
Phone: (765) 413-8990
E-mail: teamsterleader@yahoo.com
Website: http://bradthompsonforstatesenate.blogspot.com/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 6, 2012,
General Election
1. QUESTION: What are your priorities regarding the 2013-2015 state budget?
ANSWER: Current year revenues should exceed current year appropriations.
2. QUESTION: Should the non-transportation appropriations from the state’s
Motor Vehicle Highway Account be transferred to the state’s General Fund so
more of our Indiana Gasoline Tax dollars can be properly spent to meet our
transportation needs? ANSWER: Yes.
3. QUESTION: Should the Automatic Taxpayer Refund law be (a) improved to make
refunds more likely, (b) kept as it is, or (c) eliminated? ANSWER: The Automatic
Taxpayer Refund law should be improved to make refunds more likely.
4. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and
the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: Yes.
5. QUESTION: What is your position regarding township government reform? ANSWER:
Support public question on ballot . One of the problems with township government
is tax and hoard mentality. Local control of monies is desirable with money
going for what its intended for.
6. QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment commissions
oversight? ANSWER: Support much improved oversight over redevelopment
commissions by everyday Hoosiers through the public meeting and public records
laws.
7. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: When elected I will work with groups like Watchdog Indiana to decrease
the tax burden on Hoosiers and get the most out of tax dollars for Hoosiers.
Please see http://bradthompsonforstatesenate.blogspot.com/2012/04/brandt-hershman-politics-that-hurt.html.
State Senate District 8:
Debra J. Birkholz (Taxpayer
UNfriendly)
4932 N 200 East
LaPorte, IN 46350
Phone: (219) 778-9769
E-mail: djbirk@csinet.net; ddecker3@verizon.net
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate
Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race ):
No.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
Austin Griffin (Taxpayer
Friendly)
10164 North Ruby Road
LaPorte, IN 46350
Phone: (219) 778-9575
E-mail: GriffinForSenate@gmail.com
Website:
www.austingriffinstatesenate.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 8, 2012,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Should the 2013-2015 state budget be balanced where (a) current
year appropriations do not exceed current year revenues, (b) there are no
delayed payments and one-time fund transfers, and (c) a reserves balance of at
least 5% is maintained? ANSWER: YES. I believe in a
balanced budget. A reserve balance
should be higher than 5% but you have written "at least" so I must
agree with that.
2. QUESTION: Should the non-transportation appropriations from the state’s
Motor Vehicle Highway Account be transferred to the state’s General Fund so
more of our Indiana Gasoline Tax can be properly spent to meet our transportation needs? ANSWER:
YES. It is important to maintain the state’s General Fund so
more or our gas tax can spent on our state, county and local roads. This is
important for new Economic Development as well as the ingress/egress of the
farmer.
3. QUESTION: Should the automatic taxpayer refund be improved, maintained, or
eliminated? ANSWER: Improved. In 2011, the surplus came in at
9.1% thus the 10% taxpayer refund did not kick in. The idea behind the refund
put more money in circulation thus some of it comes back in taxes and that
should just be part of the budgeted process under the continued theory of
"government there to assist" not penalize or hoard.
4. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and
the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: YES.
The Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction are in
place as assistance to the homeowner in a time of recession and real estate
de-valuations.
5. QUESTION: What is your position regarding township government reform? ANSWER:
Continue to evaluate such reforms. We should always be looking
for down-sizing government where we can in efforts to save tax dollars, create
efficiencies, and allow even the smallest of towns to not be over-burdened by
bloated governments.
6. QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment commissions
oversight? ANSWER: All government should be transparent. All
officials should be accountable. We must create an efficient system of
transparency and accountability and not increase the size of government by
creating another audit division or another oversight division that eat up more
tax dollars.
7. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: My Facebook page is Austin Griffin For State Senate
District 8.
Eric Harris (Taxpayer Friendly)
4441 Laurel Creek Dr.
South Bend, IN 46628
Phone: (574) 286-2243
E-mail: media@ericharris2012.com
Website: http://ericharris2012.com/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 6, 2012,
General Election
1. QUESTION: What are your priorities regarding the 2013-2015 state budget?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD( from campaign website): A balance budget is the
only part of the solution to transform to increase in revenues. State budget
should be balanced; increasing taxes is not an option.
I will not vote for new or increased taxes.
2. QUESTION: Should the non-transportation appropriations from the state’s
Motor Vehicle Highway Account be transferred to the state’s General Fund so
more of our Indiana Gasoline Tax dollars can be properly spent to meet our
transportation needs? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
3. QUESTION: Should the Automatic Taxpayer Refund law be (a) improved to make
refunds more likely, (b) kept as it is, or (c) eliminated? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
4. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and
the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND. RECORD (from campaign website): We must pledge
to maintain both the Homestead Supplemental and Homestead Standard property tax
deductions.
5. QUESTION: What is your position regarding township government reform? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
6. QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment commissions
oversight? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
7. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 8, 2012, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Should the 2013-2015 state budget be balanced where (a) current
year appropriations do not exceed current year revenues, (b) there are no
delayed payments and one-time fund transfers, and (c) a reserves balance of at
least 5% is maintained? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Should the non-transportation appropriations from the state’s
Motor Vehicle Highway Account be transferred to the state’s General Fund so
more of our Indiana Gasoline Tax can be properly spent to meet our
transportation needs? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
3. QUESTION: Should the automatic taxpayer refund be improved, maintained, or
eliminated? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
4. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and
the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
5. QUESTION: What is your position regarding township government reform? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
6. QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment commissions
oversight? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
7. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
Gregory D. Kelver (Taxpayer
UNfriendly - DESPICABLE)
PO Box 222
Union Mills, IN 46382
Phone: (219) 324-4229
E-mail:
Website: http://www.sensiblealternative.org/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in
2009 for the exact same version of Senate Joint Resolution 1 that passed in
2008? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your
candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID
NOT RESPOND.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 7,
2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax
increased from 5% to 6% with a promise that the proceeds would be used to
decrease homeowner homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3% decrease
into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average Hoosier
homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility to levy
income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax relief. QUESTION:
Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose additional income, sales,
and other taxes? NO. I believe that
Indiana's property tax system should be radically restructured (lower) into a uniform
, equal, and simple square footage
based flat tax on land & structures to reduce the burden on property
taxpayers. Education funding should be pulled off of the property tax system and
parents should receive an individual education grant or a tax credit to be used
to expand parental choices in education.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget the last two fiscal years has been balanced
without fund transfers for the first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm).
QUESTION: Should the state's total budget expenditures be no more than total
revenues for the next biennium? YES.
I believe the state budget should be reduced by 3-5% per year.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced with the inclusion of a
one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This decreases property taxes for the
average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be
continued beyond 2007? I believe that Indiana's property tax system should
be radically restructured into a simple, flat tax on land & structures to
reduce the burden on property taxpayers. Education funding should be pulled off
of the property tax system entirely and parents should receive an individual
education grant or a tax credit to be used to expand parental choices in
education.
4. BACKGROUND: Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of
Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners could cost up to $150 million. QUESTION: Should
the state pay for full-day kindergarten? NO. Education funding
should be pulled off of the property tax system entirely and parents should
receive an individual education grant or a tax credit to be used to expand
parental choices in education.
5. BACKGROUND: The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road
("Major Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to
pay off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next
ten years? NO. The proceeds from the Toll
Road sale should have been used to pay off debt as required by Indiana's
constitution.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects include $694 million for a new
terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to Evansville as well as a $500 million
Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION: Should the "Major Moves" expenditures
be combined with the Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain
I-69 extension without state tax increases? I am opposed
to a "new terrain" I-69 -
no additional tax (of any type) should be necessary.
7. BACKGROUND: The 2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a
toll road for an I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION:
Do you favor legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? I am opposed to a "new terrain" I-69 but I favor
user fees (tolls) to pay for interstate highway maintenance and improvements
instead of using general taxation paid by all taxpayers.
8. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
I favor a radical overhaul of property tax and education funding similar to the
Libertarian Party of Indiana Plan that was proposed in 2001. I
am strongly opposed to any tax plan such as Hometown Matters that would permit
new taxes on sales, income, food, beverages, or hotel rooms to be imposed by
local officials.
Maxine Spenner (Uncertain)
2582 W. Joliet Rd.
LaPorte, IN 46350
Phone: (219) 324-8571
E-mail:
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 8, 2012,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Should the 2013-2015 state budget be balanced where (a) current
year appropriations do not exceed current year revenues, (b) there are no
delayed payments and one-time fund transfers, and (c) a reserves balance of at
least 5% is maintained? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Should the non-transportation appropriations from the state’s
Motor Vehicle Highway Account be transferred to the state’s General Fund so
more of our Indiana Gasoline Tax can be properly spent to meet our
transportation needs? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
3. QUESTION: Should the automatic taxpayer refund be improved, maintained, or
eliminated? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
4. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and
the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
5. QUESTION: What is your position regarding township government reform? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
6. QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment commissions
oversight? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
7. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to
vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT
RESPOND. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race ):
I'm not sure this is the fairest plan, as I have always believed in equality,
and I question the fairness of the assessment.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your
candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT
RESPOND.
Allen L. Stevens, Jr. (Taxpayer
UNfriendly -
DESPICABLE)
705 Union Street
Union Mills, IN 46382
Phone: (219) 767-3144
E-mail:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in
2009 for the exact same version of Senate Joint Resolution 1 that passed in
2008? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your
candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID
NOT RESPOND.
State Senate District 9:
Mike Settles (Taxpayer
UNfriendly - DESPICABLE)
409 N Vine
Elkhart, IN 46514
Phone:
E-mail: cmsettles@juno.com
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in
2009 for the exact same version of Senate Joint Resolution 1 that passed in
2008? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your
candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID
NOT RESPOND.
State Senate District 10:
Glenn L. Terry (Uncertain)
2614 Macarthur Ave.
South Bend, IN 46615
Phone: (574) 232-5754
E-mail: terrygl@sbcglobal.net
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 6, 2012,
General Election
1. QUESTION: What are your priorities regarding the 2013-2015 state budget?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Should the non-transportation appropriations from the state’s
Motor Vehicle Highway Account be transferred to the state’s General Fund so
more of our Indiana Gasoline Tax dollars can be properly spent to meet our
transportation needs? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
3. QUESTION: Should the Automatic Taxpayer Refund law be (a) improved to make
refunds more likely, (b) kept as it is, or (c) eliminated? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
4. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and
the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
5. QUESTION: What is your position regarding township government reform? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
6. QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment commissions
oversight? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
7. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
State Senate District 11:
Catherine Fanello (Uncertain)
18441 Summer Wind Lane
South Bend, IN 46637
Phone: (574) 277-9774
E-mail: cfanello@comcast.net; fanelloforsenate@gmail.com
Website: http://www.fanelloforsenate.com/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2,
2010,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you
support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the
1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax
deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced?
Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility
of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be
replenished.
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (From Website): We should be worrying
about fully funding kindergarten, providing textbooks and discussing student
achievement gaps, not diverting money to cure funding problems in Indianapolis
like the Marion County Professional Sports Development Area. While job creation
is imperative for our communities to thrive and grow, we must also focus our energy
on ensuring that not one educational opportunity is lost for our children.
Indiana must improve its transparency so that Hoosiers can have easier access to
monitor our government’s spending. My goal is to work with lawmakers to come
up with an online, searchable database that provides residents with information
on annual state spending. A transparency website can save millions of dollars as
a result of providing more efficient government administration. The largest
savings reported may come from the prevention of fraud and wasteful spending.
This website would also allow the government to track the performance of state
subsidies and target underperforming programs to reinvest funding into
successful programs. I believe a good economy starts with a strong work ethic
and empowering our working families by keeping taxes low, assisting small
business owners, providing a business friendly climate and investing in
education and a skilled workforce. Education must also be a top priority, next
to job creation and economic growth. Without a strong education, Hoosier
children will not be able to compete in today’s increasingly tough job market.
I believe in providing an appropriate level of public school funding for our
children while at the same time ensuring that school systems operate as
efficiently as possible. Additionally, I support extending full-day kindergarten
to every Hoosier child, providing funding for early childhood education and
offering professional development opportunities to teachers. I also support
providing adequate state funding to public universities to allow every Hoosier
access to affordable, quality higher education. I support a fair and equitable
system of taxation and am committed to keeping taxes low for Hoosiers.
Additionally, state government must work to reduce unnecessary spending while
providing the most critical services to citizens at a fair price they can
afford. I support providing adequate funding for state
provided pensions for public safety personnel, fully funding Indiana’s law
enforcement and emergency responder training facilities, providing state
assistance to returning military personnel in securing employment and education
opportunities, and fully funding Homeland Security efforts in all Hoosier
counties.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain
both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction
without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General
Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between
I-64 and Martinsville?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
5. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
Patricia A. (Pat) McQuade (Uncertain)
Address: 1604 Blue Heron Way, South Bend, IN 46628
Phone: (574) 271-7843
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 7,
2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax
increased from 5% to 6% with a promise that the proceeds would be used to
decrease homeowner homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3% decrease
into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average Hoosier
homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility to levy
income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax relief. QUESTION:
Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose additional income, sales,
and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget the last two fiscal years has been balanced
without fund transfers for the first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm).
QUESTION: Should the state's total budget expenditures be no more than total
revenues for the next biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced with the inclusion of a
one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This decreases property taxes for the
average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be
continued beyond 2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. BACKGROUND: Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of
Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should
the state pay for full-day kindergarten? If YES, where should the state
get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND: The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road
("Major Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to
pay off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next
ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects include $694 million for a new
terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to Evansville as well as a $500 million
Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION: Should the "Major Moves" expenditures
be combined with the Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain
I-69 extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The 2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a
toll road for an I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION:
Do you favor legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
State Senate District 12:
Jim Ball (Uncertain)
57131 Westlake Dr.
Middlebury, IN 46540
Phone: (574) 361-6156
E-mail: hoosiers4jimball@gmail.com
Website: http://hoosiers4jimball.com/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November
6, 2012, General Election
1. QUESTION: What are your priorities regarding the 2013-2015 state budget?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (from campaign website): We need to restore the
$300 million cut from the public education budget and make early childhood
education accessible to all Hoosier children. We must help small business owners
invest in the equipment they need to expand their businesses by making the
enhanced expensing deductions permanent.
2. QUESTION: Should the non-transportation appropriations from the state’s
Motor Vehicle Highway Account be transferred to the state’s General Fund so
more of our Indiana Gasoline Tax dollars can be properly spent to meet our
transportation needs? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
3. QUESTION: Should the Automatic Taxpayer Refund law be (a) improved to make
refunds more likely, (b) kept as it is, or (c) eliminated? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
4. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and
the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
5. QUESTION: What is your position regarding township government reform? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
6. QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment commissions
oversight? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
7. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (from campaign website): I will work to restore
workers’ rights and prevailing wage protections. I will oppose the outsourcing
of critical government services for profit. As Hoosiers, we can do a better job
of helping those who want to work by minimizing barriers to employment: skilled
job training, expanded public transportation, and quality, accessible and
affordable childcare. We must promote training for hard working Hoosiers with
technical and post-secondary education and retraining for new opportunities.
James C. Erb (Taxpayer
UNfriendly)
P.O. Box 177
13633 CR44
Millersburg, IN 46543
Phone: (574) 642-3847
E-mail: jimerb@embarqmail.com;
erbefour@yahoo.com; brendanamber@yahoo.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate
Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
Joe Guerrero (Taxpayer
UNfriendly)
65831 Barrens Drive
Goshen, IN 46526
Phone: (574) 534-3212
E-mail: guerrero2K@aol.com; joeg.statesenate@yahoo.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate
Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
Mike Leasor (Taxpayer
UNfriendly)
15 St Joseph Manor
Elkhart, IN 46516
Phone: (574) 527-6047
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate
Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
Don Metzler-Smith (Taxpayer
UNfriendly - Part of
the Problem)
59272 Lewis Street
Elkhart, IN 46516
Phone: (574) 575-1582
E-mail: dlmetzle@alumni.iu.edu
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in
2009 for the exact same version of Senate Joint Resolution 1 that passed in
2008? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD
(www.indystar.com/2008race):
Until "trending" plays out, and we know more about exactly how urban
areas are affected, a constitutional amendment for the caps is premature. I
would like to see a tax formula constructed that includes a futuristic stance in
a proactive way rather than reactive. My question to incumbents of both parties
has always been: Where were they the last nine to 10 years since the St. Johns
decision was handed down? Couldn't they see the inevitable instability and
erratic nature of property taxes? I care deeply for the future of Indiana and
the state's education structure, workforce, and job status. Messing around with
time and highway assets only distracts from the fundamentals needed for Indiana
to be a leader in the region in the 21st century.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your
candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID
NOT RESPOND.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to
vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT
RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your
candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT
RESPOND.
Joseph P. Williams (Taxpayer
UNfriendly)
57043 Downy Ct.
Goshen, IN 46528
Phone: (574) 875-9440
E-mail:
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate
Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
State Senate District 13:
Fred Demske (Taxpayer
UNfriendly - Part of
the Problem)
911 Eagle Trace
Kendallville, IN 46755
Phone: (260) 347-2437
E-mail: demskeforsenate@live.com;
demo009@hotmail.com; ldemske@comcast.net
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in
2009 for the exact same version of Senate Joint Resolution 1 that passed in
2008? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD
(www.indystar.com/2008race): No.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your
candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID
NOT RESPOND.
Robert L. Meeks (Taxpayer
UNfriendly)
Address: P.O. Box 85, LaGrange, IN 46761
Phone: (317) 232-9400
E-mail: S13@in.gov
Website: http://www.in.gov/legislative/senate_republicans/homepages/s13/index.html
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Senate Joint Resolution 1 passed
the Indiana Senate 40-7 and the Indiana House 79-20 on March 14, 2008, and
was signed by the Governor on March 19, 2008. SJR 1 amends the Indiana
Constitution to cap homeowners' property tax bills at 1% of assessed value,
rental and agricultural property at 2%, and business property at 3%. For
property taxes first due and payable in 2012, 90 of Indiana's 92
counties must have a homeowner property tax cap that is 1% of the gross
assessed value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008,
is exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St.
Joseph counties ONLY. The result of these two existing debt service
exemptions equates to a 1.88% homeowner cap in Lake County and a 1.52%
homeowner cap in St.
Joseph County. The homeowner caps for Lake and St. Joseph counties must become
1% in 2020. The exact same version of SJR 1 that passed in 2008 must again pass in the General Assembly in 2009 to put the 1%
constitutional homeowner property tax cap amendment on the 2010 ballot. We
the people can then vote to make the 1% homeowner property tax cap a
permanent part of the Indiana Constitution. Never has it been so easy to separate those who are part of the
property tax relief solution from those who are part of the property tax
spending problem. A General Assembly candidate who pledges to
vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009 is part of the
solution, otherwise the legislator is part of
the problem. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in 2009 for
the exact same version of Senate
Joint Resolution 1 that passed in 2008? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
2008 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on Senate
Joint Resolution 1, which amended the Indiana Constitution beginning 2012 to
include a cap on homestead property tax in 90 counties at 1% of gross assessed
value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008, is
exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St. Joseph
counties ONLY. The effective constitutional homeowner property tax caps in Lake
and St. Joseph counties are 1.88% and 1.52% respectively until the 1% cap takes
effect in 2020.
Voted YES on
House
Bill 1001, which phases in the SJR 1 constitutional property tax caps by
2010. Also, 2008 property taxes are reduced 26% from the prior year. An increase
in the sales tax from 6% to 7% and local option income taxes will be used to
replace the property tax revenue reductions that result from the property tax
caps.
2007 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that is Taxpayer
Friendly because the General Fund & Property Tax Replacement Fund $26.0722
billion expenditures total for the 2008 and 2009 fiscal years is less than the
$26.1946 billion revenues total. HB 1001 also includes additional homestead
credits from the Property Tax Reduction Trust Fund of $300 million in 2007 and
$250 million in 2008.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1478, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly for the following reasons: (1)
Homeowner property taxes will increase 1.2% each year from 2009 through 2013
with annual decreases in the Homestead Standard Deduction. (2) The 2% Circuit
Breaker Cap on residential property taxes passed by the General Assembly in 2006
has been watered down to the point where it is almost eliminated. (3) The new
local option income tax for property tax relief will be offset by future
property tax increases unless the new local option income tax to replace
property tax increases is implemented. (4) Using the new local option income tax
to replace property tax increases means that income tax increases on Hoosier
working families would lower the proportionate tax burden of businesses and
utilities by freezing business and utility property taxes without a
corresponding increase in other business and utility taxes. (5) A new local
option income tax has been authorized for public safety.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1835,which is Taxpayer Friendly because it uses slot machine licensing
fees and wagering taxes to establish the Property Tax Reduction Trust Fund,
which is to be used for property tax relief in any manner prescribed by the
General Assembly.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 401, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly because state legislators voted
themselves a perpetual pay increase that is 20% more than the typical Hoosier
working family earns during an entire year. SB 401 also eliminated taxpayer-paid
lifetime health insurance and the $4 taxpayer match for each $1 of legislator
pension contribution, but General Assembly members should not have received an
excessive salary increase in return for eliminating extravagant perks they
should not have in the first place.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
7, 2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND:
Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax increased from 5% to 6%
with a promise that the proceeds would be used to decrease homeowner
homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3%
decrease into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average
Hoosier homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility
to levy income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax
relief. QUESTION: Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose
additional income, sales, and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget
the last two fiscal years has been balanced without fund transfers for the
first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm). QUESTION: Should the state's total budget
expenditures be no more than total revenues for the next
biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced
with the inclusion of a one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This
decreases property taxes for the average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should
the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be continued beyond
2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4.
BACKGROUND:
Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners
could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should the state pay for full-day
kindergarten? If YES, where should the state get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten?
HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND:
The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road ("Major
Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to pay
off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the
next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects
include $694 million for a new terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to
Evansville as well as a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION:
Should the "Major Moves" expenditures be combined with the
Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain I-69
extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The
2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a toll road for an
I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION: Do you favor
legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2006 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES
on "Major
Moves" House
Bill 1008, which authorizes the Indiana Department of Transportation to
enter into public-private agreements with private entities (operators)
concerning tollway projects for I-69 between Martinsville and Evansville. HB
1008 also authorizes the Indiana Finance Authority to enter into public-private
agreements with operators for the Indiana Toll Road.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, a residential property tax reduction bill that increases the
homestead credit for one year in 2006 to 28% and the homestead standard
deduction for one year in 2007 to $45,000. Beginning in 2007 for Lake County and
2008 for all other counties, HB 1001 also establishes a cap on residential
property taxes equal to 2% of the assessed value of the residential property.
2005 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES
on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that included seven significant homeowner
property tax increases.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1120, which contained thirteen negative tax impacts including a
regional Food and Beverage Tax to finance a new Colts stadium.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
2, 2004, General Election
1. Guiding Principles for 2005-07 Biennium Budget. DID NOT RESPOND.
2. Opinions on Homeowner Property Taxes. DID NOT RESPOND.
3. Position on Indianapolis to Evansville Interstate. DID NOT RESPOND.
4. Additional Comments. DID NOT RESPOND.
2003 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted
FOR on
House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that was Taxpayer UNfriendly primarily
because (1) the 2004-05 fiscal year General Fund and Property Tax Replacement
Fund spending total of $11.48 billion exceeded the $11.4424 billion revenues
total (fiscal year 2004-05 was the eighth straight year where spending exceeded
revenues), (2) the full Property Tax relief that was promised to homeowners in
last year's special session legislation was reduced by the so-called Homestead
Credit "correction," and (3) Pension Stabilization Fund transfers were
included (these transfers worsened the $8.5 billion shortfall in teacher
retirement funds).
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
5, 2002, General Election
1-2. Special session vote AGAINST
several tax increases that will increase revenues $1.7782 billion from July 1,
2002, through June 30, 2005.
3. Special session vote AGAINST
a 20% gas tax increase (from 15 to 18 cents per gallon) effective
01/01/03.
4. Special session vote AGAINST
a phased-in shift of the inventory tax to (1) all other types of property
through an increased property tax rate and (2) a tax on the income of
individuals (in those counties choosing to do so) through the
establishment or increase of a County Economic Development Income Tax (CEDIT).
5. Did not receive General Election Questionnaire. See the Legislative
Voting Record.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 7,
2002, Primary Election
1. Voted on February 28 AGAINST
the Indiana Senate version of HB 1004, which included an unneeded
Income Tax rate increase, imposed a new
business Payroll Tax, and increased revenues
$933 million more than taxes would have been reduced through June 30,
2004.
2. Voted on February 27 FOR
the Indiana Senate version of HB 1317, which would have raised
the Gasoline Tax from 15 cents per gallon to 18 cents during 2003, 20
cents during 2004, and 22 cents after 2004.
3-4. Did not receive Primary Questionnaire. See the Legislative
Voting Record.
Marlin A. Stutzman (Taxpayer
Friendly)
Address: 250 W 600 N, Howe, IN 46746
Phone: (260) 562-3303
E-mail: marlin@marlinstutzman.com
Website:
2010 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES
on House Joint Resolution 1,
which gives voters statewide the opportunity to amend the Indiana Constitution
to (1) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (2) protect
homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1001, which contains 21 Taxpayer Friendly government ethics reform
provisions including a 365-day wait after leaving the General Assembly before a
legislator can become a lobbyist or legislative liaison, the reporting of
certain expenditures by the legislative liaisons of state agencies and state
educational institutions, and a reduction from $100 to $50 in the minimum
reportable amount for the total daily gifts given by a registered lobbyist to a
legislative person.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1086, which contains 7 Taxpayer Friendly provisions including the HJR
1 Constitutional Amendment ballot language.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1367, which contains 5 Taxpayer Friendly K-12 education provisions
that preserve and protect instructional programs.
Voted YES on
Senate Bill 23, which delays the scheduled increase in unemployment insurance
premiums for one year until 2011.
Voted YES on Senate Bill
396, which mandates an
adjusted six-year average that eliminates the highest value to calculate the
base rate for the assessment of agricultural land.
2009 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted
YES
on Senate
Joint Resolution 1, which amended the Indiana Constitution beginning 2012 to
include a cap on homestead property tax in 90 counties at 1% of gross assessed
value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008, is
exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St. Joseph
counties ONLY. The effective constitutional homeowner property tax caps in Lake
and St. Joseph counties are 1.88% and 1.52% respectively until the 1% cap takes
effect in 2020.
Voted YES
on House Bill 1001 SS, the
2009-2011 special session budget bill that (1) provides enough resources for
good government AND (2) satisfactorily protects Hoosier working families
from state and local tax increases. A
YES vote supports a budget that is sufficiently Taxpayer Friendly.
A NO vote would have shut down much of state government.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 348 to have a Library Services Plan developed and approved by a Public
Library Service Planning Committee (with an "opt out" referendum
provision) in every county (except Marion County) to help more effectively use
working family dollars currently spent on library services (with the option to
equitably replace public library property taxes with a county economic
development income tax).
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 452 to prohibit employees of a
local government unit from serving as elected officials within the same local
government unit, move the elections of municipal officers to even-numbered
years, move all school board member elections to the November general election
in even-numbered years, establish the use of vote centers as an option for all
counties, and require a city clerk-treasurer in a third class city to attend
fiscal officer training provided by the state board of accounts.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 506 to (1) allow a single County Chief Executive
Officer or County Manager, (2) allow the County Council or the Board of
County Supervisors to exercise both the fiscal and legislative powers
of the county, (3) provide for voter-initiated referendums on county
government reorganization, (4) repeal the requirement that political
subdivisions must approve local government reorganizations initiated by voters,
(5) assign the Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations four
responsibilities to identify and monitor good local government
practices, (6) prohibit County Manager nepotism, (7) repeal unproductive
reporting requirements, and (8) continue to elect the County Assessor.
Voted YES
on Senate
Bill 512 to (1) abolish on January 1, 2013, each township board in every
county (other than Marion County) and make the county fiscal body also the
fiscal body and legislative body of each township, (2) require a township when
formulating an annual budget to consider whether the part of the ending balance
in each township fund in excess of 10% of budgeted expenditures should be used
instead of imposing additional property taxes for the ensuing year, (3) prohibit
a relative of a township officer or employee from being employed by the township
in a position that would put the relative in a direct supervisory or subordinate
relationship with the officer or employee, (4) require a township trustee's
annual report to list separately each expenditure to reimburse the trustee for
the trustee's public business use of personal property, (5) require each
township office to include the address, phone number, and regular office hours
(if any) of the township office in at least one local telephone directory, (6)
prohibits a public meeting or a public hearing of a township official or
governing body from being held in a private residence, and (7) requires the
State Board of Accounts to submit an annual township examination report to the
executive director of the Legislative Services Agency and to county councils.
Voted YES
on House
Bill 1607 to require a referendum before establishing a Northern Indiana
Regional Transportation District, which is a new tax-imposing level of
Indiana government in Lake, Porter, LaPorte, and St. Joseph counties controlled
by a board with unrestricted powers (where most board members have no real
connection to the taxpayers' community).
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008, General Election
1.
BACKGROUND: Senate Joint Resolution 1 passed
the Indiana Senate 40-7 and the Indiana House 79-20 on March 14, 2008, and
was signed by the Governor on March 19, 2008. SJR 1 amends the Indiana
Constitution to cap homeowners' property tax bills at 1% of assessed value,
rental and agricultural property at 2%, and business property at 3%. For
property taxes first due and payable in 2012, 90 of Indiana's 92
counties must have a homeowner property tax cap that is 1% of the gross
assessed value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008,
is exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St.
Joseph counties ONLY. The result of these two existing debt service
exemptions equates to a 1.88% homeowner cap in Lake County and a 1.52%
homeowner cap in St.
Joseph County. The homeowner caps for Lake and St. Joseph counties must become
1% in 2020. The exact same version of SJR 1 that passed in 2008 must again pass in the General Assembly in 2009 to put the 1%
constitutional homeowner property tax cap amendment on the 2010 ballot. We
the people can then vote to make the 1% homeowner property tax cap a
permanent part of the Indiana Constitution. Never has it been so easy to separate those who are part of the
property tax relief solution from those who are part of the property tax
spending problem. A General Assembly candidate who pledges to
vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009 is part of the
solution, otherwise the legislator is part of
the problem. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in 2009 for
the exact same version of Senate
Joint Resolution 1 that passed in 2008? DID NOT
RESPOND. RECORD (10/14/08 Indiana
Family Institute Voter Guide): Undecided
about passing the constitutional amendment on property tax reform again next
year (must pass two sessions) so it can go on the November general election
ballot for a vote.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID
NOT RESPOND.
2008 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on Senate
Joint Resolution 1, which amends the Indiana Constitution to
include a cap beginning 2012 on homestead property tax in 90 counties at 1% of gross assessed
value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008, is
exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St. Joseph
counties ONLY. The effective constitutional homeowner property tax caps in Lake
and St. Joseph counties are 1.88% and 1.52% respectively until their 1% cap takes
effect in 2020.
Voted YES on
House
Bill 1001, which phases in the SJR 1 constitutional property tax caps by
2010. Also, 2008 property taxes are reduced 26% from the prior year. An increase
in the sales tax from 6% to 7% and county-wide local option income taxes will be used to
replace the property tax revenue reductions that result from the property tax
caps.
2007 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted NO on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that is Taxpayer
Friendly because the General Fund & Property Tax Replacement Fund $26.0722
billion expenditures total for the 2008 and 2009 fiscal years is less than the
$26.1946 billion revenues total. HB 1001 also includes additional homestead
credits from the Property Tax Reduction Trust Fund of $300 million in 2007 and
$250 million in 2008.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1478, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly for the following reasons: (1)
Homeowner property taxes will increase 1.2% each year from 2009 through 2013
with annual decreases in the Homestead Standard Deduction. (2) The 2% Circuit
Breaker Cap on residential property taxes passed by the General Assembly in 2006
has been watered down to the point where it is almost eliminated. (3) The new
local option income tax for property tax relief will be offset by future
property tax increases unless the new local option income tax to replace
property tax increases is implemented. (4) Using the new local option income tax
to replace property tax increases means that income tax increases on Hoosier
working families would lower the proportionate tax burden of businesses and
utilities by freezing business and utility property taxes without a
corresponding increase in other business and utility taxes. (5) A new local
option income tax has been authorized for public safety.
Voted NO on House
Bill 1835,which is Taxpayer Friendly because it uses slot machine licensing
fees and wagering taxes to establish the Property Tax Reduction Trust Fund,
which is to be used for property tax relief in any manner prescribed by the
General Assembly.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 401, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly because state legislators voted
themselves a perpetual pay increase that is 20% more than the typical Hoosier
working family earns during an entire year. SB 401 also eliminated taxpayer-paid
lifetime health insurance and the $4 taxpayer match for each $1 of legislator
pension contribution, but General Assembly members should not have received an
excessive salary increase in return for eliminating extravagant perks they
should not have in the first place.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
7, 2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND:
Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax increased from 5% to 6%
with a promise that the proceeds would be used to decrease homeowner
homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3%
decrease into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average
Hoosier homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility
to levy income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax
relief. QUESTION: Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose
additional income, sales, and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget
the last two fiscal years has been balanced without fund transfers for the
first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm). QUESTION: Should the state's total budget
expenditures be no more than total revenues for the next
biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced
with the inclusion of a one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This
decreases property taxes for the average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should
the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be continued beyond
2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4.
BACKGROUND:
Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners
could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should the state pay for full-day
kindergarten? If YES, where should the state get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten?
HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND:
The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road ("Major
Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to pay
off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the
next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects
include $694 million for a new terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to
Evansville as well as a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION:
Should the "Major Moves" expenditures be combined with the
Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain I-69
extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The
2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a toll road for an
I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION: Do you favor
legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2006 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES
on "Major
Moves" House
Bill 1008, which authorizes the Indiana Department of Transportation to
enter into public-private agreements with private entities (operators)
concerning tollway projects for I-69 between Martinsville and Evansville. HB
1008 also authorizes the Indiana Finance Authority to enter into public-private
agreements with operators for the Indiana Toll Road.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, a residential property tax reduction bill that increases the
homestead credit for one year in 2006 to 28% and the homestead standard
deduction for one year in 2007 to $45,000. Beginning in 2007 for Lake County and
2008 for all other counties, HB 1001 also establishes a cap on residential
property taxes equal to 2% of the assessed value of the residential property.
2005 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES
on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that included seven significant homeowner
property tax increases.
Voted NO on House
Bill 1120, which contained thirteen negative tax impacts including a
regional Food and Beverage Tax to finance a new Colts stadium.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
2, 2004, General Election
1. Guiding Principles for 2005-07
Biennium Budget. DID NOT RESPOND. Record:
Voted AGAINST the 2004-05 state budget where
General Fund and Property Tax Replacement Fund spending totals exceed current
revenue totals for the eighth straight year.
The 2004-05 state budget also includes Pension Stabilization Fund transfers,
which worsen the $8.5 billion shortfall in teacher retirement funds.
2. Opinions
on Homeowner Property Taxes. DID NOT RESPOND. Record: Voted
AGAINST the 2004-05 state budget where the
property tax relief promised to homeowners in the 2002 special session was
reduced by the so-called Homestead Credit
"correction."
3. Position on Indianapolis to Evansville Interstate. DID NOT RESPOND.
4. Additional Comments. DID NOT RESPOND. Record: Did not
respond to the Candidate Questionnaires for November
5, 2002, General Election and the May
7, 2002, Primary Election. See the Legislative
Voting Record.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
5, 2002, General Election
1-5. DID NOT RESPOND to General Election Questionnaire. See the Candidate
Questionnaire for the May 7, 2002, Primary Election.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 7,
2002, Primary Election
1-4. DID NOT RESPOND to Primary Questionnaire. See the Candidate
Questionnaire for the November 5, 2002, General Election.
David Yarde II (Taxpayer
Friendly)
Address: 1194 St Rd 8, Garrett, IN 46738
Phone: (260) 402-2730
E-mail:
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 8, 2012,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Should the 2013-2015 state budget be balanced where (a) current
year appropriations do not exceed current year revenues, (b) there are no
delayed payments and one-time fund transfers, and (c) a reserves balance of at
least 5% is maintained? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Should the non-transportation appropriations from the state’s
Motor Vehicle Highway Account be transferred to the state’s General Fund so
more of our Indiana Gasoline Tax can be properly spent to meet our
transportation needs? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
3. QUESTION: Should the automatic taxpayer refund be improved, maintained, or
eliminated? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
4. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and
the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
5. QUESTION: What is your position regarding township government reform? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
6. QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment commissions
oversight? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
7. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2012 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1003, which is Taxpayer Friendly because (1) public access to
government meetings and records is improved and (2) it is less likely that
public agencies will intentionally violate the Public Access Laws.
DID NOT VOTE on House
Bill 1005, which contains six Taxpayer Friendly local government Conflict Of
Interest provisions and sixteen Taxpayer Friendly local government Nepotism
provisions.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1376,
which is Taxpayer UNfriendly because (1) the automatic taxpayer refund excess
reserves trigger is increased from 10% to 12.5% and (2) Hoosier working families
will possibly receive an automatic taxpayer refund every even-numbered year
instead of every year.
2011 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, which includes among its 16 Taxpayer Friendly state budget
provisions no tax increases and an operating surplus in both the 2012 and 2013
fiscal years with a satisfactory reserve balance on June 30, 2013.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1002, which is Taxpayer Friendly because (1) charter schools have the
potential to help increase the academic growth of lower socioeconomic students,
(2) the number of Indiana nonprofit private colleges and universities authorized
to create charter schools is limited, (3) the Indianapolis mayor is the only
Indiana mayor who may authorize charter schools, (4) conversion from a public
school to a charter school is sufficiently stringent, and (5) property taxes are
NOT improperly used to support charter schools.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1003, which uses state K-12
tuition support money to fund scholarships for nonpublic school students and is
Taxpayer UNfriendly because (1) nonpublic private and parochial schools are not
equally open to all children, (2) nonpublic school budgets are not approved by a
directly elected public body, (3) evidence-based research does not support
greater school choice as a means to achieve overall educational improvement, (4)
it is very likely unconstitutional, and (5) state tuition support dollars would
go to nonpublic schools that are not uniformly distributed throughout the state.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1022, which would have implemented a number of Taxpayer Friendly local
government provisions related to nepotism and officeholder conflict-of-interest.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1074, which provides that school board members selected by election
must be elected at November general elections and is Taxpayer Friendly because
the greater voter turnout in general elections will make it more difficult for
local vested interests to unduly influence school board elections.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1583, which passed as part of House
Bill 1004 and is Taxpayer Friendly because the 1% homeowner property tax cap
and ten homeowner property tax deductions are allowed in the year of a property
transfer if the property is determined to be exempt in the year following the
transfer year.
2010 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES
on House Joint Resolution 1,
which gives voters statewide the opportunity to amend the Indiana Constitution
to (1) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (2) protect
homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1001, which contains 21 Taxpayer Friendly government ethics reform
provisions including a 365-day wait after leaving the General Assembly before a
legislator can become a lobbyist or legislative liaison, the reporting of
certain expenditures by the legislative liaisons of state agencies and state
educational institutions, and a reduction from $100 to $50 in the minimum
reportable amount for the total daily gifts given by a registered lobbyist to a
legislative person.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1086, which contains 7 Taxpayer Friendly provisions including the HJR
1 Constitutional Amendment ballot language.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1367, which contains 5 Taxpayer Friendly K-12 education provisions
that preserve and protect instructional programs.
Voted YES on
Senate Bill 23, which delays the scheduled increase in unemployment insurance
premiums for one year until 2011.
Voted YES on Senate Bill
396, which mandates an
adjusted six-year average that eliminates the highest value to calculate the
base rate for the assessment of agricultural land.
2009 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES
on House Bill 1001 SS, the
2009-2011 special session budget bill that (1) provides enough resources for
good government AND (2) satisfactorily protects Hoosier working families
from state and local tax increases. A
YES vote supports a budget that is sufficiently Taxpayer Friendly.
A NO vote would have shut down much of state government.
Voted NO on
Senate Bill 374 to allow Regional Transportation Districts, which are new tax-imposing
levels of Indiana government controlled by boards with unrestricted powers where
most board members have no real connection to the taxpayers' community, to be
established WITHOUT a referendum of affected voters.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4,
2008, General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in
2009 for the exact same version of Senate Joint Resolution 1 that passed in
2008? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD
(10/14/08 Indiana Family Institute
Voter Guide): Favors
passing the constitutional amendment on property tax reform again next year
(must pass two sessions) so it can go on the November general election ballot
for a vote.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your
candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID
NOT RESPOND.
State Senate District 14:
State Senate District 15:
R. Michael (Mike) Bynum (Uncertain)
Address: 7511 Leswood Court, Fort Wayne, IN 46816
Phone: (260) 447-2617
E-mail: royalb@verizon.net
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 7,
2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax
increased from 5% to 6% with a promise that the proceeds would be used to
decrease homeowner homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3% decrease
into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average Hoosier
homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility to levy
income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax relief. QUESTION:
Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose additional income, sales,
and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget the last two fiscal years has been balanced
without fund transfers for the first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm).
QUESTION: Should the state's total budget expenditures be no more than total
revenues for the next biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced with the inclusion of a
one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This decreases property taxes for the
average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be
continued beyond 2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. BACKGROUND: Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of
Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should
the state pay for full-day kindergarten? If YES, where should the state
get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND: The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road
("Major Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to
pay off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next
ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects include $694 million for a new
terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to Evansville as well as a $500 million
Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION: Should the "Major Moves" expenditures
be combined with the Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain
I-69 extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The 2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a
toll road for an I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION:
Do you favor legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Jack Morris (Unknown)
1034 Wingate Drive
Fort Wayne, IN 46845
Phone: (260) 417-6177
E-mail: jack@morrisforstatesenate.com;
bpmjl@verizon.net
Website: http://www.morrisforstatesenate.com/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2,
2010,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you
support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the
1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax
deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced?
Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility
of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be
replenished.
ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED. RECORD (From Website): I pledge to create an
online checkbook view of the state budget to assure transparency. The goal is to
make the state budget transparent. I believe this issue is important if we are
ever going to assure our government functions appropriately and our officials
are held accountable. I will be fighting for properly funded education. A
comprehensive, searchable online database of state spending and contracts would
be an important step in transparency. An online site with the details on state
spending, state service cuts, contracts, and how job creation awards are being
used, allows taxpayers to hold politicians accountable and gives us all greater
confidence that government is serving us as it should. Hoosiers are not careless
spenders and will use an open site to not only hold elected officials
accountable, but will provide great feedback and ideas. Open government
initiatives can save millions of taxpayer dollars through more efficient
government operations, more competitive contracting bids, fewer manual
information requests, and lower risk of fraud. Transparency also allows states
to track how well subsidies and tax incentives deliver results. Coupled with
corporate accountability laws and greater public input, transparency allows the
state to recoup funding from underperforming projects and programs and reinvest
those dollars into more successful programs. Our politicians must protect our
schools from funding shortfalls. We must review all aspects of our state’s
spending to find a proper way to fully fund education and avoid crisis
reductions. In addition to establishing full and consistent funding for our
schools we must also find a way to provide early childhood funding. Providing
adequate state funding to our public universities can keep tuition low and
teaching quality high. Making more financial aid available guarantees that
middle class families can access higher education opportunities for their
children. Policies to spur the development of clean energy resources could
position Indiana as a natural leader in producing renewable energy, income, and
jobs, and would export homegrown energy to other states. Failure to
progressively pursue clean energy jobs affects Indiana’s security, prosperity,
lasting jobs, and our environment. Rethinking these opportunities can improve
our security by significantly reducing our dependence on foreign oil and provide
a positive impact on Indiana’s prosperity. We, the people of Indiana, don’t
want government to do everything for us but we do want a government that cares
and works for the people.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain
both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction
without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General
Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between
I-64 and Martinsville?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
5. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
State Senate District 16:
Charles T. (Tom) Keen (Uncertain)
PO Box 206
Arcola, IN 46704-206
Phone: (260) 267-5336
E-mail: Tom.Keen@comcast.net
Website: http://www.keenforinstatesenate.com/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 6, 2012,
General Election
1. QUESTION: What are your priorities regarding the 2013-2015 state budget?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Should the non-transportation appropriations from the state’s
Motor Vehicle Highway Account be transferred to the state’s General Fund so
more of our Indiana Gasoline Tax dollars can be properly spent to meet our
transportation needs? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
3. QUESTION: Should the Automatic Taxpayer Refund law be (a) improved to make
refunds more likely, (b) kept as it is, or (c) eliminated? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
4. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and
the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
5. QUESTION: What is your position regarding township government reform? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
6. QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment commissions
oversight? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
7. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (from campaign website): For years, the standard
operating procedure for wooing businesses has been to provide millions of
dollars in taxpayer-funded incentives with no constraints. Tax breaks without
accountability have to end. Businesses need to be held to their end of the deal
when it comes to providing high-paying jobs. Implementing regular and thorough
fiscal audits will also ensure that our government can be trusted to properly
handle taxpayer money. We need to restore the public’s trust in the state’s
ability to accurately keep its books. Hoosier businesses need to work together
with the Department of Environmental Management to create real world regulations
that protect our most precious resources, and keep all Hoosiers safe and
healthy. By investing in domestic energy sources like natural gas we can curb
our dependence on foreign energy and encourage the production of clean, green
energy right here in Indiana.
State Senate District 17:
Gary Dillon (Taxpayer
Friendly)
Address: 8378 Ryerson Road, Pierceton, IN 46562
Phone: (219) 248-8765
E-mail:
Website:
2010 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES
on House Joint Resolution 1,
which gives voters statewide the opportunity to amend the Indiana Constitution
to (1) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (2) protect
homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1001, which contains 21 Taxpayer Friendly government ethics reform
provisions including a 365-day wait after leaving the General Assembly before a
legislator can become a lobbyist or legislative liaison, the reporting of
certain expenditures by the legislative liaisons of state agencies and state
educational institutions, and a reduction from $100 to $50 in the minimum
reportable amount for the total daily gifts given by a registered lobbyist to a
legislative person.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1086, which contains 7 Taxpayer Friendly provisions including the HJR
1 Constitutional Amendment ballot language.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1367, which contains 5 Taxpayer Friendly K-12 education provisions
that preserve and protect instructional programs.
Voted YES on
Senate Bill 23, which delays the scheduled increase in unemployment insurance
premiums for one year until 2011.
Voted YES on Senate Bill
396, which mandates an
adjusted six-year average that eliminates the highest value to calculate the
base rate for the assessment of agricultural land.
2009 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted
YES
on Senate
Joint Resolution 1, which amended the Indiana Constitution beginning 2012 to
include a cap on homestead property tax in 90 counties at 1% of gross assessed
value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008, is
exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St. Joseph
counties ONLY. The effective constitutional homeowner property tax caps in Lake
and St. Joseph counties are 1.88% and 1.52% respectively until the 1% cap takes
effect in 2020.
Voted YES
on House Bill 1001 SS, the
2009-2011 special session budget bill that (1) provides enough resources for
good government AND (2) satisfactorily protects Hoosier working families
from state and local tax increases. A
YES vote supports a budget that is sufficiently Taxpayer Friendly.
A NO vote would have shut down much of state government.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 348 to have a Library Services Plan developed and approved by a Public
Library Service Planning Committee (with an "opt out" referendum
provision) in every county (except Marion County) to help more effectively use
working family dollars currently spent on library services (with the option to
equitably replace public library property taxes with a county economic
development income tax).
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 452 to prohibit employees of a
local government unit from serving as elected officials within the same local
government unit, move the elections of municipal officers to even-numbered
years, move all school board member elections to the November general election
in even-numbered years, establish the use of vote centers as an option for all
counties, and require a city clerk-treasurer in a third class city to attend
fiscal officer training provided by the state board of accounts.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 506 to (1) allow a single County Chief Executive
Officer or County Manager, (2) allow the County Council or the Board of
County Supervisors to exercise both the fiscal and legislative powers
of the county, (3) provide for voter-initiated referendums on county
government reorganization, (4) repeal the requirement that political
subdivisions must approve local government reorganizations initiated by voters,
(5) assign the Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations four
responsibilities to identify and monitor good local government
practices, (6) prohibit County Manager nepotism, (7) repeal unproductive
reporting requirements, and (8) continue to elect the County Assessor.
Voted YES
on Senate
Bill 512 to (1) abolish on January 1, 2013, each township board in every
county (other than Marion County) and make the county fiscal body also the
fiscal body and legislative body of each township, (2) require a township when
formulating an annual budget to consider whether the part of the ending balance
in each township fund in excess of 10% of budgeted expenditures should be used
instead of imposing additional property taxes for the ensuing year, (3) prohibit
a relative of a township officer or employee from being employed by the township
in a position that would put the relative in a direct supervisory or subordinate
relationship with the officer or employee, (4) require a township trustee's
annual report to list separately each expenditure to reimburse the trustee for
the trustee's public business use of personal property, (5) require each
township office to include the address, phone number, and regular office hours
(if any) of the township office in at least one local telephone directory, (6)
prohibits a public meeting or a public hearing of a township official or
governing body from being held in a private residence, and (7) requires the
State Board of Accounts to submit an annual township examination report to the
executive director of the Legislative Services Agency and to county councils.
Voted YES
on House
Bill 1607 to require a referendum before establishing a Northern Indiana
Regional Transportation District, which is a new tax-imposing level of
Indiana government in Lake, Porter, LaPorte, and St. Joseph counties controlled
by a board with unrestricted powers (where most board members have no real
connection to the taxpayers' community).
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008, General Election
1.
BACKGROUND: Senate Joint Resolution 1 passed
the Indiana Senate 40-7 and the Indiana House 79-20 on March 14, 2008, and
was signed by the Governor on March 19, 2008. SJR 1 amends the Indiana
Constitution to cap homeowners' property tax bills at 1% of assessed value,
rental and agricultural property at 2%, and business property at 3%. For
property taxes first due and payable in 2012, 90 of Indiana's 92
counties must have a homeowner property tax cap that is 1% of the gross
assessed value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008,
is exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St.
Joseph counties ONLY. The result of these two existing debt service
exemptions equates to a 1.88% homeowner cap in Lake County and a 1.52%
homeowner cap in St.
Joseph County. The homeowner caps for Lake and St. Joseph counties must become
1% in 2020. The exact same version of SJR 1 that passed in 2008 must again pass in the General Assembly in 2009 to put the 1%
constitutional homeowner property tax cap amendment on the 2010 ballot. We
the people can then vote to make the 1% homeowner property tax cap a
permanent part of the Indiana Constitution. Never has it been so easy to separate those who are part of the
property tax relief solution from those who are part of the property tax
spending problem. A General Assembly candidate who pledges to
vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009 is part of the
solution, otherwise the legislator is part of
the problem. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in 2009 for
the exact same version of Senate
Joint Resolution 1 that passed in 2008? ANSWER: I
intend to vote for the caps in 2009 the same as
I did in 2008.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID
NOT RESPOND.
2008 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on Senate
Joint Resolution 1, which amended the Indiana Constitution beginning 2012 to
include a cap on homestead property tax in 90 counties at 1% of gross assessed
value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008, is
exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St. Joseph
counties ONLY. The effective constitutional homeowner property tax caps in Lake
and St. Joseph counties are 1.88% and 1.52% respectively until the 1% cap takes
effect in 2020.
Voted YES on
House
Bill 1001, which phases in the SJR 1 constitutional property tax caps by
2010. Also, 2008 property taxes are reduced 26% from the prior year. An increase
in the sales tax from 6% to 7% and local option income taxes will be used to
replace the property tax revenue reductions that result from the property tax
caps.
2007 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that is Taxpayer
Friendly because the General Fund & Property Tax Replacement Fund $26.0722
billion expenditures total for the 2008 and 2009 fiscal years is less than the
$26.1946 billion revenues total. HB 1001 also includes additional homestead
credits from the Property Tax Reduction Trust Fund of $300 million in 2007 and
$250 million in 2008.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1478, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly for the following reasons: (1)
Homeowner property taxes will increase 1.2% each year from 2009 through 2013
with annual decreases in the Homestead Standard Deduction. (2) The 2% Circuit
Breaker Cap on residential property taxes passed by the General Assembly in 2006
has been watered down to the point where it is almost eliminated. (3) The new
local option income tax for property tax relief will be offset by future
property tax increases unless the new local option income tax to replace
property tax increases is implemented. (4) Using the new local option income tax
to replace property tax increases means that income tax increases on Hoosier
working families would lower the proportionate tax burden of businesses and
utilities by freezing business and utility property taxes without a
corresponding increase in other business and utility taxes. (5) A new local
option income tax has been authorized for public safety.
Voted NO on House
Bill 1835,which is Taxpayer Friendly because it uses slot machine licensing
fees and wagering taxes to establish the Property Tax Reduction Trust Fund,
which is to be used for property tax relief in any manner prescribed by the
General Assembly.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 401, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly because state legislators voted
themselves a perpetual pay increase that is 20% more than the typical Hoosier
working family earns during an entire year. SB 401 also eliminated taxpayer-paid
lifetime health insurance and the $4 taxpayer match for each $1 of legislator
pension contribution, but General Assembly members should not have received an
excessive salary increase in return for eliminating extravagant perks they
should not have in the first place.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
7, 2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND:
Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax increased from 5% to 6%
with a promise that the proceeds would be used to decrease homeowner
homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3%
decrease into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average
Hoosier homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility
to levy income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax
relief. QUESTION: Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose
additional income, sales, and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget
the last two fiscal years has been balanced without fund transfers for the
first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm). QUESTION: Should the state's total budget
expenditures be no more than total revenues for the next
biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced
with the inclusion of a one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This
decreases property taxes for the average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should
the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be continued beyond
2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4.
BACKGROUND:
Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners
could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should the state pay for full-day
kindergarten? If YES, where should the state get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten?
HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND:
The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road ("Major
Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to pay
off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the
next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects
include $694 million for a new terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to
Evansville as well as a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION:
Should the "Major Moves" expenditures be combined with the
Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain I-69
extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The
2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a toll road for an
I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION: Do you favor
legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2006 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES
on "Major
Moves" House
Bill 1008, which authorizes the Indiana Department of Transportation to
enter into public-private agreements with private entities (operators)
concerning tollway projects for I-69 between Martinsville and Evansville. HB
1008 also authorizes the Indiana Finance Authority to enter into public-private
agreements with operators for the Indiana Toll Road.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, a residential property tax reduction bill that increases the
homestead credit for one year in 2006 to 28% and the homestead standard
deduction for one year in 2007 to $45,000. Beginning in 2007 for Lake County and
2008 for all other counties, HB 1001 also establishes a cap on residential
property taxes equal to 2% of the assessed value of the residential property.
2005 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES
on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that included seven significant homeowner
property tax increases.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1120, which contained thirteen negative tax impacts including a
regional Food and Beverage Tax to finance a new Colts stadium.
2003 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES
on
House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that was Taxpayer UNfriendly primarily
because (1) the 2004-05 fiscal year General Fund and Property Tax Replacement
Fund spending total of $11.48 billion exceeded the $11.4424 billion revenues
total (fiscal year 2004-05 was the eighth straight year where spending exceeded
revenues), (2) the full Property Tax relief that was promised to homeowners in
last year's special session legislation was reduced by the so-called Homestead
Credit "correction," and (3) Pension Stabilization Fund transfers were
included (these transfers worsened the $8.5 billion shortfall in teacher
retirement funds).
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
5, 2002, General Election
1-2.
Special session vote AGAINST several tax increases that
will increase revenues $1.7782 billion from July 1, 2002, through June 30, 2005.
3. Special
session vote AGAINST a 20% gas tax increase
(from 15 to 18 cents per gallon) effective 01/01/03.
4. Special
session vote AGAINST a phased-in shift of the inventory
tax to (1) all other types of property through an increased property tax rate
and (2) a tax on the income of individuals (in those counties
choosing to do so) through the establishment or increase of a County Economic
Development Income Tax (CEDIT).
5. DID NOT RESPOND to General Election Questionnaire. See the Candidate
Questionnaire for the May 7, 2002, Primary Election.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 7,
2002, Primary Election
1. Voted on February 4 AGAINST
the Indiana House of Representatives version of HB 1004, which did not
have enough Property Tax relief in return for a 20% Sales Tax rate increase,
imposed a new Business Franchise Tax (Business
Activity Fee) based on net worth, and increased
revenues $2.683 billion more than taxes would have been reduced
through June 30, 2004.
2. Voted on February 5 AGAINST
the Indiana House of Representatives version of HB 1317, which would have raised
the Gasoline Tax from 15 cents per gallon to 16 cents during 2003 and
17 cents after 2003.
3. Voted March 13 to override the Governor's
veto of HB 1083 in an effort to keep Indiana General
Assembly members from being covered by the state's Public Access Laws.
4. Did not receive Primary Questionnaire. See the Candidate
Questionnaire for the November 5, 2002, General Election.
Tom Wall (Uncertain)
1359 W 200 S
Huntington, IN 46750
Phone: (260) 468-2533
E-mail: tom.wall@huntington.in.us;
tom@wallsmh.com
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 4, 2010,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you
support or oppose the Constitutional Amendment on the November 2, 2010,
statewide ballot? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced?
ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain
both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction
without ANY change? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General
Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between
I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
HAS NOT RESPONDED.
State Senate District 18:
Linda L. Klinck (Taxpayer
UNfriendly -
DESPICABLE)
2822 High St.
Logansport, IN 46947
Phone: (574) 722-1241
E-mail: dlklinck@verizon.net
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4,
2008, General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in
2009 for the exact same version of Senate Joint Resolution 1 that passed in
2008? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your
candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID
NOT RESPOND.
David R. Martin (Taxpayer
Friendly)
6106 South, 800 East
Walton, IN 46994
Phone: (574) 626-2571
E-mail: drmartinva@hotmail.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate
Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: I support the 1%
cap on property taxes for homes.
I would vote for the legislation to amend the cap into
the Indiana Constitution.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
Not at this time.
Phillip R. Messer (Taxpayer
Friendly)
11837 W. 300 S.
Francesville, IN 47946
Phone: (219) 567-9987
E-mail:
PhillipRMesser@gmail.com
Website:
www.PhillipRMesser.politicalgateway.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate
Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: I
do support the 1% cap on property taxes for homes.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
Please visit my website for additional information about my candidacy.
Brian Thomas (Taxpayer
Friendly)
8559 E. State Road 18
Galveston, IN 46932
Home: (574) 699-9029
Cell: (765) 210-1804
Work: (765) 457-6787
E-mail: brian@avs-in.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate
Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: Yes
– for the sole reason I believe the majority of people want to be able to put
this to a vote. It should be understood that the caps being put into the Indiana
Constitution is nothing more than a “get me re-elected” strategy. Without a
set plan and guidelines laid out to insure how money in excess of the capped
amount will be replaced or cut - the caps will simply force money that has been
relinquished by the caps to be ascertained using another tactic. Taxpayer
education, elimination of unnecessary and redundant government layers, and
fixing this broken property taxation system are all absolutely necessary
elements to be included with these constitutional caps.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? ANSWER:
I pledge to bring a common man with family values mentality to the table. I have
worked with property taxes for 15 years day in and day out. I know the
system why it is broken and how to fix it. I am the only candidate with the
Thomas K. Weatherwax (Taxpayer
UNfriendly)
Address: 3012 Woodland Drive, Logansport, IN 46947
Phone: (219) 753-3060
E-mail:
Website:
2008 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on Senate
Joint Resolution 1, which amended the Indiana Constitution beginning 2012 to
include a cap on homestead property tax in 90 counties at 1% of gross assessed
value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008, is
exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St. Joseph
counties ONLY. The effective constitutional homeowner property tax caps in Lake
and St. Joseph counties are 1.88% and 1.52% respectively until the 1% cap takes
effect in 2020.
Voted YES on
House
Bill 1001, which phases in the SJR 1 constitutional property tax caps by
2010. Also, 2008 property taxes are reduced 26% from the prior year. An increase
in the sales tax from 6% to 7% and local option income taxes will be used to
replace the property tax revenue reductions that result from the property tax
caps.
2007 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that is Taxpayer Friendly because the General
Fund & Property Tax Replacement Fund $26.0722 billion expenditures total for
the 2008 and 2009 fiscal years is less than the $26.1946 billion revenues total.
HB 1001 also includes additional homestead credits from the Property Tax
Reduction Trust Fund of $300 million in 2007 and $250 million in 2008.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1478, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly for the following reasons: (1)
Homeowner property taxes will increase 1.2% each year from 2009 through 2013
with annual decreases in the Homestead Standard Deduction. (2) The 2% Circuit
Breaker Cap on residential property taxes passed by the General Assembly in 2006
has been watered down to the point where it is almost eliminated. (3) The new
local option income tax for property tax relief will be offset by future
property tax increases unless the new local option income tax to replace
property tax increases is implemented. (4) Using the new local option income tax
to replace property tax increases means that income tax increases on Hoosier
working families would lower the proportionate tax burden of businesses and
utilities by freezing business and utility property taxes without a
corresponding increase in other business and utility taxes. (5) A new local
option income tax has been authorized for public safety.
Voted YES on
House
Bill 1835,which is Taxpayer Friendly because it uses slot machine licensing
fees and wagering taxes to establish the Property Tax Reduction Trust Fund,
which is to be used for property tax relief in any manner prescribed by the
General Assembly.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 401, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly because state legislators voted
themselves a perpetual pay increase that is 20% more than the typical Hoosier
working family earns during an entire year. SB 401 also eliminated taxpayer-paid
lifetime health insurance and the $4 taxpayer match for each $1 of legislator
pension contribution, but General Assembly members should not have received an
excessive salary increase in return for eliminating extravagant perks they
should not have in the first place.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
7, 2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax
increased from 5% to 6% with a promise that the proceeds would be used to
decrease homeowner homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3% decrease
into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average Hoosier
homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility to levy
income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax relief. QUESTION:
Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose additional income, sales,
and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget the last two fiscal years has been balanced
without fund transfers for the first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm).
QUESTION: Should the state's total budget expenditures be no more than total
revenues for the next biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced with the inclusion of a
one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This decreases property taxes for the
average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be
continued beyond 2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. BACKGROUND: Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of
Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should
the state pay for full-day kindergarten? If YES, where should the state
get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND: The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road
("Major Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to
pay off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next
ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects include $694 million for a new
terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to Evansville as well as a $500 million
Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION: Should the "Major Moves" expenditures
be combined with the Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain
I-69 extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The 2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a
toll road for an I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION:
Do you favor legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2006 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on "Major
Moves" House
Bill 1008, which authorizes the Indiana Department of Transportation to
enter into public-private agreements with private entities (operators)
concerning tollway projects for I-69 between Martinsville and Evansville. HB
1008 also authorizes the Indiana Finance Authority to enter into public-private
agreements with operators for the Indiana Toll Road.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, a residential property tax reduction bill that increases the
homestead credit for one year in 2006 to 28% and the homestead standard
deduction for one year in 2007 to $45,000. Beginning in 2007 for Lake County and
2008 for all other counties, HB 1001 also establishes a cap on residential
property taxes equal to 2% of the assessed value of the residential property.
2005 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that included seven significant homeowner
property tax increases.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1120, which contained thirteen negative tax impacts including a
regional Food and Beverage Tax to finance a new Colts stadium.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
2, 2004, General Election
1. Guiding Principles for 2005-07 Biennium Budget. DID NOT RESPOND.
2. Opinions on Homeowner Property Taxes. DID NOT RESPOND.
3. Position on Indianapolis to Evansville Interstate. DID NOT RESPOND.
4. Additional Comments. DID NOT RESPOND.
2003 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted FOR on
House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that was Taxpayer UNfriendly primarily
because (1) the 2004-05 fiscal year General Fund and Property Tax Replacement
Fund spending total of $11.48 billion exceeded the $11.4424 billion revenues
total (fiscal year 2004-05 was the eighth straight year where spending exceeded
revenues), (2) the full Property Tax relief that was promised to homeowners in
last year's special session legislation was reduced by the so-called Homestead
Credit "correction," and (3) Pension Stabilization Fund transfers were
included (these transfers worsened the $8.5 billion shortfall in teacher
retirement funds).
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 5,
2002, General Election
1-2. Special session vote FOR
several tax increases that will increase revenues $1.7782 billion from July 1,
2002, through June 30, 2005.
3. Special session vote FOR
a 20% gas tax increase (from 15 to 18 cents per gallon) effective
01/01/03.
4. Special session vote FOR
a phased-in shift of the inventory tax to (1) all other types of property
through an increased property tax rate and (2) a tax on the income of
individuals (in those counties choosing to do so) through the
establishment or increase of a County Economic Development Income Tax (CEDIT).
5. Did not receive General Election Questionnaire. See the Legislative
Voting Record.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 7, 2002,
Primary Election
1. Voted on February 28 FOR
the Indiana Senate version of HB 1004, which included an unneeded
Income Tax rate increase, imposed a new
business Payroll Tax, and increased revenues
$933 million more than taxes would have been reduced through June 30,
2004.
2. Voted on February 27 FOR
the Indiana Senate version of HB 1317, which would have raised
the Gasoline Tax from 15 cents per gallon to 18 cents during 2003, 20
cents during 2004, and 22 cents after 2004.
3-4. Did not receive Primary Questionnaire. See the Legislative
Voting Record.
State Senate District 19:
Robert Couse (Taxpayer
Friendly)
705 S Water St
Jonesboro, IN 46938
Phone: (765) 618-6013
E-mail: couseforsenatedistrict19@gmail.com
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you
support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the
1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax
deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: I
support making the property tax caps permanent.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced?
Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility
of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be
replenished.
ANSWER:
I unfortunately do not have a good answer for this issue.
I do know that Indiana statue requires that the budget be balanced. If funds
continue to shrink, more than likely across the board cuts will have to be made.
I would hope that through cuts the State of Indiana could avoid tax increases.
Here again I am not sure that budget cuts will be enough. With the economic times being the way they are
I truly do not know what the best answer will be especially two years out. I
fully understand that this is not the answer everyone wants to hear, but I also
know from my experience on the Jonesboro City Council that financial situations,
especially in the climate that we are in currently, require the ability to be
flexible, creative, and proactive.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain
both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction
without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER:
Yes.
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General
Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between
I-64 and Martinsville?
ANSWER: Yes.
5. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
I have a facebook group page under Robert Couse for Indiana State Senate
District 19. I would like to say that out of all the current candidates I am
probably the one the best understands the issues that face every day Hoosiers.
Other candidates have probably faced issues along the way but their families and
careers grew before the current economic times that we are in currently. My
family and I face trying to grow during this time of economic hardship. I understand what it is like not being able to find a job
that matches my skill sets. I'm currently employed as a janitor despite my
multiple degrees from Purdue University and despite the fact that I'll have
completed my Masters this coming February. I really understand the fears that
parents have when it comes to education here in Indiana My children are only starting to enter into the local
school systems, and in the next two years, I will have a child in 1st grade,
kindergarten, and preschool. I know the hard balance of finding time for the
family despite both my wife and I having to work just to be able to pay the
bills and have a little extra to do things as a family. From my position on the
Jonesboro City Council, I know and understand the impact of budget cuts and I am
forced to make decisions that impact the livelihood of individuals whom I have
to see and interact with on a daily basis. I will say that I do not fault any
candidate for achieving the level of comfort that they have, because I myself am
striving for, and will one day achieve that for my family and I. However, I can
say that other candidates will legislate from what they think the everyday
Hoosier needs, where as, I will legislate from what I know the everyday Hoosier
needs, because I live the life that the majority of Hoosiers are living today.
State Senate District 20:
Ken Geesaman (Taxpayer
UNfriendly)
5527 Elderberry Road
Noblesville, IN 46062
Phone: (317) 770-3689
E-mail: ken.geesaman@gmail.com
Website:
www.kenforsenator.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate
Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race):
Property taxes should be eliminated.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
State Senate District 21:
Jeff Drozda (Taxpayer
UNfriendly)
Address: P.O. Box 555, Westfield, IN 46074
Phone: (765) 438-1592
E-mail: S21@ai.org
Website: http://www.in.gov/legislative/senate_republicans/homepages/s21/index.html
2008 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on Senate
Joint Resolution 1, which amended the Indiana Constitution beginning 2012 to
include a cap on homestead property tax in 90 counties at 1% of gross assessed
value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008, is
exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St. Joseph
counties ONLY. The effective constitutional homeowner property tax caps in Lake
and St. Joseph counties are 1.88% and 1.52% respectively until the 1% cap takes
effect in 2020.
Voted YES on
House
Bill 1001, which phases in the SJR 1 constitutional property tax caps by
2010. Also, 2008 property taxes are reduced 26% from the prior year. An increase
in the sales tax from 6% to 7% and local option income taxes will be used to
replace the property tax revenue reductions that result from the property tax
caps.
2007 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted NO on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that is Taxpayer
Friendly because the General Fund & Property Tax Replacement Fund $26.0722
billion expenditures total for the 2008 and 2009 fiscal years is less than the
$26.1946 billion revenues total. HB 1001 also includes additional homestead
credits from the Property Tax Reduction Trust Fund of $300 million in 2007 and
$250 million in 2008.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1478, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly for the following reasons: (1)
Homeowner property taxes will increase 1.2% each year from 2009 through 2013
with annual decreases in the Homestead Standard Deduction. (2) The 2% Circuit
Breaker Cap on residential property taxes passed by the General Assembly in 2006
has been watered down to the point where it is almost eliminated. (3) The new
local option income tax for property tax relief will be offset by future
property tax increases unless the new local option income tax to replace
property tax increases is implemented. (4) Using the new local option income tax
to replace property tax increases means that income tax increases on Hoosier
working families would lower the proportionate tax burden of businesses and
utilities by freezing business and utility property taxes without a
corresponding increase in other business and utility taxes. (5) A new local
option income tax has been authorized for public safety.
Voted NO on House
Bill 1835,which is Taxpayer Friendly because it uses slot machine licensing
fees and wagering taxes to establish the Property Tax Reduction Trust Fund,
which is to be used for property tax relief in any manner prescribed by the
General Assembly.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 401, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly because state legislators voted
themselves a perpetual pay increase that is 20% more than the typical Hoosier
working family earns during an entire year. SB 401 also eliminated taxpayer-paid
lifetime health insurance and the $4 taxpayer match for each $1 of legislator
pension contribution, but General Assembly members should not have received an
excessive salary increase in return for eliminating extravagant perks they
should not have in the first place.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
7, 2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND:
Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax increased from 5% to 6%
with a promise that the proceeds would be used to decrease homeowner
homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3%
decrease into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average
Hoosier homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility
to levy income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax
relief. QUESTION: Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose
additional income, sales, and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget
the last two fiscal years has been balanced without fund transfers for the
first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm). QUESTION: Should the state's total budget
expenditures be no more than total revenues for the next
biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced
with the inclusion of a one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This
decreases property taxes for the average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should
the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be continued beyond
2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4.
BACKGROUND:
Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners
could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should the state pay for full-day
kindergarten? If YES, where should the state get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten?
HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND:
The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road ("Major
Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to pay
off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the
next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects
include $694 million for a new terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to
Evansville as well as a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION:
Should the "Major Moves" expenditures be combined with the
Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain I-69
extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The
2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a toll road for an
I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION: Do you favor
legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2006 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES
on "Major
Moves" House
Bill 1008, which authorizes the Indiana Department of Transportation to
enter into public-private agreements with private entities (operators)
concerning tollway projects for I-69 between Martinsville and Evansville. HB
1008 also authorizes the Indiana Finance Authority to enter into public-private
agreements with operators for the Indiana Toll Road.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, a residential property tax reduction bill that increases the
homestead credit for one year in 2006 to 28% and the homestead standard
deduction for one year in 2007 to $45,000. Beginning in 2007 for Lake County and
2008 for all other counties, HB 1001 also establishes a cap on residential
property taxes equal to 2% of the assessed value of the residential property.
2005 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted NO
on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that included seven significant homeowner
property tax increases.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1120, which contained thirteen negative tax impacts including a
regional Food and Beverage Tax to finance a new Colts stadium.
2003 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted NO
on
House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that was Taxpayer UNfriendly primarily
because (1) the 2004-05 fiscal year General Fund and Property Tax Replacement
Fund spending total of $11.48 billion exceeded the $11.4424 billion revenues
total (fiscal year 2004-05 was the eighth straight year where spending exceeded
revenues), (2) the full Property Tax relief that was promised to homeowners in
last year's special session legislation was reduced by the so-called Homestead
Credit "correction," and (3) Pension Stabilization Fund transfers were
included (these transfers worsened the $8.5 billion shortfall in teacher
retirement funds).
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
5, 2002, General Election
1. Yes, state government
needs can be met without any more tax and fee increases through at
least June 30, 2005.
2. If a last-resort tax or fee increase
becomes necessary to solve a problem, I would insist on
a revenue-neutral, dollar-for-dollar decrease in another tax or fee.
3. I would be open to consider the
revenue-neutral approach of exempting gasoline sales from the sales tax and
increasing the gasoline tax by another 5 cents. I
generally do not favor increasing the gasoline tax.
4. The inventory tax should be eliminated immediately. There are creative
ways to do this. Indiana may want to look at what the other surrounding
states have done to accomplish this same goal.
5. I would love to hear from anyone regarding my
qualifications and background to be your public servant. Please send me an
E-mail or give me a call. My campaign mailing address is Jeff Drozda for State
Senate, P.O. Box 555, Westfield, IN 46074. See the Candidate
Questionnaire for the May 7, 2002, Primary Election.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 7,
2002, Primary Election
1. I do not
fully support HB 1004 as passed by the House. I do not fully support HB1004 as
passed by the Senate; an additional $933 million (through June 30, 2004) beyond
a balanced budget is excessive. Now is not the
time to be taxing Hoosier families.
I would support ideas such as the previously
suggested Watchdog Indiana Solution #1 with some added features.
(a) I would consider increasing the Riverboat
Admission Fee (which really is not an increase
to individuals but is paid by riverboat owners) from $3 to $5 per person. (b)
Considering the recent report in The Indianapolis Star, the
homeowner property tax shelter may only need to be increased a small percentage.
However, I do have a concern that each
county/township assessor may not be assessing in a uniform and accurate
procedure. This may lead to lower valuations
and variations from one county to the next. (c) I fully
support a total transfer of the Build Indiana Fund money to the General Fund.
(d) Furthermore, I support the elimination of
the Build Indiana Fund. Once our $1.3 billion
deficit is erased, then Indiana should have a
Capital Improvements bill in the even numbered years for an open and honest
discussion of those projects that would qualify for support
under Indiana law. The current process is a disgrace to all Hoosier taxpayers. (e)
The Inventory Tax must be totally eliminated
if Indiana is to compete with other Midwest states in the hopes of expanding our
economic development.
2. I do not
support HB 1317 as passed by the House. I do not support HB 1317 as passed by
the Senate. A gasoline tax increase for wants
beyond our transportation needs is not needed at this time.
All resources should be centered on Indiana's looming $1.3 billion budget
deficit.
3. I do support
the Governor's veto of HB 1083. Any attempts to
circumvent Indiana's Open Access laws must be viewed with suspicion.
An open and truthful government is one that works best.
4. I can be reached at Drozda2002@aol.com.
I would love to hear from anyone regarding my qualifications and background to
be your public servant. See the Candidate
Questionnaire for the November 5, 2002, General Election.
Jan Ellis (Uncertain)
Address: 30 Waterford Court, Zionsville, IN 46677
Phone: (317) 733-9412
E-mail: ellis4senate@hotmail.com
Website: www.ellis4senate.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 7,
2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax
increased from 5% to 6% with a promise that the proceeds would be used to
decrease homeowner homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3% decrease
into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average Hoosier
homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility to levy
income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax relief. QUESTION:
Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose additional income, sales,
and other taxes? ANSWER: NO.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget the last two fiscal years has been balanced
without fund transfers for the first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm).
QUESTION: Should the state's total budget expenditures be no more than total
revenues for the next biennium? ANSWER: In a perfect world, that would be
the ideal. However, when programs are cut, especially programs that benefit the
poor, we pay in other ways: increased crime, decreased services. I will agree
that budget deficits should be kept at a minimum.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced with the inclusion of a
one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This decreases property taxes for the
average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be
continued beyond 2007? ANSWER: NO.
Property tax is an unfair tax which sometimes requires Hoosiers on fixed incomes
to give up their homes. I favor eliminating property taxes, and increasing state
income taxes to cover the shortage.
4. BACKGROUND: Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of
Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners would cost $210 million in 2009. QUESTION:
Should the state pay for full-day kindergarten? ANSWER: YES. If YES, where
should the state get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten? DID NOT
RESPOND.
5. BACKGROUND: The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road
("Major Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to
pay off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next
ten years? ANSWER: NO.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects include $694 million for a new
terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to Evansville as well as a $500 million
Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION: Should the "Major Moves" expenditures
be combined with the Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain
I-69 extension without state tax increases? ANSWER: NO.
7. BACKGROUND: The 2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a
toll road for an I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION:
Do you favor legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? ANSWER: YES.
8. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
DID NOT RESPOND.
State Senate District 22:
Michael J. Oxenrider (Uncertain)
105 Leslie Avenue
West Lafayette, IN 47906
Phone: (765) 577-5627
E-mail: michael@oxenriderforIndiana.com
Website: http://www.oxenriderforstatesenate.com/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you
support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the
1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax
deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced?
Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility
of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be
replenished.
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (From Website): I will work to award our
public/private contracts to Indiana companies first, reward Indiana companies
that do business with other Indiana companies, leverage the power of our
universities to become leaders in new industries, attract green jobs by
promoting a Renewable Portfolio Standard for Indiana, invest in new agricultural
technologies for the next generation of Hoosier farms, protect the family farm
and property values by controlling urban sprawl, and improve the ability of our
foreign trade offices to sell Indiana products overseas. It's time to
re-evaluate the tax code and funding structure for education so that we can
balance the state's budget without opening our schools to the risk of an
unstable economy. I will work to provide more incentives for those seeking
careers in education, overhaul the way we balance the budget and fund our
schools, streamline our schools and school corporations, and relieve schools and
classroom teachers from unfunded mandates. I will work to promote arts districts
as enterprise zones to attract new businesses, enhance our creative economy to
promote tourism and keep talent in-state, and bring resources home to make our
districts a major point-of-interest for inter- and intra-state travelers.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain
both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction
without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General
Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between
I-64 and Martinsville?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
5. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
Dave Vorbeck (Uncertain)
Address: 2140 N. River Road, W. Lafayette, IN 47906
Phone: (765) 742-8300
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 7,
2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax
increased from 5% to 6% with a promise that the proceeds would be used to
decrease homeowner homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3% decrease
into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average Hoosier
homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility to levy
income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax relief. QUESTION:
Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose additional income, sales,
and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget the last two fiscal years has been balanced
without fund transfers for the first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm).
QUESTION: Should the state's total budget expenditures be no more than total
revenues for the next biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced with the inclusion of a
one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This decreases property taxes for the
average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be
continued beyond 2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. BACKGROUND: Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of
Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should
the state pay for full-day kindergarten? If YES, where should the state
get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND: The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road
("Major Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to
pay off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next
ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects include $694 million for a new
terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to Evansville as well as a $500 million
Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION: Should the "Major Moves" expenditures
be combined with the Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain
I-69 extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The 2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a
toll road for an I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION:
Do you favor legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
State Senate District 23:
James R. Detamore (Uncertain)
Address: P.O. Box 127, Lebanon, IN 46052
Phone:
E-mail: judgejrd@insightbb.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 2, 2006,
Primary Election
1. What will be your guiding principles for the 2007-2009 biennium
budget? Specifically, what mix of spending cuts, tax increases, and/or reserve
depletions will you support? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. What are your opinions regarding homeowner property taxes? Specifically, do
favor freezing all property taxes and funding budget increases through both
individual and business income tax increases? Or, do you favor a mixture of
income tax, sales tax and meals tax increases to reduce property tax growth
while providing additional revenue to local governments? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. Considering the "Major Moves" legislation passed by the General
Assembly this year, do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases
the next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. What is your position regarding the construction of an interstate from
Indianapolis to Evansville? Specifically, should the $500 million Next
Generation Trust Fund that is part of "Major Moves" be used
exclusively for a new terrain I-69 extension so as to avoid state gas tax
increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Susan B. McGrady (Uncertain)
Address: P.O. Box 6, Hillsboro, IN 47949
Phone: (765) 798-2880
E-mail: mmcgrady@tds.net
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 2, 2006,
Primary Election
1. What will be your guiding principles for the 2007-2009 biennium
budget? Specifically, what mix of spending cuts, tax increases, and/or reserve
depletions will you support? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. What are your opinions regarding homeowner property taxes? Specifically, do
favor freezing all property taxes and funding budget increases through both
individual and business income tax increases? Or, do you favor a mixture of
income tax, sales tax and meals tax increases to reduce property tax growth
while providing additional revenue to local governments? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. Considering the "Major Moves" legislation passed by the General
Assembly this year, do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases
the next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. What is your position regarding the construction of an interstate from
Indianapolis to Evansville? Specifically, should the $500 million Next
Generation Trust Fund that is part of "Major Moves" be used
exclusively for a new terrain I-69 extension so as to avoid state gas tax
increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Richard (Dick) Thompson (Uncertain)
Address: 5563 W. 650 N., North Salem, IN 46165
Phone: (317) 372-9471
E-mail:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 2, 2006,
Primary Election
1. What will be your guiding principles for the 2007-2009 biennium
budget? Specifically, what mix of spending cuts, tax increases, and/or reserve
depletions will you support? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. What are your opinions regarding homeowner property taxes? Specifically, do
favor freezing all property taxes and funding budget increases through both
individual and business income tax increases? Or, do you favor a mixture of
income tax, sales tax and meals tax increases to reduce property tax growth
while providing additional revenue to local governments? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. Considering the "Major Moves" legislation passed by the General
Assembly this year, do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases
the next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. What is your position regarding the construction of an interstate from
Indianapolis to Evansville? Specifically, should the $500 million Next
Generation Trust Fund that is part of "Major Moves" be used
exclusively for a new terrain I-69 extension so as to avoid state gas tax
increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
State Senate District 24:
Charles Albert Bender (Uncertain)
2069 Riverstone Ct.
Avon, IN 46123
Phone: (317) 268-3064
E-mail: cabender42@gmail.com
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November
6, 2012, General Election
1. QUESTION: What are your priorities regarding the 2013-2015 state budget?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (from https://hendrickscodems.org/CANDIDATES___OFFICES.php):
I will work to ensure financial management and budget transparency in a
government that misplaced over $500 million while cutting Indiana’s education
budget and enabling tax rebates and vouchers for parents who send their children
to mostly religious schools.
2. QUESTION: Should the non-transportation appropriations from the state’s
Motor Vehicle Highway Account be transferred to the state’s General Fund so
more of our Indiana Gasoline Tax dollars can be properly spent to meet our
transportation needs? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
3. QUESTION: Should the Automatic Taxpayer Refund law be (a) improved to make
refunds more likely, (b) kept as it is, or (c) eliminated? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
4. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and
the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
5. QUESTION: What is your position regarding township government reform? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
6. QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment commissions
oversight? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
7. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
John M. Gootee (Taxpayer Friendly)
10443 N CR 1000 E
Brownsburg, IN 46112
Phone: (317) 769-3212
E-mail: solutions1@tds.net
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in 2009 for the exact same version
of Senate
Joint Resolution 1 that passed in 2008? DID NOT
RESPOND.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID
NOT RESPOND.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate
Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: YES.
I will support SJR 1.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: my thoughts are simple: Less government, less spending equals lower
taxes. It is truly a shame that we have to make it ILLEGAL for the legislature
to take money from us. This again shows you how easy it is to spend someone
else’s money. According to the Office of Management and Budget, wasteful
spending is everywhere in our state government. We knowingly spend half a
million dollars a year educating
Connie Lawson (Taxpayer
Friendly)
Address: P.O. Box 327, Danville, IN 46122
Phone: (317) 745-5358
E-mail: S24@in.gov
Website: www.lawsonforsenate.com
2012 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1003, which is Taxpayer Friendly because (1) public access to
government meetings and records is improved and (2) it is less likely that
public agencies will intentionally violate the Public Access Laws.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1005, which contains six Taxpayer Friendly local government Conflict Of
Interest provisions and sixteen Taxpayer Friendly local government Nepotism
provisions.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1376,
which is Taxpayer UNfriendly because (1) the automatic taxpayer refund excess
reserves trigger is increased from 10% to 12.5% and (2) Hoosier working families
will possibly receive an automatic taxpayer refund every even-numbered year
instead of every year.
Voted YES on
Senate Bill 25,
which was Taxpayer Friendly because (if it had passed the House) much improved
oversight would have been provided for redevelopment commissions and
departments.
2011 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, which includes among its 16 Taxpayer Friendly state budget
provisions no tax increases and an operating surplus in both the 2012 and 2013
fiscal years with a satisfactory reserve balance on June 30, 2013.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1002, which is Taxpayer Friendly because (1) charter schools have the
potential to help increase the academic growth of lower socioeconomic students,
(2) the number of Indiana nonprofit private colleges and universities authorized
to create charter schools is limited, (3) the Indianapolis mayor is the only
Indiana mayor who may authorize charter schools, (4) conversion from a public
school to a charter school is sufficiently stringent, and (5) property taxes are
NOT improperly used to support charter schools.
Voted YES on
House Bill
1003, which uses state K-12 tuition support money to fund scholarships for
nonpublic school students and is Taxpayer UNfriendly because (1) nonpublic
private and parochial schools are not equally open to all children, (2)
nonpublic school budgets are not approved by a directly elected public body, (3)
evidence-based research does not support greater school choice as a means to
achieve overall educational improvement, (4) it is very likely unconstitutional,
and (5) state tuition support dollars would go to nonpublic schools that are not
uniformly distributed throughout the state.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1022, which would have implemented a number of Taxpayer Friendly local
government provisions related to nepotism and officeholder conflict-of-interest.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1074, which provides that school board members selected by election
must be elected at November general elections and is Taxpayer Friendly because
the greater voter turnout in general elections will make it more difficult for
local vested interests to unduly influence school board elections.
2010 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES
on House Joint Resolution 1,
which gives voters statewide the opportunity to amend the Indiana Constitution
to (1) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (2) protect
homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1001, which contains 21 Taxpayer Friendly government ethics reform
provisions including a 365-day wait after leaving the General Assembly before a
legislator can become a lobbyist or legislative liaison, the reporting of
certain expenditures by the legislative liaisons of state agencies and state
educational institutions, and a reduction from $100 to $50 in the minimum
reportable amount for the total daily gifts given by a registered lobbyist to a
legislative person.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1086, which contains 7 Taxpayer Friendly provisions including the HJR
1 Constitutional Amendment ballot language.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1367, which contains 5 Taxpayer Friendly K-12 education provisions
that preserve and protect instructional programs.
Voted YES on
Senate Bill 23, which delays the scheduled increase in unemployment insurance
premiums for one year until 2011.
Voted YES on Senate Bill
396, which mandates an
adjusted six-year average that eliminates the highest value to calculate the
base rate for the assessment of agricultural land.
2009 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted
YES
on Senate
Joint Resolution 1, which amended the Indiana Constitution beginning 2012 to
include a cap on homestead property tax in 90 counties at 1% of gross assessed
value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008, is
exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St. Joseph
counties ONLY. The effective constitutional homeowner property tax caps in Lake
and St. Joseph counties are 1.88% and 1.52% respectively until the 1% cap takes
effect in 2020.
Voted YES
on House Bill 1001 SS, the
2009-2011 special session budget bill that (1) provides enough resources for
good government AND (2) satisfactorily protects Hoosier working families
from state and local tax increases. A
YES vote supports a budget that is sufficiently Taxpayer Friendly.
A NO vote would have shut down much of state government.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 348 to have a Library Services Plan developed and approved by a Public
Library Service Planning Committee (with an "opt out" referendum
provision) in every county (except Marion County) to help more effectively use
working family dollars currently spent on library services (with the option to
equitably replace public library property taxes with a county economic
development income tax).
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 452 to prohibit employees of a
local government unit from serving as elected officials within the same local
government unit, move the elections of municipal officers to even-numbered
years, move all school board member elections to the November general election
in even-numbered years, establish the use of vote centers as an option for all
counties, and require a city clerk-treasurer in a third class city to attend
fiscal officer training provided by the state board of accounts.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 506 to (1) allow a single County Chief Executive
Officer or County Manager, (2) allow the County Council or the Board of
County Supervisors to exercise both the fiscal and legislative powers
of the county, (3) provide for voter-initiated referendums on county
government reorganization, (4) repeal the requirement that political
subdivisions must approve local government reorganizations initiated by voters,
(5) assign the Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations four
responsibilities to identify and monitor good local government
practices, (6) prohibit County Manager nepotism, (7) repeal unproductive
reporting requirements, and (8) continue to elect the County Assessor.
Voted YES
on Senate
Bill 512 to (1) abolish on January 1, 2013, each township board in every
county (other than Marion County) and make the county fiscal body also the
fiscal body and legislative body of each township, (2) require a township when
formulating an annual budget to consider whether the part of the ending balance
in each township fund in excess of 10% of budgeted expenditures should be used
instead of imposing additional property taxes for the ensuing year, (3) prohibit
a relative of a township officer or employee from being employed by the township
in a position that would put the relative in a direct supervisory or subordinate
relationship with the officer or employee, (4) require a township trustee's
annual report to list separately each expenditure to reimburse the trustee for
the trustee's public business use of personal property, (5) require each
township office to include the address, phone number, and regular office hours
(if any) of the township office in at least one local telephone directory, (6)
prohibits a public meeting or a public hearing of a township official or
governing body from being held in a private residence, and (7) requires the
State Board of Accounts to submit an annual township examination report to the
executive director of the Legislative Services Agency and to county councils.
Voted YES
on House
Bill 1607 to require a referendum before establishing a Northern Indiana
Regional Transportation District, which is a new tax-imposing level of
Indiana government in Lake, Porter, LaPorte, and St. Joseph counties controlled
by a board with unrestricted powers (where most board members have no real
connection to the taxpayers' community).
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Senate Joint Resolution 1 passed
the Indiana Senate 40-7 and the Indiana House 79-20 on March 14, 2008, and
was signed by the Governor on March 19, 2008. SJR 1 amends the Indiana
Constitution to cap homeowners' property tax bills at 1% of assessed value,
rental and agricultural property at 2%, and business property at 3%. For
property taxes first due and payable in 2012, 90 of Indiana's 92
counties must have a homeowner property tax cap that is 1% of the gross
assessed value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008,
is exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St.
Joseph counties ONLY. The result of these two existing debt service
exemptions equates to a 1.88% homeowner cap in Lake County and a 1.52%
homeowner cap in St.
Joseph County. The homeowner caps for Lake and St. Joseph counties must become
1% in 2020. The exact same version of SJR 1 that passed in 2008 must again pass in the General Assembly in 2009 to put the 1%
constitutional homeowner property tax cap amendment on the 2010 ballot. We
the people can then vote to make the 1% homeowner property tax cap a
permanent part of the Indiana Constitution. Never has it been so easy to separate those who are part of the
property tax relief solution from those who are part of the property tax
spending problem. A General Assembly candidate who pledges to
vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009 is part of the
solution, otherwise the legislator is part of
the problem. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in 2009 for
the exact same version of Senate
Joint Resolution 1 that passed in 2008? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race):
The General Assembly must pass SJR 1,
which amends the constitution to place caps on all classes of property. The
voters will ultimately have the final word. Experience in other states that have
adopted property tax reduction measures tells us that without constitutional
protection, property tax rates will likely continue to increase.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID
NOT RESPOND.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008,
Primary Election
1. BACKGROUND: Senate Joint Resolution 1, which contains a meaningful
homeowner property tax cap amendment to the Indiana Constitution, passed
the Indiana Senate 40-7 and the Indiana House 79-20 on March 14, 2008. For
property taxes first due and payable in 2012, 90 of Indiana's 92
counties must have a homeowner property tax cap that is 1% of the gross
assessed value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008,
is exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St.
Joseph counties ONLY. The result of these two existing debt service
exemptions equates to a 1.88% cap in Lake County and a 1.52% cap in St.
Joseph County. The caps for Lake and St. Joseph counties must become
1% in 2020. SJR 1 must again pass in the General Assembly in 2009 to put the 1%
constitutional homeowner property tax cap amendment on the 2010 ballot. We
the people can then vote to make the 1% homeowner property tax cap a
permanent part of the Indiana Constitution. Never has it been so easy to separate those who are part of the
property tax relief solution from those who are part of the property tax
spending problem. A General Assembly candidate who pledges to
vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009 is part of the
solution, otherwise the legislator is part of
the problem. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate
Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: Yes, I
wholeheartedly support SJR 1.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
Not at this time.
2008 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on Senate
Joint Resolution 1, which amended the Indiana Constitution beginning 2012 to
include a cap on homestead property tax in 90 counties at 1% of gross assessed
value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008, is
exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St. Joseph
counties ONLY. The effective constitutional homeowner property tax caps in Lake
and St. Joseph counties are 1.88% and 1.52% respectively until the 1% cap takes
effect in 2020.
Voted YES on
House
Bill 1001, which phases in the SJR 1 constitutional property tax caps by
2010. Also, 2008 property taxes are reduced 26% from the prior year. An increase
in the sales tax from 6% to 7% and local option income taxes will be used to
replace the property tax revenue reductions that result from the property tax
caps.
2007 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that is Taxpayer
Friendly because the General Fund & Property Tax Replacement Fund $26.0722
billion expenditures total for the 2008 and 2009 fiscal years is less than the
$26.1946 billion revenues total. HB 1001 also includes additional homestead
credits from the Property Tax Reduction Trust Fund of $300 million in 2007 and
$250 million in 2008.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1478, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly for the following reasons: (1)
Homeowner property taxes will increase 1.2% each year from 2009 through 2013
with annual decreases in the Homestead Standard Deduction. (2) The 2% Circuit
Breaker Cap on residential property taxes passed by the General Assembly in 2006
has been watered down to the point where it is almost eliminated. (3) The new
local option income tax for property tax relief will be offset by future
property tax increases unless the new local option income tax to replace
property tax increases is implemented. (4) Using the new local option income tax
to replace property tax increases means that income tax increases on Hoosier
working families would lower the proportionate tax burden of businesses and
utilities by freezing business and utility property taxes without a
corresponding increase in other business and utility taxes. (5) A new local
option income tax has been authorized for public safety.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1835,which is Taxpayer Friendly because it uses slot machine licensing
fees and wagering taxes to establish the Property Tax Reduction Trust Fund,
which is to be used for property tax relief in any manner prescribed by the
General Assembly.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 401, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly because state legislators voted
themselves a perpetual pay increase that is 20% more than the typical Hoosier
working family earns during an entire year. SB 401 also eliminated taxpayer-paid
lifetime health insurance and the $4 taxpayer match for each $1 of legislator
pension contribution, but General Assembly members should not have received an
excessive salary increase in return for eliminating extravagant perks they
should not have in the first place.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
7, 2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND:
Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax increased from 5% to 6%
with a promise that the proceeds would be used to decrease homeowner
homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3%
decrease into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average
Hoosier homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility
to levy income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax
relief. QUESTION: Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose
additional income, sales, and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget
the last two fiscal years has been balanced without fund transfers for the
first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm). QUESTION: Should the state's total budget
expenditures be no more than total revenues for the next
biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced
with the inclusion of a one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This
decreases property taxes for the average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should
the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be continued beyond
2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4.
BACKGROUND:
Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners
could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should the state pay for full-day
kindergarten? If YES, where should the state get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten?
HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND:
The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road ("Major
Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to pay
off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the
next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects
include $694 million for a new terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to
Evansville as well as a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION:
Should the "Major Moves" expenditures be combined with the
Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain I-69
extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The
2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a toll road for an
I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION: Do you favor
legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2006 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES
on "Major
Moves" House
Bill 1008, which authorizes the Indiana Department of Transportation to
enter into public-private agreements with private entities (operators)
concerning tollway projects for I-69 between Martinsville and Evansville. HB
1008 also authorizes the Indiana Finance Authority to enter into public-private
agreements with operators for the Indiana Toll Road.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, a residential property tax reduction bill that increases the
homestead credit for one year in 2006 to 28% and the homestead standard
deduction for one year in 2007 to $45,000. Beginning in 2007 for Lake County and
2008 for all other counties, HB 1001 also establishes a cap on residential
property taxes equal to 2% of the assessed value of the residential property.
2005 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES
on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that included seven significant homeowner
property tax increases.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1120, which contained thirteen negative tax impacts including a
regional Food and Beverage Tax to finance a new Colts stadium.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
2, 2004, General Election
1. Guiding Principles for 2005-07 Biennium Budget. DID NOT RESPOND.
2. Opinions on Homeowner Property Taxes. DID NOT RESPOND.
3. Position on Indianapolis to Evansville Interstate. DID NOT RESPOND.
4. Additional Comments. DID NOT RESPOND.
2003 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted FOR
on
House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that was Taxpayer UNfriendly primarily
because (1) the 2004-05 fiscal year General Fund and Property Tax Replacement
Fund spending total of $11.48 billion exceeded the $11.4424 billion revenues
total (fiscal year 2004-05 was the eighth straight year where spending exceeded
revenues), (2) the full Property Tax relief that was promised to homeowners in
last year's special session legislation was reduced by the so-called Homestead
Credit "correction," and (3) Pension Stabilization Fund transfers were
included (these transfers worsened the $8.5 billion shortfall in teacher
retirement funds).
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
5, 2002, General Election
1-2. Special session vote FOR
several tax increases that will increase revenues $1.7782 billion from July 1,
2002, through June 30, 2005.
3. Special session vote FOR
a 20% gas tax increase (from 15 to 18 cents per gallon) effective
01/01/03.
4. Special session vote FOR
a phased-in shift of the inventory tax to (1) all other types of property
through an increased property tax rate and (2) a tax on the income of
individuals (in those counties choosing to do so) through the
establishment or increase of a County Economic Development Income Tax (CEDIT).
5. Did not receive General Election Questionnaire. See the Legislative
Voting Record.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 7,
2002, Primary Election
1. Voted on February 28 FOR
the Indiana Senate version of HB 1004, which included an unneeded
Income Tax rate increase, imposed a new
business Payroll Tax, and increased revenues
$933 million more than taxes would have been reduced through June 30,
2004.
2. Voted on February 27 FOR
the Indiana Senate version of HB 1317, which would have raised
the Gasoline Tax from 15 cents per gallon to 18 cents during 2003, 20
cents during 2004, and 22 cents after 2004.
3-4. Did not receive Primary Questionnaire. See the Legislative
Voting Record.
State Senate District 25:
Dan Dykes (Uncertain)
Address: 2101 Dena Drive, Anderson, IN 46017
Phone: (765) 378-5179
E-mail: dkdykes@hotmail.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 7,
2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax
increased from 5% to 6% with a promise that the proceeds would be used to
decrease homeowner homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3% decrease
into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average Hoosier
homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility to levy
income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax relief. QUESTION:
Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose additional income, sales,
and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget the last two fiscal years has been balanced
without fund transfers for the first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm).
QUESTION: Should the state's total budget expenditures be no more than total
revenues for the next biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced with the inclusion of a
one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This decreases property taxes for the
average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be
continued beyond 2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. BACKGROUND: Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of
Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should
the state pay for full-day kindergarten? If YES, where should the state
get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND: The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road
("Major Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to
pay off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next
ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects include $694 million for a new
terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to Evansville as well as a $500 million
Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION: Should the "Major Moves" expenditures
be combined with the Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain
I-69 extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The 2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a
toll road for an I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION:
Do you favor legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Brian S. Jacobs (Taxpayer
Friendly)
8975 S 800 W
Pendleton, IN 46064
Phone: (317) 485-3117
E-mail: bjacobs@healthmatch.com;
brian@votejacobs.com
Website: http://votejacobs.com/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2,
2010,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you
support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the
1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax
deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: I
support the Amendment as written because the level
of property taxation reflected by the 1-2-3% caps is a ceiling above which
property tax cannot rise while leaving the General Assembly free to reduce
property taxes further as they see fit.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced?
Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility
of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be
replenished. ANSWER:
Let's start by laying out some boundaries of what we
shouldn't do: (a) We shouldn't raise taxes. This will simply drive business
investment away from Indiana when we desperately need to get Hoosiers back to
work. Such an irresponsible act would hurt Hoosier families for decades. (b) We
shouldn't count on federal stimulus money. This money is not "free";
it is simply going on the tab of our children. Besides, if states become dependent on federal dollars it will further erode the foundations of
federalism which is central in the Constitution and vital to our liberty. Now
for what we MUST do. We must cut spending. There are two general principles for finding the spending cuts needed to balance the budget. First,
and most obviously, we should eliminate programs that are wasteful, unnecessary,
or things that could be done by the private sector. This is the low hanging
fruit that almost everyone would agree on...but there isn't enough of this in
Indiana to keep the budget balanced. The second principle is we must make cuts
where all the money goes. In Indiana, this means two things, Medicaid and
education. There are two ways to reduce Medicaid spending without affecting
health outcomes. First,
eliminate payment for services considered
optional by the federal Medicaid program
such as chiropractic care. Average Hoosier families
should not be asked to sacrifice more to provide optional services even for the
poorest Hoosiers. Second, Medicaid suffers from over-utilization because the end
users have no "skin in the game." People consume more units if there
is no additional marginal cost to them for such usage; this is called Moral
Hazard. We can reduce Moral Hazard in Medicaid in a couple of ways. First,
we can expand Indiana's creative pilot programs
in Medicaid Health Savings Accounts. These have
been shown to substantially reduce costs to taxpayers. Second, we can introduce
co-pays, particularly for the most expensive types of care, like the ER. And we
can electronically link those co-pays to other forms of public assistance. For
example, if a Medicaid beneficiary goes to the ER and does not have the $20
co-pay, we won't turn them away, but we will deduct that $20 from other public
assistance they might receive, such as from welfare checks. This will deter them
from casually consuming more than they need and will encourage them not to use
the ER for convenience instead of making a far less expensive (to the taxpayer)
appointment with a primary care physician. The second place we must cut is
education. We have no choice, as about 50% of the general fund is spent on K-12
education and another 13% on higher education. With regard to higher education,
let's let students pay for more of their own education instead of burdening taxpayers further. This has a couple of good
effects: (a) People value things more if they pay for them. (b) Isolating people
from the costs encourages over consumption. (c) It is easy for universities to
beg the General Assembly for more money but it is difficult for them to justify
tuition rises to students and parents. Perhaps this will encourage universities
to find operational efficiencies (which they have not done in decades) instead
of simply seeking more revenue. In K-12, results aren't about money. During the
downturn, K-12 was pared, and yet I-STEP scores went up. We can save money and
get better results by concentrating on the basics: English, Math, and civics.
American schools of 100 years ago performed better without spending nearly as
much. We should allow broader use of participation fees for student activities
outside those basics. We should rely on competition through charter schools,
vouchers, or even home-schooling. Competition breeds excellence and efficiency,
monopoly does the reverse, even if that monopoly is state K12 education.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain
both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction
without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER:
While I don't favor govt using the tax code to foster social policy, I
don't see changing the homestead credit as feasible or desirable
unless part of a wholesale reform of Indiana tax policy. And there is always the
problem of changing the rules mid-stream.
4.
QUESTION: Do
you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General
Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between
I-64 and Martinsville?
ANSWER: Toll roads and other user-taxes can be an efficient and fair means of
paying for such projects. In general, I support such efforts in lieu of broader
taxation of non-users. The General Assembly could always act in specific cases
to prevent such agreements. So no, I don't believe such
a change is necessary.
5. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
Overspending and overtaxation at the federal level is threatening the future of
my children and is what prompted me to get involved. I believe we need to get
Hoosiers back to work, and we can do that by making Indiana the most business
friendly state in the nation. We need to rely less on government and more on the
creativity, common sense, and work ethic of everyday Hoosiers. More government
isn't the answer...not in the economy, not in healthcare, not in education.
Frankly, we've had enough of "change you can believe in." It is time
for Change that Believes in YOU!
State Senate District 26:
Kevin J. Barrett (Uncertain)
301 S. Walnut St., Apt. 203
Muncie, IN 47305
Phone: (765) 717-2636
E-mail:
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 4, 2010,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you
support or oppose the Constitutional Amendment on the November 2, 2010,
statewide ballot? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced?
ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain
both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction
without ANY change? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General
Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between
I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Lewis R. (Papa Lou) Coulter (Uncertain)
2513 Oliver Dr.
Muncie, IN 47302
Phone:
(765) 212-7364
E-mail:
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 4, 2010,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you
support or oppose the Constitutional Amendment on the November 2, 2010,
statewide ballot? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced?
ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain
both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction
without ANY change? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General
Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between
I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 2, 2006, Primary
Election
1. What will be your guiding principles for the 2007-2009 biennium
budget? Specifically, what mix of spending cuts, tax increases, and/or reserve
depletions will you support? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. What are your opinions regarding homeowner property taxes? Specifically, do
favor freezing all property taxes and funding budget increases through both
individual and business income tax increases? Or, do you favor a mixture of
income tax, sales tax and meals tax increases to reduce property tax growth
while providing additional revenue to local governments? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. Considering the "Major Moves" legislation passed by the General
Assembly this year, do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases
the next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. What is your position regarding the construction of an interstate from
Indianapolis to Evansville? Specifically, should the $500 million Next
Generation Trust Fund that is part of "Major Moves" be used
exclusively for a new terrain I-69 extension so as to avoid state gas tax
increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Allie V. Craycraft (Taxpayer Friendly)
Steven L. Graves (Uncertain)
Address: 11670 South US 35, Selma, IN 47383
Phone: (765) 287-1869
E-mail:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 2, 2006,
Primary Election
1. What will be your guiding principles for the 2007-2009 biennium
budget? Specifically, what mix of spending cuts, tax increases, and/or reserve
depletions will you support? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. What are your opinions regarding homeowner property taxes? Specifically, do
favor freezing all property taxes and funding budget increases through both
individual and business income tax increases? Or, do you favor a mixture of
income tax, sales tax and meals tax increases to reduce property tax growth
while providing additional revenue to local governments? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. Considering the "Major Moves" legislation passed by the General
Assembly this year, do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases
the next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. What is your position regarding the construction of an interstate from
Indianapolis to Evansville? Specifically, should the $500 million Next
Generation Trust Fund that is part of "Major Moves" be used
exclusively for a new terrain I-69 extension so as to avoid state gas tax
increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
B. Jeff Ellison (Uncertain)
7400 E. McGalliard
Muncie, IN 47303
Phone:
(765) 212-4537
E-mail:
jeffellison64@gmail.com
Website:
http://bjeffellison4senate.ning.com/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 4, 2010,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you
support or oppose the Constitutional Amendment on the November 2, 2010,
statewide ballot? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced?
ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain
both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction
without ANY change? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General
Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between
I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Sue Errington (POLITICAL
HOG)
Address: P.O. Box 274, Muncie, IN 47308
Phone: (765) 282-3581
E-mail: sue4senate@comcast.net
Website: http://sue4senate.com/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2,
2010,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you
support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the
1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax
deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced?
Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility
of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be
replenished.
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain
both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction
without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General
Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between
I-64 and Martinsville?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
5. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 4, 2010,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you
support or oppose the Constitutional Amendment on the November 2, 2010,
statewide ballot? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced?
ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain
both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction
without ANY change? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General
Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between
I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2010 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted NO
on House Joint Resolution 1
to deny voters statewide the opportunity to amend the Indiana Constitution
to (1) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (2) protect
homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1001, which contains 21 Taxpayer Friendly government ethics reform
provisions including a 365-day wait after leaving the General Assembly before a
legislator can become a lobbyist or legislative liaison, the reporting of
certain expenditures by the legislative liaisons of state agencies and state
educational institutions, and a reduction from $100 to $50 in the minimum
reportable amount for the total daily gifts given by a registered lobbyist to a
legislative person.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1086, which contains 7 Taxpayer Friendly provisions including the HJR
1 Constitutional Amendment ballot language.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1367, which contains 5 Taxpayer Friendly K-12 education provisions
that preserve and protect instructional programs.
Voted YES on
Senate Bill 23, which delays the scheduled increase in unemployment insurance
premiums for one year until 2011.
Voted YES on Senate Bill
396, which mandates an
adjusted six-year average that eliminates the highest value to calculate the
base rate for the assessment of agricultural land.
2009 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted NO on
Senate
Joint Resolution 1, which amended the Indiana Constitution beginning 2012 to
include a cap on homestead property tax in 90 counties at 1% of gross assessed
value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008, is
exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St. Joseph
counties ONLY. The effective constitutional homeowner property tax caps in Lake
and St. Joseph counties are 1.88% and 1.52% respectively until the 1% cap takes
effect in 2020.
Voted NO
on House Bill 1001 SS, the
2009-2011 special session budget bill that (1) provides enough resources for
good government AND (2) satisfactorily protects Hoosier working families
from state and local tax increases. A
YES vote supports a budget that is sufficiently Taxpayer Friendly.
A NO vote would have shut down much of state government.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 348 to have a Library Services Plan developed and approved by a Public
Library Service Planning Committee (with an "opt out" referendum
provision) in every county (except Marion County) to help more effectively use
working family dollars currently spent on library services (with the option to
equitably replace public library property taxes with a county economic
development income tax).
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 452 to prohibit employees of a
local government unit from serving as elected officials within the same local
government unit, move the elections of municipal officers to even-numbered
years, move all school board member elections to the November general election
in even-numbered years, establish the use of vote centers as an option for all
counties, and require a city clerk-treasurer in a third class city to attend
fiscal officer training provided by the state board of accounts.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 506 to (1) allow a single County Chief Executive
Officer or County Manager, (2) allow the County Council or the Board of
County Supervisors to exercise both the fiscal and legislative powers
of the county, (3) provide for voter-initiated referendums on county
government reorganization, (4) repeal the requirement that political
subdivisions must approve local government reorganizations initiated by voters,
(5) assign the Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations four
responsibilities to identify and monitor good local government
practices, (6) prohibit County Manager nepotism, (7) repeal unproductive
reporting requirements, and (8) continue to elect the County Assessor.
Voted NO
on Senate
Bill 512 to (1) abolish on January 1, 2013, each township board in every
county (other than Marion County) and make the county fiscal body also the
fiscal body and legislative body of each township, (2) require a township when
formulating an annual budget to consider whether the part of the ending balance
in each township fund in excess of 10% of budgeted expenditures should be used
instead of imposing additional property taxes for the ensuing year, (3) prohibit
a relative of a township officer or employee from being employed by the township
in a position that would put the relative in a direct supervisory or subordinate
relationship with the officer or employee, (4) require a township trustee's
annual report to list separately each expenditure to reimburse the trustee for
the trustee's public business use of personal property, (5) require each
township office to include the address, phone number, and regular office hours
(if any) of the township office in at least one local telephone directory, (6)
prohibits a public meeting or a public hearing of a township official or
governing body from being held in a private residence, and (7) requires the
State Board of Accounts to submit an annual township examination report to the
executive director of the Legislative Services Agency and to county councils.
Voted YES
on House
Bill 1607 to require a referendum before establishing a Northern Indiana
Regional Transportation District, which is a new tax-imposing level of
Indiana government in Lake, Porter, LaPorte, and St. Joseph counties controlled
by a board with unrestricted powers (where most board members have no real
connection to the taxpayers' community).
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008, General Election
1.
BACKGROUND: Senate Joint Resolution 1 passed
the Indiana Senate 40-7 and the Indiana House 79-20 on March 14, 2008, and
was signed by the Governor on March 19, 2008. SJR 1 amends the Indiana
Constitution to cap homeowners' property tax bills at 1% of assessed value,
rental and agricultural property at 2%, and business property at 3%. For
property taxes first due and payable in 2012, 90 of Indiana's 92
counties must have a homeowner property tax cap that is 1% of the gross
assessed value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008,
is exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St.
Joseph counties ONLY. The result of these two existing debt service
exemptions equates to a 1.88% homeowner cap in Lake County and a 1.52%
homeowner cap in St.
Joseph County. The homeowner caps for Lake and St. Joseph counties must become
1% in 2020. The exact same version of SJR 1 that passed in 2008 must again pass in the General Assembly in 2009 to put the 1%
constitutional homeowner property tax cap amendment on the 2010 ballot. We
the people can then vote to make the 1% homeowner property tax cap a
permanent part of the Indiana Constitution. Never has it been so easy to separate those who are part of the
property tax relief solution from those who are part of the property tax
spending problem. A General Assembly candidate who pledges to
vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009 is part of the
solution, otherwise the legislator is part of
the problem. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in 2009 for
the exact same version of Senate
Joint Resolution 1 that passed in 2008? DID NOT
RESPOND. Watchdog E-mail (06/30/2008): "I
confronted Senator Errington on the issue of voting for the tax caps next
Session and she backstepped and wouldn't commit,
indicating 'it may take some time to see if we've done the right thing'."
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID
NOT RESPOND.
2008 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on Senate
Joint Resolution 1, which amended the Indiana Constitution beginning 2012 to
include a cap on homestead property tax in 90 counties at 1% of gross assessed
value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008, is
exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St. Joseph
counties ONLY. The effective constitutional homeowner property tax caps in Lake
and St. Joseph counties are 1.88% and 1.52% respectively until the 1% cap takes
effect in 2020.
Voted YES on
House
Bill 1001, which phases in the SJR 1 constitutional property tax caps by
2010. Also, 2008 property taxes are reduced 26% from the prior year. An increase
in the sales tax from 6% to 7% and local option income taxes will be used to
replace the property tax revenue reductions that result from the property tax
caps.
2007 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that is Taxpayer
Friendly because the General Fund & Property Tax Replacement Fund $26.0722
billion expenditures total for the 2008 and 2009 fiscal years is less than the
$26.1946 billion revenues total. HB 1001 also includes additional homestead
credits from the Property Tax Reduction Trust Fund of $300 million in 2007 and
$250 million in 2008.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1478, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly for the following reasons: (1)
Homeowner property taxes will increase 1.2% each year from 2009 through 2013
with annual decreases in the Homestead Standard Deduction. (2) The 2% Circuit
Breaker Cap on residential property taxes passed by the General Assembly in 2006
has been watered down to the point where it is almost eliminated. (3) The new
local option income tax for property tax relief will be offset by future
property tax increases unless the new local option income tax to replace
property tax increases is implemented. (4) Using the new local option income tax
to replace property tax increases means that income tax increases on Hoosier
working families would lower the proportionate tax burden of businesses and
utilities by freezing business and utility property taxes without a
corresponding increase in other business and utility taxes. (5) A new local
option income tax has been authorized for public safety.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1835,which is Taxpayer Friendly because it uses slot machine licensing
fees and wagering taxes to establish the Property Tax Reduction Trust Fund,
which is to be used for property tax relief in any manner prescribed by the
General Assembly.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 401, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly because state legislators voted
themselves a perpetual pay increase that is 20% more than the typical Hoosier
working family earns during an entire year. SB 401 also eliminated taxpayer-paid
lifetime health insurance and the $4 taxpayer match for each $1 of legislator
pension contribution, but General Assembly members should not have received an
excessive salary increase in return for eliminating extravagant perks they
should not have in the first place.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
7, 2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND:
Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax increased from 5% to 6%
with a promise that the proceeds would be used to decrease homeowner
homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3%
decrease into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average
Hoosier homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility
to levy income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax
relief. QUESTION: Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose
additional income, sales, and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget
the last two fiscal years has been balanced without fund transfers for the
first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm). QUESTION: Should the state's total budget
expenditures be no more than total revenues for the next
biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced
with the inclusion of a one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This
decreases property taxes for the average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should
the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be continued beyond
2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4.
BACKGROUND:
Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners
could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should the state pay for full-day
kindergarten? If YES, where should the state get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten?
HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND:
The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road ("Major
Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to pay
off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the
next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects
include $694 million for a new terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to
Evansville as well as a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION:
Should the "Major Moves" expenditures be combined with the
Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain I-69
extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The
2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a toll road for an
I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION: Do you favor
legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May
2, 2006, Primary Election
1. What will be your guiding principles for the 2007-2009 biennium
budget? Specifically, what mix of spending cuts, tax increases, and/or reserve
depletions will you support? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. What are your opinions regarding homeowner property taxes? Specifically, do
favor freezing all property taxes and funding budget increases through both
individual and business income tax increases? Or, do you favor a mixture of
income tax, sales tax and meals tax increases to reduce property tax growth
while providing additional revenue to local governments? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. Considering the "Major Moves" legislation passed by the General
Assembly this year, do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases
the next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. What is your position regarding the construction of an interstate from
Indianapolis to Evansville? Specifically, should the $500 million Next
Generation Trust Fund that is part of "Major Moves" be used
exclusively for a new terrain I-69 extension so as to avoid state gas tax
increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Andrew Stillman Phipps (Uncertain)
Address: 4603 West C.R. 400 South, Muncie, IN 47302
Phone: (765) 288-5131
E-mail: phippsgosp@aol.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 7,
2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax
increased from 5% to 6% with a promise that the proceeds would be used to
decrease homeowner homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3% decrease
into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average Hoosier
homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility to levy
income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax relief. QUESTION:
Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose additional income, sales,
and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget the last two fiscal years has been balanced
without fund transfers for the first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm).
QUESTION: Should the state's total budget expenditures be no more than total
revenues for the next biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced with the inclusion of a
one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This decreases property taxes for the
average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be
continued beyond 2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. BACKGROUND: Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of
Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should
the state pay for full-day kindergarten? If YES, where should the state
get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND: The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road
("Major Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to
pay off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next
ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects include $694 million for a new
terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to Evansville as well as a $500 million
Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION: Should the "Major Moves" expenditures
be combined with the Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain
I-69 extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The 2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a
toll road for an I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION:
Do you favor legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 5,
2002, General Election
1-5. DID NOT RESPOND to General Election Questionnaire. See the Candidate
Questionnaire for the May 7, 2002, Primary Election.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 7, 2002,
Primary Election
1-4. Did not receive Primary Questionnaire. See the Candidate
Questionnaire for the November 5, 2002, General Election.
Pat L. Smith (Uncertain)
Address: 8304 W. Thorntree Road, Muncie, IN 47304
Phone: (765) 759-5955
E-mail: allworknoparty@patlsmith.us
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 7,
2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax
increased from 5% to 6% with a promise that the proceeds would be used to
decrease homeowner homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3% decrease
into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average Hoosier
homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility to levy
income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax relief. QUESTION:
Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose additional income, sales,
and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget the last two fiscal years has been balanced
without fund transfers for the first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm).
QUESTION: Should the state's total budget expenditures be no more than total
revenues for the next biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced with the inclusion of a
one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This decreases property taxes for the
average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be
continued beyond 2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. BACKGROUND: Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of
Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should
the state pay for full-day kindergarten? If YES, where should the state
get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND: The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road
("Major Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to
pay off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next
ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects include $694 million for a new
terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to Evansville as well as a $500 million
Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION: Should the "Major Moves" expenditures
be combined with the Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain
I-69 extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The 2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a
toll road for an I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION:
Do you favor legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
State Senate District 27:
Donald Crossley (Uncertain)
9600 Smoky Row Rd.
Greens Fork, IN 47345
Phone:
(765) 886-9955
E-mail: don.crossley@yahoo.com
Website: http://doncrossleyforsenate.com/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2,
2010,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you
support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the
1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax
deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (From
Website): Property taxes are too high at 1% and we can work without them. I feel
that it is a crime for a person to work into their 70's, save all of their life,
pay for their home...miss paying $450 in property taxes, then the State
confiscates their home and sell for a profit.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced?
Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility
of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be
replenished.
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (From Website): Indiana has been
proactive in cutting expenses but they haven't done enough to cut taxes. I want
the State of Indiana to cut expenses further so the tax payers pay less
in taxes. I support Fine Arts and I will fight hard to keep financial
cuts away from the Fine Arts.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain
both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction
without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General
Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between
I-64 and Martinsville?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (From Website): We need to cut the Toll Road
from Indianapolis to Evansville and turn that money into a promotion of Indiana
small businesses.
5. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
I will do the questionnaire soon. But, I don't like yes or no answers. Property
tax, no I don't support it...it is better than it was I will say #1 Property
taxes should be lower I prefer none at all, some states have $0
property tax and do fine. #2 No matter how you look at how low it is now...A
retired person that has worked all of their life to pay off their home, they are
now 78 years old, they miss a paying their taxes in the fall, Indiana
could confiscate their home and sell it for a profit and boot them out. Its not
a "yes" or "no" answer to me. Personally The state blows to
much, like there is a ton of it. They are planning on spending $2 Billion more
in 2011 ouch! They better have 600,000 jobs coming in the next 6 months!
Clayton Phillips (Uncertain)
Address: P.O. Box 337, Redkey, IN 47373
Phone: (765) 730-3301
E-mail: CLAYTO55@aol.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 7,
2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax
increased from 5% to 6% with a promise that the proceeds would be used to
decrease homeowner homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3% decrease
into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average Hoosier
homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility to levy
income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax relief. QUESTION:
Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose additional income, sales,
and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget the last two fiscal years has been balanced
without fund transfers for the first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm).
QUESTION: Should the state's total budget expenditures be no more than total
revenues for the next biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced with the inclusion of a
one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This decreases property taxes for the
average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be
continued beyond 2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. BACKGROUND: Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of
Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should
the state pay for full-day kindergarten? If YES, where should the state
get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND: The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road
("Major Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to
pay off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next
ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects include $694 million for a new
terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to Evansville as well as a $500 million
Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION: Should the "Major Moves" expenditures
be combined with the Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain
I-69 extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The 2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a
toll road for an I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION:
Do you favor legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Bruce Wissel (Uncertain)
Address: P.O. Box 726, Richmond, IN 47374
Phone: (765) 965-5218
E-mail:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 2,
2006, Primary Election
1. What will be your guiding principles for the 2007-2009 biennium
budget? Specifically, what mix of spending cuts, tax increases, and/or reserve
depletions will you support? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. What are your opinions regarding homeowner property taxes? Specifically, do
favor freezing all property taxes and funding budget increases through both
individual and business income tax increases? Or, do you favor a mixture of
income tax, sales tax and meals tax increases to reduce property tax growth
while providing additional revenue to local governments? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. Considering the "Major Moves" legislation passed by the General
Assembly this year, do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases
the next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. What is your position regarding the construction of an interstate from
Indianapolis to Evansville? Specifically, should the $500 million Next
Generation Trust Fund that is part of "Major Moves" be used
exclusively for a new terrain I-69 extension so as to avoid state gas tax
increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
State Senate District 28:
Michael L. Adkins (Uncertain)
1198 N 200 W
Greenfield, IN 46140
Phone: (317) 462-4095
E-mail: Adkinsmchl69@aol.com
Website: http://www.adkinsforcommonsensegovernment.org/index.html
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November
6, 2012, General Election
1. QUESTION: What are your priorities regarding the 2013-2015 state budget?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (from campaign website): I support small
business tax credits and low-interest start up loans. I will work for incentives
to bring manufacturers back to our abandoned factories.
2. QUESTION: Should the non-transportation appropriations from the state’s
Motor Vehicle Highway Account be transferred to the state’s General Fund so
more of our Indiana Gasoline Tax dollars can be properly spent to meet our
transportation needs? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
3. QUESTION: Should the Automatic Taxpayer Refund law be (a) improved to make
refunds more likely, (b) kept as it is, or (c) eliminated? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
4. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and
the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
5. QUESTION: What is your position regarding township government reform? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
6. QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment commissions
oversight? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
7. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
Mike Brinegar (Taxpayer
Friendly - Part of the
Solution)
4552 N 600 West
McCordsville, IN 46055
Phone: (317) 989-8455
E-mail: brinegar@hrtc.net; brinegarforsenate@gmail.com
Website: http://mikebrinegar.com/default.aspx
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4,
2008, General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in
2009 for the exact same version of Senate Joint Resolution 1 that passed in
2008? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD
(www.indystar.com/2008race): Yes,
but property taxes should be repealed on owner-occupied single family homes
valued at $75,000 fair market value or less and on rental property for
lower-income families with some limitations or exceptions. (That last statement
to complete would require a lot of research and very careful consideration.)
Agricultural property being farmed by the owner should be taxed at the same rate
as homeowners; agricultural property being rented should be at the rental
property rate. CFOs and CAFOs should be considered industrial and taxed as
Industry/Business or higher due to environmental issues. Indiana's taxes are
very regressive in that the tax burden falls on those who can least afford to
pay them. Corporate tax rates are considered extremely low in the state by the
Department of Commerce. For the past several decades there has been a continued
shifting of tax burden from business to the individual. When elected I will
support legislation to promote a progressive income tax structure, based on
ability to pay, which will insure a strong economy and adequate funding for the
services provided by the State of Indiana.. A healthy state economy is a
foundation for quality of life for Indiana's citizens. A healthy economy
requires Indiana government to take an active role in providing such services as
quality education, sound infrastructure, accessible health care, responsible
human services, effective public safety and adequate recreational and cultural
amenities. The financing for these services must be raised in a fair and
equitable manner. I will support "Indiana's Common Construction Wage
Act" and will work to raise the minimum wage. The wealthiest 1% of all
Americans earned a whopping 21.2% of all the income in 2005, while the bottom
50% of Americans earned only 12.8% of all income. This is the largest income
inequality since 1928. In Indiana, the top 5% of families have an average income
of $195,217, while the bottom 20% of families earn an average of only $18,590. A
large portion of the gap is caused by private companies that pay their top-level
executives at rates that are out of proportion to the salaries earned by
laborers in the same company. Recent tax policies have also unfairly allowed the
rich to prosper at faster rates.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your
candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID
NOT RESPOND.
Beverly J. Gard (Taxpayer
Friendly)
Address: 3660 N. 50 E., Greenfield, IN 46140
Phone: (317) 462-2527
E-mail:
Website:
2012 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1003, which is Taxpayer Friendly because (1) public access to
government meetings and records is improved and (2) it is less likely that
public agencies will intentionally violate the Public Access Laws.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1005, which contains six Taxpayer Friendly local government Conflict Of
Interest provisions and sixteen Taxpayer Friendly local government Nepotism
provisions.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1376,
which is Taxpayer UNfriendly because (1) the automatic taxpayer refund excess
reserves trigger is increased from 10% to 12.5% and (2) Hoosier working families
will possibly receive an automatic taxpayer refund every even-numbered year
instead of every year.
Voted YES on
Senate Bill 25,
which was Taxpayer Friendly because (if it had passed the House) much improved
oversight would have been provided for redevelopment commissions and
departments.
2011 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, which includes among its 16 Taxpayer Friendly state budget
provisions no tax increases and an operating surplus in both the 2012 and 2013
fiscal years with a satisfactory reserve balance on June 30, 2013.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1002, which is Taxpayer Friendly because (1) charter schools have the
potential to help increase the academic growth of lower socioeconomic students,
(2) the number of Indiana nonprofit private colleges and universities authorized
to create charter schools is limited, (3) the Indianapolis mayor is the only
Indiana mayor who may authorize charter schools, (4) conversion from a public
school to a charter school is sufficiently stringent, and (5) property taxes are
NOT improperly used to support charter schools.
Voted YES on
House Bill
1003, which uses state K-12 tuition support money to fund scholarships for
nonpublic school students and is Taxpayer UNfriendly because (1) nonpublic
private and parochial schools are not equally open to all children, (2)
nonpublic school budgets are not approved by a directly elected public body, (3)
evidence-based research does not support greater school choice as a means to
achieve overall educational improvement, (4) it is very likely unconstitutional,
and (5) state tuition support dollars would go to nonpublic schools that are not
uniformly distributed throughout the state.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1022, which would have implemented a number of Taxpayer Friendly local
government provisions related to nepotism and officeholder conflict-of-interest.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1074, which provides that school board members selected by election
must be elected at November general elections and is Taxpayer Friendly because
the greater voter turnout in general elections will make it more difficult for
local vested interests to unduly influence school board elections.
2010 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES
on House Joint Resolution 1,
which gives voters statewide the opportunity to amend the Indiana Constitution
to (1) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (2) protect
homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1001, which contains 21 Taxpayer Friendly government ethics reform
provisions including a 365-day wait after leaving the General Assembly before a
legislator can become a lobbyist or legislative liaison, the reporting of
certain expenditures by the legislative liaisons of state agencies and state
educational institutions, and a reduction from $100 to $50 in the minimum
reportable amount for the total daily gifts given by a registered lobbyist to a
legislative person.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1086, which contains 7 Taxpayer Friendly provisions including the HJR
1 Constitutional Amendment ballot language.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1367, which contains 5 Taxpayer Friendly K-12 education provisions
that preserve and protect instructional programs.
Voted YES on
Senate Bill 23, which delays the scheduled increase in unemployment insurance
premiums for one year until 2011.
Voted YES on Senate Bill
396, which mandates an
adjusted six-year average that eliminates the highest value to calculate the
base rate for the assessment of agricultural land.
2009 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted
YES
on Senate
Joint Resolution 1, which amended the Indiana Constitution beginning 2012 to
include a cap on homestead property tax in 90 counties at 1% of gross assessed
value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008, is
exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St. Joseph
counties ONLY. The effective constitutional homeowner property tax caps in Lake
and St. Joseph counties are 1.88% and 1.52% respectively until the 1% cap takes
effect in 2020.
Voted YES
on House Bill 1001 SS, the
2009-2011 special session budget bill that (1) provides enough resources for
good government AND (2) satisfactorily protects Hoosier working families
from state and local tax increases. A
YES vote supports a budget that is sufficiently Taxpayer Friendly.
A NO vote would have shut down much of state government.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 348 to have a Library Services Plan developed and approved by a Public
Library Service Planning Committee (with an "opt out" referendum
provision) in every county (except Marion County) to help more effectively use
working family dollars currently spent on library services (with the option to
equitably replace public library property taxes with a county economic
development income tax).
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 452 to prohibit employees of a
local government unit from serving as elected officials within the same local
government unit, move the elections of municipal officers to even-numbered
years, move all school board member elections to the November general election
in even-numbered years, establish the use of vote centers as an option for all
counties, and require a city clerk-treasurer in a third class city to attend
fiscal officer training provided by the state board of accounts.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 506 to (1) allow a single County Chief Executive
Officer or County Manager, (2) allow the County Council or the Board of
County Supervisors to exercise both the fiscal and legislative powers
of the county, (3) provide for voter-initiated referendums on county
government reorganization, (4) repeal the requirement that political
subdivisions must approve local government reorganizations initiated by voters,
(5) assign the Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations four
responsibilities to identify and monitor good local government
practices, (6) prohibit County Manager nepotism, (7) repeal unproductive
reporting requirements, and (8) continue to elect the County Assessor.
Voted YES
on Senate
Bill 512 to (1) abolish on January 1, 2013, each township board in every
county (other than Marion County) and make the county fiscal body also the
fiscal body and legislative body of each township, (2) require a township when
formulating an annual budget to consider whether the part of the ending balance
in each township fund in excess of 10% of budgeted expenditures should be used
instead of imposing additional property taxes for the ensuing year, (3) prohibit
a relative of a township officer or employee from being employed by the township
in a position that would put the relative in a direct supervisory or subordinate
relationship with the officer or employee, (4) require a township trustee's
annual report to list separately each expenditure to reimburse the trustee for
the trustee's public business use of personal property, (5) require each
township office to include the address, phone number, and regular office hours
(if any) of the township office in at least one local telephone directory, (6)
prohibits a public meeting or a public hearing of a township official or
governing body from being held in a private residence, and (7) requires the
State Board of Accounts to submit an annual township examination report to the
executive director of the Legislative Services Agency and to county councils.
Voted YES
on House
Bill 1607 to require a referendum before establishing a Northern Indiana
Regional Transportation District, which is a new tax-imposing level of
Indiana government in Lake, Porter, LaPorte, and St. Joseph counties controlled
by a board with unrestricted powers (where most board members have no real
connection to the taxpayers' community).
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008, General Election
1.
BACKGROUND: Senate Joint Resolution 1 passed
the Indiana Senate 40-7 and the Indiana House 79-20 on March 14, 2008, and
was signed by the Governor on March 19, 2008. SJR 1 amends the Indiana
Constitution to cap homeowners' property tax bills at 1% of assessed value,
rental and agricultural property at 2%, and business property at 3%. For
property taxes first due and payable in 2012, 90 of Indiana's 92
counties must have a homeowner property tax cap that is 1% of the gross
assessed value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008,
is exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St.
Joseph counties ONLY. The result of these two existing debt service
exemptions equates to a 1.88% homeowner cap in Lake County and a 1.52%
homeowner cap in St.
Joseph County. The homeowner caps for Lake and St. Joseph counties must become
1% in 2020. The exact same version of SJR 1 that passed in 2008 must again pass in the General Assembly in 2009 to put the 1%
constitutional homeowner property tax cap amendment on the 2010 ballot. We
the people can then vote to make the 1% homeowner property tax cap a
permanent part of the Indiana Constitution. Never has it been so easy to separate those who are part of the
property tax relief solution from those who are part of the property tax
spending problem. A General Assembly candidate who pledges to
vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009 is part of the
solution, otherwise the legislator is part of
the problem. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in 2009 for
the exact same version of Senate
Joint Resolution 1 that passed in 2008? ANSWER: Yes,
I will work hard to pass and I will vote for the same version of SJR that
passed and I voted for in 2008. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race):
Experts in tax policy have told us that without a constitutional amendment to
cap property taxes they are likely to continue to rise to unacceptable
percentages. A cap on all classifications is desirable. It needs to be
understood that these caps are the maximum property tax that can be paid without
the consent of local voters and lower percentages should be strived for. Voters
should be the ones who ultimately decide on the constitutional amendment and
they deserve to have the opportunity to voice their opinion with their vote.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
Not at this time.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008,
Primary Election
1. BACKGROUND: Senate Joint Resolution 1, which contains a meaningful
homeowner property tax cap amendment to the Indiana Constitution, passed
the Indiana Senate 40-7 and the Indiana House 79-20 on March 14, 2008. For
property taxes first due and payable in 2012, 90 of Indiana's 92
counties must have a homeowner property tax cap that is 1% of the gross
assessed value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008,
is exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St.
Joseph counties ONLY. The result of these two existing debt service
exemptions equates to a 1.88% cap in Lake County and a 1.52% cap in St.
Joseph County. The caps for Lake and St. Joseph counties must become
1% in 2020. SJR 1 must again pass in the General Assembly in 2009 to put the 1%
constitutional homeowner property tax cap amendment on the 2010 ballot. We
the people can then vote to make the 1% homeowner property tax cap a
permanent part of the Indiana Constitution. Never has it been so easy to separate those who are part of the
property tax relief solution from those who are part of the property tax
spending problem. A General Assembly candidate who pledges to
vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009 is part of the
solution, otherwise the legislator is part of
the problem. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate
Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: Yes, I do plan to
vote for SJR 1 in 2009 and work hard for its passage.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
Not at this time.
2008 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on Senate
Joint Resolution 1, which amended the Indiana Constitution beginning 2012 to
include a cap on homestead property tax in 90 counties at 1% of gross assessed
value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008, is
exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St. Joseph
counties ONLY. The effective constitutional homeowner property tax caps in Lake
and St. Joseph counties are 1.88% and 1.52% respectively until the 1% cap takes
effect in 2020.
Voted YES on
House
Bill 1001, which phases in the SJR 1 constitutional property tax caps by
2010. Also, 2008 property taxes are reduced 26% from the prior year. An increase
in the sales tax from 6% to 7% and local option income taxes will be used to
replace the property tax revenue reductions that result from the property tax
caps.
2007 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that is Taxpayer
Friendly because the General Fund & Property Tax Replacement Fund $26.0722
billion expenditures total for the 2008 and 2009 fiscal years is less than the
$26.1946 billion revenues total. HB 1001 also includes additional homestead
credits from the Property Tax Reduction Trust Fund of $300 million in 2007 and
$250 million in 2008.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1478, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly for the following reasons: (1)
Homeowner property taxes will increase 1.2% each year from 2009 through 2013
with annual decreases in the Homestead Standard Deduction. (2) The 2% Circuit
Breaker Cap on residential property taxes passed by the General Assembly in 2006
has been watered down to the point where it is almost eliminated. (3) The new
local option income tax for property tax relief will be offset by future
property tax increases unless the new local option income tax to replace
property tax increases is implemented. (4) Using the new local option income tax
to replace property tax increases means that income tax increases on Hoosier
working families would lower the proportionate tax burden of businesses and
utilities by freezing business and utility property taxes without a
corresponding increase in other business and utility taxes. (5) A new local
option income tax has been authorized for public safety.
Voted NO on House
Bill 1835,which is Taxpayer Friendly because it uses slot machine licensing
fees and wagering taxes to establish the Property Tax Reduction Trust Fund,
which is to be used for property tax relief in any manner prescribed by the
General Assembly.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 401, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly because state legislators voted
themselves a perpetual pay increase that is 20% more than the typical Hoosier
working family earns during an entire year. SB 401 also eliminated taxpayer-paid
lifetime health insurance and the $4 taxpayer match for each $1 of legislator
pension contribution, but General Assembly members should not have received an
excessive salary increase in return for eliminating extravagant perks they
should not have in the first place.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
7, 2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND:
Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax increased from 5% to 6%
with a promise that the proceeds would be used to decrease homeowner
homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3%
decrease into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average
Hoosier homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility
to levy income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax
relief. QUESTION: Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose
additional income, sales, and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget
the last two fiscal years has been balanced without fund transfers for the
first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm). QUESTION: Should the state's total budget
expenditures be no more than total revenues for the next
biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced
with the inclusion of a one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This
decreases property taxes for the average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should
the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be continued beyond
2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4.
BACKGROUND:
Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners
could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should the state pay for full-day
kindergarten? If YES, where should the state get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten?
HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND:
The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road ("Major
Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to pay
off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the
next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects
include $694 million for a new terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to
Evansville as well as a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION:
Should the "Major Moves" expenditures be combined with the
Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain I-69
extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The
2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a toll road for an
I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION: Do you favor
legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2006 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES
on "Major
Moves" House
Bill 1008, which authorizes the Indiana Department of Transportation to
enter into public-private agreements with private entities (operators)
concerning tollway projects for I-69 between Martinsville and Evansville. HB
1008 also authorizes the Indiana Finance Authority to enter into public-private
agreements with operators for the Indiana Toll Road.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, a residential property tax reduction bill that increases the
homestead credit for one year in 2006 to 28% and the homestead standard
deduction for one year in 2007 to $45,000. Beginning in 2007 for Lake County and
2008 for all other counties, HB 1001 also establishes a cap on residential
property taxes equal to 2% of the assessed value of the residential property.
2005 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES
on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that included seven significant homeowner
property tax increases.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1120, which contained thirteen negative tax impacts including a
regional Food and Beverage Tax to finance a new Colts stadium.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
2, 2004, General Election
1. Guiding Principles for 2005-07 Biennium Budget. DID NOT RESPOND.
2. Opinions on Homeowner Property Taxes. DID NOT RESPOND.
3. Position on Indianapolis to Evansville Interstate. DID NOT RESPOND.
4. Additional Comments. DID NOT RESPOND.
2003 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted FOR
on
House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that was Taxpayer UNfriendly primarily
because (1) the 2004-05 fiscal year General Fund and Property Tax Replacement
Fund spending total of $11.48 billion exceeded the $11.4424 billion revenues
total (fiscal year 2004-05 was the eighth straight year where spending exceeded
revenues), (2) the full Property Tax relief that was promised to homeowners in
last year's special session legislation was reduced by the so-called Homestead
Credit "correction," and (3) Pension Stabilization Fund transfers were
included (these transfers worsened the $8.5 billion shortfall in teacher
retirement funds).
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
5, 2002, General Election
1-2. Special session vote FOR
several tax increases that will increase revenues $1.7782 billion from July 1,
2002, through June 30, 2005.
3. Special session vote FOR
a 20% gas tax increase (from 15 to 18 cents per gallon) effective
01/01/03.
4. Special session vote FOR
a phased-in shift of the inventory tax to (1) all other types of property
through an increased property tax rate and (2) a tax on the income of
individuals (in those counties choosing to do so) through the
establishment or increase of a County Economic Development Income Tax (CEDIT).
5. Did not receive General Election Questionnaire. See the Legislative
Voting Record.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 7,
2002, Primary Election
1. Voted on February 28 FOR
the Indiana Senate version of HB 1004, which included an unneeded
Income Tax rate increase, imposed a new
business Payroll Tax, and increased revenues
$933 million more than taxes would have been reduced through June 30,
2004.
2. Voted on February 27 FOR
the Indiana Senate version of HB 1317, which would have raised
the Gasoline Tax from 15 cents per gallon to 18 cents during 2003, 20
cents during 2004, and 22 cents after 2004.
3-4. Did not receive Primary Questionnaire. See the Legislative
Voting Record.
Chris Lytle (Uncertain)
4074 S. Black Oak Ln.
New Palestine, IN 46163
Phone: (317) 861-5961
E-mail: kristinlytle@sbcglobal.net
Website:
http://www.lytleforindiana.com/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 8, 2012,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Should the 2013-2015 state budget be balanced where (a) current
year appropriations do not exceed current year revenues, (b) there are no
delayed payments and one-time fund transfers, and (c) a reserves balance of at
least 5% is maintained? ANSWER: A.
2. QUESTION: Should the non-transportation appropriations from the state’s
Motor Vehicle Highway Account be transferred to the state’s General Fund so
more of our Indiana Gasoline Tax can be properly spent to meet our
transportation needs? ANSWER: No, I believe
there is a greater possiblity of money being spent improperly if it's in the
General Fund.
3. QUESTION: Should the automatic taxpayer refund be improved, maintained, or
eliminated? ANSWER: I think if the budget is simplified and properly maintained,
it could be eliminated. Giving money to the government to have them possibly
return a portion later seems like a logistical nightmare and just one more
unnecessary thing to take up more time and resources.
4. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and
the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: I would have to
say no due to the word ANY. Something more beneficial could possibly be
introduced..
5. QUESTION: What is your position regarding township government reform? ANSWER:
I would be in favor of finding ways to eliminate excessive spending and agree
the system in unnecessary in Marion County. However, I feel it is effective and
necessary in nearly every other county. Therefore I am not in favor of it.
6. QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment commissions
oversight? ANSWER: I feel the RDC needs to be held accountable for there
actions. I don't believe an unelected group should have that power with no
oversight.
7. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: I am running not as a politican but as a concerned citizen. It is time
we put people into our government without a political agenda or their our
personal goals in mind. My concerns are for my family and the people of this
state. I'm confident that any of the candidates can do the job, so the question
is who will fight the hardest for the needs of the people of Indiana?
John Merlau (Uncertain)
P.O. Box 406
New Palestine, IN 46163
Phone: (317) 861-4795
E-mail: merlau@merlau.com
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 8, 2012,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Should the 2013-2015 state budget be balanced where (a) current
year appropriations do not exceed current year revenues, (b) there are no
delayed payments and one-time fund transfers, and (c) a reserves balance of at
least 5% is maintained? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Should the non-transportation appropriations from the state’s
Motor Vehicle Highway Account be transferred to the state’s General Fund so
more of our Indiana Gasoline Tax can be properly spent to meet our
transportation needs? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
3. QUESTION: Should the automatic taxpayer refund be improved, maintained, or
eliminated? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
4. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and
the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
5. QUESTION: What is your position regarding township government reform? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
6. QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment commissions
oversight? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
7. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
Terry L. Michael (Taxpayer
UNfriendly)
10928 Geist Woods N Dr.
Indianapolis, IN 46256
Phone: (317) 842-9699
E-mail:
terryleemichael@comcast.net
Website:
www.terrymichael.org
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate
Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race):
No. We should not be so irresponsible to make the caps constitutional. In an
ever-evolving economy, we cannot assume things will always be the same. We must
have the freedom to roll with the time.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
State Senate District 29:
James Litton (Uncertain)
9041 Colgate Street
Indianapolis, IN 46268
Phone:
(812) 521-2672
E-mail:
littonj@gmail.com
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 4, 2010,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you
support or oppose the Constitutional Amendment on the November 2, 2010,
statewide ballot? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced?
ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain
both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction
without ANY change? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General
Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between
I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
HAS NOT RESPONDED.
State Senate District 30:
Todd DeGroff (Taxpayer
UNfriendly - Part of
the Problem)
8650 Driftwood Drive
Indianapolis, IN 46240
Phone: (317) 514-3831
E-mail: tdegroff@comcast.net
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in
2009 for the exact same version of Senate Joint Resolution 1 that passed in
2008? ANSWER: If elected, I would not vote for SJR 1.
It crudely panders to the public's present anger at property taxes WHILE
DOING NOTHING TO ADDRESS THE UNDERLYING PROBLEM! The problem is excessive
layers of government with overlapping taxing authority, not necessarily the assessed
value of property. Only 50% of the recent increases in property taxes was
attributable to increases in assessed value; the rest was the result of tax
levies by overlapping government units. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race):
No. I believe this amendment, which applies different levels of assessment to
different categories of property (regardless of value), may violate
constitutional guarantees of Equal Protection. In any event, owners of
commercial property and rental property would simply pass these burdens along to
consumer-customers, who are already facing increases in income and sales taxes.
SJR 1 is a quick and sloppy attempt to address a complicated, systemic problem.
Indiana requires a top-to-bottom assessment of its taxation system, coordinated
with efforts to streamline government, such as those recommended by the
Kernan-Shepard Commission.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: I strongly endorse the conclusions of the Kernan-Shepard Commission report,
which observed that in some jurisdictions 5 or 6 governmental units--some
unelected--have property taxing authority. If we implemented the
Kernan-Shepard Commission's recommendations and streamlined Indiana's
antique government structure (which was adopted about 1850, before the
Civil War, when Indiana's second Constitution was ratified), we could save
billions of dollars, and solve our property tax problems. Delivery of all
types of services would be cheaper and much improved, and Indiana would
become a friendlier climate for business development.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 2, 2006,
Primary Election
1. What will be your guiding principles for the 2007-2009 biennium
budget? Specifically, what mix of spending cuts, tax increases, and/or reserve
depletions will you support? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. What are your opinions regarding homeowner property taxes? Specifically, do
favor freezing all property taxes and funding budget increases through both
individual and business income tax increases? Or, do you favor a mixture of
income tax, sales tax and meals tax increases to reduce property tax growth
while providing additional revenue to local governments? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. Considering the "Major Moves" legislation passed by the General
Assembly this year, do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases
the next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. What is your position regarding the construction of an interstate from
Indianapolis to Evansville? Specifically, should the $500 million Next
Generation Trust Fund that is part of "Major Moves" be used
exclusively for a new terrain I-69 extension so as to avoid state gas tax
increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Tim DeLaney (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
3640 Washington Blvd.
Indianapolis, IN 46205
Phone: (317) 809-0583
E-mail: delaneyforsenate@gmail.com
Website: http://www.delaneyforindiana.com/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 6, 2012,
General Election
1. QUESTION: What are your priorities regarding the 2013-2015 state budget?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (from campaign website): Indiana can incubate
emerging industries with tax incentives, infrastructure and by providing a
strong public education system. We can replace red tape with laws designed to
foster economic growth like tax incentives for new hires and a capital access
fund for entrepreneurs. Stronger oversight and mandatory audits will help
stretch every dollar, eliminate government waste and make sure our government is
not wasting our hard-earned money.
2. QUESTION: Should the non-transportation appropriations from the state’s
Motor Vehicle Highway Account be transferred to the state’s General Fund so
more of our Indiana Gasoline Tax dollars can be properly spent to meet our
transportation needs? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (from campaign website):
To ensure that Indiana does not get left behind, we need to reinvest in our
infrastructure, particularly in central Indiana.
3. QUESTION: Should the Automatic Taxpayer Refund law be (a) improved to make
refunds more likely, (b) kept as it is, or (c) eliminated? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
4. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and
the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND. RECORD (from campaign website): While property tax caps were
desperately needed when property taxes skyrocketed, the
property tax caps should not have been amended to the state constitution.
5. QUESTION: What is your position regarding township government reform? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
6. QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment commissions
oversight? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
7. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (From campaign website): When schools find what
works, we should reward them. Successful schools deserve greater automony and an
opportunity to continue practicing what works. We must not rest until every
child in the state has access to quality, full day education at age five. In
addition, Indiana is only one of ten states without an early childhood education
initiative. We cannot afford to be left behind in the 21st century’s
knowledge-based economy.
Steve Keltner (Taxpayer
Friendly - Part of the
Solution)
7527 Cape Cod Lane
Indianapolis, IN 46250
Phone: (317) 576-1937
E-mail: votekeltner@comcast.net
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in
2009 for the exact same version of Senate Joint Resolution 1 that passed in
2008? ANSWER: I would vote
to pass SJR 1 in its current form.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your
candidacy? ANSWER: I would like to point out that I view SJR1 as a
stepping stone but not a total solution. Thirty states currently have some form
of tax payer protection (Bill of Rights), Indiana is NOT one of them. SJR 1 is
the FIRST step in that process. It is the beginning, not the end. Other ways I
plan to change tax burdens: (1) My job creation plan could take 70,000 people
statewide off unemployment and provide them with salaries around $40K/year and
benefits. "Benefits" means they also come off of Medicaid = more
savings for taxpayers. The last benefit is the revenue generated by the
industry, around $500 million a year in the Ohio system. Did I mention that this
works in Ohio? (2a) Medicaid need to be revamped! After spending more than
6 years practicing in a busy Indiana ER, serving mostly under-served Hoosiers, I
can see (as all practitioners in my field) where the waste is and how to make
the system more functional. For example: On any given weekend, hundreds of
Medicaid patients will lie in indiana hospital beds at a cost of about $2,000 a
night each. If Medicaid legislation was modified to cover "long term
care" they could be cared for at home by a visiting nurse for about $300
(or less) per night. I have verified this though VNA. It's simple and would save
tax payers millions. (2b) Indiana Medicaid allows recipients to crash emergency
rooms at will. The care is excellent, but by nature it's fragmented. It is also
the most expensive type of care. Other states have realized great savings by
requiring these patients to keep their appointments with their approved doctors
and not abuse the ER. The details will bore you, but the results have been very
effective in other states. (3) Taxation for all the new roads is a disgrace. Yes
we have to pay for their upkeep and that requires taxes. However, the dedication
to roads at the expense of all other forms of mass transit is unacceptable. We
need Mass transit asap. But for it to be effective, we must have infrastructure.
Before we spend $160 million on a train to service the Northeast corridor only,
lets build sidewalks and bike paths to park and ride stations to facilitate
commuter busses in all corridors. Remember the $500 million I mentioned in the
first question? Some of that could be used to help fund that transit
infrastructure. I could give another 10 or 15 ways I'll help protect taxpayers
(like me) if elected. If you want more let me know. I spent 2 years in the run
up to this election coming up with specific solutions to reconcile the tax
problem. I believe that makes me different than either of my opponents.
Teresa S. Lubbers (Taxpayer
Friendly)
Address: 6325 N. Guilford, Suite 202, Indianapolis, IN 46220
Phone: (317) 253-5078
E-mail: senlub@aol.com
Website: http://lubbersforsenate.com/
2009 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted
YES
on Senate
Joint Resolution 1, which amended the Indiana Constitution beginning 2012 to
include a cap on homestead property tax in 90 counties at 1% of gross assessed
value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008, is
exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St. Joseph
counties ONLY. The effective constitutional homeowner property tax caps in Lake
and St. Joseph counties are 1.88% and 1.52% respectively until the 1% cap takes
effect in 2020.
Voted YES
on House Bill 1001 SS, the
2009-2011 special session budget bill that (1) provides enough resources for
good government AND (2) satisfactorily protects Hoosier working families
from state and local tax increases. A
YES vote supports a budget that is sufficiently Taxpayer Friendly.
A NO vote would have shut down much of state government.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 348 to have a Library Services Plan developed and approved by a Public
Library Service Planning Committee (with an "opt out" referendum
provision) in every county (except Marion County) to help more effectively use
working family dollars currently spent on library services (with the option to
equitably replace public library property taxes with a county economic
development income tax).
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 452 to prohibit employees of a
local government unit from serving as elected officials within the same local
government unit, move the elections of municipal officers to even-numbered
years, move all school board member elections to the November general election
in even-numbered years, establish the use of vote centers as an option for all
counties, and require a city clerk-treasurer in a third class city to attend
fiscal officer training provided by the state board of accounts.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 506 to (1) allow a single County Chief Executive
Officer or County Manager, (2) allow the County Council or the Board of
County Supervisors to exercise both the fiscal and legislative powers
of the county, (3) provide for voter-initiated referendums on county
government reorganization, (4) repeal the requirement that political
subdivisions must approve local government reorganizations initiated by voters,
(5) assign the Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations four
responsibilities to identify and monitor good local government
practices, (6) prohibit County Manager nepotism, (7) repeal unproductive
reporting requirements, and (8) continue to elect the County Assessor.
Voted YES
on Senate
Bill 512 to (1) abolish on January 1, 2013, each township board in every
county (other than Marion County) and make the county fiscal body also the
fiscal body and legislative body of each township, (2) require a township when
formulating an annual budget to consider whether the part of the ending balance
in each township fund in excess of 10% of budgeted expenditures should be used
instead of imposing additional property taxes for the ensuing year, (3) prohibit
a relative of a township officer or employee from being employed by the township
in a position that would put the relative in a direct supervisory or subordinate
relationship with the officer or employee, (4) require a township trustee's
annual report to list separately each expenditure to reimburse the trustee for
the trustee's public business use of personal property, (5) require each
township office to include the address, phone number, and regular office hours
(if any) of the township office in at least one local telephone directory, (6)
prohibits a public meeting or a public hearing of a township official or
governing body from being held in a private residence, and (7) requires the
State Board of Accounts to submit an annual township examination report to the
executive director of the Legislative Services Agency and to county councils.
Voted YES
on House
Bill 1607 to require a referendum before establishing a Northern Indiana
Regional Transportation District, which is a new tax-imposing level of
Indiana government in Lake, Porter, LaPorte, and St. Joseph counties controlled
by a board with unrestricted powers (where most board members have no real
connection to the taxpayers' community).
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008, General Election
1.
BACKGROUND: Senate Joint Resolution 1 passed
the Indiana Senate 40-7 and the Indiana House 79-20 on March 14, 2008, and
was signed by the Governor on March 19, 2008. SJR 1 amends the Indiana
Constitution to cap homeowners' property tax bills at 1% of assessed value,
rental and agricultural property at 2%, and business property at 3%. For
property taxes first due and payable in 2012, 90 of Indiana's 92
counties must have a homeowner property tax cap that is 1% of the gross
assessed value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008,
is exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St.
Joseph counties ONLY. The result of these two existing debt service
exemptions equates to a 1.88% homeowner cap in Lake County and a 1.52%
homeowner cap in St.
Joseph County. The homeowner caps for Lake and St. Joseph counties must become
1% in 2020. The exact same version of SJR 1 that passed in 2008 must again pass in the General Assembly in 2009 to put the 1%
constitutional homeowner property tax cap amendment on the 2010 ballot. We
the people can then vote to make the 1% homeowner property tax cap a
permanent part of the Indiana Constitution. Never has it been so easy to separate those who are part of the
property tax relief solution from those who are part of the property tax
spending problem. A General Assembly candidate who pledges to
vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009 is part of the
solution, otherwise the legislator is part of
the problem. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in 2009 for
the exact same version of Senate
Joint Resolution 1 that passed in 2008? ANSWER: I will
vote for SJR 1 again in the upcoming session.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
Not at this time.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008,
Primary Election
1. BACKGROUND: Senate Joint Resolution 1, which contains a meaningful
homeowner property tax cap amendment to the Indiana Constitution, passed
the Indiana Senate 40-7 and the Indiana House 79-20 on March 14, 2008. For
property taxes first due and payable in 2012, 90 of Indiana's 92
counties must have a homeowner property tax cap that is 1% of the gross
assessed value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008,
is exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St.
Joseph counties ONLY. The result of these two existing debt service
exemptions equates to a 1.88% cap in Lake County and a 1.52% cap in St.
Joseph County. The caps for Lake and St. Joseph counties must become
1% in 2020. SJR 1 must again pass in the General Assembly in 2009 to put the 1%
constitutional homeowner property tax cap amendment on the 2010 ballot. We
the people can then vote to make the 1% homeowner property tax cap a
permanent part of the Indiana Constitution. Never has it been so easy to separate those who are part of the
property tax relief solution from those who are part of the property tax
spending problem. A General Assembly candidate who pledges to
vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009 is part of the
solution, otherwise the legislator is part of
the problem. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate
Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: I am committed to
supporting SJR 1 in 2009.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
Not at this time.
2008 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on Senate
Joint Resolution 1, which amended the Indiana Constitution beginning 2012 to
include a cap on homestead property tax in 90 counties at 1% of gross assessed
value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008, is
exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St. Joseph
counties ONLY. The effective constitutional homeowner property tax caps in Lake
and St. Joseph counties are 1.88% and 1.52% respectively until the 1% cap takes
effect in 2020.
Voted YES on
House
Bill 1001, which phases in the SJR 1 constitutional property tax caps by
2010. Also, 2008 property taxes are reduced 26% from the prior year. An increase
in the sales tax from 6% to 7% and local option income taxes will be used to
replace the property tax revenue reductions that result from the property tax
caps.
2007 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that is Taxpayer
Friendly because the General Fund & Property Tax Replacement Fund $26.0722
billion expenditures total for the 2008 and 2009 fiscal years is less than the
$26.1946 billion revenues total. HB 1001 also includes additional homestead
credits from the Property Tax Reduction Trust Fund of $300 million in 2007 and
$250 million in 2008.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1478, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly for the following reasons: (1)
Homeowner property taxes will increase 1.2% each year from 2009 through 2013
with annual decreases in the Homestead Standard Deduction. (2) The 2% Circuit
Breaker Cap on residential property taxes passed by the General Assembly in 2006
has been watered down to the point where it is almost eliminated. (3) The new
local option income tax for property tax relief will be offset by future
property tax increases unless the new local option income tax to replace
property tax increases is implemented. (4) Using the new local option income tax
to replace property tax increases means that income tax increases on Hoosier
working families would lower the proportionate tax burden of businesses and
utilities by freezing business and utility property taxes without a
corresponding increase in other business and utility taxes. (5) A new local
option income tax has been authorized for public safety.
Voted NO on House
Bill 1835,which is Taxpayer Friendly because it uses slot machine licensing
fees and wagering taxes to establish the Property Tax Reduction Trust Fund,
which is to be used for property tax relief in any manner prescribed by the
General Assembly.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 401, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly because state legislators voted
themselves a perpetual pay increase that is 20% more than the typical Hoosier
working family earns during an entire year. SB 401 also eliminated taxpayer-paid
lifetime health insurance and the $4 taxpayer match for each $1 of legislator
pension contribution, but General Assembly members should not have received an
excessive salary increase in return for eliminating extravagant perks they
should not have in the first place.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
7, 2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND:
Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax increased from 5% to 6%
with a promise that the proceeds would be used to decrease homeowner
homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3%
decrease into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average
Hoosier homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility
to levy income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax
relief. QUESTION: Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose
additional income, sales, and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget
the last two fiscal years has been balanced without fund transfers for the
first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm). QUESTION: Should the state's total budget
expenditures be no more than total revenues for the next
biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced
with the inclusion of a one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This
decreases property taxes for the average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should
the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be continued beyond
2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4.
BACKGROUND:
Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners
could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should the state pay for full-day
kindergarten? If YES, where should the state get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten?
HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND:
The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road ("Major
Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to pay
off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the
next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects
include $694 million for a new terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to
Evansville as well as a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION:
Should the "Major Moves" expenditures be combined with the
Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain I-69
extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The
2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a toll road for an
I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION: Do you favor
legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2006 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES
on "Major
Moves" House
Bill 1008, which authorizes the Indiana Department of Transportation to
enter into public-private agreements with private entities (operators)
concerning tollway projects for I-69 between Martinsville and Evansville. HB
1008 also authorizes the Indiana Finance Authority to enter into public-private
agreements with operators for the Indiana Toll Road.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, a residential property tax reduction bill that increases the
homestead credit for one year in 2006 to 28% and the homestead standard
deduction for one year in 2007 to $45,000. Beginning in 2007 for Lake County and
2008 for all other counties, HB 1001 also establishes a cap on residential
property taxes equal to 2% of the assessed value of the residential property.
2005 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES
on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that included seven significant homeowner
property tax increases.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1120, which contained thirteen negative tax impacts including a
regional Food and Beverage Tax to finance a new Colts stadium.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
2, 2004, General Election
1. Guiding Principles for 2005-07 Biennium Budget. DID NOT RESPOND.
2. Opinions on Homeowner Property Taxes. DID NOT RESPOND.
3. Position on Indianapolis to Evansville Interstate. DID NOT RESPOND.
4. Additional Comments. DID NOT RESPOND.
2003 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted
FOR on
House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that was Taxpayer UNfriendly primarily
because (1) the 2004-05 fiscal year General Fund and Property Tax Replacement
Fund spending total of $11.48 billion exceeded the $11.4424 billion revenues
total (fiscal year 2004-05 was the eighth straight year where spending exceeded
revenues), (2) the full Property Tax relief that was promised to homeowners in
last year's special session legislation was reduced by the so-called Homestead
Credit "correction," and (3) Pension Stabilization Fund transfers were
included (these transfers worsened the $8.5 billion shortfall in teacher
retirement funds).
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
5, 2002, General Election
1-2. Special session vote FOR
several tax increases that will increase revenues $1.7782 billion from July 1,
2002, through June 30, 2005.
3. Special session vote FOR
a 20% gas tax increase (from 15 to 18 cents per gallon) effective
01/01/03.
4. Special session vote FOR
a phased-in shift of the inventory tax to (1) all other types of property
through an increased property tax rate and (2) a tax on the income of
individuals (in those counties choosing to do so) through the
establishment or increase of a County Economic Development Income Tax (CEDIT).
5. Did not receive General Election Questionnaire. See the Legislative
Voting Record.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 7,
2002, Primary Election
1. Voted on February 28 FOR
the Indiana Senate version of HB 1004, which included an unneeded
Income Tax rate increase, imposed a new
business Payroll Tax, and increased revenues
$933 million more than taxes would have been reduced through June 30,
2004.
2. Voted on February 27 FOR
the Indiana Senate version of HB 1317, which would have raised
the Gasoline Tax from 15 cents per gallon to 18 cents during 2003, 20
cents during 2004, and 22 cents after 2004.
3-4. Did not receive Primary Questionnaire. See the Legislative
Voting Record.
Ken Morgan (Uncertain)
404 East 50th Street
Indianapolis, IN 46205
Phone: (317) 260-1828
E-mail: morgan.ken@mac.com
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate
Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: I will vote for SJR1 only
unless I can't get something better. The only reason I would vote for
it, is because I think the people should have a larger voice in their laws
than they now have. Having voted to allow the people a voice on the matter,
I would actively encourage people to vote against it. The 1/2/3 formula has
no logic or justice in it. The Indiana constitution states: “The General
Assembly shall provide, by law, for a uniform and equal rate of property
assessment and taxation.” Amending the constitution with a 1/2/3 formula
would unleash all restraint on unfair taxation in Indiana. It would also be an
obstacle to my goal of abolishing property tax all together.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
Not at this time.
F. C. Peterson (Uncertain)
316 W. 52nd St.
Indianapolis, IN 46208
Phone: (317) 441-1121
E-mail: sailorboycutter@yahoo.com
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November
6, 2012, General Election
1. QUESTION: What are your priorities regarding the 2013-2015 state budget?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Should the non-transportation appropriations from the state’s
Motor Vehicle Highway Account be transferred to the state’s General Fund so
more of our Indiana Gasoline Tax dollars can be properly spent to meet our
transportation needs? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
3. QUESTION: Should the Automatic Taxpayer Refund law be (a) improved to make
refunds more likely, (b) kept as it is, or (c) eliminated? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
4. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and
the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
5. QUESTION: What is your position regarding township government reform? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
6. QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment commissions
oversight? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
7. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
State Senate District 31:
Frank J. Anderson (Uncertain)
115 W Washington St Ste 1165
Indianapolis, IN 46204
Phone: (317) 231-7121
E-mail: sheriff4senate@gmail.com
Website: http://sheriff4senate.com/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you
support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the
1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax
deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced?
Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility
of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be
replenished.
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (From IndyStar.com 2010 Voter Guide): I
think we need to constantly evaluate what businesses need – from large
corporations to small businesses – and tailor specific initiatives around
those needs. I also think it’s important in the jobs discussion that we
include renewable energy. That’s why I support expanding net metering, rather
than restricting it. At the same time, we must be comprehensive in how we look
at mass transit. People need to get to work, so let’s be sure we don’t make
cuts that hurt our workforce, rather than help them. Education should be the
last thing we cut, not the first. If we continue to cut education, our kids
won’t be able to compete in a global economy. That’s why I think school
districts need flexibility and local control. We can’t take a “one size fits
all” approach because each school district is different, with its own set of
complexities and challenges. What works in an urban or township district in
Indianapolis may not work in Switzerland County.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain
both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction
without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General
Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between
I-64 and Martinsville?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
5. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
Russell Brown (Uncertain)
Address: 6040 Honeywell Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46236
Phone: (317) 826-2456
E-mail: rlbrown77@hotmail.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 7,
2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax
increased from 5% to 6% with a promise that the proceeds would be used to
decrease homeowner homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3% decrease
into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average Hoosier
homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility to levy
income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax relief. QUESTION:
Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose additional income, sales,
and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget the last two fiscal years has been balanced
without fund transfers for the first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm).
QUESTION: Should the state's total budget expenditures be no more than total
revenues for the next biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced with the inclusion of a
one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This decreases property taxes for the
average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be
continued beyond 2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. BACKGROUND: Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of
Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should
the state pay for full-day kindergarten? If YES, where should the state
get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND: The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road
("Major Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to
pay off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next
ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects include $694 million for a new
terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to Evansville as well as a $500 million
Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION: Should the "Major Moves" expenditures
be combined with the Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain
I-69 extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The 2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a
toll road for an I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION:
Do you favor legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Benjamin Hale (Uncertain)
8527 Honeysuckle Way
Indianapolis, IN 46256
Phone: (317) 698-3418
E-mail: halebenw@gmail.com
Website: http://benhale2010.com/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you
support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the
1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax
deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced?
Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility
of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be
replenished.
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (From Website): As a Libertarian, I
believe in being served by a small, non-intrusive government that is
financially responsible, administratively competent and socially tolerant.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain
both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction
without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General
Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between
I-64 and Martinsville?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
5. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
State Senate District 32:
John F. Barnes (Taxpayer Friendly)
7902 Willow Wind Circle
Indianapolis, IN 46239
Phone: (317) 375-0120
E-mail: john_barnes57@comcast.net
Website: http://johnbarnes.us/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 6, 2012,
General Election
1. QUESTION: What are your priorities regarding the 2013-2015 state budget?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (from campaign website): I call for the
establishment of a permanent funding source for full day kindergarten and the
creation of an early pre-kindergarten education grant program for middle income
families. I believe that establishing a pre-kindergarten program that provides
funding assistance to families whose earnings put them just outside eligibility
for federal assistance would make sense. We could incentivize innovation in
state and local government through a “gainsharing” program where front-line
employees are teamed in groups of eight to twelve workers to look for ways that
their agency or program can save money and then share in the savings through a
rewards payment. I will work to keep Hoosiers safely enrolled in all federal
healthcare programs by repealing the Health Care Compact legislation, which
would allow Indiana to withdraw from all federal healthcare programs and replace
them with an unknown state-run program.
2. QUESTION: Should the non-transportation appropriations from the state’s
Motor Vehicle Highway Account be transferred to the state’s General Fund so
more of our Indiana Gasoline Tax dollars can be properly spent to meet our
transportation needs? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (frrom campaign website):
The state should make low interest loans to local governments to make money
available for work on sewers, bridges, roads and other important infrastructure.
3. QUESTION: Should the Automatic Taxpayer Refund law be (a) improved to make
refunds more likely, (b) kept as it is, or (c) eliminated? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
4. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and
the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
5. QUESTION: What is your position regarding township government reform? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
6. QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment commissions
oversight? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
7. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 8, 2012, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Should the 2013-2015 state budget be balanced where (a) current
year appropriations do not exceed current year revenues, (b) there are no
delayed payments and one-time fund transfers, and (c) a reserves balance of at
least 5% is maintained? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Should the non-transportation appropriations from the state’s
Motor Vehicle Highway Account be transferred to the state’s General Fund so
more of our Indiana Gasoline Tax can be properly spent to meet our
transportation needs? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
3. QUESTION: Should the automatic taxpayer refund be improved, maintained, or
eliminated? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
4. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and
the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
5. QUESTION: What is your position regarding township government reform? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
6. QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment commissions
oversight? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
7. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2010 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Joint Resolution 1, which gives voters statewide the opportunity to amend
the Indiana Constitution to (1) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps
permanent and (2) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal
challenge.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, which contains 21 Taxpayer Friendly government ethics reform
provisions including a 365-day wait after leaving the General Assembly before a
legislator can become a lobbyist or legislative liaison, the reporting of
certain expenditures by the legislative liaisons of state agencies and state
educational institutions, and a reduction from $100 to $50 in the minimum
reportable amount for the total daily gifts given by a registered lobbyist to a
legislative person.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1086, which contains 7 Taxpayer Friendly provisions including the HJR 1
Constitutional Amendment ballot language.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1367, which contains 5 Taxpayer Friendly K-12 education provisions that
preserve and protect instructional programs.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 23, which delays the scheduled increase in unemployment insurance
premiums for one year until 2011.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 396, which mandates an adjusted six-year average that eliminates the
highest value to calculate the base rate for the assessment of agricultural
land.
2009 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001 SS, the 2009-2011 special session budget bill that (1) provides
enough resources for good government AND (2) satisfactorily protects Hoosier
working families from state and local tax increases. A
YES vote supports a budget that is sufficiently Taxpayer Friendly. A
NO vote would have shut down much of state government.
Voted YES as a member of the House Committee on
Government and Regulatory Reform on a bill that combined the following local
government reforms passed by the Senate in SB 348, SB 452, SB 506, and SB 512:
(1) develop and approve a Library Services Plan by a Public Library Service
Planning Committee (with an "opt out" referendum provision) in every
county (except Marion County) to help more effectively use working family
dollars currently spent on library services (with the option to equitably
replace public library property taxes with a county economic development income
tax); (2) prohibit employees of a local government unit from serving as elected
officials within the same local government unit; (3) move the elections of
municipal officers to even-numbered years; (4) move all school board member
elections to the November general election in even-numbered years; (5) establish
the use of vote centers as an option for all counties; (6) require a city
clerk-treasurer in a third class city to attend fiscal officer training provided
by the state board of accounts; (7) allow a single County Chief Executive
Officer or County Manager; (8) allow the County Council or the Board of County
Supervisors to exercise both the fiscal and legislative powers of the county;
(9) provide for voter-initiated referendums on county government reorganization;
(10) repeal the requirement that political subdivisions must approve local
government reorganizations initiated by voters; (11) assign the Advisory
Commission on Intergovernmental Relations four responsibilities to identify and
monitor good local government practices; (12) prohibit County Manager nepotism;
(13) repeal unproductive reporting requirements; (14) continue to elect the
County Assessor; (15) abolish on January 1, 2013, each township board in every
county (other than Marion County) and make the county fiscal body also the
fiscal body and legislative body of each township; (16) require a township when
formulating an annual budget to consider whether the part of the ending balance
in each township fund in excess of 10% of budgeted expenditures should be used
instead of imposing additional property taxes for the ensuing year; (17)
prohibit a relative of a township officer or employee from being employed by the
township in a position that would put the relative in a direct supervisory or
subordinate relationship with the officer or employee; (18) require a township
trustee's annual report to list separately each expenditure to reimburse the
trustee for the trustee's public business use of personal property; (19) require
each township office to include the address, phone number, and regular office
hours (if any) of the township office in at least one local telephone directory;
(20) prohibit a public meeting or a public hearing of a township official or
governing body from being held in a private residence; (21) require the State
Board of Accounts to submit an annual township examination report to the
executive director of the Legislative Services Agency and to county councils.
Voted YES on Senate Bill 374 to allow
Regional Transportation Districts, which are new tax-imposing levels of Indiana
government controlled by boards with unrestricted powers where most board
members have no real connection to the taxpayers' community, to be established
WITHOUT a referendum of affected voters.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008, General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in 2009 for
the exact same version of Senate Joint Resolution 1 that passed in 2008? DID
NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your
candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT
RESPOND.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008, Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate
Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD
(www.indystar.com/2008race): I
believe that we must be cautious any time we look to amend Indiana’s
Constitution. We have amended the constitution many times, but rarely have we
repealed an amendment. I look forward to examining the impact that the property
tax caps have, and if elected, evaluating the proposed constitutional amendment
that will come before the next General Assembly.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your
candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT
RESPOND.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 7,
2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax
increased from 5% to 6% with a promise that the proceeds would be used to
decrease homeowner homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3% decrease
into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average Hoosier
homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility to levy
income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax relief. QUESTION:
Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose additional income, sales,
and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget the last two fiscal years has been balanced
without fund transfers for the first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm).
QUESTION: Should the state's total budget expenditures be no more than total
revenues for the next biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced with the inclusion of a
one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead Deduction
for Pay 2007 property taxes. This decreases property taxes for the average
homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be continued
beyond 2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. BACKGROUND: Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of Indiana's 75,000
kindergartners could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should the state pay
for full-day kindergarten? If YES, where should the state get the funds needed
for full-day kindergarten? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND: The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road
("Major Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to
pay off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next
ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects include $694 million for a new
terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to Evansville as well as a $500 million
Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION: Should the "Major Moves"
expenditures be combined with the Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a
new terrain I-69 extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The 2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a toll
road for an I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION: Do you
favor legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Ken Kern (Taxpayer
Friendly -
Part of the Solution)
5407 E Pleasant Run Pky
Indianapolis, IN 46219
Phone: (317) 353-6038
E-mail: cdkern@rocketmail.com;
kernin2008@yahoo.com
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in
2009 for the exact same version of Senate Joint Resolution 1 that passed in
2008? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race):
Yes.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your
candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID
NOT RESPOND.
Patricia (Patti) G. Mink (Uncertain)
447 Garden Grace Drive
Indianapolis, IN 46239
Phone: (317) 345-4868
E-mail: pattimink@sbcglobal.net
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 8, 2012,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Should the 2013-2015 state budget be balanced where (a) current
year appropriations do not exceed current year revenues, (b) there are no
delayed payments and one-time fund transfers, and (c) a reserves balance of at
least 5% is maintained? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Should the non-transportation appropriations from the state’s
Motor Vehicle Highway Account be transferred to the state’s General Fund so
more of our Indiana Gasoline Tax can be properly spent to meet our
transportation needs? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
3. QUESTION: Should the automatic taxpayer refund be improved, maintained, or
eliminated? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
4. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and
the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
5. QUESTION: What is your position regarding township government reform? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
6. QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment commissions
oversight? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
7. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
State Senate District 33:
Charles "Doc" Henderson (Taxpayer
Friendly)
3626 Nuthatcher Dr.
Indianapolis, IN 46228
Phone: (317) 989-1411
E-mail:
chas4124@yahoo.com
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate
Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race):
Yes. This cap
may help homeowners in working out a fair budget for their families, should they
decide to buy or sell a home.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
Glenn L. Howard (POLITICAL
HOG)
Address: 1005 W. 36th Street, Indianapolis, IN 46208
Phone: (317) 923-1101
E-mail:
Website:
2008 General Assembly Voting Record
DID NOT VOTE on
Senate
Joint Resolution 1, which amended the Indiana Constitution beginning 2012 to
include a cap on homestead property tax in 90 counties at 1% of gross assessed
value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008, is
exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St. Joseph
counties ONLY. The effective constitutional homeowner property tax caps in Lake
and St. Joseph counties are 1.88% and 1.52% respectively until the 1% cap takes
effect in 2020.
DID NOT VOTE on House
Bill 1001, which phases in the SJR 1 constitutional property tax caps by
2010. Also, 2008 property taxes are reduced 26% from the prior year. An increase
in the sales tax from 6% to 7% and local option income taxes will be used to
replace the property tax revenue reductions that result from the property tax
caps.
2007 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that is Taxpayer Friendly because the General
Fund & Property Tax Replacement Fund $26.0722 billion expenditures total for
the 2008 and 2009 fiscal years is less than the $26.1946 billion revenues total.
HB 1001 also includes additional homestead credits from the Property Tax
Reduction Trust Fund of $300 million in 2007 and $250 million in 2008.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1478, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly for the following reasons: (1)
Homeowner property taxes will increase 1.2% each year from 2009 through 2013
with annual decreases in the Homestead Standard Deduction. (2) The 2% Circuit
Breaker Cap on residential property taxes passed by the General Assembly in 2006
has been watered down to the point where it is almost eliminated. (3) The new
local option income tax for property tax relief will be offset by future
property tax increases unless the new local option income tax to replace
property tax increases is implemented. (4) Using the new local option income tax
to replace property tax increases means that income tax increases on Hoosier
working families would lower the proportionate tax burden of businesses and
utilities by freezing business and utility property taxes without a
corresponding increase in other business and utility taxes. (5) A new local
option income tax has been authorized for public safety.
Voted YES on
House
Bill 1835,which is Taxpayer Friendly because it uses slot machine licensing
fees and wagering taxes to establish the Property Tax Reduction Trust Fund,
which is to be used for property tax relief in any manner prescribed by the
General Assembly.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 401, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly because state legislators voted
themselves a perpetual pay increase that is 20% more than the typical Hoosier
working family earns during an entire year. SB 401 also eliminated taxpayer-paid
lifetime health insurance and the $4 taxpayer match for each $1 of legislator
pension contribution, but General Assembly members should not have received an
excessive salary increase in return for eliminating extravagant perks they
should not have in the first place.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
7, 2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax
increased from 5% to 6% with a promise that the proceeds would be used to
decrease homeowner homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3% decrease
into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average Hoosier
homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility to levy
income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax relief. QUESTION:
Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose additional income, sales,
and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget the last two fiscal years has been balanced
without fund transfers for the first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm).
QUESTION: Should the state's total budget expenditures be no more than total
revenues for the next biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced with the inclusion of a
one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This decreases property taxes for the
average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be
continued beyond 2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. BACKGROUND: Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of
Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should
the state pay for full-day kindergarten? If YES, where should the state
get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND: The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road
("Major Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to
pay off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next
ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects include $694 million for a new
terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to Evansville as well as a $500 million
Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION: Should the "Major Moves" expenditures
be combined with the Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain
I-69 extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The 2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a
toll road for an I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION:
Do you favor legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2006 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on "Major
Moves" House
Bill 1008, which authorizes the Indiana Department of Transportation to
enter into public-private agreements with private entities (operators)
concerning tollway projects for I-69 between Martinsville and Evansville. HB
1008 also authorizes the Indiana Finance Authority to enter into public-private
agreements with operators for the Indiana Toll Road.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, a residential property tax reduction bill that increases the
homestead credit for one year in 2006 to 28% and the homestead standard
deduction for one year in 2007 to $45,000. Beginning in 2007 for Lake County and
2008 for all other counties, HB 1001 also establishes a cap on residential
property taxes equal to 2% of the assessed value of the residential property.
2005 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted NO on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that included seven significant homeowner
property tax increases.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1120, which contained thirteen negative tax impacts including a
regional Food and Beverage Tax to finance a new Colts stadium.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
2, 2004, General Election
1. Guiding Principles for 2005-07 Biennium Budget. DID NOT RESPOND.
2. Opinions on Homeowner Property Taxes. DID NOT RESPOND.
3. Position on Indianapolis to Evansville Interstate. DID NOT RESPOND.
4. Additional Comments. DID NOT RESPOND.
2003 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted FOR on
House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that was Taxpayer UNfriendly primarily
because (1) the 2004-05 fiscal year General Fund and Property Tax Replacement
Fund spending total of $11.48 billion exceeded the $11.4424 billion revenues
total (fiscal year 2004-05 was the eighth straight year where spending exceeded
revenues), (2) the full Property Tax relief that was promised to homeowners in
last year's special session legislation was reduced by the so-called Homestead
Credit "correction," and (3) Pension Stabilization Fund transfers were
included (these transfers worsened the $8.5 billion shortfall in teacher
retirement funds).
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 5,
2002, General Election
1-2. Special session vote Against
several tax increases that will increase revenues
$1.7782 billion from July 1, 2002, through June 30, 2005.
3. Special session vote AGAINST
a 20% gas tax increase (from 15 to 18
cents per gallon) effective 01/01/03.
4. Special session vote AGAINST
a phased-in shift of the inventory tax to (1) all
other types of property through an increased property tax rate and (2) a tax on
the income of individuals (in those counties choosing to do so)
through the establishment or increase of a County Economic Development Income
Tax (CEDIT).
5. Did not receive General Election Questionnaire. See the Legislative
Voting Record.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 7, 2002,
Primary Election
1. Voted on February 28 FOR
the Indiana Senate version of HB 1004, which included an unneeded
Income Tax rate increase, imposed a new
business Payroll Tax, and increased revenues
$933 million more than taxes would have been reduced through June 30,
2004.
2. Voted on February 27 FOR
the Indiana Senate version of HB 1317, which would have raised
the Gasoline Tax from 15 cents per gallon to 18 cents during 2003, 20
cents during 2004, and 22 cents after 2004.
3-4. Did not receive Primary Questionnaire. See the Legislative
Voting Record.
Peter Krempely (Taxpayer
Friendly)
4719 Arabian Run
Indianapolis, IN 46228
Phone: (317) 387-1236
E-mail:
pkrempely@gmail.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate
Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: If given the
opportunity I will vote yes on SJR 1. I'm
just surprised it took so long.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
Not at this time.
Gena Martinez (Uncertain)
1320 N. Delaware #401
Indianapolis, IN 46202
Phone: (812) 552-6916
E-mail: lpinhq@lpin.org
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November
6, 2012, General Election
1. QUESTION: What are your priorities regarding the 2013-2015 state budget?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Should the non-transportation appropriations from the state’s
Motor Vehicle Highway Account be transferred to the state’s General Fund so
more of our Indiana Gasoline Tax dollars can be properly spent to meet our
transportation needs? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
3. QUESTION: Should the Automatic Taxpayer Refund law be (a) improved to make
refunds more likely, (b) kept as it is, or (c) eliminated? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
4. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and
the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
5. QUESTION: What is your position regarding township government reform? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
6. QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment commissions
oversight? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
7. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
James Patterson (Taxpayer
UNfriendly)
6829 Bretton Wood Drive
Indianapolis, IN 46268
Phone: (317) 297-1035
E-mail: jamespattersonforindiana@gmail.com
Website:
www.jamespattersonforindiana.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate
Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race):
Indiana homeowners desire and deserve tax relief. However, amending the Indiana
Constitution to cap property taxes for agricultural proprietors, businesses,
renters and homeowners would be a major step, and it portends a significant
impact on the ability of government to fund services for a long time to come. I
would need to see the details of such a plan before deciding on a position.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
State Senate District 34:
Eric "The Nobody" Scott (Uncertain)
821 N. Lasalle St.
Indianapolis, IN 46201
Phone: (317) 748-8371
E-mail:
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November
6, 2012, General Election
1. QUESTION: What are your priorities regarding the 2013-2015 state budget?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Should the non-transportation appropriations from the state’s
Motor Vehicle Highway Account be transferred to the state’s General Fund so
more of our Indiana Gasoline Tax dollars can be properly spent to meet our
transportation needs? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
3. QUESTION: Should the Automatic Taxpayer Refund law be (a) improved to make
refunds more likely, (b) kept as it is, or (c) eliminated? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
4. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and
the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
5. QUESTION: What is your position regarding township government reform? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
6. QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment commissions
oversight? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
7. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
David L. Nicholson (Taxpayer
UNfriendly)
2440 N Bolton Ave
Indianapolis, IN 46218
Phone: (765) 914-0375
E-mail: davidlnicholson@aol.com
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate
Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race):
Capping property tax at 1, 2 and 3 percent of the assessed valuation of the
property sounds good, but it has a fundamental flaw. It’s based on the
assessed valuation of the property which is a subjective figure that’s
established by guidelines that can be changed at any time. Having a cap on
property taxes built into the law is a good safeguard to have, but because of
the flaws and ambiguities associated with property taxes, it’s not a good idea
to amend it into the constitution. If we are going to amend the Indiana
Constitution to include some kind of a cap on taxes, we should amend it to cap
the percentage of an individual's income that is consumed in taxes.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
James Rainey (Taxpayer
UNfriendly -
DESPICABLE)
6219 Raleigh Drive
Indianapolis, IN 46219
Phone: (317) 353-0991
E-mail:
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in
2009 for the exact same version of Senate Joint Resolution 1 that passed in
2008? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your
candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID
NOT RESPOND.
State Senate District 35:
Michael Cesnik (Taxpayer
UNfriendly - DESPICABLE)
6703 Raritan Ct
Indianapolis, IN 46221
Phone: (317) 821-8711
E-mail: majlcesnik@sbcglobal.net
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in
2009 for the exact same version of Senate Joint Resolution 1 that passed in
2008? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your
candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID
NOT RESPOND.
Daniel L. Kinnamon (Taxpayer
Friendly)
5841 Kiah Court
Plainfield, IN 46168
Phone: (317) 430-3646
E-mail: Daniel@VoteKinnamon.com
Website:
http://votekinnamon.com/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 8, 2012,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Should the 2013-2015 state budget be balanced where (a) current
year appropriations do not exceed current year revenues, (b) there are no
delayed payments and one-time fund transfers, and (c) a reserves balance of at
least 5% is maintained? ANSWER: a) Yes!
b) Yes! c) Would like slightly higher
reserve balance as long as taxes were not raised to do so. Would prefer reserve
comes from cutting or holding back spending.
2. QUESTION: Should the non-transportation appropriations from the state’s
Motor Vehicle Highway Account be transferred to the state’s General Fund so
more of our Indiana Gasoline Tax can be properly spent to meet our
transportation needs? ANSWER: Yes, to the
extent possible taxes should match the expense for which they are collected. If
not a General Obligation tax should not be allowed to be spent as a General
Obligation. The more transparent our taxes are to their use the better the
taxpayer understands what they are paying for.
3. QUESTION: Should the automatic taxpayer refund be improved, maintained, or
eliminated? ANSWER: I STRONGLY agree with ATR. If the budget is met surplus
should be returned to the rightful owner the taxpayer. Was OK with increasing
rainy day fund but, would have preferred it had happened BEFORE they
knew funds were there. Would have been upset with new spending.
4. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and
the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: YES,
would like to potentially strengthen for those who have lived in their homes for
10 plus years and are Seniors.
5. QUESTION: What is your position regarding township government reform? ANSWER:
I believe Township reform should take place at the local government level. Have
been very pleased with what has happened in Zionsville/Eagle Township...as a
current local official I don't want it decreed from state but would like to see
every township undertake the study to see if it makes sense for them.
Communication is a key part of the issue. Taxpayers should not be double taxed
for same services.
6. QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment commissions
oversight? ANSWER: I agree with much improved oversight over redevelopment
commissions.
7. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: I believe my combination of business skills living within a budget,
combined with local government understanding (Guilford Township Board) make me
an excellent candidate for the Indiana General Assembly. A fundamental belief of
mine is that we have a spending problem NOT a revenue problem...you cannot tax
your way out of a spending problem.
Mark Waterfill (Uncertain)
6425 E. Co. Rd. 600 S.
Plainfield, IN 46168
Phone: (317) 501-6060
E-mail: mwaterfill@beneschlaw.com
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November
6, 2012, General Election
1. QUESTION: What are your priorities regarding the 2013-2015 state budget?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Should the non-transportation appropriations from the state’s
Motor Vehicle Highway Account be transferred to the state’s General Fund so
more of our Indiana Gasoline Tax dollars can be properly spent to meet our
transportation needs? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
3. QUESTION: Should the Automatic Taxpayer Refund law be (a) improved to make
refunds more likely, (b) kept as it is, or (c) eliminated? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
4. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and
the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
5. QUESTION: What is your position regarding township government reform? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
6. QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment commissions
oversight? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
7. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
State Senate District 36:
Mike Beeles (Taxpayer
Friendly)
409 Brewer Place
Greenwood, IN 46142
Phone: (317) 859-9012
E-mail: beeles08senator@yahoo.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate
Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: YES I DO.
I want to add Seniors and retirees to
have a larger discount or even no property tax issued to them, they have paid
their dues to this State.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
To have total property tax free problems we must first fix
or cut area's that makes up the total pie of property taxes, if
not, this State will need to find other means of income which would come
from the tax payers. I'm a family man with 6 children, 3 teens still living
at home, the burden that everyone else feels, I feel. The job of State Senator
is to help the people of his district and the people of his State. we are not
getting that now. I don't want a State Senator that is there to promote himself
or his career and not for the people as we have now.
Barry Campbell (Taxpayer
UNfriendly - Part of
the Problem)
1402 E Kelly St
Indianapolis, IN 46203
Phone: (317) 490-1469
E-mail: altic.lock@gmail.com; campaign@lowertaxestotheground.com
Website: http://lowertaxestotheground.com/default.aspx
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in
2009 for the exact same version of Senate Joint Resolution 1 that passed in
2008? ANSWER: No.
I advocate the elimination of our current property taxes, as well as local
income taxes and sales taxes, you might think your organization might consider
me taxpayer friendly. The first result of a cap on property taxes is
skyrocketing real estate prices (as happened in California after Proposition
13). And since SJR 1 does nothing to curb government spending, and does nothing
to prevent an increased tax burden as a result of higher income and sales taxes,
I cannot imagine how it could be considered taxpayer friendly. SJR 1 is a boon,
first and foremost, to land speculators and owners of vacant, abandoned, and
run-down properties. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race):
No. Property improvements need not, and should not, be taxed at all. Land value
should be taxed equally, regardless of use.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your
candidacy? ANSWER: I support land value taxation (LVT). I advocate raising the
tax on the value of unimproved land, first to the extent that we can eliminate
all taxation of property improvements, then to the extent that we can eliminate
sales and income taxes. The first result of increasing the tax on land while
decreasing the tax on improvements is to spur the economy, with land being put
to its most productive use. Every study of communities that have used LVT
confirms that construction and building improvements increase (as measured by
the value of building permits issued). Real jobs are created. More new homes and
businesses are built. The increased supply reduces their cost. Without further
government intervention, urban blight is reversed. Urban sprawl is reduced as
vacant, abandoned, and run-down property is put to productive use.
Transportation costs are reduced. Mass transit becomes more efficient. The
average homeowner's tax burden is reduced, as is the tax burden for most
businesses and family farms. As LVT reduces the profit from land speculation
(that a property tax cap would increase), more land is made available for sale,
reducing its cost.
Terry Rice (Taxpayer
UNfriendly - Part of
the Problem)
1665 Danaher St.
Indianapolis, IN 46219
Phone: (317) 889-3687
E-mail: mcoonrice@comcast.net
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in
2009 for the exact same version of Senate Joint Resolution 1 that passed in
2008? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD
(www.indystar.com/2008race): I
think that it is way too early to tell whether or not an amendment is wise. To
portend that property tax relief will be replaced by other revenues is not an
optimistic outlook. Again, Indiana's economy faces the same delimnas as do other
states. We are not immune from lack of high-paying jobs, cost of housing, loss
of housing, high health care costs. Our economy will have to be a priority
initiative if we are to support vital community services based entirely on state
revenues. Until we see a sustained and long-term upturn in the Hoosier economy,
I believe that it would be an irreversible mistake to make the caps an amendment
to the state Constitution.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your
candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID
NOT RESPOND.
Mary Ann Sullivan (Taxpayer
Friendly)
Address: 315 W. Walnut St., Indianapolis, IN 46202
Phone: (317) 917-0791
E-mail: maryannforsenate@gmail.com
Website: http://maryannforsenate.com/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 6, 2012,
General Election
1. QUESTION: What are your priorities regarding the 2013-2015 state budget?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Should the non-transportation appropriations from the state’s
Motor Vehicle Highway Account be transferred to the state’s General Fund so
more of our Indiana Gasoline Tax dollars can be properly spent to meet our
transportation needs? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
3. QUESTION: Should the Automatic Taxpayer Refund law be (a) improved to make
refunds more likely, (b) kept as it is, or (c) eliminated? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
4. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and
the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
5. QUESTION: What is your position regarding township government reform? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
6. QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment commissions
oversight? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
7. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2012 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1003, which is Taxpayer Friendly because (1) public access to
government meetings and records is improved and (2) it is less likely that
public agencies will intentionally violate the Public Access Laws.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1005, which contains six Taxpayer Friendly local government Conflict Of
Interest provisions and sixteen Taxpayer Friendly local government Nepotism
provisions.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1376, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly because (1) the automatic taxpayer
refund excess reserves trigger is increased from 10% to 12.5% and (2) Hoosier
working families will possibly receive an automatic taxpayer refund every
even-numbered year instead of every year.
2011 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted NO on House
Bill 1001, which includes among its 16 Taxpayer Friendly state budget
provisions no tax increases and an operating surplus in both the 2012 and 2013
fiscal years with a satisfactory reserve balance on June 30, 2013.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1002, which is Taxpayer Friendly because (1) charter schools have the
potential to help increase the academic growth of lower socioeconomic students,
(2) the number of Indiana nonprofit private colleges and universities authorized
to create charter schools is limited, (3) the Indianapolis mayor is the only
Indiana mayor who may authorize charter schools, (4) conversion from a public
school to a charter school is sufficiently stringent, and (5) property taxes are
NOT improperly used to support charter schools.
Voted NO on House
Bill 1003, which uses state K-12 tuition support money to fund scholarships
for nonpublic school students and is Taxpayer UNfriendly because (1) nonpublic
private and parochial schools are not equally open to all children, (2)
nonpublic school budgets are not approved by a directly elected public body, (3)
evidence-based research does not support greater school choice as a means to
achieve overall educational improvement, (4) it is very likely unconstitutional,
and (5) state tuition support dollars would go to nonpublic schools that are not
uniformly distributed throughout the state.
Voted NO on House
Bill 1022, which would have implemented a number of Taxpayer Friendly local
government provisions related to nepotism and officeholder conflict-of-interest.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1074, which provides that school board members selected by election
must be elected at November general elections and is Taxpayer Friendly because
the greater voter turnout in general elections will make it more difficult for
local vested interests to unduly influence school board elections.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1583, which passed as part of House
Bill 1004 and is Taxpayer Friendly because the 1% homeowner property tax cap
and ten homeowner property tax deductions are allowed in the year of a property
transfer if the property is determined to be exempt in the year following the
transfer year.
2010 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Joint Resolution 1, which gives voters statewide the opportunity to amend
the Indiana Constitution to (1) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps
permanent and (2) protect homestead property tax deductions from legal
challenge.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, which contains 21 Taxpayer Friendly government ethics reform
provisions including a 365-day wait after leaving the General Assembly before a
legislator can become a lobbyist or legislative liaison, the reporting of
certain expenditures by the legislative liaisons of state agencies and state
educational institutions, and a reduction from $100 to $50 in the minimum
reportable amount for the total daily gifts given by a registered lobbyist to a
legislative person.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1086, which contains 7 Taxpayer Friendly provisions including the HJR 1
Constitutional Amendment ballot language.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1367, which contains 5 Taxpayer Friendly K-12 education provisions that
preserve and protect instructional programs.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 23, which delays the scheduled increase in unemployment insurance
premiums for one year until 2011.
Voted YES on
Senate
Bill 396, which mandates an adjusted six-year average that eliminates the
highest value to calculate the base rate for the assessment of agricultural
land.
2009 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001 SS, the 2009-2011 special session budget bill that (1) provides
enough resources for good government AND (2) satisfactorily protects Hoosier
working families from state and local tax increases. A
YES vote supports a budget that is sufficiently Taxpayer Friendly. A
NO vote would have shut down much of state government.
Voted YES on Senate Bill 374 to allow Regional
Transportation Districts, which are new tax-imposing levels of Indiana
government controlled by boards with unrestricted powers where most board
members have no real connection to the taxpayers' community, to be established
WITHOUT a referendum of affected voters.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008, General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in 2009 for
the exact same version of Senate Joint Resolution 1 that passed in 2008? DID
NOT RESPOND. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race):
I am concerned that setting unequal tax rates for different types of property
may negatively impact our economic competitiveness with other states. As Indiana
struggles to attract and retain good jobs, businesses will evaluate the
attractiveness of our business environment, and our tax climate will certainly
play a role in their decisions. I am not sure that given the challenges of our
state's weak job growth, permanently setting these percentages in the
Constitution is the best strategy. Additionally, increases in rental and
business property taxes are usually passed on to consumers in the form of higher
prices and lower wages. Homeowners may take comfort in believing they are being
given a break relative to other classes of property owners, while in fact they
will be paying an "invisible" tax by paying more for goods and
services. To the extent that this is the case, homeowners may or may not realize
any savings.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your
candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT
RESPOND.
State Senate District 37:
Richard D. Bray (Taxpayer
Friendly)
Address: 210 E. Morgan Street, Martinsville, IN 46151
Phone: (765) 342-6814
E-mail:
Website:
2012 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1003, which is Taxpayer Friendly because (1) public access to
government meetings and records is improved and (2) it is less likely that
public agencies will intentionally violate the Public Access Laws.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1005, which contains six Taxpayer Friendly local government Conflict Of
Interest provisions and sixteen Taxpayer Friendly local government Nepotism
provisions.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1376,
which is Taxpayer UNfriendly because (1) the automatic taxpayer refund excess
reserves trigger is increased from 10% to 12.5% and (2) Hoosier working families
will possibly receive an automatic taxpayer refund every even-numbered year
instead of every year.
Voted YES on
Senate Bill 25,
which was Taxpayer Friendly because (if it had passed the House) much improved
oversight would have been provided for redevelopment commissions and
departments.
2011 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, which includes among its 16 Taxpayer Friendly state budget
provisions no tax increases and an operating surplus in both the 2012 and 2013
fiscal years with a satisfactory reserve balance on June 30, 2013.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1002, which is Taxpayer Friendly because (1) charter schools have the
potential to help increase the academic growth of lower socioeconomic students,
(2) the number of Indiana nonprofit private colleges and universities authorized
to create charter schools is limited, (3) the Indianapolis mayor is the only
Indiana mayor who may authorize charter schools, (4) conversion from a public
school to a charter school is sufficiently stringent, and (5) property taxes are
NOT improperly used to support charter schools.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1003, which uses state K-12
tuition support money to fund scholarships for nonpublic school students and is
Taxpayer UNfriendly because (1) nonpublic private and parochial schools are not
equally open to all children, (2) nonpublic school budgets are not approved by a
directly elected public body, (3) evidence-based research does not support
greater school choice as a means to achieve overall educational improvement, (4)
it is very likely unconstitutional, and (5) state tuition support dollars would
go to nonpublic schools that are not uniformly distributed throughout the state.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1022, which would have implemented a number of Taxpayer Friendly local
government provisions related to nepotism and officeholder conflict-of-interest.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1074, which provides that school board members selected by election
must be elected at November general elections and is Taxpayer Friendly because
the greater voter turnout in general elections will make it more difficult for
local vested interests to unduly influence school board elections.
2010 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES
on House Joint Resolution 1,
which gives voters statewide the opportunity to amend the Indiana Constitution
to (1) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (2) protect
homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1001, which contains 21 Taxpayer Friendly government ethics reform
provisions including a 365-day wait after leaving the General Assembly before a
legislator can become a lobbyist or legislative liaison, the reporting of
certain expenditures by the legislative liaisons of state agencies and state
educational institutions, and a reduction from $100 to $50 in the minimum
reportable amount for the total daily gifts given by a registered lobbyist to a
legislative person.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1086, which contains 7 Taxpayer Friendly provisions including the HJR
1 Constitutional Amendment ballot language.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1367, which contains 5 Taxpayer Friendly K-12 education provisions
that preserve and protect instructional programs.
Voted YES on
Senate Bill 23, which delays the scheduled increase in unemployment insurance
premiums for one year until 2011.
Voted YES on Senate Bill
396, which mandates an
adjusted six-year average that eliminates the highest value to calculate the
base rate for the assessment of agricultural land.
2009 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted
YES
on Senate
Joint Resolution 1, which amended the Indiana Constitution beginning 2012 to
include a cap on homestead property tax in 90 counties at 1% of gross assessed
value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008, is
exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St. Joseph
counties ONLY. The effective constitutional homeowner property tax caps in Lake
and St. Joseph counties are 1.88% and 1.52% respectively until the 1% cap takes
effect in 2020.
Voted YES
on House Bill 1001 SS, the
2009-2011 special session budget bill that (1) provides enough resources for
good government AND (2) satisfactorily protects Hoosier working families
from state and local tax increases. A
YES vote supports a budget that is sufficiently Taxpayer Friendly.
A NO vote would have shut down much of state government.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 348 to have a Library Services Plan developed and approved by a Public
Library Service Planning Committee (with an "opt out" referendum
provision) in every county (except Marion County) to help more effectively use
working family dollars currently spent on library services (with the option to
equitably replace public library property taxes with a county economic
development income tax).
Voted NO on Senate
Bill 452 to prohibit employees of a
local government unit from serving as elected officials within the same local
government unit, move the elections of municipal officers to even-numbered
years, move all school board member elections to the November general election
in even-numbered years, establish the use of vote centers as an option for all
counties, and require a city clerk-treasurer in a third class city to attend
fiscal officer training provided by the state board of accounts.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 506 to (1) allow a single County Chief Executive
Officer or County Manager, (2) allow the County Council or the Board of
County Supervisors to exercise both the fiscal and legislative powers
of the county, (3) provide for voter-initiated referendums on county
government reorganization, (4) repeal the requirement that political
subdivisions must approve local government reorganizations initiated by voters,
(5) assign the Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations four
responsibilities to identify and monitor good local government
practices, (6) prohibit County Manager nepotism, (7) repeal unproductive
reporting requirements, and (8) continue to elect the County Assessor.
Voted YES
on Senate
Bill 512 to (1) abolish on January 1, 2013, each township board in every
county (other than Marion County) and make the county fiscal body also the
fiscal body and legislative body of each township, (2) require a township when
formulating an annual budget to consider whether the part of the ending balance
in each township fund in excess of 10% of budgeted expenditures should be used
instead of imposing additional property taxes for the ensuing year, (3) prohibit
a relative of a township officer or employee from being employed by the township
in a position that would put the relative in a direct supervisory or subordinate
relationship with the officer or employee, (4) require a township trustee's
annual report to list separately each expenditure to reimburse the trustee for
the trustee's public business use of personal property, (5) require each
township office to include the address, phone number, and regular office hours
(if any) of the township office in at least one local telephone directory, (6)
prohibits a public meeting or a public hearing of a township official or
governing body from being held in a private residence, and (7) requires the
State Board of Accounts to submit an annual township examination report to the
executive director of the Legislative Services Agency and to county councils.
Voted YES
on House
Bill 1607 to require a referendum before establishing a Northern Indiana
Regional Transportation District, which is a new tax-imposing level of
Indiana government in Lake, Porter, LaPorte, and St. Joseph counties controlled
by a board with unrestricted powers (where most board members have no real
connection to the taxpayers' community).
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008, General Election
1.
BACKGROUND: Senate Joint Resolution 1 passed
the Indiana Senate 40-7 and the Indiana House 79-20 on March 14, 2008, and
was signed by the Governor on March 19, 2008. SJR 1 amends the Indiana
Constitution to cap homeowners' property tax bills at 1% of assessed value,
rental and agricultural property at 2%, and business property at 3%. For
property taxes first due and payable in 2012, 90 of Indiana's 92
counties must have a homeowner property tax cap that is 1% of the gross
assessed value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008,
is exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St.
Joseph counties ONLY. The result of these two existing debt service
exemptions equates to a 1.88% homeowner cap in Lake County and a 1.52%
homeowner cap in St.
Joseph County. The homeowner caps for Lake and St. Joseph counties must become
1% in 2020. The exact same version of SJR 1 that passed in 2008 must again pass in the General Assembly in 2009 to put the 1%
constitutional homeowner property tax cap amendment on the 2010 ballot. We
the people can then vote to make the 1% homeowner property tax cap a
permanent part of the Indiana Constitution. Never has it been so easy to separate those who are part of the
property tax relief solution from those who are part of the property tax
spending problem. A General Assembly candidate who pledges to
vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009 is part of the
solution, otherwise the legislator is part of
the problem. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in 2009 for
the exact same version of Senate
Joint Resolution 1 that passed in 2008? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race):
The caps are necessary
for two reasons. First, to avoid constitutional challenge under the Indiana
Constitution and second, to prevent the rates from edging up as they have in the
past.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID
NOT RESPOND.
2008 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on Senate
Joint Resolution 1, which amended the Indiana Constitution beginning 2012 to
include a cap on homestead property tax in 90 counties at 1% of gross assessed
value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008, is
exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St. Joseph
counties ONLY. The effective constitutional homeowner property tax caps in Lake
and St. Joseph counties are 1.88% and 1.52% respectively until the 1% cap takes
effect in 2020.
Voted YES on
House
Bill 1001, which phases in the SJR 1 constitutional property tax caps by
2010. Also, 2008 property taxes are reduced 26% from the prior year. An increase
in the sales tax from 6% to 7% and local option income taxes will be used to
replace the property tax revenue reductions that result from the property tax
caps.
2007 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that is Taxpayer
Friendly because the General Fund & Property Tax Replacement Fund $26.0722
billion expenditures total for the 2008 and 2009 fiscal years is less than the
$26.1946 billion revenues total. HB 1001 also includes additional homestead
credits from the Property Tax Reduction Trust Fund of $300 million in 2007 and
$250 million in 2008.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1478, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly for the following reasons: (1)
Homeowner property taxes will increase 1.2% each year from 2009 through 2013
with annual decreases in the Homestead Standard Deduction. (2) The 2% Circuit
Breaker Cap on residential property taxes passed by the General Assembly in 2006
has been watered down to the point where it is almost eliminated. (3) The new
local option income tax for property tax relief will be offset by future
property tax increases unless the new local option income tax to replace
property tax increases is implemented. (4) Using the new local option income tax
to replace property tax increases means that income tax increases on Hoosier
working families would lower the proportionate tax burden of businesses and
utilities by freezing business and utility property taxes without a
corresponding increase in other business and utility taxes. (5) A new local
option income tax has been authorized for public safety.
Voted NO on House
Bill 1835,which is Taxpayer Friendly because it uses slot machine licensing
fees and wagering taxes to establish the Property Tax Reduction Trust Fund,
which is to be used for property tax relief in any manner prescribed by the
General Assembly.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 401, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly because state legislators voted
themselves a perpetual pay increase that is 20% more than the typical Hoosier
working family earns during an entire year. SB 401 also eliminated taxpayer-paid
lifetime health insurance and the $4 taxpayer match for each $1 of legislator
pension contribution, but General Assembly members should not have received an
excessive salary increase in return for eliminating extravagant perks they
should not have in the first place.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
7, 2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND:
Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax increased from 5% to 6%
with a promise that the proceeds would be used to decrease homeowner
homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3%
decrease into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average
Hoosier homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility
to levy income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax
relief. QUESTION: Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose
additional income, sales, and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget
the last two fiscal years has been balanced without fund transfers for the
first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm). QUESTION: Should the state's total budget
expenditures be no more than total revenues for the next
biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced
with the inclusion of a one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This
decreases property taxes for the average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should
the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be continued beyond
2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4.
BACKGROUND:
Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners
could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should the state pay for full-day
kindergarten? If YES, where should the state get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten?
HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND:
The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road ("Major
Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to pay
off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the
next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects
include $694 million for a new terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to
Evansville as well as a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION:
Should the "Major Moves" expenditures be combined with the
Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain I-69
extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The
2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a toll road for an
I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION: Do you favor
legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2006 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES
on "Major
Moves" House
Bill 1008, which authorizes the Indiana Department of Transportation to
enter into public-private agreements with private entities (operators)
concerning tollway projects for I-69 between Martinsville and Evansville. HB
1008 also authorizes the Indiana Finance Authority to enter into public-private
agreements with operators for the Indiana Toll Road.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, a residential property tax reduction bill that increases the
homestead credit for one year in 2006 to 28% and the homestead standard
deduction for one year in 2007 to $45,000. Beginning in 2007 for Lake County and
2008 for all other counties, HB 1001 also establishes a cap on residential
property taxes equal to 2% of the assessed value of the residential property.
2005 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES
on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that included seven significant homeowner
property tax increases.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1120, which contained thirteen negative tax impacts including a
regional Food and Beverage Tax to finance a new Colts stadium.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
2, 2004, General Election
1. Guiding Principles for 2005-07 Biennium Budget. DID NOT RESPOND.
2. Opinions on Homeowner Property Taxes. DID NOT RESPOND.
3. Position on Indianapolis to Evansville Interstate. DID NOT RESPOND.
4. Additional Comments. DID NOT RESPOND.
2003 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted AGAINST
on
House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that was Taxpayer UNfriendly primarily
because (1) the 2004-05 fiscal year General Fund and Property Tax Replacement
Fund spending total of $11.48 billion exceeded the $11.4424 billion revenues
total (fiscal year 2004-05 was the eighth straight year where spending exceeded
revenues), (2) the full Property Tax relief that was promised to homeowners in
last year's special session legislation was reduced by the so-called Homestead
Credit "correction," and (3) Pension Stabilization Fund transfers were
included (these transfers worsened the $8.5 billion shortfall in teacher
retirement funds).
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
5, 2002, General Election
1-2. Special session vote FOR
several tax increases that will increase revenues $1.7782 billion from July 1,
2002, through June 30, 2005.
3. Special session vote FOR
a 20% gas tax increase (from 15 to 18 cents per gallon) effective
01/01/03.
4. Special session vote FOR
a phased-in shift of the inventory tax to (1) all other types of property
through an increased property tax rate and (2) a tax on the income of
individuals (in those counties choosing to do so) through the
establishment or increase of a County Economic Development Income Tax (CEDIT).
5. Did not receive General Election Questionnaire. See the Legislative
Voting Record.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 7,
2002, Primary Election
1. Voted on February 28 FOR
the Indiana Senate version of HB 1004, which included an unneeded
Income Tax rate increase, imposed a new
business Payroll Tax, and increased revenues
$933 million more than taxes would have been reduced through June 30,
2004.
2. Voted on February 27 AGAINST
the Indiana Senate version of HB 1317, which would have raised
the Gasoline Tax from 15 cents per gallon to 18 cents during 2003, 20
cents during 2004, and 22 cents after 2004.
3-4. Did not receive Primary Questionnaire. See the Legislative
Voting Record.
Jim S. Cahill (Uncertain)
7242 E. Centenary Rd.
Mooresville, IN 46158
Phone: (317) 258-7012
E-mail: jcahill4senate@live.com;
jcahill716@hotmail.com
Website: http://www.cahillforsenate.org/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 6, 2012,
General Election
1. QUESTION: What are your priorities regarding the 2013-2015 state budget?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Should the non-transportation appropriations from the state’s
Motor Vehicle Highway Account be transferred to the state’s General Fund so
more of our Indiana Gasoline Tax dollars can be properly spent to meet our
transportation needs? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
3. QUESTION: Should the Automatic Taxpayer Refund law be (a) improved to make
refunds more likely, (b) kept as it is, or (c) eliminated? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
4. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and
the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
5. QUESTION: What is your position regarding township government reform? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
6. QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment commissions
oversight? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
7. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (from campaign website): I will work in a
bi-partisan way to repeal Right to Work. I also will focus on promoting more
educational training opportunities and creating infrastructure improvements.
This includes bringing high-speed Internet service to District 37. I will work
to create optimum teacher/student classroom ratios and implementing other
pertinent criteria to maximize a child’s chances for success. I’m passionate
about seeing meaningful reforms brought to the Department of Child Services. I
will seek ways to make telecommunication companies provide affordable high-speed
Internet service available in rural areas like District 37.
Ryan Goodwin (Taxpayer
Friendly)
104 Karrington Boulevard
Mooresville, IN 46158
Phone: (317) 509-2868
E-mail: Ryan@Ryangoodwin.org
Website:
http://www.ryangoodwin.org/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 8, 2012,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Should the 2013-2015 state budget be balanced where (a) current
year appropriations do not exceed current year revenues, (b) there are no
delayed payments and one-time fund transfers, and (c) a reserves balance of at
least 5% is maintained? ANSWER: Absolutely.
This three-pronged test would provide a reasonable budget without gimmickry
while maintaining sufficient reserves. This is a responsible approach to
budgeting.
2. QUESTION: Should the non-transportation appropriations from the state’s
Motor Vehicle Highway Account be transferred to the state’s General Fund so
more of our Indiana Gasoline Tax can be properly spent to meet our
transportation needs? ANSWER: Yes. Though
this would place a greater burden on the general fund, it would allow for more
local funding of critical infrastructure projects without raising taxes. The
gasoline tax should go directly to maintaining and improving roads.
3. QUESTION: Should the automatic taxpayer refund be improved, maintained, or
eliminated? ANSWER: When state governments reach certain levels of fiscal
health, taxpayers should receive a refund. It is also prudent, however, to
maintain a comfortable fiscal margin in these uncertain economic times.
Additionally, Indiana has unfunded pension liabilities and other obligations
that should be taken care of in times of surplus. I would support efforts to
maintain the Automatic Taxpayer Refund; I would not work to eliminate it.
4. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and
the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: Yes.
These are reasonable deductions that Hoosier families rely on. I would not
support any changes.
5. QUESTION: What is your position regarding township government reform? ANSWER:
There are many township trustees and other township officials doing great work
in Indiana. My district is home to several of them. This being said, however,
township government is certainly antiquated and in need of reform. I support the
effort to place the question of township government on the ballot in every
county. This way, an individual county can decide the best direction for their
county and react accordingly. There is no question in my mind that services can
be improved, oversight strengthened and unnecessary expenses eliminated with
reasonable and proper reform.
6. QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment commissions
oversight? ANSWER: Redevelopment commissions play an interesting and important
role in local community development. We must have enhanced oversight, however,
as current law allows for the substantial accumulation of taxpayer money in
redevelopment commission accounts. Redevelopment commissions are comprised of
appointed officials, and not elected officials, and work with little oversight.
While I would not want to weaken the ability of redevelopment commissions to
make their community more prosperous, I do support greater oversight of their
activities. This is prudent and responsible on behalf of Hoosier taxpayers.
7. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: You can also connect with me on Facebook at www.Facebook.com/ElectRyanGoodwin.
Joseph F. Osborn (Taxpayer
UNfriendly - Part of
the Problem)
7399 N Co Rd 425 W
Brazil, IN 47834
Phone: (812) 442-0828
E-mail: osbornj@verizon.net; teresadosborn@verizon.net
Website: http://www.josephfosborn.com/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in
2009 for the exact same version of Senate Joint Resolution 1 that passed in
2008? DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD
(www.indystar.com/2008race): Cap
property tax for homeowners at 1 percent, rental & agricultural property at
1 percent; business Property at 3 percent.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your
candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID
NOT RESPOND.
State Senate District 38:
Ed Gluck (Taxpayer
UNfriendly)
628 Ash St. Apt. 53
Terre Haute, IN 47804
Phone: (812) 235-0412
E-mail: Ed@ElectEdGluck.com;
edgluck2@yahoo.com
Website:
http://www.electedgluck.com:80/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you
support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the
1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax
deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: Oppose.
You mentioned in a previous reason why the amendment must be passed, that other
taxes were already planned. Voters must vote out Democrats and Republicans and
support good candidates rather than corrupt parties. Good candidates would pass
a similar amendment without crushing the working and the children. Don't support
the global agenda!
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced?
Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility
of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be
replenished. ANSWER: Medicaid spending: Spend 100% of Federal money allotted, 0%
coming from state government. K-12 education: The
Indiana Constitution has a fund for this. Follow the Constitution. (As a
representative I must!) We can also consider state funding only K-6. Statewide
income tax increase: Do not attack the worker. If income is defined as dividends
and capital gains on stocks, then perhaps we can increase the % as long as taxes
on wages and tips is ended. I do not see this as a revenue generator. Reserve
funds should be replenished to at least $2 billion. Tough times are ahead and
this phony stimulus federal money must dry up.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain
both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction
without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER:
These values should probably be raised ($45,000 and
$600,000) since the price of housing is still in bubble mode. I agree this
progressive taxing looks fair and I certainly would NOT raise it. (Now I would
have to visit an assessor, but I think a decimal pt. is missing - perhaps .35%
plus .25%.) Allow me to tell you my philosophy: If they can tax it they can take
it, if they can take it, you don't own it.
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General
Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between
I-64 and Martinsville?
ANSWER: Yes I approve changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General
Assembly is required. I understand the tolls will be used to build Pacific side
ports for Mexico and China. Indiana tolls should be used for Indiana roads.
5. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
I will support a U.S. amendment limiting corporations and their contract with
the state. Corporations are not people, therefore have no free speech rights.
Corporations must be limited in life, (the past practice of 10 years under good
behavior seems a maximum). Owners will be liable for losses. On
the other side, I will not leave losers penniless. Indiana bankruptcy law is
unconstitutional (Indiana Constitution). The equity allowed in your house under
bankruptcy in Indiana has moved from $13,000 in the 1990s to $15,000 today. I
propose moving that to $120,000 or higher. I do see many medical bankruptcies in
the near future.
I will be for a tenth amendment
resolution to keep Indiana from bailing out other states and other nations. I
will support an amendment to the U.S. Constitution if the resolution is
ineffective.
Bill Webster (Taxpayer
Friendly)
5191 S. Coxville Road
Montezuma, IN 47862
Phone: (765) 569-2385
E-mail: bill@webstersenate.com; patriotsforwebster@gmail.com
Website: http://www.webstersenate.com/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2,
2010,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you
support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the
1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax
deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: SUPPORT.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced?
Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility
of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be
replenished.
ANSWER: We should live within our means. I will not
vote to raise taxes. K-12 is always a high priority. Yes, reserve funds should
be replenished.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain
both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction
without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER:
YES!
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General
Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between
I-64 and Martinsville?
ANSWER: YES!
5. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
Please join us on Facebook Bill Webster State Senate and
visit our Website.
State Senate District 39:
Ron Boger (Uncertain)
1518 College Avenue
Vincennes, IN 47591
Phone:
(812) 887-0810
E-mail: bogeysan_1@hotmail.com
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 4, 2010,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you
support or oppose the Constitutional Amendment on the November 2, 2010,
statewide ballot? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced?
ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain
both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction
without ANY change? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General
Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between
I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Steven M. Thais (Uncertain)
205 Nicholas St.
Vincennes, IN 47591
Phone: (812) 886-6676
E-mail: steveforsenate@live.com
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2, 2010,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you
support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the
1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax
deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced?
Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility
of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be
replenished.
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain
both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction
without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General
Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between
I-64 and Martinsville?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
5. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 7,
2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax
increased from 5% to 6% with a promise that the proceeds would be used to
decrease homeowner homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3% decrease
into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average Hoosier
homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility to levy
income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax relief. QUESTION:
Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose additional income, sales,
and other taxes? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget the last two fiscal years has been balanced
without fund transfers for the first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm).
QUESTION: Should the state's total budget expenditures be no more than total
revenues for the next biennium? DID NOT RESPOND.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced with the inclusion of a
one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This decreases property taxes for the
average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be
continued beyond 2007? DID NOT RESPOND.
4. BACKGROUND: Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of
Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should
the state pay for full-day kindergarten? If YES, where should the state
get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten? DID NOT RESPOND.
5. BACKGROUND: The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road
("Major Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to
pay off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next
ten years? DID NOT RESPOND.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects include $694 million for a new
terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to Evansville as well as a $500 million
Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION: Should the "Major Moves" expenditures
be combined with the Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain
I-69 extension without state tax increases? DID NOT RESPOND.
7. BACKGROUND: The 2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a
toll road for an I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION:
Do you favor legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? DID NOT RESPOND.
8. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
State Senate District 40:
Leslie O. Compton (Taxpayer
UNfriendly -
DESPICABLE)
708 Cory Lane Lot #1
Bloomington, IN 47403
Phone: (812) 925-2200
E-mail:
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in
2009 for the exact same version of Senate Joint Resolution 1 that passed in
2008? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your
candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID
NOT RESPOND.
Reid Dallas (Uncertain)
PO Box 907
Bloomington, IN 47402
Phone: (812) 876-8340
E-mail: jjerrells@bluemarble.net
Website: http://www.reiddallas.com/index.asp
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 6, 2012,
General Election
1. QUESTION: What are your priorities regarding the 2013-2015 state budget?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (from campaign website): I will remove
government obstacles to help grow the economy, protect family budgets through
low taxes, reduce wasteful government spending, and stop government-run
healthcare.
2. QUESTION: Should the non-transportation appropriations from the state’s
Motor Vehicle Highway Account be transferred to the state’s General Fund so
more of our Indiana Gasoline Tax dollars can be properly spent to meet our
transportation needs? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
3. QUESTION: Should the Automatic Taxpayer Refund law be (a) improved to make
refunds more likely, (b) kept as it is, or (c) eliminated? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
4. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and
the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
5. QUESTION: What is your position regarding township government reform? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
6. QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment commissions
oversight? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
7. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
Vi Simpson (POLITICAL
HOG)
Address: 4965 W. Woodland Drive, Bloomington, IN 47404
Phone: (812) 876-2908
E-mail:
Website:
2012 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1003, which is Taxpayer Friendly because (1) public access to
government meetings and records is improved and (2) it is less likely that
public agencies will intentionally violate the Public Access Laws.
Voted NO on House
Bill 1005, which contains six Taxpayer Friendly local government Conflict Of
Interest provisions and sixteen Taxpayer Friendly local government Nepotism
provisions.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1376,
which is Taxpayer UNfriendly because (1) the automatic taxpayer refund excess
reserves trigger is increased from 10% to 12.5% and (2) Hoosier working families
will possibly receive an automatic taxpayer refund every even-numbered year
instead of every year.
Voted NO on
Senate Bill 25,
which was Taxpayer Friendly because (if it had passed the House) much improved
oversight would have been provided for redevelopment commissions and
departments.
2011 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted NO on House
Bill 1001, which includes among its 16 Taxpayer Friendly state budget
provisions no tax increases and an operating surplus in both the 2012 and 2013
fiscal years with a satisfactory reserve balance on June 30, 2013.
Voted NO on House
Bill 1002, which is Taxpayer Friendly because (1) charter schools have the
potential to help increase the academic growth of lower socioeconomic students,
(2) the number of Indiana nonprofit private colleges and universities authorized
to create charter schools is limited, (3) the Indianapolis mayor is the only
Indiana mayor who may authorize charter schools, (4) conversion from a public
school to a charter school is sufficiently stringent, and (5) property taxes are
NOT improperly used to support charter schools.
Voted NO on
House Bill 1003, which uses state K-12
tuition support money to fund scholarships for nonpublic school students and is
Taxpayer UNfriendly because (1) nonpublic private and parochial schools are not
equally open to all children, (2) nonpublic school budgets are not approved by a
directly elected public body, (3) evidence-based research does not support
greater school choice as a means to achieve overall educational improvement, (4)
it is very likely unconstitutional, and (5) state tuition support dollars would
go to nonpublic schools that are not uniformly distributed throughout the state.
Voted NO on House
Bill 1022, which would have implemented a number of Taxpayer Friendly local
government provisions related to nepotism and officeholder conflict-of-interest.
Voted NO on House
Bill 1074, which provides that school board members selected by election
must be elected at November general elections and is Taxpayer Friendly because
the greater voter turnout in general elections will make it more difficult for
local vested interests to unduly influence school board elections.
2010 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted NO
on House Joint Resolution 1
to deny voters statewide the opportunity to amend the Indiana Constitution
to (1) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (2) protect
homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1001, which contains 21 Taxpayer Friendly government ethics reform
provisions including a 365-day wait after leaving the General Assembly before a
legislator can become a lobbyist or legislative liaison, the reporting of
certain expenditures by the legislative liaisons of state agencies and state
educational institutions, and a reduction from $100 to $50 in the minimum
reportable amount for the total daily gifts given by a registered lobbyist to a
legislative person.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1086, which contains 7 Taxpayer Friendly provisions including the HJR
1 Constitutional Amendment ballot language.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1367, which contains 5 Taxpayer Friendly K-12 education provisions
that preserve and protect instructional programs.
Voted YES on
Senate Bill 23, which delays the scheduled increase in unemployment insurance
premiums for one year until 2011.
Voted YES on Senate Bill
396, which mandates an
adjusted six-year average that eliminates the highest value to calculate the
base rate for the assessment of agricultural land.
2009 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted NO on
Senate
Joint Resolution 1, which amended the Indiana Constitution beginning 2012 to
include a cap on homestead property tax in 90 counties at 1% of gross assessed
value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008, is
exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St. Joseph
counties ONLY. The effective constitutional homeowner property tax caps in Lake
and St. Joseph counties are 1.88% and 1.52% respectively until the 1% cap takes
effect in 2020.
Voted NO
on House Bill 1001 SS, the
2009-2011 special session budget bill that (1) provides enough resources for
good government AND (2) satisfactorily protects Hoosier working families
from state and local tax increases. A
YES vote supports a budget that is sufficiently Taxpayer Friendly. A NO vote would have shut down much of state government.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 348 to have a Library Services Plan developed and approved by a Public
Library Service Planning Committee (with an "opt out" referendum
provision) in every county (except Marion County) to help more effectively use
working family dollars currently spent on library services (with the option to
equitably replace public library property taxes with a county economic
development income tax).
Voted NO on Senate
Bill 452 to prohibit employees of a
local government unit from serving as elected officials within the same local
government unit, move the elections of municipal officers to even-numbered
years, move all school board member elections to the November general election
in even-numbered years, establish the use of vote centers as an option for all
counties, and require a city clerk-treasurer in a third class city to attend
fiscal officer training provided by the state board of accounts.
Voted NO on Senate
Bill 506 to (1) allow a single County Chief Executive
Officer or County Manager, (2) allow the County Council or the Board of
County Supervisors to exercise both the fiscal and legislative powers
of the county, (3) provide for voter-initiated referendums on county
government reorganization, (4) repeal the requirement that political
subdivisions must approve local government reorganizations initiated by voters,
(5) assign the Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations four
responsibilities to identify and monitor good local government
practices, (6) prohibit County Manager nepotism, (7) repeal unproductive
reporting requirements, and (8) continue to elect the County Assessor.
Voted NO
on Senate
Bill 512 to (1) abolish on January 1, 2013, each township board in every
county (other than Marion County) and make the county fiscal body also the
fiscal body and legislative body of each township, (2) require a township when
formulating an annual budget to consider whether the part of the ending balance
in each township fund in excess of 10% of budgeted expenditures should be used
instead of imposing additional property taxes for the ensuing year, (3) prohibit
a relative of a township officer or employee from being employed by the township
in a position that would put the relative in a direct supervisory or subordinate
relationship with the officer or employee, (4) require a township trustee's
annual report to list separately each expenditure to reimburse the trustee for
the trustee's public business use of personal property, (5) require each
township office to include the address, phone number, and regular office hours
(if any) of the township office in at least one local telephone directory, (6)
prohibits a public meeting or a public hearing of a township official or
governing body from being held in a private residence, and (7) requires the
State Board of Accounts to submit an annual township examination report to the
executive director of the Legislative Services Agency and to county councils.
Voted YES
on House
Bill 1607 to require a referendum before establishing a Northern Indiana
Regional Transportation District, which is a new tax-imposing level of
Indiana government in Lake, Porter, LaPorte, and St. Joseph counties controlled
by a board with unrestricted powers (where most board members have no real
connection to the taxpayers' community).
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008, General Election
1.
BACKGROUND: Senate Joint Resolution 1 passed
the Indiana Senate 40-7 and the Indiana House 79-20 on March 14, 2008, and
was signed by the Governor on March 19, 2008. SJR 1 amends the Indiana
Constitution to cap homeowners' property tax bills at 1% of assessed value,
rental and agricultural property at 2%, and business property at 3%. For
property taxes first due and payable in 2012, 90 of Indiana's 92
counties must have a homeowner property tax cap that is 1% of the gross
assessed value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008,
is exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St.
Joseph counties ONLY. The result of these two existing debt service
exemptions equates to a 1.88% homeowner cap in Lake County and a 1.52%
homeowner cap in St.
Joseph County. The homeowner caps for Lake and St. Joseph counties must become
1% in 2020. The exact same version of SJR 1 that passed in 2008 must again pass in the General Assembly in 2009 to put the 1%
constitutional homeowner property tax cap amendment on the 2010 ballot. We
the people can then vote to make the 1% homeowner property tax cap a
permanent part of the Indiana Constitution. Never has it been so easy to separate those who are part of the
property tax relief solution from those who are part of the property tax
spending problem. A General Assembly candidate who pledges to
vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009 is part of the
solution, otherwise the legislator is part of
the problem. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in 2009 for
the exact same version of Senate
Joint Resolution 1 that passed in 2008? DID NOT
RESPOND.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID
NOT RESPOND.
2008 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted NO on Senate
Joint Resolution 1, which amended the Indiana Constitution beginning 2012 to
include a cap on homestead property tax in 90 counties at 1% of gross assessed
value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008, is
exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St. Joseph
counties ONLY. The effective constitutional homeowner property tax caps in Lake
and St. Joseph counties are 1.88% and 1.52% respectively until the 1% cap takes
effect in 2020.
Voted YES on
House
Bill 1001, which phases in the SJR 1 constitutional property tax caps by
2010. Also, 2008 property taxes are reduced 26% from the prior year. An increase
in the sales tax from 6% to 7% and local option income taxes will be used to
replace the property tax revenue reductions that result from the property tax
caps.
2007 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that is Taxpayer
Friendly because the General Fund & Property Tax Replacement Fund $26.0722
billion expenditures total for the 2008 and 2009 fiscal years is less than the
$26.1946 billion revenues total. HB 1001 also includes additional homestead
credits from the Property Tax Reduction Trust Fund of $300 million in 2007 and
$250 million in 2008.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1478, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly for the following reasons: (1)
Homeowner property taxes will increase 1.2% each year from 2009 through 2013
with annual decreases in the Homestead Standard Deduction. (2) The 2% Circuit
Breaker Cap on residential property taxes passed by the General Assembly in 2006
has been watered down to the point where it is almost eliminated. (3) The new
local option income tax for property tax relief will be offset by future
property tax increases unless the new local option income tax to replace
property tax increases is implemented. (4) Using the new local option income tax
to replace property tax increases means that income tax increases on Hoosier
working families would lower the proportionate tax burden of businesses and
utilities by freezing business and utility property taxes without a
corresponding increase in other business and utility taxes. (5) A new local
option income tax has been authorized for public safety.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1835,which is Taxpayer Friendly because it uses slot machine licensing
fees and wagering taxes to establish the Property Tax Reduction Trust Fund,
which is to be used for property tax relief in any manner prescribed by the
General Assembly.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 401, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly because state legislators voted
themselves a perpetual pay increase that is 20% more than the typical Hoosier
working family earns during an entire year. SB 401 also eliminated taxpayer-paid
lifetime health insurance and the $4 taxpayer match for each $1 of legislator
pension contribution, but General Assembly members should not have received an
excessive salary increase in return for eliminating extravagant perks they
should not have in the first place.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
7, 2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND:
Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax increased from 5% to 6%
with a promise that the proceeds would be used to decrease homeowner
homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3%
decrease into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average
Hoosier homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility
to levy income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax
relief. QUESTION: Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose
additional income, sales, and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget
the last two fiscal years has been balanced without fund transfers for the
first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm). QUESTION: Should the state's total budget
expenditures be no more than total revenues for the next
biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced
with the inclusion of a one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This
decreases property taxes for the average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should
the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be continued beyond
2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4.
BACKGROUND:
Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners
could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should the state pay for full-day
kindergarten? If YES, where should the state get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten?
HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND:
The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road ("Major
Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to pay
off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the
next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects
include $694 million for a new terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to
Evansville as well as a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION:
Should the "Major Moves" expenditures be combined with the
Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain I-69
extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The
2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a toll road for an
I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION: Do you favor
legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2006 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted NO
on "Major
Moves" House
Bill 1008, which authorizes the Indiana Department of Transportation to
enter into public-private agreements with private entities (operators)
concerning tollway projects for I-69 between Martinsville and Evansville. HB
1008 also authorizes the Indiana Finance Authority to enter into public-private
agreements with operators for the Indiana Toll Road.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, a residential property tax reduction bill that increases the
homestead credit for one year in 2006 to 28% and the homestead standard
deduction for one year in 2007 to $45,000. Beginning in 2007 for Lake County and
2008 for all other counties, HB 1001 also establishes a cap on residential
property taxes equal to 2% of the assessed value of the residential property.
2005 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES
on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that included seven significant homeowner
property tax increases.
DID NOT VOTE on House
Bill 1120, which contained thirteen negative tax impacts including a
regional Food and Beverage Tax to finance a new Colts stadium.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
2, 2004, General Election
1. Guiding Principles for 2005-07 Biennium Budget. DID NOT RESPOND.
2. Opinions on Homeowner Property Taxes. DID NOT RESPOND.
3. Position on Indianapolis to Evansville Interstate. DID NOT RESPOND.
4. Additional Comments. DID NOT RESPOND.
2003 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted
FOR on
House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that was Taxpayer UNfriendly primarily
because (1) the 2004-05 fiscal year General Fund and Property Tax Replacement
Fund spending total of $11.48 billion exceeded the $11.4424 billion revenues
total (fiscal year 2004-05 was the eighth straight year where spending exceeded
revenues), (2) the full Property Tax relief that was promised to homeowners in
last year's special session legislation was reduced by the so-called Homestead
Credit "correction," and (3) Pension Stabilization Fund transfers were
included (these transfers worsened the $8.5 billion shortfall in teacher
retirement funds).
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
5, 2002, General Election
1-2. Special session vote FOR
several tax increases that will increase revenues $1.7782 billion from July 1,
2002, through June 30, 2005.
3. Special session vote FOR
a 20% gas tax increase (from 15 to 18 cents per gallon) effective
01/01/03.
4. Special session vote FOR
a phased-in shift of the inventory tax to (1) all other types of property
through an increased property tax rate and (2) a tax on the income of
individuals (in those counties choosing to do so) through the
establishment or increase of a County Economic Development Income Tax (CEDIT).
5. Did not receive General Election Questionnaire. See the Legislative
Voting Record.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 7,
2002, Primary Election
1. Voted on February 28 FOR
the Indiana Senate version of HB 1004, which included an unneeded
Income Tax rate increase, imposed a new
business Payroll Tax, and increased revenues
$933 million more than taxes would have been reduced through June 30,
2004.
2. Voted on February 27 FOR
the Indiana Senate version of HB 1317, which would have raised
the Gasoline Tax from 15 cents per gallon to 18 cents during 2003, 20
cents during 2004, and 22 cents after 2004.
3-4. Did not receive Primary Questionnaire. See the Legislative
Voting Record.
State Senate District 41:
Terry Coriden (Uncertain)
Address: P.O. Box 1510, Columbus, IN 47202
Phone: (812) 376-9105
E-mail: http://www.coridenforsenate.com/contact.shtml
Website: www.coridenforsenate.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 7,
2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax
increased from 5% to 6% with a promise that the proceeds would be used to
decrease homeowner homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3% decrease
into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average Hoosier
homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility to levy
income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax relief. QUESTION:
Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose additional income, sales,
and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget the last two fiscal years has been balanced
without fund transfers for the first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm).
QUESTION: Should the state's total budget expenditures be no more than total
revenues for the next biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced with the inclusion of a
one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This decreases property taxes for the
average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be
continued beyond 2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. BACKGROUND: Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of
Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should
the state pay for full-day kindergarten? If YES, where should the state
get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND: The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road
("Major Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to
pay off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next
ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects include $694 million for a new
terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to Evansville as well as a $500 million
Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION: Should the "Major Moves" expenditures
be combined with the Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain
I-69 extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The 2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a
toll road for an I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION:
Do you favor legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Robert D. Garton (Taxpayer
UNfriendly)
Address: P.O. Box 1111, Columbus, IN 47202-1111
Phone: (812) 372-9925
E-mail: S41@ai.org
Website: http://www.in.gov/S41/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 2, 2006,
Primary Election
1. What will be your guiding principles for the 2007-2009 biennium
budget? Specifically, what mix of spending cuts, tax increases, and/or reserve
depletions will you support? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. What are your opinions regarding homeowner property taxes? Specifically, do
favor freezing all property taxes and funding budget increases through both
individual and business income tax increases? Or, do you favor a mixture of
income tax, sales tax and meals tax increases to reduce property tax growth
while providing additional revenue to local governments? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. Considering the "Major Moves" legislation passed by the General
Assembly this year, do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases
the next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. What is your position regarding the construction of an interstate from
Indianapolis to Evansville? Specifically, should the $500 million Next
Generation Trust Fund that is part of "Major Moves" be used
exclusively for a new terrain I-69 extension so as to avoid state gas tax
increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2006 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on
"Major Moves" House
Bill 1008, which authorizes the Indiana Department of Transportation to
enter into public-private agreements with private entities (operators)
concerning tollway projects for I-69 between Martinsville and Evansville. HB
1008 also authorizes the Indiana Finance Authority to enter into public-private
agreements with operators for the Indiana Toll Road.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, a residential property tax reduction bill that increases the
homestead credit for one year in 2006 to 28% and the homestead standard
deduction for one year in 2007 to $45,000. Beginning in 2007 for Lake County and
2008 for all other counties, HB 1001 also establishes a cap on residential
property taxes equal to 2% of the assessed value of the residential property.
2005 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that included seven significant homeowner
property tax increases.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1120, which contained thirteen negative tax impacts including a
regional Food and Beverage Tax to finance a new Colts stadium.
2004 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1005 to establish the Property Tax Replacement Study Commission, which
studied the elimination of all or part of the current property tax.
2003 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on
House
Bill 1001. HB 1001 is Taxpayer
UNfriendly primarily because (1) the 2004-05 fiscal year General Fund and
Property Tax Replacement Fund spending total of $11.48 billion exceeds the
$11.4424 billion revenues total (fiscal year 2004-05 will be the eighth straight
year where spending exceeds revenues), (2) the full Property Tax relief that was
promised to homeowners in last year's special session legislation was reduced by
the so-called Homestead Credit "correction," and (3) Pension
Stabilization Fund transfers were included (these transfers worsen the $8.5
billion shortfall in teacher retirement funds).
Voted YES on the
Indiana Senate version of House
Bill 2008, which would have used current revenues (instead of funds from the
sale of bonds payable from future tobacco settlement payments) for economic
development initiatives.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 5,
2002, General Election
1-2.
Special session vote FOR several tax increases that
will increase revenues $1.7782 billion from July 1, 2002, through June 30, 2005.
3. Special session vote FOR
a 20% gas tax increase (from 15 to 18 cents per gallon) effective
01/01/03.
4. Special session vote FOR
a phased-in shift of the inventory tax to (1) all other types of property
through an increased property tax rate and (2) a tax on the income of
individuals (in those counties choosing to do so) through the
establishment or increase of a County Economic Development Income Tax (CEDIT).
5. DID NOT RESPOND to General Election Questionnaire. See the Candidate
Questionnaire for the May 7, 2002, Primary Election.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 7, 2002,
Primary Election
1. Voted on February 28 AGAINST
the Indiana Senate version of HB 1004, which included an unneeded
Income Tax rate increase, imposed a new
business Payroll Tax, and increased revenues
$933 million more than taxes would have been reduced through June 30,
2004.
2. Voted on February 27 FOR
the Indiana Senate version of HB 1317, which would have raised
the Gasoline Tax from 15 cents per gallon to 18 cents during 2003, 20
cents during 2004, and 22 cents after 2004.
3- 4. Did not receive Primary Questionnaire. See the Candidate
Questionnaire for the November 5, 2002, General Election.
Kenn Gividen (Taxpayer
Friendly)
Address: P.O. Box 2012, Columbus, IN 47202
Phone: (812) 418-0556
E-mail: 1492@usa.com
Website: http://www.kenngividen.com/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 7,
2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax
increased from 5% to 6% with a promise that the proceeds would be used to
decrease homeowner homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3% decrease
into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average Hoosier
homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility to levy
income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax relief. QUESTION:
Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose additional income, sales,
and other taxes? ANSWER: NO. I prefer use taxes over income and property taxes.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget the last two fiscal years has been balanced
without fund transfers for the first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm).
QUESTION: Should the state's total budget expenditures be no more than total
revenues for the next biennium? ANSWER: My view is that the states budget
should not exceed its revenues; the state should not
spend more than it brings in. The budget expenditures should be no
more than the total revenues. That is the spirit of the state's constitution
that disallows the state to go into debt.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced with the inclusion of a
one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This decreases property taxes for the
average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be
continued beyond 2007? ANSWER: YES.
4. BACKGROUND: Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of
Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners would cost $210 million in 2009. QUESTIONS:
Should the state pay for full-day kindergarten? If YES, where should the
state get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten? ANSWER: NO. School
choice has a greater positive impact on education outcome. School choice
should be our priority.
5. BACKGROUND: The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road
("Major Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to
pay off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next
ten years? ANSWER: NO.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects include $694 million for a new
terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to Evansville as well as a $500 million
Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION: Should the "Major Moves" expenditures
be combined with the Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain
I-69 extension without state tax increases? ANSWER: YES.
7. BACKGROUND: The 2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a
toll road for an I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION:
Do you favor legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? ANSWER: YES.
I favor tolls in lieu of other taxes, not in addition to other taxes.
8. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: I support the fair tax initiative. I support the initiative to repeal
Indiana property taxes through an amendment to the state constitution.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 2,
2004, General Election
1. Guiding Principles for 2005-07 Biennium Budget. Spending cuts. My
objective will be to roll back government spending to 1984 levels. I
have no plans for any tax increase
and intend to vigorously oppose any such increase.
2. Opinions on Homeowner Property Taxes. Effectively, such taxation is
"rent" charged by the county to the owner. Because this tax harms
those most who can afford it least - the elderly and young families locked out
of ownership by high taxes - my objective is to eliminate property taxes, not
only for homeowners, but businesses as well. The revenue lost by eliminating
property tax would be "replaced" by dramatically scaled back
government. By converting government schools to charter schools, the cost of
education could be cut by 50 percent. Parents of each individual school would
elect a board of directors to manage the school's finances, academics, etc. Each
child would be awarded a $4,500 voucher from state and federal funds; no
property tax would be permitted for education. Property
tax deferral is a first, but temporary, step to remedy the problem.
The tax caps of 1 percent, 1.5 percent and 2 percent are 1 percent, 1.5 percent
and 2 percent too high respectively. (Tax caps are ineffective when not
accompanied by equivalent or greater government spending cuts.)
3. Position on Indianapolis to Evansville Interstate. The new terrain I-69
diverts nearly $1 billion from other construction projects. I support
the alternate terrain (I-70 and US 41), allowing the $1 billion to be
available for other projects. Specifically, I would propose those funds be used
to upgrade US 31 to a FREEWAY (NOT TOLLWAY) from Indianapolis to South Bend.
This would allow new a freeway to stretch the length of the state for the same
money as the new terrain I-69. I prefer the principle of tollways ONLY when
those tolls replace tax reductions. In most cases, highway tolls constitute
double taxation and, in those cases, I am opposed to them. An ideal scenario
would be to contract the purchase rights to private industry, including the
construction and maintenance costs (including patrolling). When exercising
eminent domain, the rights of current property owners demand careful
consideration.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 5,
2002, General Election
1-5. DID NOT RESPOND to General Election Questionnaire.
Chris Roller (Uncertain)
921 Princeton Dr.
New Whiteland, IN 46184
Phone: (317) 691-7028
E-mail: chrisroller77@yahoo.com;
voteroller2010@yahoo.com
Website: http://voteroller2010.com/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2,
2010,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you
support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the
1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax
deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced?
Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility
of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be
replenished.
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (From Website): Trying to find a fair and
equal way to distribute funding to schools is an issue I take very
seriously.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain
both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction
without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General
Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between
I-64 and Martinsville?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
5. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
State Senate District 42:
Max A. Ellison, Jr. (Taxpayer
Friendly)
1205 N Central Ave
Connersville, IN 47331
Phone: (765) 265-4619
E-mail: max@thepoint.net
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate
Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race):
I believe that Indiana's constitution should be
amended to 1 percent of homeowners and
agricultural property and at 3 percent for all others. While in the business
domain, a portion (or all) would likely be passed to consumers.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
Warren Goodrich (Taxpayer
UNfriendly - Part of
the Problem)
881 West Mausoleum Road
Shelbyville, IN 46176
Phone: (317) 398-9514
E-mail: wgoodrich@starband.net;
wgoodrich@warrengoodrichforindianasenate.com
Website: http://www.warrengoodrichforindianasenate.com/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in
2009 for the exact same version of Senate Joint Resolution 1 that passed in
2008? ANSWER: I have been studying this subject in depth and find we have a
major problem with the assessments not being true values of a majority of the
properties these caps are designed for. Also the assessed value is based in 2
years past not the value of what this property can be sold for today while
setting the amount owed for property tax for the tax year. Some of these
assessed values are so inflated that the owners would love to sell for the
assessed value declared for their property but will never find a buyer at the
declared assessed value or in many cases for even half of the assessed value
declared for their property. What good is a limit or cap on the percentage of
assessed value when we have much to do to make the assessed values declared to
be accurate for what they can be sold for. If the assessed value is inflated to
say double the true value the cap you are seeking would in reality be double tax
for the unrealistic assessed valued declared creating twice the tax due to twice
the assessed value compared to the true sellable value at current rates. I am
seeing a major need to watch this bill in action and wait till the bugs are
worked out of this bill to create more accurate assessing of true values before
we create a constitutional amendment. I am not saying the cap is not needed but
saying we need some experience from the affects of this bill allowing adjustment
corrections to the bill before we mess with the constitution. The caps are in
the bill now and will become effective without the constitutional amendment. Why
the hurry for the constitutional amendment without proper research and time to
experience results to prove the bill is without need for change to correct
adverse reactions caused due to the bill ? It is my opinion the Constitution
should be respected causing reluctance to create an amendment to it without
knowledge the amendment is without flaw first. RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race):
Not at this time. While I believe the legislature and Senate provided a good
bill to make a fast action to reduce property taxes this year, I believe this
subject will be revisited for some years to come, making new adjustments to a
very big change created by this property tax and school funding bill. I believe
creating a forced cleanup of waste within county and city government should be
active for a few years to see the results. Then after we have seen what actually
is working to truly reduce property taxes or eliminate these taxes preferably,
we should consider making permanent by amending the Indiana Constitution to
better serve our citizens in the long-term future.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your
candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID
NOT RESPOND.
John Heaton (Taxpayer
Friendly)
1270 North 350 East
Shelbyville, IN 46176
Phone: (317) 398-4288
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate
Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? ANSWER: Yes.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
No.
Robert N. Jackman (Taxpayer
UNfriendly)
Address: 352 W. St Rd 244, Milroy, IN 46156
Phone: (765) 629-2010
E-mail:
Website:
2008 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on Senate
Joint Resolution 1, which amended the Indiana Constitution beginning 2012 to
include a cap on homestead property tax in 90 counties at 1% of gross assessed
value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008, is
exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St. Joseph
counties ONLY. The effective constitutional homeowner property tax caps in Lake
and St. Joseph counties are 1.88% and 1.52% respectively until the 1% cap takes
effect in 2020.
Voted YES on
House
Bill 1001, which phases in the SJR 1 constitutional property tax caps by
2010. Also, 2008 property taxes are reduced 26% from the prior year. An increase
in the sales tax from 6% to 7% and local option income taxes will be used to
replace the property tax revenue reductions that result from the property tax
caps.
2007 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that is Taxpayer Friendly because the General
Fund & Property Tax Replacement Fund $26.0722 billion expenditures total for
the 2008 and 2009 fiscal years is less than the $26.1946 billion revenues total.
HB 1001 also includes additional homestead credits from the Property Tax
Reduction Trust Fund of $300 million in 2007 and $250 million in 2008.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1478, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly for the following reasons: (1)
Homeowner property taxes will increase 1.2% each year from 2009 through 2013
with annual decreases in the Homestead Standard Deduction. (2) The 2% Circuit
Breaker Cap on residential property taxes passed by the General Assembly in 2006
has been watered down to the point where it is almost eliminated. (3) The new
local option income tax for property tax relief will be offset by future
property tax increases unless the new local option income tax to replace
property tax increases is implemented. (4) Using the new local option income tax
to replace property tax increases means that income tax increases on Hoosier
working families would lower the proportionate tax burden of businesses and
utilities by freezing business and utility property taxes without a
corresponding increase in other business and utility taxes. (5) A new local
option income tax has been authorized for public safety.
Voted YES on
House
Bill 1835,which is Taxpayer Friendly because it uses slot machine licensing
fees and wagering taxes to establish the Property Tax Reduction Trust Fund,
which is to be used for property tax relief in any manner prescribed by the
General Assembly.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 401, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly because state legislators voted
themselves a perpetual pay increase that is 20% more than the typical Hoosier
working family earns during an entire year. SB 401 also eliminated taxpayer-paid
lifetime health insurance and the $4 taxpayer match for each $1 of legislator
pension contribution, but General Assembly members should not have received an
excessive salary increase in return for eliminating extravagant perks they
should not have in the first place.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
7, 2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax
increased from 5% to 6% with a promise that the proceeds would be used to
decrease homeowner homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3% decrease
into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average Hoosier
homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility to levy
income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax relief. QUESTION:
Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose additional income, sales,
and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget the last two fiscal years has been balanced
without fund transfers for the first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm).
QUESTION: Should the state's total budget expenditures be no more than total
revenues for the next biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced with the inclusion of a
one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This decreases property taxes for the
average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be
continued beyond 2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. BACKGROUND: Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of
Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should
the state pay for full-day kindergarten? If YES, where should the state
get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND: The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road
("Major Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to
pay off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next
ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects include $694 million for a new
terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to Evansville as well as a $500 million
Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION: Should the "Major Moves" expenditures
be combined with the Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain
I-69 extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The 2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a
toll road for an I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION:
Do you favor legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2006 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on "Major
Moves" House
Bill 1008, which authorizes the Indiana Department of Transportation to
enter into public-private agreements with private entities (operators)
concerning tollway projects for I-69 between Martinsville and Evansville. HB
1008 also authorizes the Indiana Finance Authority to enter into public-private
agreements with operators for the Indiana Toll Road.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, a residential property tax reduction bill that increases the
homestead credit for one year in 2006 to 28% and the homestead standard
deduction for one year in 2007 to $45,000. Beginning in 2007 for Lake County and
2008 for all other counties, HB 1001 also establishes a cap on residential
property taxes equal to 2% of the assessed value of the residential property.
2005 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that included seven significant homeowner
property tax increases.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1120, which contained thirteen negative tax impacts including a
regional Food and Beverage Tax to finance a new Colts stadium.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
2, 2004, General Election
1. Guiding Principles for 2005-07 Biennium Budget. DID NOT RESPOND.
2. Opinions on Homeowner Property Taxes. DID NOT RESPOND.
3. Position on Indianapolis to Evansville Interstate. DID NOT RESPOND.
4. Additional Comments. DID NOT RESPOND.
2003 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted FOR on
House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that was Taxpayer UNfriendly primarily
because (1) the 2004-05 fiscal year General Fund and Property Tax Replacement
Fund spending total of $11.48 billion exceeded the $11.4424 billion revenues
total (fiscal year 2004-05 was the eighth straight year where spending exceeded
revenues), (2) the full Property Tax relief that was promised to homeowners in
last year's special session legislation was reduced by the so-called Homestead
Credit "correction," and (3) Pension Stabilization Fund transfers were
included (these transfers worsened the $8.5 billion shortfall in teacher
retirement funds).
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 5,
2002, General Election
1-2. Special session vote FOR
several tax increases that will increase revenues $1.7782 billion from July 1,
2002, through June 30, 2005.
3. Special session vote FOR
a 20% gas tax increase (from 15 to 18 cents per gallon) effective
01/01/03.
4. Special session vote FOR
a phased-in shift of the inventory tax to (1) all other types of property
through an increased property tax rate and (2) a tax on the income of
individuals (in those counties choosing to do so) through the
establishment or increase of a County Economic Development Income Tax (CEDIT).
5. Did not receive General Election Questionnaire. See the Legislative
Voting Record.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 7, 2002,
Primary Election
1. Voted on February 28 FOR
the Indiana Senate version of HB 1004, which included an unneeded
Income Tax rate increase, imposed a new
business Payroll Tax, and increased revenues
$933 million more than taxes would have been reduced through June 30,
2004.
2. Voted on February 27 FOR
the Indiana Senate version of HB 1317, which would have raised
the Gasoline Tax from 15 cents per gallon to 18 cents during 2003, 20
cents during 2004, and 22 cents after 2004.
3-4. Did not receive Primary Questionnaire. See the Legislative
Voting Record.
Jeff Sponsel (Taxpayer
Friendly)
110 Saint Mary Street
Shelbyville, IN 46176
Phone: (317) 402-0667
E-mail: jeff@jeffsponsel.com
Website: www.SponselforSenate.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate
Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
RECORD (www.indystar.com/2008race):
Yes.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
State Senate District 43:
Lindsay Patterson (Uncertain)
1145 Main Street
Brookville, IN 47012
Phone:
(513) 313-3220
E-mail:
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 4, 2010,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you
support or oppose the Constitutional Amendment on the November 2, 2010,
statewide ballot? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced?
ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain
both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction
without ANY change? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General
Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between
I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Lane A. Siekman (Uncertain)
Address: 612 Highland Avenue, Rising Sun, IN 47040
Phone: (812) 438-2706
E-mail: siekmanforsenate@yahoo.com
Website: www.lanesiekman.com
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 7,
2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax
increased from 5% to 6% with a promise that the proceeds would be used to
decrease homeowner homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3% decrease
into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average Hoosier
homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility to levy
income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax relief. QUESTION:
Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose additional income, sales,
and other taxes? ANSWER: They should be allowed flexibility to address local
concerns but not just new taxes. Shift taxes to local units and eliminate state
taxes.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget the last two fiscal years has been balanced
without fund transfers for the first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm).
QUESTION: Should the state's total budget expenditures be no more than total
revenues for the next biennium? ANSWER: YES.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced with the inclusion of a
one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This decreases property taxes for the
average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be
continued beyond 2007? ANSWER: Maybe. Property Taxes need to be
eliminated as we know them. We need a fair and equitable system of taxation.
4. BACKGROUND: Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of
Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should
the state pay for full-day kindergarten? If YES, where should the state
get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten? ANSWER: YES. If we have
the funds without a tax increase.
5. BACKGROUND: The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road
("Major Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to
pay off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next
ten years? ANSWER: NO.
I would like the toll road proceeds to spread out past 10 years.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects include $694 million for a new
terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to Evansville as well as a $500 million
Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION: Should the "Major Moves" expenditures
be combined with the Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain
I-69 extension without state tax increases? ANSWER: If financially
feasible. I don't have the numbers to answer this question.
7. BACKGROUND: The 2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a
toll road for an I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION:
Do you favor legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? ANSWER: YES.
8. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
State Senate District 44:
Matthew S. Colglazier (Taxpayer
UNfriendly -
DESPICABLE)
588 Humpback Bridge Rd
Heltonville, IN 47436
Phone: (812) 834-5431
E-mail: mscolgla@indiana.edu; rscolglazier@gmail.com;
marticolglazier@att.net
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in
2009 for the exact same version of Senate Joint Resolution 1 that passed in
2008? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your
candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID
NOT RESPOND.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to
vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT
RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your
candidacy? Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT
RESPOND.
Tony "Big Dog" Van Pelt (Taxpayer
UNfriendly)
404 M Street
Bedford, IN 47421
Phone: (812) 797-2107
E-mail: vanpelt4indianasenate@yahoo.com;
treasurer@unleashthedog.us
Website: www.unleashthedog.us
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 6, 2008,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote for Senate
Joint Resolution 1 in 2009? DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID NOT RESPOND.
State Senate District 45:
Floyd Coates (Uncertain)
Address: 998 North 900 West, Lexington, IN 47135
Phones: (812) 866-4900, 812-752-7000 Office, 812-595-0906 Cell sometimes
E-mail: floyd@APMC.com
Website: http://www.floydcoates.com/watchdog.html
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 7,
2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax
increased from 5% to 6% with a promise that the proceeds would be used to
decrease homeowner homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3% decrease
into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average Hoosier
homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility to levy
income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax relief. QUESTION:
Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose additional income, sales,
and other taxes? ANSWER: Taxes are out of balance. I favor fair tax. local
governments should exercise more control. Total government spending should
be reduced.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget the last two fiscal years has been balanced
without fund transfers for the first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm).
QUESTION: Should the state's total budget expenditures be no more than total
revenues for the next biennium? ANSWER: YES.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced with the inclusion of a
one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This decreases property taxes for the
average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be
continued beyond 2007? ANSWER: Property tax
should be eliminated in deference to a sales tax.
4. BACKGROUND: Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of
Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners would cost $210 million in 2009. QUESTION:
Should the state pay for full-day kindergarten? ANSWER: NO.
5. BACKGROUND: The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road
("Major Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to
pay off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next
ten years? ANSWER: NO.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects include $694 million for a new
terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to Evansville as well as a $500 million
Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION: Should the "Major Moves" expenditures
be combined with the Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain
I-69 extension without state tax increases? ANSWER: I do not have enough
information to make an intelligent statement.
7. BACKGROUND: The 2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a
toll road for an I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION:
Do you favor legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? ANSWER: I do not have enough information to make an
intelligent statement.
8. QUESTIONS: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
Do you have a website? ANSWERS: Life time healthcare benefits for State Senators
is an abomination. Senators are elected to serve not to be served.
Their pension plan should also be eliminated. Government aid is like a blood
transfusion from your right arm to a left arm with a leaky hose that goes
through a bureaucracy, and the politicians determine into whose arm it goes.
Government should not try to solve all problems. People should be
permitted to keep their own cash to solve their own problems. My website
is www.Floyd.com.
James (Jim) Lewis (POLITICAL
HOG)
Address: 774 Level Street, Charlestown, IN 47111
Phone: (812) 256-3585
E-mail:
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2,
2010,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you
support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the
1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax
deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced?
Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility
of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be
replenished.
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain
both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction
without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General
Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between
I-64 and Martinsville?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
5. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
2010 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted NO
on House Joint Resolution 1
to deny voters statewide the opportunity to amend the Indiana Constitution
to (1) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (2) protect
homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1001, which contains 21 Taxpayer Friendly government ethics reform
provisions including a 365-day wait after leaving the General Assembly before a
legislator can become a lobbyist or legislative liaison, the reporting of
certain expenditures by the legislative liaisons of state agencies and state
educational institutions, and a reduction from $100 to $50 in the minimum
reportable amount for the total daily gifts given by a registered lobbyist to a
legislative person.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1086, which contains 7 Taxpayer Friendly provisions including the HJR
1 Constitutional Amendment ballot language.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1367, which contains 5 Taxpayer Friendly K-12 education provisions
that preserve and protect instructional programs.
Voted YES on
Senate Bill 23, which delays the scheduled increase in unemployment insurance
premiums for one year until 2011.
Voted YES on Senate Bill
396, which mandates an
adjusted six-year average that eliminates the highest value to calculate the
base rate for the assessment of agricultural land.
2009 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted NO on
Senate
Joint Resolution 1, which amended the Indiana Constitution beginning 2012 to
include a cap on homestead property tax in 90 counties at 1% of gross assessed
value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008, is
exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St. Joseph
counties ONLY. The effective constitutional homeowner property tax caps in Lake
and St. Joseph counties are 1.88% and 1.52% respectively until the 1% cap takes
effect in 2020.
Voted NO
on House Bill 1001 SS, the
2009-2011 special session budget bill that (1) provides enough resources for
good government AND (2) satisfactorily protects Hoosier working families
from state and local tax increases. A
YES vote supports a budget that is sufficiently Taxpayer Friendly.
A NO vote would have shut down much of state government.
Voted NO on Senate
Bill 348 to have a Library Services Plan developed and approved by a Public
Library Service Planning Committee (with an "opt out" referendum
provision) in every county (except Marion County) to help more effectively use
working family dollars currently spent on library services (with the option to
equitably replace public library property taxes with a county economic
development income tax).
Voted NO on Senate
Bill 452 to prohibit employees of a
local government unit from serving as elected officials within the same local
government unit, move the elections of municipal officers to even-numbered
years, move all school board member elections to the November general election
in even-numbered years, establish the use of vote centers as an option for all
counties, and require a city clerk-treasurer in a third class city to attend
fiscal officer training provided by the state board of accounts.
Voted NO on Senate
Bill 506 to (1) allow a single County Chief Executive
Officer or County Manager, (2) allow the County Council or the Board of
County Supervisors to exercise both the fiscal and legislative powers
of the county, (3) provide for voter-initiated referendums on county
government reorganization, (4) repeal the requirement that political
subdivisions must approve local government reorganizations initiated by voters,
(5) assign the Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations four
responsibilities to identify and monitor good local government
practices, (6) prohibit County Manager nepotism, (7) repeal unproductive
reporting requirements, and (8) continue to elect the County Assessor.
Voted NO
on Senate
Bill 512 to (1) abolish on January 1, 2013, each township board in every
county (other than Marion County) and make the county fiscal body also the
fiscal body and legislative body of each township, (2) require a township when
formulating an annual budget to consider whether the part of the ending balance
in each township fund in excess of 10% of budgeted expenditures should be used
instead of imposing additional property taxes for the ensuing year, (3) prohibit
a relative of a township officer or employee from being employed by the township
in a position that would put the relative in a direct supervisory or subordinate
relationship with the officer or employee, (4) require a township trustee's
annual report to list separately each expenditure to reimburse the trustee for
the trustee's public business use of personal property, (5) require each
township office to include the address, phone number, and regular office hours
(if any) of the township office in at least one local telephone directory, (6)
prohibits a public meeting or a public hearing of a township official or
governing body from being held in a private residence, and (7) requires the
State Board of Accounts to submit an annual township examination report to the
executive director of the Legislative Services Agency and to county councils.
Voted YES
on House
Bill 1607 to require a referendum before establishing a Northern Indiana
Regional Transportation District, which is a new tax-imposing level of
Indiana government in Lake, Porter, LaPorte, and St. Joseph counties controlled
by a board with unrestricted powers (where most board members have no real
connection to the taxpayers' community).
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008, General Election
1.
BACKGROUND: Senate Joint Resolution 1 passed
the Indiana Senate 40-7 and the Indiana House 79-20 on March 14, 2008, and
was signed by the Governor on March 19, 2008. SJR 1 amends the Indiana
Constitution to cap homeowners' property tax bills at 1% of assessed value,
rental and agricultural property at 2%, and business property at 3%. For
property taxes first due and payable in 2012, 90 of Indiana's 92
counties must have a homeowner property tax cap that is 1% of the gross
assessed value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008,
is exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St.
Joseph counties ONLY. The result of these two existing debt service
exemptions equates to a 1.88% homeowner cap in Lake County and a 1.52%
homeowner cap in St.
Joseph County. The homeowner caps for Lake and St. Joseph counties must become
1% in 2020. The exact same version of SJR 1 that passed in 2008 must again pass in the General Assembly in 2009 to put the 1%
constitutional homeowner property tax cap amendment on the 2010 ballot. We
the people can then vote to make the 1% homeowner property tax cap a
permanent part of the Indiana Constitution. Never has it been so easy to separate those who are part of the
property tax relief solution from those who are part of the property tax
spending problem. A General Assembly candidate who pledges to
vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009 is part of the
solution, otherwise the legislator is part of
the problem. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in 2009 for
the exact same version of Senate
Joint Resolution 1 that passed in 2008? DID NOT
RESPOND.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID
NOT RESPOND.
2008 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on Senate
Joint Resolution 1, which amended the Indiana Constitution beginning 2012 to
include a cap on homestead property tax in 90 counties at 1% of gross assessed
value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008, is
exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St. Joseph
counties ONLY. The effective constitutional homeowner property tax caps in Lake
and St. Joseph counties are 1.88% and 1.52% respectively until the 1% cap takes
effect in 2020.
Voted YES on
House
Bill 1001, which phases in the SJR 1 constitutional property tax caps by
2010. Also, 2008 property taxes are reduced 26% from the prior year. An increase
in the sales tax from 6% to 7% and local option income taxes will be used to
replace the property tax revenue reductions that result from the property tax
caps.
2007 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that is Taxpayer
Friendly because the General Fund & Property Tax Replacement Fund $26.0722
billion expenditures total for the 2008 and 2009 fiscal years is less than the
$26.1946 billion revenues total. HB 1001 also includes additional homestead
credits from the Property Tax Reduction Trust Fund of $300 million in 2007 and
$250 million in 2008.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1478, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly for the following reasons: (1)
Homeowner property taxes will increase 1.2% each year from 2009 through 2013
with annual decreases in the Homestead Standard Deduction. (2) The 2% Circuit
Breaker Cap on residential property taxes passed by the General Assembly in 2006
has been watered down to the point where it is almost eliminated. (3) The new
local option income tax for property tax relief will be offset by future
property tax increases unless the new local option income tax to replace
property tax increases is implemented. (4) Using the new local option income tax
to replace property tax increases means that income tax increases on Hoosier
working families would lower the proportionate tax burden of businesses and
utilities by freezing business and utility property taxes without a
corresponding increase in other business and utility taxes. (5) A new local
option income tax has been authorized for public safety.
Voted NO on House
Bill 1835,which is Taxpayer Friendly because it uses slot machine licensing
fees and wagering taxes to establish the Property Tax Reduction Trust Fund,
which is to be used for property tax relief in any manner prescribed by the
General Assembly.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 401, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly because state legislators voted
themselves a perpetual pay increase that is 20% more than the typical Hoosier
working family earns during an entire year. SB 401 also eliminated taxpayer-paid
lifetime health insurance and the $4 taxpayer match for each $1 of legislator
pension contribution, but General Assembly members should not have received an
excessive salary increase in return for eliminating extravagant perks they
should not have in the first place.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
7, 2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND:
Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax increased from 5% to 6%
with a promise that the proceeds would be used to decrease homeowner
homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3%
decrease into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average
Hoosier homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility
to levy income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax
relief. QUESTION: Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose
additional income, sales, and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget
the last two fiscal years has been balanced without fund transfers for the
first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm). QUESTION: Should the state's total budget
expenditures be no more than total revenues for the next
biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced
with the inclusion of a one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This
decreases property taxes for the average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should
the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be continued beyond
2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4.
BACKGROUND:
Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners
could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should the state pay for full-day
kindergarten? If YES, where should the state get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten?
HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND:
The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road ("Major
Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to pay
off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the
next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects
include $694 million for a new terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to
Evansville as well as a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION:
Should the "Major Moves" expenditures be combined with the
Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain I-69
extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The
2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a toll road for an
I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION: Do you favor
legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 2,
2006, Primary Election
1. What will be your guiding principles for the 2007-2009 biennium
budget? Specifically, what mix of spending cuts, tax increases, and/or reserve
depletions will you support? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. What are your opinions regarding homeowner property taxes? Specifically, do
favor freezing all property taxes and funding budget increases through both
individual and business income tax increases? Or, do you favor a mixture of
income tax, sales tax and meals tax increases to reduce property tax growth
while providing additional revenue to local governments? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. Considering the "Major Moves" legislation passed by the General
Assembly this year, do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases
the next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. What is your position regarding the construction of an interstate from
Indianapolis to Evansville? Specifically, should the $500 million Next
Generation Trust Fund that is part of "Major Moves" be used
exclusively for a new terrain I-69 extension so as to avoid state gas tax
increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2006 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted NO on
"Major
Moves" House
Bill 1008, which authorizes the Indiana Department of Transportation to
enter into public-private agreements with private entities (operators)
concerning tollway projects for I-69 between Martinsville and Evansville. HB
1008 also authorizes the Indiana Finance Authority to enter into public-private
agreements with operators for the Indiana Toll Road.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, a residential property tax reduction bill that increases the
homestead credit for one year in 2006 to 28% and the homestead standard
deduction for one year in 2007 to $45,000. Beginning in 2007 for Lake County and
2008 for all other counties, HB 1001 also establishes a cap on residential
property taxes equal to 2% of the assessed value of the residential property.
2005 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted NO on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that included seven significant homeowner
property tax increases.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1120, which contained thirteen negative tax impacts including a
regional Food and Beverage Tax to finance a new Colts stadium.
2004 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1005 to establish the Property Tax Replacement Study Commission, which
studied the elimination of all or part of the current property tax.
2003 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted NO on
House
Bill 1001. HB 1001 is Taxpayer
UNfriendly primarily because (1) the 2004-05 fiscal year General Fund and
Property Tax Replacement Fund spending total of $11.48 billion exceeds the
$11.4424 billion revenues total (fiscal year 2004-05 will be the eighth straight
year where spending exceeds revenues), (2) the full Property Tax relief that was
promised to homeowners in last year's special session legislation was reduced by
the so-called Homestead Credit "correction," and (3) Pension
Stabilization Fund transfers were included (these transfers worsen the $8.5
billion shortfall in teacher retirement funds).
Voted YES on the
Indiana Senate version of House
Bill 2008, which would have used current revenues (instead of funds from the
sale of bonds payable from future tobacco settlement payments) for economic
development initiatives.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
5, 2002, General Election
1-2.
Special session vote FOR several tax increases that
will increase revenues $1.7782 billion from July 1, 2002, through June 30, 2005.
3. Special session vote FOR
a 20% gas tax increase (from 15 to 18 cents per gallon) effective
01/01/03.
4. Special session vote FOR
a phased-in shift of the inventory tax to (1) all other types of property
through an increased property tax rate and (2) a tax on the income of
individuals (in those counties choosing to do so) through the
establishment or increase of a County Economic Development Income Tax (CEDIT).
5. DID NOT RESPOND to General Election Questionnaire. See the Candidate
Questionnaire for the May 7, 2002, Primary Election.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire
- May 7,
2002, Primary Election
1. Voted on February 28 FOR
the Indiana Senate version of HB 1004, which included an unneeded
Income Tax rate increase, imposed a new
business Payroll Tax, and increased revenues
$933 million more than taxes would have been reduced through June 30,
2004.
2. Voted on February 27 FOR
the Indiana Senate version of HB 1317, which would have raised
the Gasoline Tax from 15 cents per gallon to 18 cents during 2003, 20
cents during 2004, and 22 cents after 2004.
3-4. Did not receive Primary Questionnaire. See the Candidate
Questionnaire for the November 5, 2002, General Election.
Steve Meyer (Uncertain)
Address: 1467 E. Paula Drive, Scottsburg, IN 47170
Phone: (812) 752-5101
E-mail:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 2, 2006,
Primary Election
1. What will be your guiding principles for the 2007-2009 biennium
budget? Specifically, what mix of spending cuts, tax increases, and/or reserve
depletions will you support? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. What are your opinions regarding homeowner property taxes? Specifically, do
favor freezing all property taxes and funding budget increases through both
individual and business income tax increases? Or, do you favor a mixture of
income tax, sales tax and meals tax increases to reduce property tax growth
while providing additional revenue to local governments? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. Considering the "Major Moves" legislation passed by the General
Assembly this year, do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases
the next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. What is your position regarding the construction of an interstate from
Indianapolis to Evansville? Specifically, should the $500 million Next
Generation Trust Fund that is part of "Major Moves" be used
exclusively for a new terrain I-69 extension so as to avoid state gas tax
increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
State Senate District 46:
Ryan Bergman (Uncertain)
Address: 1209 E. Main Street, New Albany, IN 47150
Phone: (812) 941-0495
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 7,
2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax
increased from 5% to 6% with a promise that the proceeds would be used to
decrease homeowner homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3% decrease
into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average Hoosier
homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility to levy
income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax relief. QUESTION:
Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose additional income, sales,
and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget the last two fiscal years has been balanced
without fund transfers for the first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm).
QUESTION: Should the state's total budget expenditures be no more than total
revenues for the next biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced with the inclusion of a
one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This decreases property taxes for the
average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be
continued beyond 2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. BACKGROUND: Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of
Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should
the state pay for full-day kindergarten? If YES, where should the state
get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND: The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road
("Major Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to
pay off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next
ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects include $694 million for a new
terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to Evansville as well as a $500 million
Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION: Should the "Major Moves" expenditures
be combined with the Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain
I-69 extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The 2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a
toll road for an I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION:
Do you favor legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 2,
2004, General Election
1. Guiding Principles for 2005-07 Biennium Budget. DID NOT RESPOND.
2. Opinions on Homeowner Property Taxes. DID NOT RESPOND.
3. Position on Indianapolis to Evansville Interstate. DID NOT RESPOND.
4. Additional Comments. DID NOT RESPOND. See the Candidate
Questionnaire for the November
5, 2002, General Election.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
5, 2002, General Election
1. Yes, state government
needs can be met without any more tax and fee increases through at
least June 30, 2005. We need to control pork spending.
2. If a last-resort tax or fee increase
becomes necessary to solve a problem, I would definitely insist
on a revenue-neutral, dollar-for-dollar decrease in another tax or
fee.
3. I support the revenue-neutral
approach of exempting gasoline sales from
the sales tax and increasing the gasoline tax by another 5 cents.
4. Cut the pork spending to offset the
elimination of the inventory tax. If there wouldn't have been out of
control spending over the past decade, the inventory tax probably
could have been eliminated immediately without any shift to any other tax.
5. I am against any type of property tax because this type of tax does not
take into account whether the person being taxed has any income or not. I
have been out knocking on doors and talking to too many elderly people on fixed
income that are struggling to keep up with their property tax. This also
applies to people that have been laid off, that own a business that is
struggling, etc., etc. The state gaining revenue off these people is
criminal. In other words, the end does not justify the means.
Charles "Chuck" Freiberger (Uncertain)
7011 Brenlee Drive
Georgetown, IN 47122
Phone: (812) 923-3711
E-mail: cfry@insightbb.com
Website: http://chuckfreiberger.com/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2,
2010,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you
support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the
1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax
deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced?
Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility
of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be
replenished.
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (From Website): Allow
a school corporation to transfer up to 50 percent of the capital projects fund
to its general fund with no stipulations. Allow individuals to donate
part or all of their state income tax refund to a fund benefitting an Indiana
public school corporation or public education foundation by a check-off box on
their tax return form. Expand to Indiana public education foundations
eligibility for an existing tax credit program for donations to private school
scholarship funds. The current cap of $2.5 million in tax credits available each
year would remain. I support a new government transparency plan aimed at
bringing greater accountability in state budgeting and spending. Hoosiers
deserve to know how their tax dollars are spent, and a comprehensive, searchable
online database of state spending and contracts would be an important step in
greater transparency. By creating a one-stop service for information on state
spending, state service cuts, contracts, and how job creation awards are being
used, gives us all greater confidence that government is serving us as it
should. I support corporate accountability laws for state economic incentives,
including “clawback” provisions companies that receive tax breaks then fail
to make the investment or create the jobs promised. “Pay to play” in state
contracts should be ended to ensure that the contracts are awarded based on
qualifications, not political contributions.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain
both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction
without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General
Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between
I-64 and Martinsville?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
5. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
Connie Weigleb Sipes (Taxpayer
Friendly)
Address: 1825 Ekin Avenue, New Albany, IN 47150
Phone: (812) 948-9445
E-mail: clsipes@insightbb.com
Website:
2010 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES
on House Joint Resolution 1,
which gives voters statewide the opportunity to amend the Indiana Constitution
to (1) make the 1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (2) protect
homestead property tax deductions from legal challenge.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1001, which contains 21 Taxpayer Friendly government ethics reform
provisions including a 365-day wait after leaving the General Assembly before a
legislator can become a lobbyist or legislative liaison, the reporting of
certain expenditures by the legislative liaisons of state agencies and state
educational institutions, and a reduction from $100 to $50 in the minimum
reportable amount for the total daily gifts given by a registered lobbyist to a
legislative person.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1086, which contains 7 Taxpayer Friendly provisions including the HJR
1 Constitutional Amendment ballot language.
Voted YES on
House Bill 1367, which contains 5 Taxpayer Friendly K-12 education provisions
that preserve and protect instructional programs.
Voted YES on
Senate Bill 23, which delays the scheduled increase in unemployment insurance
premiums for one year until 2011.
Voted YES on Senate Bill
396, which mandates an
adjusted six-year average that eliminates the highest value to calculate the
base rate for the assessment of agricultural land.
2009 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted NO on
Senate
Joint Resolution 1, which amended the Indiana Constitution beginning 2012 to
include a cap on homestead property tax in 90 counties at 1% of gross assessed
value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008, is
exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St. Joseph
counties ONLY. The effective constitutional homeowner property tax caps in Lake
and St. Joseph counties are 1.88% and 1.52% respectively until the 1% cap takes
effect in 2020.
Voted NO
on House Bill 1001 SS, the
2009-2011 special session budget bill that (1) provides enough resources for
good government AND (2) satisfactorily protects Hoosier working families
from state and local tax increases. A
YES vote supports a budget that is sufficiently Taxpayer Friendly.
A NO vote would have shut down much of state government.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 348 to have a Library Services Plan developed and approved by a Public
Library Service Planning Committee (with an "opt out" referendum
provision) in every county (except Marion County) to help more effectively use
working family dollars currently spent on library services (with the option to
equitably replace public library property taxes with a county economic
development income tax).
Voted NO on Senate
Bill 452 to prohibit employees of a
local government unit from serving as elected officials within the same local
government unit, move the elections of municipal officers to even-numbered
years, move all school board member elections to the November general election
in even-numbered years, establish the use of vote centers as an option for all
counties, and require a city clerk-treasurer in a third class city to attend
fiscal officer training provided by the state board of accounts.
Voted NO on Senate
Bill 506 to (1) allow a single County Chief Executive
Officer or County Manager, (2) allow the County Council or the Board of
County Supervisors to exercise both the fiscal and legislative powers
of the county, (3) provide for voter-initiated referendums on county
government reorganization, (4) repeal the requirement that political
subdivisions must approve local government reorganizations initiated by voters,
(5) assign the Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations four
responsibilities to identify and monitor good local government
practices, (6) prohibit County Manager nepotism, (7) repeal unproductive
reporting requirements, and (8) continue to elect the County Assessor.
Voted NO
on Senate
Bill 512 to (1) abolish on January 1, 2013, each township board in every
county (other than Marion County) and make the county fiscal body also the
fiscal body and legislative body of each township, (2) require a township when
formulating an annual budget to consider whether the part of the ending balance
in each township fund in excess of 10% of budgeted expenditures should be used
instead of imposing additional property taxes for the ensuing year, (3) prohibit
a relative of a township officer or employee from being employed by the township
in a position that would put the relative in a direct supervisory or subordinate
relationship with the officer or employee, (4) require a township trustee's
annual report to list separately each expenditure to reimburse the trustee for
the trustee's public business use of personal property, (5) require each
township office to include the address, phone number, and regular office hours
(if any) of the township office in at least one local telephone directory, (6)
prohibits a public meeting or a public hearing of a township official or
governing body from being held in a private residence, and (7) requires the
State Board of Accounts to submit an annual township examination report to the
executive director of the Legislative Services Agency and to county councils.
Voted YES
on House
Bill 1607 to require a referendum before establishing a Northern Indiana
Regional Transportation District, which is a new tax-imposing level of
Indiana government in Lake, Porter, LaPorte, and St. Joseph counties controlled
by a board with unrestricted powers (where most board members have no real
connection to the taxpayers' community).
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 4, 2008, General Election
1.
BACKGROUND: Senate Joint Resolution 1 passed
the Indiana Senate 40-7 and the Indiana House 79-20 on March 14, 2008, and
was signed by the Governor on March 19, 2008. SJR 1 amends the Indiana
Constitution to cap homeowners' property tax bills at 1% of assessed value,
rental and agricultural property at 2%, and business property at 3%. For
property taxes first due and payable in 2012, 90 of Indiana's 92
counties must have a homeowner property tax cap that is 1% of the gross
assessed value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008,
is exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St.
Joseph counties ONLY. The result of these two existing debt service
exemptions equates to a 1.88% homeowner cap in Lake County and a 1.52%
homeowner cap in St.
Joseph County. The homeowner caps for Lake and St. Joseph counties must become
1% in 2020. The exact same version of SJR 1 that passed in 2008 must again pass in the General Assembly in 2009 to put the 1%
constitutional homeowner property tax cap amendment on the 2010 ballot. We
the people can then vote to make the 1% homeowner property tax cap a
permanent part of the Indiana Constitution. Never has it been so easy to separate those who are part of the
property tax relief solution from those who are part of the property tax
spending problem. A General Assembly candidate who pledges to
vote for Senate Joint Resolution 1 in 2009 is part of the
solution, otherwise the legislator is part of
the problem. QUESTION: Do you pledge to vote in 2009 for
the exact same version of Senate
Joint Resolution 1 that passed in 2008? DID NOT
RESPOND.
2. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? DID
NOT RESPOND.
2008 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on Senate
Joint Resolution 1, which amended the Indiana Constitution beginning 2012 to
include a cap on homestead property tax in 90 counties at 1% of gross assessed
value. Until 2020, existing debt service prior to July 1, 2008, is
exempted from the 1% homeowner gross assessed value cap in Lake and St. Joseph
counties ONLY. The effective constitutional homeowner property tax caps in Lake
and St. Joseph counties are 1.88% and 1.52% respectively until the 1% cap takes
effect in 2020.
Voted YES on
House
Bill 1001, which phases in the SJR 1 constitutional property tax caps by
2010. Also, 2008 property taxes are reduced 26% from the prior year. An increase
in the sales tax from 6% to 7% and local option income taxes will be used to
replace the property tax revenue reductions that result from the property tax
caps.
2007 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that is Taxpayer
Friendly because the General Fund & Property Tax Replacement Fund $26.0722
billion expenditures total for the 2008 and 2009 fiscal years is less than the
$26.1946 billion revenues total. HB 1001 also includes additional homestead
credits from the Property Tax Reduction Trust Fund of $300 million in 2007 and
$250 million in 2008.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1478, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly for the following reasons: (1)
Homeowner property taxes will increase 1.2% each year from 2009 through 2013
with annual decreases in the Homestead Standard Deduction. (2) The 2% Circuit
Breaker Cap on residential property taxes passed by the General Assembly in 2006
has been watered down to the point where it is almost eliminated. (3) The new
local option income tax for property tax relief will be offset by future
property tax increases unless the new local option income tax to replace
property tax increases is implemented. (4) Using the new local option income tax
to replace property tax increases means that income tax increases on Hoosier
working families would lower the proportionate tax burden of businesses and
utilities by freezing business and utility property taxes without a
corresponding increase in other business and utility taxes. (5) A new local
option income tax has been authorized for public safety.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1835,which is Taxpayer Friendly because it uses slot machine licensing
fees and wagering taxes to establish the Property Tax Reduction Trust Fund,
which is to be used for property tax relief in any manner prescribed by the
General Assembly.
Voted YES on Senate
Bill 401, which is Taxpayer UNfriendly because state legislators voted
themselves a perpetual pay increase that is 20% more than the typical Hoosier
working family earns during an entire year. SB 401 also eliminated taxpayer-paid
lifetime health insurance and the $4 taxpayer match for each $1 of legislator
pension contribution, but General Assembly members should not have received an
excessive salary increase in return for eliminating extravagant perks they
should not have in the first place.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
7, 2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND:
Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax increased from 5% to 6%
with a promise that the proceeds would be used to decrease homeowner
homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3%
decrease into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average
Hoosier homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility
to levy income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax
relief. QUESTION: Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose
additional income, sales, and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget
the last two fiscal years has been balanced without fund transfers for the
first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm). QUESTION: Should the state's total budget
expenditures be no more than total revenues for the next
biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced
with the inclusion of a one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This
decreases property taxes for the average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should
the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be continued beyond
2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4.
BACKGROUND:
Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners
could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should the state pay for full-day
kindergarten? If YES, where should the state get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten?
HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND:
The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road ("Major
Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to pay
off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the
next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects
include $694 million for a new terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to
Evansville as well as a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION:
Should the "Major Moves" expenditures be combined with the
Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain I-69
extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The
2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a toll road for an
I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION: Do you favor
legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2006 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted NO
on "Major
Moves" House
Bill 1008, which authorizes the Indiana Department of Transportation to
enter into public-private agreements with private entities (operators)
concerning tollway projects for I-69 between Martinsville and Evansville. HB
1008 also authorizes the Indiana Finance Authority to enter into public-private
agreements with operators for the Indiana Toll Road.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1001, a residential property tax reduction bill that increases the
homestead credit for one year in 2006 to 28% and the homestead standard
deduction for one year in 2007 to $45,000. Beginning in 2007 for Lake County and
2008 for all other counties, HB 1001 also establishes a cap on residential
property taxes equal to 2% of the assessed value of the residential property.
2005 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted NO
on House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that included seven significant homeowner
property tax increases.
Voted YES on House
Bill 1120, which contained thirteen negative tax impacts including a
regional Food and Beverage Tax to finance a new Colts stadium.
2003 General Assembly Voting Record
Voted YES
on
House
Bill 1001, the budget bill that was Taxpayer UNfriendly primarily
because (1) the 2004-05 fiscal year General Fund and Property Tax Replacement
Fund spending total of $11.48 billion exceeded the $11.4424 billion revenues
total (fiscal year 2004-05 was the eighth straight year where spending exceeded
revenues), (2) the full Property Tax relief that was promised to homeowners in
last year's special session legislation was reduced by the so-called Homestead
Credit "correction," and (3) Pension Stabilization Fund transfers were
included (these transfers worsened the $8.5 billion shortfall in teacher
retirement funds).
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
5, 2002, General Election
1-2.
Special session vote FOR several tax increases that
will increase revenues $1.7782 billion from July 1, 2002, through June 30, 2005.
3. Special session vote FOR
a 20% gas tax increase (from 15 to 18 cents per gallon) effective
01/01/03.
4. Special session vote FOR
a phased-in shift of the inventory tax to (1) all other types of property
through an increased property tax rate and (2) a tax on the income of
individuals (in those counties choosing to do so) through the
establishment or increase of a County Economic Development Income Tax (CEDIT).
5. DID NOT RESPOND to General Election Questionnaire. See the Candidate
Questionnaire for the May 7, 2002, Primary Election.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 7,
2002, Primary Election
1. Voted on February 28 FOR
the Indiana Senate version of HB 1004, which included an unneeded
Income Tax rate increase, imposed a new
business Payroll Tax, and increased revenues
$933 million more than taxes would have been reduced through June 30,
2004.
2. DID NOT VOTE
3-4. Did not receive Primary Questionnaire. See the Candidate
Questionnaire for the November 5, 2002, General Election.
Lee Ann Wiseheart (Taxpayer
Friendly)
222 Spickert Knob Road
New Albany, IN 47150
Phone:
(812) 572-2483
E-mail:
lawiseheart@sbcglobal.net
Website:
http://www.teamwiseheart.com/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 4, 2010,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you
support or oppose the Constitutional Amendment on the November 2, 2010,
statewide ballot? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED. POSITION
(from Website): My priorities as your State Senator would include making
property tax caps permanent and assessments
more accurate.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced?
ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED. POSITION (from Website): My
priorities as your State Senator would include watching over budget
proceedings to ensure government efficiency and promoting innovation by investing
in our colleges and universities. I am running for State Senate to serve as a
strong voice for lower taxes and government efficiency.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain
both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction
without ANY change? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General
Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between
I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
HAS NOT RESPONDED.
State Senate District 47:
Brian C. Thomas (Uncertain)
Address: 292 Hwy 337 SE, Corydon, IN 47112
Phone: (812) 734-0348
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November
7, 2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax
increased from 5% to 6% with a promise that the proceeds would be used to
decrease homeowner homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3% decrease
into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average Hoosier
homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility to levy
income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax relief. QUESTION:
Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose additional income, sales,
and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget the last two fiscal years has been balanced
without fund transfers for the first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm).
QUESTION: Should the state's total budget expenditures be no more than total
revenues for the next biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced with the inclusion of a
one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This decreases property taxes for the
average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be
continued beyond 2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. BACKGROUND: Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of
Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should
the state pay for full-day kindergarten? If YES, where should the state
get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND: The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road
("Major Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to
pay off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next
ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects include $694 million for a new
terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to Evansville as well as a $500 million
Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION: Should the "Major Moves" expenditures
be combined with the Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain
I-69 extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The 2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a
toll road for an I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION:
Do you favor legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
State Senate District 48:
Ted Metzger (Taxpayer
Friendly)
1433 Mt. Gilead Road
Boonville, IN 47601
Phone: (812) 897-7969
E-mail: Hoosiersformetzger@gmail.com
Website:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - 2013
1. QUESTION: What are your priorities regarding the 2015-2017
state budget including whether or not (a) current year revenues should exceed
current year appropriations, (b) delayed payments and one-time fund transfers
should be used to balance the budget, and (c) a reserves balance of at least 5%
should be maintained? ANSWER: My priority would always
include that a current year's revenues match or exceed current year's
appropriations. When revenues exceed appropriation a refund is due
taxpayer. Unless taxpayers mandate the excess go to a reserve balance.
2. BACKGROUND: The 2013-15 state budget makes better use of the
existing state Gasoline Tax and state Sales Tax revenues from gasoline purchases
with NO NEW TRANSPORTATION TAX INCREASES to increase transportation funding for
INDOT by 11%, cities and towns by 34%, and counties by 23%. QUESTION: Do you
pledge to support (a) the continued exclusion of non-transportation funding from
the state Motor Vehicle Highway Account and (2) the continued dedication of 1%
of the total state Sales Tax to meet transportation needs? ANSWER: Yes,
especially now with lower gasoline taxes being collected. I
am opposed to raising the the states gasoline sales tax.
3. BACKGROUND: Homeowners rely on the following
assessed value deductions to control their property tax burden: (a) the
Homestead Standard Deduction is the lesser of $45,000 or 60% of the home’s
gross assessed value, (b) the Homestead Supplemental Deduction (after
subtracting the $45,000 standard deduction) is 35% of the first $600,000 of net
assessed value plus 25% of any net assessed value that exceeds $600,000.
QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and
the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: This is a Yes
and No question. Yes I would support keeping the Homestead Standard and
Supplemental Deduction in place. However, No to the "without ANY
change" part of the question. I will strive to reduce the amount of taxes
Hoosiers pay on their primary Indiana residence property tax. I
would like to abolish primary Indiana residence property taxes and move the
burden over to a fairer sales tax system in Indiana.
4. BACKGROUND: Watchdog Indiana supports much improved oversight over
redevelopment commissions by (a) the legislative or fiscal body of the taxing
unit that created a redevelopment commission, (b) the State Board of Accounts,
and (c) everyday Hoosiers through the public meeting and public records laws:
see http://www.finplaneducation.net/redevelopment_commissions_oversight.htm.
QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment commissions oversight?
ANSWER: I could support legislation that would improve oversight of
redevelopment commissions.
5. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER:
I am a self-employed small business owner of a 30-year-old commercial contract
cleaning service. I was born and raised here in southern Indiana and have
resided in Boonville, for the last 23 years. I have been happily married to
Melissa for 36 years and have one son. I am a veteran of the U.S. Air Force and
a long time member of the American Legion Post #200. After my military duty I
returned to school under the G.I. bill where I earned my Associates Degree in
Air Conditioning, Refrigeration and Heating Technology. This will be my first
elected office. I have no formal political experience. Yet I am exactly the type
of individual our founding fathers intended to hold office, the average citizen.
For the last fourteen years I have been fighting in the trenches on a local
level as a grassroots activist working to restore our liberties. I have received
the Defender of the Constitution award for my staunch support of the Bill of
Rights. My campaign has received the endorsement of The
Independence Caucus, a conservative grassroots caucus comprised of
liberty-minded individuals from across the nation. I believe our elected
officials have lost their way and no longer represent the people. I am a
Christian conservative, constitutionalists, republican from the working class. I
have learned to live within my means and believes it’s time for the government
to live within its means. I will work for Hoosier families to reduce taxes and
eliminate wasteful spending. I believe in the sanctity of marriage and am
Pro-Life. I understand the importance of keeping the first and second amendment
intact. I am now ready to take my grassroots efforts to the next level as your
state senator. I will be a strong voice for the people of southern Indiana at
the State Capital in Indianapolis. I will work tirelessly to defend our family
values, our American traditions, and our children’s freedom at the state
level.
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2,
2010,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you
support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the
1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax
deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: Yes, I
support the Constitutional Amendment. However,
I would like to abolish property taxes all together and replace them with a flat
tax/fair tax system. Which will allow Hoosiers to truly own their property like
our founding fathers intended.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced?
Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility
of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be
replenished. ANSWER:
I would oppose any increases
in taxes. I believe a balanced budget should be accomplished by simply living
within our means. I would favor budget cuts across the board, some items (like Medicaid)
more then others (like infrastructure). If and when the State starts producing a
surplus in the budget, then the reserve fund may be replenished or tax cuts
issued which ever Hoosiers prefer.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain
both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction
without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER:
I do pledge to maintain both Homestead Deductions.
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General
Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between
I-64 and Martinsville?
ANSWER: Yes, this brings our state back in
line with our republic principles.
5. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
I am a self-employed small business owner of a 30-year-old commercial contract
cleaning service. I was born and raised here in southern Indiana and have
resided in Boonville, for the last 23 years. I have been happily married to
Melissa for 36 years and have one son. I am a veteran of the U.S. Air Force and
a long time member of the American Legion Post #200. After my military duty I
returned to school under the G.I. bill where I earned my Associates Degree in
Air Conditioning, Refrigeration and Heating Technology. This will be my first
elected office. I have no formal political experience. Yet I am exactly the type
of individual our founding fathers intended to hold office, the average citizen.
For the last ten years I have been fighting in the trenches on a local level as
a grassroots activist working to restore our liberties. I have received the
Defender of the Constitution award for my staunch support of the Bill of Rights.
I have also received recognition from the Institute for Legislative Action for
my grassroots efforts. My campaign has received the endorsement of The
Independence Caucus, a conservative grassroots caucus comprised of
liberty-minded individuals from across the nation. I believe our elected
officials have lost their way and no longer represent the people. I am a
conservative, constitutionalist, Republican from the working class. I have
learned to live within my means and believes it’s time for the government to
live within its means. I will work for Hoosier families to reduce taxes and
eliminate wasteful spending. I believe in the sanctity of marriage and am
Pro-Life. I understand the importance of keeping the first and second amendment
intact. I am now ready to take my grassroots efforts to the next level as your
state senator. I will be a strong voice for the people of southern Indiana at
the State Capital in Indianapolis. I will work tirelessly to defend our family
values, our American traditions, and our children’s freedom at the state
level.
State Senate District 49:
Patty Avery (Uncertain)
11400 Big Cynthiana Road
Evansville, IN 47720
Phone: (812) 455-4231
E-mail: patty.avery@insightbb.com
Website: http://pattyavery.com/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 2,
2010,
General Election
1. QUESTION: Do you
support or oppose the November 2, 2010, Constitutional Amendment to (a) make the
1% - 2% - 3% property tax caps permanent and (b) protect homestead property tax
deductions from legal challenge? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced?
Please address such issues as Medicaid spending, K-12 education, the possibility
of a statewide income tax increase, and whether reserve funds should be
replenished.
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (From Website): We can create jobs by
targeted capital project spending to rebuild Indiana’s aging and deteriorating
infrastructure –our roads, bridges, sewers, and communications systems. This
creates high paying construction jobs and makes Indiana more competitive. Our
tax structure is archaic and regressive and needing reform. It was developed to
respond to political pressure and the demands of lobbyists. It needs to be fair
to the taxpayer, sensitive to the needs of local and state government, and
responsive to the economics of the marketplace. To ensure that our children can
compete in the global economy, it’s not enough to just prioritize education in
the budget. We need to reconsider the way the state divides up education funding
and be fair to all school districts, recognizing that many costs remain the same
whether a classroom has 25 students or 30. Unfair funding formulas shortchange
USI, Ivy Tech, and many of our area K-12 schools. I will promote fair formulas
that ensure our kids, college students, and adult learners receive the education
they need to build their futures and compete in the new economy. I will fight to
keep our children and investment in the future a top priority. Incentives for
small business and investment in education from kindergarten through college
will equip Hoosiers to create innovative business models and products. Taxpayers
have a right to know how their money’s being spent – and where cuts are
being made. Governor Daniels’ continued refusal to share specific
information on budget spending has highlighted the need for increased
transparency. Across the country, states have created websites where residents
can easily access information on the state’s spending. On a centralized site,
they can search by topic, project or even by the vendor who’s been paid. This
level of transparency has resulted in savings in many states through improved
efficiency in coordinating purchasing and by exposing duplication and waste.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain
both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction
without ANY change to help homeowners control their property tax burden? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General
Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between
I-64 and Martinsville?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
5. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
Larry Lutz (Taxpayer UNfriendly)
George R. Postletheweight (Uncertain)
Address: 5901 Hartman Road, Mt. Vernon, IN 47620
Phone: (812) 985-5540
E-mail: grpgate@sigecom.net
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - November 7,
2006, General Election
1. BACKGROUND: Effective December 1, 2002, the Indiana sales tax
increased from 5% to 6% with a promise that the proceeds would be used to
decrease homeowner homeowner property taxes by 16.3%. As summarized at http://finplaneducation.net/betrayal_incompetence.htm,
Indiana General Assemblies and Governors have turned the promised 16.3% decrease
into a Pay 2007 property tax increase of 20.3% for the average Hoosier
homeowner. Local governments are now pushing for more flexibility to levy
income, sales, and other taxes under the guise of property tax relief. QUESTION:
Should local Indiana governments be allowed to impose additional income, sales,
and other taxes? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. BACKGROUND: The state's budget the last two fiscal years has been balanced
without fund transfers for the first time since 1998-99 (see http://finplaneducation.net/indiana_cash_flow_data.htm).
QUESTION: Should the state's total budget expenditures be no more than total
revenues for the next biennium? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. BACKGROUND: The state's current budget is balanced with the inclusion of a
one-time increase from $35,000 to $45,000 in the state-paid Homestead
Deduction for Pay 2007 property taxes. This decreases property taxes for the
average homeowner by 6%. QUESTION: Should the $45,000 Homestead Deduction be
continued beyond 2007? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. BACKGROUND: Mandatory full-day kindergarten for all of
Indiana's 75,000 kindergartners could cost up to $150 million. QUESTIONS: Should
the state pay for full-day kindergarten? If YES, where should the state
get the funds needed for full-day kindergarten? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. BACKGROUND: The $3.7 billion proceeds from leasing the Indiana Toll Road
("Major Moves") will be used to establish a Bond Retirement Account to
pay off bonds selected by the Indiana Finance Authority, an Administration
Account, an Eligible Project Account for highway improvements throughout
Indiana, and a $500 million Next Generation Trust Fund to
be used exclusively for the provision of highways, roads, and bridges.
QUESTION: Do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases the next
ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
6. BACKGROUND: "Major Moves" projects include $694 million for a new
terrain I-69 extension from Indianapolis to Evansville as well as a $500 million
Next Generation Trust Fund. QUESTION: Should the "Major Moves" expenditures
be combined with the Next Generation Trust Fund proceeds to build a new terrain
I-69 extension without state tax increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
7. BACKGROUND: The 2006 "Major Moves" legislation authorizes a
toll road for an I-69 extension between Martinsville and Evansville. QUESTION:
Do you favor legislation that removes the toll road authorization for an I-69
extension? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
8. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
Do you have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Paul O. Swanson (Uncertain)
Address: 1008 Pleasant Valley Drive, Mount Vernon, IN 47620
Phone: (812) 838-5210
E-mail:
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 2,
2006, Primary Election
1. What will be your guiding principles for the 2007-2009 biennium
budget? Specifically, what mix of spending cuts, tax increases, and/or reserve
depletions will you support? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. What are your opinions regarding homeowner property taxes? Specifically, do
favor freezing all property taxes and funding budget increases through both
individual and business income tax increases? Or, do you favor a mixture of
income tax, sales tax and meals tax increases to reduce property tax growth
while providing additional revenue to local governments? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. Considering the "Major Moves" legislation passed by the General
Assembly this year, do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases
the next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. What is your position regarding the construction of an interstate from
Indianapolis to Evansville? Specifically, should the $500 million Next
Generation Trust Fund that is part of "Major Moves" be used
exclusively for a new terrain I-69 extension so as to avoid state gas tax
increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
Andrew Wilson (Taxpayer
Friendly)
PO Box 130
New Harmony, IN 47634
Phone:
(812) 457-9909
E-mail: Andrew@hoosiers4wilson.com;
andrew@wilsonauctions.com
Website:
http://www.hoosiers4wilson.com/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - May 4, 2010,
Primary Election
1. QUESTION: Do you
support or oppose the Constitutional Amendment on the November 2, 2010,
statewide ballot? ANSWER: I support the
Constitutional Amendment, and the voter
referendum on the November 2, 2010, ballot.
2. QUESTION: How should the 2012-2013 state budget be balanced?
ANSWER: The Indiana General Assembly should balance the 2012-2013 budget with a
mindset towards accurate and realistic revenue forecasts. We must control our
spending on Medicaid administration; focus efficient funding towards the
classroom in K12 public education; and avoid any tax increase. Absolutely every
effort should be made to replenish reserve funds, and we must promise Hoosiers
that we will be fiscally responsible.
3. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain
both the Homestead Standard Deduction and the Homestead Supplemental Deduction
without ANY change? ANSWER: I will pledge to maintain a
homeowner’s control of their property tax burdens.
4.
QUESTION: Do you support changing the Indiana Code so approval of the General
Assembly is required before I-69 becomes a toll road between
I-64 and Martinsville? ANSWER: I support the General Assembly, and
representation of the constituents of Indiana on approval of public-private
partnerships regarding Interstate 69.
5. QUESTION:
Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? ANSWER:
Please visit our campaign website to learn more. I look forward to meeting you
on the campaign to discuss the issues that matter to Hoosiers!
Kevin Winternheimer (Uncertain)
Address: 123 NW 4th Street, Ste. 419, Evansville, IN 47708
Phone: (812) 434-4866
E-mail: KWW@COURTBUILDING.COM
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questionnaire - May 2, 2006,
Primary Election
1. What will be your guiding principles for the 2007-2009 biennium
budget? Specifically, what mix of spending cuts, tax increases, and/or reserve
depletions will you support? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
2. What are your opinions regarding homeowner property taxes? Specifically, do
favor freezing all property taxes and funding budget increases through both
individual and business income tax increases? Or, do you favor a mixture of
income tax, sales tax and meals tax increases to reduce property tax growth
while providing additional revenue to local governments? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
3. Considering the "Major Moves" legislation passed by the General
Assembly this year, do you anticipate the need for any state gas tax increases
the next ten years? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
4. What is your position regarding the construction of an interstate from
Indianapolis to Evansville? Specifically, should the $500 million Next
Generation Trust Fund that is part of "Major Moves" be used
exclusively for a new terrain I-69 extension so as to avoid state gas tax
increases? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
5. Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy? Do you
have an E-mail address? Do you have a website? HAS NOT RESPONDED.
State Senate District 50:
Terry A. White (Uncertain)
4599 Woodstower Drive
Newburgh, IN 47630
Phone: (812) 490-2590
E-mail: terrywhiteforstatesenate@yahoo.com;
taw@thelawteam.net
Website: http://www.terrywhiteindiana.com/
Watchdog Indiana Candidate Questions - November 6, 2012,
General Election
1. QUESTION: What are your priorities regarding the 2013-2015 state budget?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (from campaign website): I would like to address
the issue of school bus safety by requiring seat belts in school buses for all
of our students in Indiana. My proposal is to require seat belts in each of the
new buses as they come off the assembly line, thus providing a line item
expenditure of approximately $6.4 million public dollars per year until all of
the buses are in compliance. The interest Hoosier students pay on their federal
Stafford college loans should be returned as a credit that lowers their Indiana
income taxes. Indiana should hire an outside firm to audit the state's finances
every year.
2. QUESTION: Should the non-transportation appropriations from the state’s
Motor Vehicle Highway Account be transferred to the state’s General Fund so
more of our Indiana Gasoline Tax dollars can be properly spent to meet our
transportation needs? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (from campaign website): I
propose leveraging capital from the state’s $2 billion in reserves in the form
of low interest loans to local governments to fund repairs to roads, bridges,
sewers and other vital infrastructure. Interest on the loans will be reinvested
back into the fund.
3. QUESTION: Should the Automatic Taxpayer Refund law be (a) improved to make
refunds more likely, (b) kept as it is, or (c) eliminated? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
4. QUESTION: Do you pledge to maintain both the Homestead Standard Deduction and
the Homestead Supplemental Deduction without ANY change? ANSWER: DID NOT
RESPOND.
5. QUESTION: What is your position regarding township government reform? ANSWER:
DID NOT RESPOND.
6. QUESTION: What is your position regarding redevelopment commissions
oversight? ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND.
7. QUESTION: Do you wish to make some additional comments about your candidacy?
ANSWER: DID NOT RESPOND. RECORD (from campaign website): Indiana is one of just
three states with a veteran’s affairs department that lacks accreditation from
the U.S. Department of veteran’s affairs. I intend to propose legislation,
which I call the Indiana returning heroes and wounded warriors tax credit act,
that would lower the rate of unemployment among our Indiana veterans.
Essentially the returning heroes tax credit provides for a credit of 40% of the
first $6,000 of wages for employers who hire veterans who have been in receipt
of unemployment compensation for at least four weeks, and a credit of 40% of the
first $12,000 of wages for employers who hire veterans who have been in receipt
of unemployment compensation for longer than six months. The wounded warrior tax
credit would provide a credit of 40% of the first $12,000 of wages for firms
that hire veterans with service-connected disabilities who have been in receipt
of unemployment compensation for at least 4 weeks, and 40% of the first $24,000
for those disabled veterans who have been unemployed for longer than 6 months.
It is my intention to offer legislation that seeks an Indiana constitutional
amendment limiting the consecutive terms of legislative officeholders no more
than 12 consecutive years in either house.
Watchdog
Indiana Home Page Indiana
General Assembly & Governor Ratings
This page was last updated on 05/20/13